Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response
Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to stimuli presented at the same location as a preceding cue. However, the cue-target paradigm used in most previous studies may have overestimated the contribution of eye movement programming to IOR, due to the existence of manual respon...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2002-09, Vol.146 (1), p.54-59 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 59 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 54 |
| container_title | Experimental brain research |
| container_volume | 146 |
| creator | POLIAKOFF, E SPENCE, C O'BOYLE, D. J MCGLONE, F. P CODY, F. W. J |
| description | Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to stimuli presented at the same location as a preceding cue. However, the cue-target paradigm used in most previous studies may have overestimated the contribution of eye movement programming to IOR, due to the existence of manual response inhibition effects. This confound can be circumvented by using a target-target paradigm in which participants respond to all stimuli. Here, we compared IOR magnitude from tactile cue-target and target-target tasks involving identical interstimulus intervals of 1,400 and 1,800 ms. Reaction times were measured using a foot pedal toe-lift response and a vocal response. Tactile IOR was observed using both modes of response, demonstrating IOR for the first time using a non-spatial, vocal response. Moreover, IOR effects were significantly smaller in target-target compared to cue-target conditions, thereby confirming the existence of the response inhibition confound. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-002-1153-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72015444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18605973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d5232d5eb28134f0ec363fb0094ec1bb7225f0b141408d58bdd3dce351cdca8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouq7-AC9SBL1VZ_KxzXqTxS8QRNBzSJMUK91kTdqD_96ULohevEyYyfO-TPIScoJwiQDVVQKgFMtcS0TBSrpDZsjZ2MFil8wAkJdc4vKAHKb0Mbasgn1ygBSXVFRyRl5etenbzhWtf2_rtm-DL0JTRNcP0V8XPvgymKHTMY_SJvj0i9TeFutg3SSZ7o_IXqO75I6355y83d2-rh7Kp-f7x9XNU2mYFH1pBWXUCldTiYw34AxbsKYGWHJnsK4rSkUDNXLkIK2QtbXMGscEGmu0bNicXEy-mxg-B5d6tW6TcV2nvQtDUhUFFJzzf0GUCxDLimXw7A_4EfIv5EcoiiJvWYHIEE6QiSGl6Bq1ie1axy-FoMZU1JSKylWNqSiaNadb46FeO_uj2MaQgfMtoJPRXRO1N2364ZhcVAKQfQNsVpQL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215134705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>POLIAKOFF, E ; SPENCE, C ; O'BOYLE, D. J ; MCGLONE, F. P ; CODY, F. W. J</creator><creatorcontrib>POLIAKOFF, E ; SPENCE, C ; O'BOYLE, D. J ; MCGLONE, F. P ; CODY, F. W. J</creatorcontrib><description>Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to stimuli presented at the same location as a preceding cue. However, the cue-target paradigm used in most previous studies may have overestimated the contribution of eye movement programming to IOR, due to the existence of manual response inhibition effects. This confound can be circumvented by using a target-target paradigm in which participants respond to all stimuli. Here, we compared IOR magnitude from tactile cue-target and target-target tasks involving identical interstimulus intervals of 1,400 and 1,800 ms. Reaction times were measured using a foot pedal toe-lift response and a vocal response. Tactile IOR was observed using both modes of response, demonstrating IOR for the first time using a non-spatial, vocal response. Moreover, IOR effects were significantly smaller in target-target compared to cue-target conditions, thereby confirming the existence of the response inhibition confound.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1153-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12192578</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXBRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cues ; Female ; Foot - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Movement - physiology ; Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Speech ; Superior Colliculi - physiology ; Touch - physiology ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2002-09, Vol.146 (1), p.54-59</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d5232d5eb28134f0ec363fb0094ec1bb7225f0b141408d58bdd3dce351cdca8f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13867501$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12192578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>POLIAKOFF, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPENCE, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'BOYLE, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGLONE, F. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CODY, F. W. J</creatorcontrib><title>Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to stimuli presented at the same location as a preceding cue. However, the cue-target paradigm used in most previous studies may have overestimated the contribution of eye movement programming to IOR, due to the existence of manual response inhibition effects. This confound can be circumvented by using a target-target paradigm in which participants respond to all stimuli. Here, we compared IOR magnitude from tactile cue-target and target-target tasks involving identical interstimulus intervals of 1,400 and 1,800 ms. Reaction times were measured using a foot pedal toe-lift response and a vocal response. Tactile IOR was observed using both modes of response, demonstrating IOR for the first time using a non-spatial, vocal response. Moreover, IOR effects were significantly smaller in target-target compared to cue-target conditions, thereby confirming the existence of the response inhibition confound.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Superior Colliculi - physiology</subject><subject>Touch - physiology</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouq7-AC9SBL1VZ_KxzXqTxS8QRNBzSJMUK91kTdqD_96ULohevEyYyfO-TPIScoJwiQDVVQKgFMtcS0TBSrpDZsjZ2MFil8wAkJdc4vKAHKb0Mbasgn1ygBSXVFRyRl5etenbzhWtf2_rtm-DL0JTRNcP0V8XPvgymKHTMY_SJvj0i9TeFutg3SSZ7o_IXqO75I6355y83d2-rh7Kp-f7x9XNU2mYFH1pBWXUCldTiYw34AxbsKYGWHJnsK4rSkUDNXLkIK2QtbXMGscEGmu0bNicXEy-mxg-B5d6tW6TcV2nvQtDUhUFFJzzf0GUCxDLimXw7A_4EfIv5EcoiiJvWYHIEE6QiSGl6Bq1ie1axy-FoMZU1JSKylWNqSiaNadb46FeO_uj2MaQgfMtoJPRXRO1N2364ZhcVAKQfQNsVpQL</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>POLIAKOFF, E</creator><creator>SPENCE, C</creator><creator>O'BOYLE, D. J</creator><creator>MCGLONE, F. P</creator><creator>CODY, F. W. J</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response</title><author>POLIAKOFF, E ; SPENCE, C ; O'BOYLE, D. J ; MCGLONE, F. P ; CODY, F. W. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d5232d5eb28134f0ec363fb0094ec1bb7225f0b141408d58bdd3dce351cdca8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Superior Colliculi - physiology</topic><topic>Touch - physiology</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>POLIAKOFF, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPENCE, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'BOYLE, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGLONE, F. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CODY, F. W. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>POLIAKOFF, E</au><au>SPENCE, C</au><au>O'BOYLE, D. J</au><au>MCGLONE, F. P</au><au>CODY, F. W. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>54-59</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><coden>EXBRAP</coden><abstract>Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to stimuli presented at the same location as a preceding cue. However, the cue-target paradigm used in most previous studies may have overestimated the contribution of eye movement programming to IOR, due to the existence of manual response inhibition effects. This confound can be circumvented by using a target-target paradigm in which participants respond to all stimuli. Here, we compared IOR magnitude from tactile cue-target and target-target tasks involving identical interstimulus intervals of 1,400 and 1,800 ms. Reaction times were measured using a foot pedal toe-lift response and a vocal response. Tactile IOR was observed using both modes of response, demonstrating IOR for the first time using a non-spatial, vocal response. Moreover, IOR effects were significantly smaller in target-target compared to cue-target conditions, thereby confirming the existence of the response inhibition confound.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12192578</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-002-1153-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
| ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2002-09, Vol.146 (1), p.54-59 |
| issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72015444 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Attention - physiology Biological and medical sciences Cues Female Foot - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Movement - physiology Perception Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time - physiology Speech Superior Colliculi - physiology Touch - physiology Vision |
| title | Tactile inhibition of return: non-ocular response inhibition and mode of response |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A11%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tactile%20inhibition%20of%20return:%20non-ocular%20response%20inhibition%20and%20mode%20of%20response&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=POLIAKOFF,%20E&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=54-59&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft.coden=EXBRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-002-1153-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18605973%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215134705&rft_id=info:pmid/12192578&rfr_iscdi=true |