Evaluation of catch-up growth after liver transplantation in children with biliary atresia

:  Orthotopic liver transplantation (Tx) has improved survival in infants with extrahepatic biliary atresia (BA) when portoenteroanastomosis fails. Symptoms leading to Tx include liver failure, poor quality of life and growth failure. The objective of the study was to determine catch‐up growth in ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric transplantation 2004-06, Vol.8 (3), p.255-259
Hauptverfasser: Alonso, G., Duca, P., Pasqualini, T., D'Agostino, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung::  Orthotopic liver transplantation (Tx) has improved survival in infants with extrahepatic biliary atresia (BA) when portoenteroanastomosis fails. Symptoms leading to Tx include liver failure, poor quality of life and growth failure. The objective of the study was to determine catch‐up growth in children with BA. Medical records and growth data of 36 patients (24 girls) who received a Tx due to BA were analyzed. Thirty‐two patients completed 3 yr and 15 patients 7 yr of follow‐up after Tx. At Tx, the median age was 2.7 yr (range 0.7–12.6) and mean height Z score (±s.d.) was −1.56 (±1.3). Patients were divided in two groups according to age at Tx: group I (n = 10), younger than 1.0 yr, and group II (n = 26) older than 1.0 yr. Median age (range) at Tx in group I was 0.8 yr (0.7–1.0) and in group II it was 3.35 yr (1.25–12.6). Thirteen patients (nine in group I) were receptors of living related donors. We evaluated linear growth, liver and renal function, immunosuppressive regimen and allograft rejection episodes. We did not find any significant differences in allograft or renal function, immunosuppressive therapy and number of acute rejection episodes or height Z score at Tx, second and third year post‐Tx between both groups. The mean height Z score at Tx in group I was −1.61 and in group II −1.54; at the second year, group I −0.66 and group II −1.08; at the third year, group I −0.17 and group II −0.85; and at the seventh year (total group) −0.3. However, the height gain at the third year was better in group I than in group II (p 
ISSN:1397-3142
1399-3046
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00160.x