Home Visiting by Paraprofessionals and by Nurses: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

To examine the effectiveness of home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses as separate means of improving maternal and child health when both types of visitors are trained in a program model that has demonstrated effectiveness when delivered by nurses. A randomized, controlled trial was conduc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2002-09, Vol.110 (3), p.486-496
Hauptverfasser: Olds, David L, Robinson, JoAnn, O'Brien, Ruth, Luckey, Dennis W, Pettitt, Lisa M, Henderson, Charles R., Jr, Ng, Rosanna K, Sheff, Karen L, Korfmacher, Jon, Hiatt, Susan, Talmi, Ayelet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 496
container_issue 3
container_start_page 486
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 110
creator Olds, David L
Robinson, JoAnn
O'Brien, Ruth
Luckey, Dennis W
Pettitt, Lisa M
Henderson, Charles R., Jr
Ng, Rosanna K
Sheff, Karen L
Korfmacher, Jon
Hiatt, Susan
Talmi, Ayelet
description To examine the effectiveness of home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses as separate means of improving maternal and child health when both types of visitors are trained in a program model that has demonstrated effectiveness when delivered by nurses. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in public- and private-care settings in Denver, Colorado. One thousand one hundred seventy-eight consecutive pregnant women with no previous live births who were eligible for Medicaid or who had no private health insurance were invited to participate. Seven hundred thirty-five women were randomized to control, paraprofessional, or nurse conditions. Nurses completed an average of 6.5 home visits during pregnancy and 21 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. Paraprofessionals completed an average of 6.3 home visits during pregnancy and 16 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. The main outcomes consisted of changes in women's urine cotinine over the course of pregnancy; women's use of ancillary services during pregnancy; subsequent pregnancies and births, educational achievement, workforce participation, and use of welfare; mother-infant responsive interaction; families' home environments; infants' emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli and low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli; and children's language and mental development, temperament, and behavioral problems. Paraprofessional-visited mother-child pairs in which the mother had low psychological resources interacted with one another more responsively than their control-group counterparts (99.45 vs 97.54 standard score points). There were no other statistically significant paraprofessional effects. In contrast to their control-group counterparts, nurse-visited smokers had greater reductions in cotinine levels from intake to the end of pregnancy (259.0 vs 12.32 ng/mL); by the study child's second birthday, women visited by nurses had fewer subsequent pregnancies (29% vs 41%) and births (12% vs 19%); they delayed subsequent pregnancies for longer intervals; and during the second year after the birth of their first child, they worked more than women in the control group (6.83 vs 5.65 months). Nurse-visited mother-child pairs interacted with one another more responsively than those in the control group (100.31 vs 98.99 standard score points). At 6 months of age, nurse-visited infants, in contrast to their control-group counterparts, were less likely
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.110.3.486
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72053525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A91560722</galeid><sourcerecordid>A91560722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-dc5e76480a965161b1823a2694a0daa2576701415646f6cd426037317e4a2bab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0s9v0zAUB_AIgVg3uHJEERITh6b4dxJuVQUbUsUmNLhar85L5imJOzsRjL8eR61UiqocnNgf59lP3yR5Q8mCSsE-brEKCxq_-EIU6lkyo6QsMsFy-TyZEcJpJgiRZ8l5CA-EECFz9jI5o4wRyUQ5S26vXYfpTxvsYPsm3Tylt-Bh612NIVjXQxtS6Ktp4dvoA4ZP6TL9HmdcZ_9gNU9Xrh-8a1us0jtvoX2VvKjjJny9Hy-SH18-362us_XN1dfVcp0ZRciQVUZirkRBoFSSKrqhBePAVCmAVABM5ionVFCphKqVqQRThOec5iiAbWDDL5LL3X_jWR9HDIPubDDYttCjG4PO4w25ZDLCd__BBzf66WKasYJzLlUR0XyHGmhR2752gwfTYI8eWtdjbeP0sozHITljkWcneHwq7Kw55T8c-UgG_D00MIagi6v1EZ2fomZqcYM69nB1c8QXO268C8FjrbfeduCfNCV6SoieEqJjQjTXMSFxw9t9O8ZNh9WB7yMRwfs9gGCgrT30xoaD40UpSCkPle9tc__LepwqWRi8NeGf10Plv-mqz4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228333568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Home Visiting by Paraprofessionals and by Nurses: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Olds, David L ; Robinson, JoAnn ; O'Brien, Ruth ; Luckey, Dennis W ; Pettitt, Lisa M ; Henderson, Charles R., Jr ; Ng, Rosanna K ; Sheff, Karen L ; Korfmacher, Jon ; Hiatt, Susan ; Talmi, Ayelet</creator><creatorcontrib>Olds, David L ; Robinson, JoAnn ; O'Brien, Ruth ; Luckey, Dennis W ; Pettitt, Lisa M ; Henderson, Charles R., Jr ; Ng, Rosanna K ; Sheff, Karen L ; Korfmacher, Jon ; Hiatt, Susan ; Talmi, Ayelet</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the effectiveness of home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses as separate means of improving maternal and child health when both types of visitors are trained in a program model that has demonstrated effectiveness when delivered by nurses. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in public- and private-care settings in Denver, Colorado. One thousand one hundred seventy-eight consecutive pregnant women with no previous live births who were eligible for Medicaid or who had no private health insurance were invited to participate. Seven hundred thirty-five women were randomized to control, paraprofessional, or nurse conditions. Nurses completed an average of 6.5 home visits during pregnancy and 21 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. Paraprofessionals completed an average of 6.3 home visits during pregnancy and 16 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. The main outcomes consisted of changes in women's urine cotinine over the course of pregnancy; women's use of ancillary services during pregnancy; subsequent pregnancies and births, educational achievement, workforce participation, and use of welfare; mother-infant responsive interaction; families' home environments; infants' emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli and low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli; and children's language and mental development, temperament, and behavioral problems. Paraprofessional-visited mother-child pairs in which the mother had low psychological resources interacted with one another more responsively than their control-group counterparts (99.45 vs 97.54 standard score points). There were no other statistically significant paraprofessional effects. In contrast to their control-group counterparts, nurse-visited smokers had greater reductions in cotinine levels from intake to the end of pregnancy (259.0 vs 12.32 ng/mL); by the study child's second birthday, women visited by nurses had fewer subsequent pregnancies (29% vs 41%) and births (12% vs 19%); they delayed subsequent pregnancies for longer intervals; and during the second year after the birth of their first child, they worked more than women in the control group (6.83 vs 5.65 months). Nurse-visited mother-child pairs interacted with one another more responsively than those in the control group (100.31 vs 98.99 standard score points). At 6 months of age, nurse-visited infants, in contrast to their control-group counterparts, were less likely to exhibit emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli (16% vs 25%) and nurse-visited infants born to women with low psychological resources were less likely to exhibit low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli (24% vs 40% and 13% vs 33%). At 21 months, nurse-visited children born to women with low psychological resources were less likely to exhibit language delays (7% vs 18%); and at 24 months, they exhibited superior mental development (90.18 vs 86.20 Mental Development Index scores) than their control-group counterparts. There were no statistically significant program effects for the nurses on women's use of ancillary prenatal services, educational achievement, use of welfare, or their children's temperament or behavior problems. For most outcomes on which either visitor produced significant effects, the paraprofessionals typically had effects that were about half the size of those produced by nurses. When trained in a model program of prenatal and infancy home visiting, paraprofessionals produced small effects that rarely achieved statistical or clinical significance; the absence of statistical significance for some outcomes is probably attributable to limited statistical power to detect small effects. Nurses produced significant effects on a wide range of maternal and child outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.110.3.486</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12205249</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elk Grove Village, IL: Am Acad Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical outcomes ; Effectiveness ; Female ; Health aspects ; Home health care ; House Calls ; House calls (Medicine) ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Welfare ; Infant, Newborn ; Maternal Welfare ; Maternal-Child Nursing ; Medical sciences ; Nurses ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Pediatrics ; Pregnancy ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Regression Analysis ; Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2002-09, Vol.110 (3), p.486-496</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Sep 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-dc5e76480a965161b1823a2694a0daa2576701415646f6cd426037317e4a2bab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-dc5e76480a965161b1823a2694a0daa2576701415646f6cd426037317e4a2bab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13894095$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12205249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olds, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, JoAnn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luckey, Dennis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Charles R., Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Rosanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheff, Karen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korfmacher, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiatt, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talmi, Ayelet</creatorcontrib><title>Home Visiting by Paraprofessionals and by Nurses: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>To examine the effectiveness of home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses as separate means of improving maternal and child health when both types of visitors are trained in a program model that has demonstrated effectiveness when delivered by nurses. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in public- and private-care settings in Denver, Colorado. One thousand one hundred seventy-eight consecutive pregnant women with no previous live births who were eligible for Medicaid or who had no private health insurance were invited to participate. Seven hundred thirty-five women were randomized to control, paraprofessional, or nurse conditions. Nurses completed an average of 6.5 home visits during pregnancy and 21 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. Paraprofessionals completed an average of 6.3 home visits during pregnancy and 16 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. The main outcomes consisted of changes in women's urine cotinine over the course of pregnancy; women's use of ancillary services during pregnancy; subsequent pregnancies and births, educational achievement, workforce participation, and use of welfare; mother-infant responsive interaction; families' home environments; infants' emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli and low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli; and children's language and mental development, temperament, and behavioral problems. Paraprofessional-visited mother-child pairs in which the mother had low psychological resources interacted with one another more responsively than their control-group counterparts (99.45 vs 97.54 standard score points). There were no other statistically significant paraprofessional effects. In contrast to their control-group counterparts, nurse-visited smokers had greater reductions in cotinine levels from intake to the end of pregnancy (259.0 vs 12.32 ng/mL); by the study child's second birthday, women visited by nurses had fewer subsequent pregnancies (29% vs 41%) and births (12% vs 19%); they delayed subsequent pregnancies for longer intervals; and during the second year after the birth of their first child, they worked more than women in the control group (6.83 vs 5.65 months). Nurse-visited mother-child pairs interacted with one another more responsively than those in the control group (100.31 vs 98.99 standard score points). At 6 months of age, nurse-visited infants, in contrast to their control-group counterparts, were less likely to exhibit emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli (16% vs 25%) and nurse-visited infants born to women with low psychological resources were less likely to exhibit low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli (24% vs 40% and 13% vs 33%). At 21 months, nurse-visited children born to women with low psychological resources were less likely to exhibit language delays (7% vs 18%); and at 24 months, they exhibited superior mental development (90.18 vs 86.20 Mental Development Index scores) than their control-group counterparts. There were no statistically significant program effects for the nurses on women's use of ancillary prenatal services, educational achievement, use of welfare, or their children's temperament or behavior problems. For most outcomes on which either visitor produced significant effects, the paraprofessionals typically had effects that were about half the size of those produced by nurses. When trained in a model program of prenatal and infancy home visiting, paraprofessionals produced small effects that rarely achieved statistical or clinical significance; the absence of statistical significance for some outcomes is probably attributable to limited statistical power to detect small effects. Nurses produced significant effects on a wide range of maternal and child outcomes.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Home health care</subject><subject>House Calls</subject><subject>House calls (Medicine)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Welfare</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Maternal Welfare</subject><subject>Maternal-Child Nursing</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0s9v0zAUB_AIgVg3uHJEERITh6b4dxJuVQUbUsUmNLhar85L5imJOzsRjL8eR61UiqocnNgf59lP3yR5Q8mCSsE-brEKCxq_-EIU6lkyo6QsMsFy-TyZEcJpJgiRZ8l5CA-EECFz9jI5o4wRyUQ5S26vXYfpTxvsYPsm3Tylt-Bh612NIVjXQxtS6Ktp4dvoA4ZP6TL9HmdcZ_9gNU9Xrh-8a1us0jtvoX2VvKjjJny9Hy-SH18-362us_XN1dfVcp0ZRciQVUZirkRBoFSSKrqhBePAVCmAVABM5ionVFCphKqVqQRThOec5iiAbWDDL5LL3X_jWR9HDIPubDDYttCjG4PO4w25ZDLCd__BBzf66WKasYJzLlUR0XyHGmhR2752gwfTYI8eWtdjbeP0sozHITljkWcneHwq7Kw55T8c-UgG_D00MIagi6v1EZ2fomZqcYM69nB1c8QXO268C8FjrbfeduCfNCV6SoieEqJjQjTXMSFxw9t9O8ZNh9WB7yMRwfs9gGCgrT30xoaD40UpSCkPle9tc__LepwqWRi8NeGf10Plv-mqz4w</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Olds, David L</creator><creator>Robinson, JoAnn</creator><creator>O'Brien, Ruth</creator><creator>Luckey, Dennis W</creator><creator>Pettitt, Lisa M</creator><creator>Henderson, Charles R., Jr</creator><creator>Ng, Rosanna K</creator><creator>Sheff, Karen L</creator><creator>Korfmacher, Jon</creator><creator>Hiatt, Susan</creator><creator>Talmi, Ayelet</creator><general>Am Acad Pediatrics</general><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Home Visiting by Paraprofessionals and by Nurses: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><author>Olds, David L ; Robinson, JoAnn ; O'Brien, Ruth ; Luckey, Dennis W ; Pettitt, Lisa M ; Henderson, Charles R., Jr ; Ng, Rosanna K ; Sheff, Karen L ; Korfmacher, Jon ; Hiatt, Susan ; Talmi, Ayelet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-dc5e76480a965161b1823a2694a0daa2576701415646f6cd426037317e4a2bab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Home health care</topic><topic>House Calls</topic><topic>House calls (Medicine)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Welfare</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Maternal Welfare</topic><topic>Maternal-Child Nursing</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olds, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, JoAnn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luckey, Dennis W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettitt, Lisa M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Charles R., Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Rosanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheff, Karen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korfmacher, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiatt, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talmi, Ayelet</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olds, David L</au><au>Robinson, JoAnn</au><au>O'Brien, Ruth</au><au>Luckey, Dennis W</au><au>Pettitt, Lisa M</au><au>Henderson, Charles R., Jr</au><au>Ng, Rosanna K</au><au>Sheff, Karen L</au><au>Korfmacher, Jon</au><au>Hiatt, Susan</au><au>Talmi, Ayelet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Home Visiting by Paraprofessionals and by Nurses: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>486</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>486-496</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>To examine the effectiveness of home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses as separate means of improving maternal and child health when both types of visitors are trained in a program model that has demonstrated effectiveness when delivered by nurses. A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in public- and private-care settings in Denver, Colorado. One thousand one hundred seventy-eight consecutive pregnant women with no previous live births who were eligible for Medicaid or who had no private health insurance were invited to participate. Seven hundred thirty-five women were randomized to control, paraprofessional, or nurse conditions. Nurses completed an average of 6.5 home visits during pregnancy and 21 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. Paraprofessionals completed an average of 6.3 home visits during pregnancy and 16 visits from birth to the children's second birthdays. The main outcomes consisted of changes in women's urine cotinine over the course of pregnancy; women's use of ancillary services during pregnancy; subsequent pregnancies and births, educational achievement, workforce participation, and use of welfare; mother-infant responsive interaction; families' home environments; infants' emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli and low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli; and children's language and mental development, temperament, and behavioral problems. Paraprofessional-visited mother-child pairs in which the mother had low psychological resources interacted with one another more responsively than their control-group counterparts (99.45 vs 97.54 standard score points). There were no other statistically significant paraprofessional effects. In contrast to their control-group counterparts, nurse-visited smokers had greater reductions in cotinine levels from intake to the end of pregnancy (259.0 vs 12.32 ng/mL); by the study child's second birthday, women visited by nurses had fewer subsequent pregnancies (29% vs 41%) and births (12% vs 19%); they delayed subsequent pregnancies for longer intervals; and during the second year after the birth of their first child, they worked more than women in the control group (6.83 vs 5.65 months). Nurse-visited mother-child pairs interacted with one another more responsively than those in the control group (100.31 vs 98.99 standard score points). At 6 months of age, nurse-visited infants, in contrast to their control-group counterparts, were less likely to exhibit emotional vulnerability in response to fear stimuli (16% vs 25%) and nurse-visited infants born to women with low psychological resources were less likely to exhibit low emotional vitality in response to joy and anger stimuli (24% vs 40% and 13% vs 33%). At 21 months, nurse-visited children born to women with low psychological resources were less likely to exhibit language delays (7% vs 18%); and at 24 months, they exhibited superior mental development (90.18 vs 86.20 Mental Development Index scores) than their control-group counterparts. There were no statistically significant program effects for the nurses on women's use of ancillary prenatal services, educational achievement, use of welfare, or their children's temperament or behavior problems. For most outcomes on which either visitor produced significant effects, the paraprofessionals typically had effects that were about half the size of those produced by nurses. When trained in a model program of prenatal and infancy home visiting, paraprofessionals produced small effects that rarely achieved statistical or clinical significance; the absence of statistical significance for some outcomes is probably attributable to limited statistical power to detect small effects. Nurses produced significant effects on a wide range of maternal and child outcomes.</abstract><cop>Elk Grove Village, IL</cop><pub>Am Acad Pediatrics</pub><pmid>12205249</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.110.3.486</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2002-09, Vol.110 (3), p.486-496
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72053525
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Clinical outcomes
Effectiveness
Female
Health aspects
Home health care
House Calls
House calls (Medicine)
Humans
Infant
Infant Welfare
Infant, Newborn
Maternal Welfare
Maternal-Child Nursing
Medical sciences
Nurses
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Pediatrics
Pregnancy
Proportional Hazards Models
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Regression Analysis
Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation
title Home Visiting by Paraprofessionals and by Nurses: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Home%20Visiting%20by%20Paraprofessionals%20and%20by%20Nurses:%20A%20Randomized,%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Olds,%20David%20L&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=486-496&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.110.3.486&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA91560722%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228333568&rft_id=info:pmid/12205249&rft_galeid=A91560722&rfr_iscdi=true