[1, 2-Bis(2, 6-difluoro-3-hydroxyphenyl)ethylene-diamine]platinum(II) Complexes, Compounds for the Endocrine Therapy of Breast Cancer - Mode of Action II: Contribution of Drug Inactivation, Cellular Drug Uptake and Sterical Factors in the Drug-Target Interaction to the Antitumor Activity

The marked activity of [meso‐1, 2‐bis(2, 6‐difluoro‐3‐hydroxyphenyl)ethylenediamine]platinum(II) (meso‐3‐PtLL′, L, L′ = Cl2 or L = OH2, L′ = OSO3) on the hormone‐sensitive MXT‐M‐3, 2 breast cancer implanted in mice is most probably due to a mechanism based on the reduction of the endogenous estrogen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archiv der Pharmazie (Weinheim) 2004-06, Vol.337 (6), p.349-359
Hauptverfasser: Schertl, Sabine, Hartmann, Rolf W., Batzl-Hartmann, Christine, Bernhardt, Günther, Spruß, Thilo, Beckenlehner, Karin, Koch, Marion, Krauser, Rudolf, Schlemmer, Richard, Gust, Ronald, Schönenberger, Helmut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The marked activity of [meso‐1, 2‐bis(2, 6‐difluoro‐3‐hydroxyphenyl)ethylenediamine]platinum(II) (meso‐3‐PtLL′, L, L′ = Cl2 or L = OH2, L′ = OSO3) on the hormone‐sensitive MXT‐M‐3, 2 breast cancer implanted in mice is most probably due to a mechanism based on the reduction of the endogenous estrogen level. Cytotoxic effects which are poorly pronounced in experiments on several breast cancer cell lines (e.g. MCF‐7), do not significantly contribute to the anti‐breast cancer activity of this compound. In contrast to this, the standard cisplatin and the structurally related comparison compound [meso‐1, 2‐bis(4‐fluorophenyl)ethylenediamine]platinum(II) (meso‐4‐PtLL′, L, L′ = Cl2 or L = OH2, L′ = OSO3) are strongly active in vivo as well as in vitro. Both effects entail programmed cell death, which is responsible for the inhibition of the tumor growth. The minor cytotoxicity of meso‐3‐PtLL′ in breast cancer cell cultures is caused neither by an inappropriate rate of reaction with bionucleophiles (e.g. by a too fast inactivation by plasma proteins) nor solely by the observed poor absorption by the tumor cells resulting in an insufficient drug concentration at the DNA. Additionally, an impeded reaction with biologically important, guanine‐rich sequences of DNA (owing to the 2, 6‐standing F atoms which hinder the drug‐target inter action) must be assumed as cause of its marginal cytotoxicity.
ISSN:0365-6233
1521-4184
DOI:10.1002/ardp.200300856