Conservative Surgical Treatment for Severe Endometriosis in Infertile Women: Are We Making Progress?

Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis in infertile women is one of the most challenging situations for the pelvic surgeon. The second half of the 1980s saw an increase in the supporters of laparoscopic treatment even for more extensive disease. Two opposing factions were thus created: tradit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrical & gynecological survey 1991-07, Vol.46 (7), p.490-490
Hauptverfasser: CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA, VERCELLINI, PAOLO, FEDELE, LUIGI, BIANCHI, STEFANO, VENDOLA, NICOLETTA, CANDIANI, MASSIMO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 490
container_issue 7
container_start_page 490
container_title Obstetrical & gynecological survey
container_volume 46
creator CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA
VERCELLINI, PAOLO
FEDELE, LUIGI
BIANCHI, STEFANO
VENDOLA, NICOLETTA
CANDIANI, MASSIMO
description Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis in infertile women is one of the most challenging situations for the pelvic surgeon. The second half of the 1980s saw an increase in the supporters of laparoscopic treatment even for more extensive disease. Two opposing factions were thus created: traditional gynecologic surgeons who accuse endoscopists of imprudence and technical inadequacy and enthusiastic supporters of operative laparoscopy who consider laparotomy obsolete and its associated morbidity needlessly high for the patient and health service. In the present review of the literature data we analyze laparotomy and laparoscopy techniques and compare the postoperative results in terms of reproductive success in an attempt to clarify whether conservative endoscopic treatment of severe endometriosis is only an inappropriate proposal with no future or whether, due to its efficacy, it will eventually limit interventions via laparotomy to exceptional circumstances.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00006254-199107000-00029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72051106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72051106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2159-8d892642afb034dacb2ce8a72322ede532cf04aa462ff657fa33f99be353cf6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdtKxDAQhoMo63p4BCFX3lVzaNrEG5HFw8KKgoqXIdtOdqNto0m74tsbXQ9XBoYw8_8zA98ghCk5okSVxyS9gok8o0pRUqYsS8HUBhpTwXmmZFFsovFnKSslk9toJ8anZJE8JyM0opJTIdgY1RPfRQgr07sV4LshLFxlGnwfwPQtdD22PuA7WEEAfN7VvoU-OB9dxK7D085C6F0D-DEJ3Qk-S65HwNfm2XULfBv8IkCMp3toy5omwv73v4seLs7vJ1fZ7OZyOjmbZRWjQmWylooVOTN2Tnhem2rOKpCmZJwxqEFwVlmSG5MXzNpClNZwbpWaAxe8soXhu-hwPfcl-NcBYq9bFytoGtOBH6IuGRGUkiIZ5dpYBR9jAKtfgmtNeNeU6E_A-gew_gWsvwCn1oPvHcO8hfqvcU006flaf_NNDyE-N8MbBL0E0_RL_d_d-AdnS4aZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72051106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservative Surgical Treatment for Severe Endometriosis in Infertile Women: Are We Making Progress?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA ; VERCELLINI, PAOLO ; FEDELE, LUIGI ; BIANCHI, STEFANO ; VENDOLA, NICOLETTA ; CANDIANI, MASSIMO</creator><creatorcontrib>CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA ; VERCELLINI, PAOLO ; FEDELE, LUIGI ; BIANCHI, STEFANO ; VENDOLA, NICOLETTA ; CANDIANI, MASSIMO</creatorcontrib><description>Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis in infertile women is one of the most challenging situations for the pelvic surgeon. The second half of the 1980s saw an increase in the supporters of laparoscopic treatment even for more extensive disease. Two opposing factions were thus created: traditional gynecologic surgeons who accuse endoscopists of imprudence and technical inadequacy and enthusiastic supporters of operative laparoscopy who consider laparotomy obsolete and its associated morbidity needlessly high for the patient and health service. In the present review of the literature data we analyze laparotomy and laparoscopy techniques and compare the postoperative results in terms of reproductive success in an attempt to clarify whether conservative endoscopic treatment of severe endometriosis is only an inappropriate proposal with no future or whether, due to its efficacy, it will eventually limit interventions via laparotomy to exceptional circumstances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7828</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-9866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006254-199107000-00029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1831552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Bias ; Endometriosis - complications ; Endometriosis - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Infertility, Female - etiology ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Laparoscopy - standards ; Laparoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Laparotomy - methods ; Laparotomy - standards ; Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Uterine Neoplasms - complications ; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Obstetrical &amp; gynecological survey, 1991-07, Vol.46 (7), p.490-490</ispartof><rights>Williams &amp; Wilkins 1991. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1831552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERCELLINI, PAOLO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEDELE, LUIGI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIANCHI, STEFANO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENDOLA, NICOLETTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CANDIANI, MASSIMO</creatorcontrib><title>Conservative Surgical Treatment for Severe Endometriosis in Infertile Women: Are We Making Progress?</title><title>Obstetrical &amp; gynecological survey</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol Surv</addtitle><description>Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis in infertile women is one of the most challenging situations for the pelvic surgeon. The second half of the 1980s saw an increase in the supporters of laparoscopic treatment even for more extensive disease. Two opposing factions were thus created: traditional gynecologic surgeons who accuse endoscopists of imprudence and technical inadequacy and enthusiastic supporters of operative laparoscopy who consider laparotomy obsolete and its associated morbidity needlessly high for the patient and health service. In the present review of the literature data we analyze laparotomy and laparoscopy techniques and compare the postoperative results in terms of reproductive success in an attempt to clarify whether conservative endoscopic treatment of severe endometriosis is only an inappropriate proposal with no future or whether, due to its efficacy, it will eventually limit interventions via laparotomy to exceptional circumstances.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Endometriosis - complications</subject><subject>Endometriosis - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - etiology</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Laparotomy - methods</subject><subject>Laparotomy - standards</subject><subject>Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0029-7828</issn><issn>1533-9866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kdtKxDAQhoMo63p4BCFX3lVzaNrEG5HFw8KKgoqXIdtOdqNto0m74tsbXQ9XBoYw8_8zA98ghCk5okSVxyS9gok8o0pRUqYsS8HUBhpTwXmmZFFsovFnKSslk9toJ8anZJE8JyM0opJTIdgY1RPfRQgr07sV4LshLFxlGnwfwPQtdD22PuA7WEEAfN7VvoU-OB9dxK7D085C6F0D-DEJ3Qk-S65HwNfm2XULfBv8IkCMp3toy5omwv73v4seLs7vJ1fZ7OZyOjmbZRWjQmWylooVOTN2Tnhem2rOKpCmZJwxqEFwVlmSG5MXzNpClNZwbpWaAxe8soXhu-hwPfcl-NcBYq9bFytoGtOBH6IuGRGUkiIZ5dpYBR9jAKtfgmtNeNeU6E_A-gew_gWsvwCn1oPvHcO8hfqvcU006flaf_NNDyE-N8MbBL0E0_RL_d_d-AdnS4aZ</recordid><startdate>199107</startdate><enddate>199107</enddate><creator>CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA</creator><creator>VERCELLINI, PAOLO</creator><creator>FEDELE, LUIGI</creator><creator>BIANCHI, STEFANO</creator><creator>VENDOLA, NICOLETTA</creator><creator>CANDIANI, MASSIMO</creator><general>Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199107</creationdate><title>Conservative Surgical Treatment for Severe Endometriosis in Infertile Women: Are We Making Progress?</title><author>CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA ; VERCELLINI, PAOLO ; FEDELE, LUIGI ; BIANCHI, STEFANO ; VENDOLA, NICOLETTA ; CANDIANI, MASSIMO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2159-8d892642afb034dacb2ce8a72322ede532cf04aa462ff657fa33f99be353cf6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Endometriosis - complications</topic><topic>Endometriosis - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - etiology</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Laparotomy - methods</topic><topic>Laparotomy - standards</topic><topic>Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERCELLINI, PAOLO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEDELE, LUIGI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIANCHI, STEFANO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENDOLA, NICOLETTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CANDIANI, MASSIMO</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrical &amp; gynecological survey</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CANDIANI, GlOVANNI BATTISTA</au><au>VERCELLINI, PAOLO</au><au>FEDELE, LUIGI</au><au>BIANCHI, STEFANO</au><au>VENDOLA, NICOLETTA</au><au>CANDIANI, MASSIMO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservative Surgical Treatment for Severe Endometriosis in Infertile Women: Are We Making Progress?</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrical &amp; gynecological survey</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol Surv</addtitle><date>1991-07</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>490-490</pages><issn>0029-7828</issn><eissn>1533-9866</eissn><abstract>Conservative surgery for severe endometriosis in infertile women is one of the most challenging situations for the pelvic surgeon. The second half of the 1980s saw an increase in the supporters of laparoscopic treatment even for more extensive disease. Two opposing factions were thus created: traditional gynecologic surgeons who accuse endoscopists of imprudence and technical inadequacy and enthusiastic supporters of operative laparoscopy who consider laparotomy obsolete and its associated morbidity needlessly high for the patient and health service. In the present review of the literature data we analyze laparotomy and laparoscopy techniques and compare the postoperative results in terms of reproductive success in an attempt to clarify whether conservative endoscopic treatment of severe endometriosis is only an inappropriate proposal with no future or whether, due to its efficacy, it will eventually limit interventions via laparotomy to exceptional circumstances.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>1831552</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006254-199107000-00029</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7828
ispartof Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 1991-07, Vol.46 (7), p.490-490
issn 0029-7828
1533-9866
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72051106
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Bias
Endometriosis - complications
Endometriosis - surgery
Female
Humans
Infertility, Female - etiology
Laparoscopy - methods
Laparoscopy - standards
Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data
Laparotomy - methods
Laparotomy - standards
Laparotomy - statistics & numerical data
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Uterine Neoplasms - complications
Uterine Neoplasms - surgery
title Conservative Surgical Treatment for Severe Endometriosis in Infertile Women: Are We Making Progress?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T10%3A49%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservative%20Surgical%20Treatment%20for%20Severe%20Endometriosis%20in%20Infertile%20Women:%20Are%20We%20Making%20Progress?&rft.jtitle=Obstetrical%20&%20gynecological%20survey&rft.au=CANDIANI,%20GlOVANNI%20BATTISTA&rft.date=1991-07&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=490-490&rft.issn=0029-7828&rft.eissn=1533-9866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006254-199107000-00029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72051106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72051106&rft_id=info:pmid/1831552&rfr_iscdi=true