Potential impact of preoperative EUS on esophageal cancer management and cost

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative proportions of esophageal cancer stages in a group of patients referred for preoperative EUS, to determine the proportions of EUS stage 1 and 4 tumors that would not be treated with combined modality therapy, and to estimate the imp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2002-09, Vol.56 (3), p.391-396
Hauptverfasser: Shumaker, Douglas A., de Garmo, Patricia, Faigel, Douglas O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 396
container_issue 3
container_start_page 391
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 56
creator Shumaker, Douglas A.
de Garmo, Patricia
Faigel, Douglas O.
description Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative proportions of esophageal cancer stages in a group of patients referred for preoperative EUS, to determine the proportions of EUS stage 1 and 4 tumors that would not be treated with combined modality therapy, and to estimate the impact of the EUS diagnosis of these stages on costs. Methods: A large national endoscopic database was reviewed retrospectively to identify cases of esophageal cancer in which there was a referral for preoperative staging with EUS. Data were analyzed as to demographics, histology and tumor stage by EUS according to the American Joint Commission for Cancer tumor node metastasis classification system for esophageal cancer. Cost estimates were based on Medicare reimbursement rates and published figures. Results: Of 188 EUS procedures done for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer (82% men, mean age 66.5 years), the histopathologic types of cancer were: adenocarcinoma, 107; squamous cell carcinoma, 39; and unknown histology, 42. Numbers and proportions of patients by American Joint Commission for Cancer group stage based on 162 procedures for which complete staging information was available are as follows: Stage I, 23 patients (14%); Stage II, 51 (31%); Stage III, 69 (43%); and Stage IV, 19 (12%). Therefore, for every 100 patients staged before surgery with EUS (cost $63,420), 14 patients with Stage I disease would be spared neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (saving $122,192) and 12 patients with Stage IV cancer would be spared surgery (saving $285,600) for an average cost savings of $3443 per patient. Conclusion: Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer with EUS identifies a significant proportion of patients (26% in this series) with stage I and IV tumors who may be spared combined modality therapy with an associated potential for cost savings. (Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:391-6.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70044-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72033284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510702700448</els_id><sourcerecordid>72033284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2388-c5987f2edea94bf7fcb45ccbd84d04257cf8ff79298e371cd117ea244677f4093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LHDEUhoNUuqvtT1By06IXY08ymU3mSoqsWlixsN3rkM2caGRmMiazQv99sx_oZW8SAs97zpuHkDMGVwzY7McS8llUDOQF8EsJIEShjsiUQS2LmZT1JzJ9RybkJKUXAFC8ZJ_JhHFWZ0ZNycPvMGI_etNS3w3GjjQ4OkQMA0Yz-jek89WShp5iCsOzecIMWtNbjLQzfX53OU1N31Ab0viFHDvTJvx6uE_J6nb-5-a-WDze_br5uSgsL5UqbFUr6Tg2aGqxdtLZtaisXTdKNCB4Ja1Tzsma1wpLyWzDmETDhcidnYC6PCXf93OHGF43mEbd-WSxbU2PYZO05FCWXIkMVnvQxpBSRKeH6DsT_2oGeutR7zzqrSQNXO88apVz54cFm3WHzUfqIC4D3w6ASda0LmYnPn1w-ZsgZ9sC13sOs443j1En6zH7a3xEO-om-P9U-QdNHo77</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72033284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential impact of preoperative EUS on esophageal cancer management and cost</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Shumaker, Douglas A. ; de Garmo, Patricia ; Faigel, Douglas O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shumaker, Douglas A. ; de Garmo, Patricia ; Faigel, Douglas O.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative proportions of esophageal cancer stages in a group of patients referred for preoperative EUS, to determine the proportions of EUS stage 1 and 4 tumors that would not be treated with combined modality therapy, and to estimate the impact of the EUS diagnosis of these stages on costs. Methods: A large national endoscopic database was reviewed retrospectively to identify cases of esophageal cancer in which there was a referral for preoperative staging with EUS. Data were analyzed as to demographics, histology and tumor stage by EUS according to the American Joint Commission for Cancer tumor node metastasis classification system for esophageal cancer. Cost estimates were based on Medicare reimbursement rates and published figures. Results: Of 188 EUS procedures done for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer (82% men, mean age 66.5 years), the histopathologic types of cancer were: adenocarcinoma, 107; squamous cell carcinoma, 39; and unknown histology, 42. Numbers and proportions of patients by American Joint Commission for Cancer group stage based on 162 procedures for which complete staging information was available are as follows: Stage I, 23 patients (14%); Stage II, 51 (31%); Stage III, 69 (43%); and Stage IV, 19 (12%). Therefore, for every 100 patients staged before surgery with EUS (cost $63,420), 14 patients with Stage I disease would be spared neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (saving $122,192) and 12 patients with Stage IV cancer would be spared surgery (saving $285,600) for an average cost savings of $3443 per patient. Conclusion: Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer with EUS identifies a significant proportion of patients (26% in this series) with stage I and IV tumors who may be spared combined modality therapy with an associated potential for cost savings. (Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:391-6.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70044-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12196778</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Adenocarcinoma - economics ; Adenocarcinoma - therapy ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - economics ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy - economics ; Databases as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Endosonography - economics ; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Esophageal Neoplasms - economics ; Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy ; Esophagus ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Preoperative Care - economics ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2002-09, Vol.56 (3), p.391-396</ispartof><rights>2002 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2388-c5987f2edea94bf7fcb45ccbd84d04257cf8ff79298e371cd117ea244677f4093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2388-c5987f2edea94bf7fcb45ccbd84d04257cf8ff79298e371cd117ea244677f4093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70044-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13880764$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12196778$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shumaker, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Garmo, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faigel, Douglas O.</creatorcontrib><title>Potential impact of preoperative EUS on esophageal cancer management and cost</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative proportions of esophageal cancer stages in a group of patients referred for preoperative EUS, to determine the proportions of EUS stage 1 and 4 tumors that would not be treated with combined modality therapy, and to estimate the impact of the EUS diagnosis of these stages on costs. Methods: A large national endoscopic database was reviewed retrospectively to identify cases of esophageal cancer in which there was a referral for preoperative staging with EUS. Data were analyzed as to demographics, histology and tumor stage by EUS according to the American Joint Commission for Cancer tumor node metastasis classification system for esophageal cancer. Cost estimates were based on Medicare reimbursement rates and published figures. Results: Of 188 EUS procedures done for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer (82% men, mean age 66.5 years), the histopathologic types of cancer were: adenocarcinoma, 107; squamous cell carcinoma, 39; and unknown histology, 42. Numbers and proportions of patients by American Joint Commission for Cancer group stage based on 162 procedures for which complete staging information was available are as follows: Stage I, 23 patients (14%); Stage II, 51 (31%); Stage III, 69 (43%); and Stage IV, 19 (12%). Therefore, for every 100 patients staged before surgery with EUS (cost $63,420), 14 patients with Stage I disease would be spared neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (saving $122,192) and 12 patients with Stage IV cancer would be spared surgery (saving $285,600) for an average cost savings of $3443 per patient. Conclusion: Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer with EUS identifies a significant proportion of patients (26% in this series) with stage I and IV tumors who may be spared combined modality therapy with an associated potential for cost savings. (Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:391-6.)</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - economics</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - economics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - economics</subject><subject>Databases as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Endosonography - economics</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - economics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LHDEUhoNUuqvtT1By06IXY08ymU3mSoqsWlixsN3rkM2caGRmMiazQv99sx_oZW8SAs97zpuHkDMGVwzY7McS8llUDOQF8EsJIEShjsiUQS2LmZT1JzJ9RybkJKUXAFC8ZJ_JhHFWZ0ZNycPvMGI_etNS3w3GjjQ4OkQMA0Yz-jek89WShp5iCsOzecIMWtNbjLQzfX53OU1N31Ab0viFHDvTJvx6uE_J6nb-5-a-WDze_br5uSgsL5UqbFUr6Tg2aGqxdtLZtaisXTdKNCB4Ja1Tzsma1wpLyWzDmETDhcidnYC6PCXf93OHGF43mEbd-WSxbU2PYZO05FCWXIkMVnvQxpBSRKeH6DsT_2oGeutR7zzqrSQNXO88apVz54cFm3WHzUfqIC4D3w6ASda0LmYnPn1w-ZsgZ9sC13sOs443j1En6zH7a3xEO-om-P9U-QdNHo77</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Shumaker, Douglas A.</creator><creator>de Garmo, Patricia</creator><creator>Faigel, Douglas O.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>Potential impact of preoperative EUS on esophageal cancer management and cost</title><author>Shumaker, Douglas A. ; de Garmo, Patricia ; Faigel, Douglas O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2388-c5987f2edea94bf7fcb45ccbd84d04257cf8ff79298e371cd117ea244677f4093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - economics</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - economics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - economics</topic><topic>Databases as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Endosonography - economics</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - economics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shumaker, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Garmo, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faigel, Douglas O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shumaker, Douglas A.</au><au>de Garmo, Patricia</au><au>Faigel, Douglas O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential impact of preoperative EUS on esophageal cancer management and cost</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>391-396</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative proportions of esophageal cancer stages in a group of patients referred for preoperative EUS, to determine the proportions of EUS stage 1 and 4 tumors that would not be treated with combined modality therapy, and to estimate the impact of the EUS diagnosis of these stages on costs. Methods: A large national endoscopic database was reviewed retrospectively to identify cases of esophageal cancer in which there was a referral for preoperative staging with EUS. Data were analyzed as to demographics, histology and tumor stage by EUS according to the American Joint Commission for Cancer tumor node metastasis classification system for esophageal cancer. Cost estimates were based on Medicare reimbursement rates and published figures. Results: Of 188 EUS procedures done for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer (82% men, mean age 66.5 years), the histopathologic types of cancer were: adenocarcinoma, 107; squamous cell carcinoma, 39; and unknown histology, 42. Numbers and proportions of patients by American Joint Commission for Cancer group stage based on 162 procedures for which complete staging information was available are as follows: Stage I, 23 patients (14%); Stage II, 51 (31%); Stage III, 69 (43%); and Stage IV, 19 (12%). Therefore, for every 100 patients staged before surgery with EUS (cost $63,420), 14 patients with Stage I disease would be spared neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (saving $122,192) and 12 patients with Stage IV cancer would be spared surgery (saving $285,600) for an average cost savings of $3443 per patient. Conclusion: Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer with EUS identifies a significant proportion of patients (26% in this series) with stage I and IV tumors who may be spared combined modality therapy with an associated potential for cost savings. (Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:391-6.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>12196778</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70044-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2002-09, Vol.56 (3), p.391-396
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72033284
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging
Adenocarcinoma - economics
Adenocarcinoma - therapy
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - economics
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy
Combined Modality Therapy - economics
Databases as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Endosonography - economics
Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Esophageal Neoplasms - economics
Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy
Esophagus
Female
Health Care Costs
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Preoperative Care - economics
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
title Potential impact of preoperative EUS on esophageal cancer management and cost
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20impact%20of%20preoperative%20EUS%20on%20esophageal%20cancer%20management%20and%20cost&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Shumaker,%20Douglas%20A.&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=391-396&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70044-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72033284%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72033284&rft_id=info:pmid/12196778&rft_els_id=S0016510702700448&rfr_iscdi=true