Visual Manifestations of Visible and Buried Optic Disc Drusen

BACKGROUND:It has been reported that visible optic disc drusen are associated with decreased visual acuity and loss of peripheral visual field. Patients with buried optic disc drusen have not been as well characterized. METHODS:An observational, retrospective review was made of 92 eyes with fundusco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuro-ophthalmology 2004-06, Vol.24 (2), p.125-129
Hauptverfasser: Wilkins, Jay M, Pomeranz, Howard D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:It has been reported that visible optic disc drusen are associated with decreased visual acuity and loss of peripheral visual field. Patients with buried optic disc drusen have not been as well characterized. METHODS:An observational, retrospective review was made of 92 eyes with funduscopic or ultrasonographic evidence of optic disc drusen. Demographics, presenting symptoms, visual acuity, refractive error, intraocular pressure, presence of an afferent pupillary defect, cup-to-disc ratio, appearance of the optic nerve, and visual field were recorded. RESULTS:Fifty-one (55%) of the eyes were symptomatic; among them, 63% had symptoms of visual acuity loss, and 49% had symptoms of visual field loss. Seventy-nine (86%) of the optic discs appeared abnormal on ophthalmoscopy, but only 42% of these had visible drusen. Forty-five (49%) of the eyes had a visual field defect, and 73% of these were nerve fiber bundle in type. Overall, 73% of optic discs with visible drusen had abnormal visual fields compared with only 36% of optic discs with buried drusen (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Among 92 eyes with optic disc drusen, only slightly more than 50% produced visual symptoms. Fewer than 50% of drusen were visible ophthalmoscopically. Buried optic disc drusen identified by ultrasound had a significantly lower frequency of associated visual field defects than did visible optic disc drusen.
ISSN:1070-8022
1536-5166
DOI:10.1097/00041327-200406000-00006