Mitochondrial disorders: Prevalence, myths and advances
Disorders of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) are renowned for their variability in clinical features and genetic causes. This makes it difficult to determine their true prevalence, but recent studies have documented a minimum birth prevalence of 13.1/100 000 or 1/7634 for oxidative...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of inherited metabolic disease 2004-05, Vol.27 (3), p.349-362 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 362 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 349 |
container_title | Journal of inherited metabolic disease |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Thorburn, D. R. |
description | Disorders of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) are renowned for their variability in clinical features and genetic causes. This makes it difficult to determine their true prevalence, but recent studies have documented a minimum birth prevalence of 13.1/100 000 or 1/7634 for oxidative phosphorylation disorders with onset at any age. This clearly remains an underestimate but it indicates that oxidative phosphorylation disorders can be regarded as the most common group of inborn errors of metabolism. Pathogenic mutations causing human oxidative phosphorylation disorders have now been identified in more than 30 of the 37 mitochondrial DNA genes and in more than 30 nuclear genes. Most of the nuclear gene defects cause autosomal recessive diseases, but autosomal dominant and X‐linked disorders also occur. It is likely that at least another 30, and perhaps over 100, nuclear‐encoded oxidative phosphorylation disorders await identification. Oxidative phosphorylation genetics are complex and there appear to be a number of common misconceptions about mitochondrial DNA mutations that may impede optimal investigation and management of patients. In our experience, mitochondrial DNA mutations are not a negligible cause of OXPHOS disorders in children but account for 20–25% of cases. Similarly, a family history suggesting maternal inheritance is the exception rather than the norm for children with mitochondrial DNA mutations, many of whom have de novo mutations. Only some mitochondrial DNA mutations disappear from cultured cells, so deficient enzyme activity in fibroblasts does not imply the presence of a nuclear defect. Finally, it is still widely thought that there are very few reproductive options that can be offered to women at risk of transmitting a mitochondrial DNA mutation. While a cautious approach is needed, there is now a consensus that prenatal diagnosis should be offered to some women, particularly those at lower recurrence risk. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis can also be an option. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/B:BOLI.0000031098.41409.55 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72009119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72009119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4959-bf3b82343c5b479c330a184c6fba084e0f953685ef64bfec6e8b0490ebdfc7a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1PwjAUhhujEUT_gllI9Mphu_ZsLVcKfmEgeKHXTde1YWRs2AKGf-8mJBjvPDdNTp63ffsg1CW4R3BEbwf9wXQ86uFmKMGC9xhhWPQAjlCbQELDKI7hGLUxYSTkAqCFzryf17jgAKeoRYAITARto2SSryo9q8rM5aoIstxXLjPO94M3ZzaqMKU2N8Fiu5r5QJVZoLKNqlf-HJ1YVXhzsT876OPp8X34Eo6nz6Ph_TjUTIAIU0tTHlFGNaQsEZpSrAhnOrapwpwZbAXQmIOxMUut0bHhKWYCmzSzOlGCdtD17t6lqz7Xxq_kIvfaFIUqTbX2MonqTxHSgN0_4Lxau7LuJiPCOYtB4Brq7yDtKu-dsXLp8oVyW0mwbNzKgWzcyoNb-eNWAtThy_0L63RhskN0L7MGrvaA8loV1tWmcv-LExiiqGlxt-O-8sJs_1FBvo4mD5gyQb8B6ImTtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218846590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitochondrial disorders: Prevalence, myths and advances</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Thorburn, D. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thorburn, D. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Disorders of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) are renowned for their variability in clinical features and genetic causes. This makes it difficult to determine their true prevalence, but recent studies have documented a minimum birth prevalence of 13.1/100 000 or 1/7634 for oxidative phosphorylation disorders with onset at any age. This clearly remains an underestimate but it indicates that oxidative phosphorylation disorders can be regarded as the most common group of inborn errors of metabolism. Pathogenic mutations causing human oxidative phosphorylation disorders have now been identified in more than 30 of the 37 mitochondrial DNA genes and in more than 30 nuclear genes. Most of the nuclear gene defects cause autosomal recessive diseases, but autosomal dominant and X‐linked disorders also occur. It is likely that at least another 30, and perhaps over 100, nuclear‐encoded oxidative phosphorylation disorders await identification. Oxidative phosphorylation genetics are complex and there appear to be a number of common misconceptions about mitochondrial DNA mutations that may impede optimal investigation and management of patients. In our experience, mitochondrial DNA mutations are not a negligible cause of OXPHOS disorders in children but account for 20–25% of cases. Similarly, a family history suggesting maternal inheritance is the exception rather than the norm for children with mitochondrial DNA mutations, many of whom have de novo mutations. Only some mitochondrial DNA mutations disappear from cultured cells, so deficient enzyme activity in fibroblasts does not imply the presence of a nuclear defect. Finally, it is still widely thought that there are very few reproductive options that can be offered to women at risk of transmitting a mitochondrial DNA mutation. While a cautious approach is needed, there is now a consensus that prenatal diagnosis should be offered to some women, particularly those at lower recurrence risk. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis can also be an option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-8955</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2665</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/B:BOLI.0000031098.41409.55</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15190193</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIMDDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Humans ; Mitochondrial Diseases - epidemiology ; Mitochondrial Diseases - genetics ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2004-05, Vol.27 (3), p.349-362</ispartof><rights>2004 SSIEM</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4959-bf3b82343c5b479c330a184c6fba084e0f953685ef64bfec6e8b0490ebdfc7a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4959-bf3b82343c5b479c330a184c6fba084e0f953685ef64bfec6e8b0490ebdfc7a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1023%2FB%3ABOLI.0000031098.41409.55$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1023%2FB%3ABOLI.0000031098.41409.55$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,1417,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15905220$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15190193$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thorburn, D. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Mitochondrial disorders: Prevalence, myths and advances</title><title>Journal of inherited metabolic disease</title><addtitle>J Inherit Metab Dis</addtitle><description>Disorders of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) are renowned for their variability in clinical features and genetic causes. This makes it difficult to determine their true prevalence, but recent studies have documented a minimum birth prevalence of 13.1/100 000 or 1/7634 for oxidative phosphorylation disorders with onset at any age. This clearly remains an underestimate but it indicates that oxidative phosphorylation disorders can be regarded as the most common group of inborn errors of metabolism. Pathogenic mutations causing human oxidative phosphorylation disorders have now been identified in more than 30 of the 37 mitochondrial DNA genes and in more than 30 nuclear genes. Most of the nuclear gene defects cause autosomal recessive diseases, but autosomal dominant and X‐linked disorders also occur. It is likely that at least another 30, and perhaps over 100, nuclear‐encoded oxidative phosphorylation disorders await identification. Oxidative phosphorylation genetics are complex and there appear to be a number of common misconceptions about mitochondrial DNA mutations that may impede optimal investigation and management of patients. In our experience, mitochondrial DNA mutations are not a negligible cause of OXPHOS disorders in children but account for 20–25% of cases. Similarly, a family history suggesting maternal inheritance is the exception rather than the norm for children with mitochondrial DNA mutations, many of whom have de novo mutations. Only some mitochondrial DNA mutations disappear from cultured cells, so deficient enzyme activity in fibroblasts does not imply the presence of a nuclear defect. Finally, it is still widely thought that there are very few reproductive options that can be offered to women at risk of transmitting a mitochondrial DNA mutation. While a cautious approach is needed, there is now a consensus that prenatal diagnosis should be offered to some women, particularly those at lower recurrence risk. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis can also be an option.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mitochondrial Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mitochondrial Diseases - genetics</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>0141-8955</issn><issn>1573-2665</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1PwjAUhhujEUT_gllI9Mphu_ZsLVcKfmEgeKHXTde1YWRs2AKGf-8mJBjvPDdNTp63ffsg1CW4R3BEbwf9wXQ86uFmKMGC9xhhWPQAjlCbQELDKI7hGLUxYSTkAqCFzryf17jgAKeoRYAITARto2SSryo9q8rM5aoIstxXLjPO94M3ZzaqMKU2N8Fiu5r5QJVZoLKNqlf-HJ1YVXhzsT876OPp8X34Eo6nz6Ph_TjUTIAIU0tTHlFGNaQsEZpSrAhnOrapwpwZbAXQmIOxMUut0bHhKWYCmzSzOlGCdtD17t6lqz7Xxq_kIvfaFIUqTbX2MonqTxHSgN0_4Lxau7LuJiPCOYtB4Brq7yDtKu-dsXLp8oVyW0mwbNzKgWzcyoNb-eNWAtThy_0L63RhskN0L7MGrvaA8loV1tWmcv-LExiiqGlxt-O-8sJs_1FBvo4mD5gyQb8B6ImTtw</recordid><startdate>200405</startdate><enddate>200405</enddate><creator>Thorburn, D. R.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200405</creationdate><title>Mitochondrial disorders: Prevalence, myths and advances</title><author>Thorburn, D. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4959-bf3b82343c5b479c330a184c6fba084e0f953685ef64bfec6e8b0490ebdfc7a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mitochondrial Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mitochondrial Diseases - genetics</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thorburn, D. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of inherited metabolic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thorburn, D. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitochondrial disorders: Prevalence, myths and advances</atitle><jtitle>Journal of inherited metabolic disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Inherit Metab Dis</addtitle><date>2004-05</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>349-362</pages><issn>0141-8955</issn><eissn>1573-2665</eissn><coden>JIMDDP</coden><abstract>Disorders of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) are renowned for their variability in clinical features and genetic causes. This makes it difficult to determine their true prevalence, but recent studies have documented a minimum birth prevalence of 13.1/100 000 or 1/7634 for oxidative phosphorylation disorders with onset at any age. This clearly remains an underestimate but it indicates that oxidative phosphorylation disorders can be regarded as the most common group of inborn errors of metabolism. Pathogenic mutations causing human oxidative phosphorylation disorders have now been identified in more than 30 of the 37 mitochondrial DNA genes and in more than 30 nuclear genes. Most of the nuclear gene defects cause autosomal recessive diseases, but autosomal dominant and X‐linked disorders also occur. It is likely that at least another 30, and perhaps over 100, nuclear‐encoded oxidative phosphorylation disorders await identification. Oxidative phosphorylation genetics are complex and there appear to be a number of common misconceptions about mitochondrial DNA mutations that may impede optimal investigation and management of patients. In our experience, mitochondrial DNA mutations are not a negligible cause of OXPHOS disorders in children but account for 20–25% of cases. Similarly, a family history suggesting maternal inheritance is the exception rather than the norm for children with mitochondrial DNA mutations, many of whom have de novo mutations. Only some mitochondrial DNA mutations disappear from cultured cells, so deficient enzyme activity in fibroblasts does not imply the presence of a nuclear defect. Finally, it is still widely thought that there are very few reproductive options that can be offered to women at risk of transmitting a mitochondrial DNA mutation. While a cautious approach is needed, there is now a consensus that prenatal diagnosis should be offered to some women, particularly those at lower recurrence risk. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis can also be an option.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><pmid>15190193</pmid><doi>10.1023/B:BOLI.0000031098.41409.55</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-8955 |
ispartof | Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2004-05, Vol.27 (3), p.349-362 |
issn | 0141-8955 1573-2665 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72009119 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Blackwell Single Titles; SpringerLink |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Feeding. Feeding behavior Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution Humans Mitochondrial Diseases - epidemiology Mitochondrial Diseases - genetics Molecular and cellular biology Prevalence Risk Factors Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems |
title | Mitochondrial disorders: Prevalence, myths and advances |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A00%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitochondrial%20disorders:%20Prevalence,%20myths%20and%20advances&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20inherited%20metabolic%20disease&rft.au=Thorburn,%20D.%20R.&rft.date=2004-05&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=349-362&rft.issn=0141-8955&rft.eissn=1573-2665&rft.coden=JIMDDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/B:BOLI.0000031098.41409.55&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72009119%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218846590&rft_id=info:pmid/15190193&rfr_iscdi=true |