Why knees fail: Lessons learned

Why knees fail: Lessons learned

This article reviews the changing modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty over the past decade. Reasons for failure include polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, instability, infection, arthrofibrosis, malalignment, or malposition, deficient extensor mechanism, periprosthetic fracture, and isola...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2004-06, Vol.19 (4), p.31-34
Hauptverfasser: Callaghan, John J, O’Rourke, Michael R, Saleh, Khaled J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
failure
Humans
Prosthesis Failure
revision
total knee arthroplasty
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 4
container_start_page 31
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 19
creator Callaghan, John J
O’Rourke, Michael R
Saleh, Khaled J
description This article reviews the changing modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty over the past decade. Reasons for failure include polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, instability, infection, arthrofibrosis, malalignment, or malposition, deficient extensor mechanism, periprosthetic fracture, and isolated patellar resurfacing. Awareness of the modes of failure may lower the prevalence of failure and aid in developing designs and techniques to better address the problems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72010479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540304001330</els_id><sourcerecordid>72010479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e260t-9ea7a3d015d1db0c8ceb20f0b907d29d727892d68f18f5ed64c7d7032aa2c46b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kDtPwzAURi0EoqXwBxggE1vC9St2EAuqeEmVWECMlmPfqC5pAnaK1H9PqpbpLkdX5zuEXFIoKNDydlXYOCwLBiAKYAVQeUSmVHKWawHlMZmC1jyXAviEnKW0AqBUSnFKJlTSCqQop-T6c7nNvjrElDU2tHfZAlPqu5S1aGOH_pycNLZNeHG4M_Lx9Pg-f8kXb8-v84dFjqyEIa_QKsv9qOCpr8FphzWDBuoKlGeVV0zpivlSN1Q3En0pnPIKOLOWOVHWfEZu9n-_Y_-zwTSYdUgO29Z22G-SUQwoCFWN4NUB3NRr9OY7hrWNW_M_aQTu9wCOur8Bo0kuYOfQh4huML4PhoLZFTQrsytodgUNMDPq8z-Zz2Fc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72010479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why knees fail: Lessons learned</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Callaghan, John J ; O’Rourke, Michael R ; Saleh, Khaled J</creator><creatorcontrib>Callaghan, John J ; O’Rourke, Michael R ; Saleh, Khaled J</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the changing modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty over the past decade. Reasons for failure include polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, instability, infection, arthrofibrosis, malalignment, or malposition, deficient extensor mechanism, periprosthetic fracture, and isolated patellar resurfacing. Awareness of the modes of failure may lower the prevalence of failure and aid in developing designs and techniques to better address the problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15190546</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; failure ; Humans ; Prosthesis Failure ; revision ; total knee arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2004-06, Vol.19 (4), p.31-34</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540304001330$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15190546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Callaghan, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Rourke, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Khaled J</creatorcontrib><title>Why knees fail: Lessons learned</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>This article reviews the changing modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty over the past decade. Reasons for failure include polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, instability, infection, arthrofibrosis, malalignment, or malposition, deficient extensor mechanism, periprosthetic fracture, and isolated patellar resurfacing. Awareness of the modes of failure may lower the prevalence of failure and aid in developing designs and techniques to better address the problems.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>failure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>revision</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kDtPwzAURi0EoqXwBxggE1vC9St2EAuqeEmVWECMlmPfqC5pAnaK1H9PqpbpLkdX5zuEXFIoKNDydlXYOCwLBiAKYAVQeUSmVHKWawHlMZmC1jyXAviEnKW0AqBUSnFKJlTSCqQop-T6c7nNvjrElDU2tHfZAlPqu5S1aGOH_pycNLZNeHG4M_Lx9Pg-f8kXb8-v84dFjqyEIa_QKsv9qOCpr8FphzWDBuoKlGeVV0zpivlSN1Q3En0pnPIKOLOWOVHWfEZu9n-_Y_-zwTSYdUgO29Z22G-SUQwoCFWN4NUB3NRr9OY7hrWNW_M_aQTu9wCOur8Bo0kuYOfQh4huML4PhoLZFTQrsytodgUNMDPq8z-Zz2Fc</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Callaghan, John J</creator><creator>O’Rourke, Michael R</creator><creator>Saleh, Khaled J</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Why knees fail: Lessons learned</title><author>Callaghan, John J ; O’Rourke, Michael R ; Saleh, Khaled J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e260t-9ea7a3d015d1db0c8ceb20f0b907d29d727892d68f18f5ed64c7d7032aa2c46b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>failure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>revision</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Callaghan, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Rourke, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Khaled J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Callaghan, John J</au><au>O’Rourke, Michael R</au><au>Saleh, Khaled J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why knees fail: Lessons learned</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>31-34</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>This article reviews the changing modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty over the past decade. Reasons for failure include polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, instability, infection, arthrofibrosis, malalignment, or malposition, deficient extensor mechanism, periprosthetic fracture, and isolated patellar resurfacing. Awareness of the modes of failure may lower the prevalence of failure and aid in developing designs and techniques to better address the problems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15190546</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.015</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2004-06, Vol.19 (4), p.31-34
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72010479
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
failure
Humans
Prosthesis Failure
revision
total knee arthroplasty
title Why knees fail: Lessons learned
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A54%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20knees%20fail:%20Lessons%20learned&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Callaghan,%20John%20J&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=31-34&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72010479%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72010479&rft_id=info:pmid/15190546&rft_els_id=S0883540304001330&rfr_iscdi=true