A theory for normalizing resting .VO(2) for differences in body size

The purpose of this paper was two-fold: 1) to present a method of normalizing data for differences in body size that is consistent with the dimensional relationship between mass and power, and can be universally applied to subjects of any age, sex, or size without statistical cross-validation; and 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2002-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1382-1390
Hauptverfasser: McCann, Daniel J, Adams, William C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1390
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1382
container_title Medicine and science in sports and exercise
container_volume 34
creator McCann, Daniel J
Adams, William C
description The purpose of this paper was two-fold: 1) to present a method of normalizing data for differences in body size that is consistent with the dimensional relationship between mass and power, and can be universally applied to subjects of any age, sex, or size without statistical cross-validation; and 2) to apply the model to data gathered from boys, girls, men, and women to determine whether or not age- and sex-dependent differences in resting .VO(2) exist. Mass, percent body fat, and resting .VO(2) were measured in 39 boys, 40 girls, 40 men, and 40 women. Dimensional analysis predicted .VO(2) = a fat-free mass (FFM)2/3, with a defined as the size-independent metabolism of FFM. Bivariate correlation revealed the association between .VO(2) and FFM in children was consistent with biological similarity but not in men and women. Group mean .VO(2).FFM(-2/3) (mL.min(-1).kg(-2/3)) was significantly greater in children (21.7 +/- 2.62) than adults (16.7 +/- 2.30). Also, .VO(2).FFM(-2/3) of female subjects was significantly lower than male subjects in children (girls: 21.0 +/- 2.46; boys: 22.5 +/- 2.61) and adults (women: 15.0 +/- 2.39; men: 16.5 +/- 2.21). The dimensional paradigm indicated that mass exponents not equal to 2/3 simultaneously factor out size-dependent and size-independent differences that accompany differences in size. Therefore, size-independent comparisons can only be made using the theoretical mass exponent of 2/3. Also, the experimental results indicated that structural changes accompanying growth must be different from those hypothesized to be the cause of 3/4 scaling in adult animals of different size and species.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71992025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71992025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-25e8c68dc5fd693f9694c9457b21d3af243fb0e9576e5f1f9812f1a404d839be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j71OwzAYRT2AaCm8AvKEYAjyf_KNVaGAVKlLxRo58Wcwyh92M6RPT4EyneEeXd17RuaMg86ASz4jlyl9MsZyKfkFmXHBjTZg5uRxSfcf2MeJ-j7Sro-tbcIhdO80Ytr_8OFteyfuf2MXvMeIXY2Jho5WvZtoCge8IufeNgmvT1yQ3fppt3rJNtvn19Vykw1amUxoLGpTuFp7Z0B6MKBqUDqvBHfSeqGkrxiCzg1qzz0UXHhuFVOukFChXJDbv9oh9l_jcV7ZhlRj09gO-zGVOQcQTOijeHMSx6pFVw4xtDZO5f9t-Q29SlFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71992025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A theory for normalizing resting .VO(2) for differences in body size</title><source>Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>McCann, Daniel J ; Adams, William C</creator><creatorcontrib>McCann, Daniel J ; Adams, William C</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this paper was two-fold: 1) to present a method of normalizing data for differences in body size that is consistent with the dimensional relationship between mass and power, and can be universally applied to subjects of any age, sex, or size without statistical cross-validation; and 2) to apply the model to data gathered from boys, girls, men, and women to determine whether or not age- and sex-dependent differences in resting .VO(2) exist. Mass, percent body fat, and resting .VO(2) were measured in 39 boys, 40 girls, 40 men, and 40 women. Dimensional analysis predicted .VO(2) = a fat-free mass (FFM)2/3, with a defined as the size-independent metabolism of FFM. Bivariate correlation revealed the association between .VO(2) and FFM in children was consistent with biological similarity but not in men and women. Group mean .VO(2).FFM(-2/3) (mL.min(-1).kg(-2/3)) was significantly greater in children (21.7 +/- 2.62) than adults (16.7 +/- 2.30). Also, .VO(2).FFM(-2/3) of female subjects was significantly lower than male subjects in children (girls: 21.0 +/- 2.46; boys: 22.5 +/- 2.61) and adults (women: 15.0 +/- 2.39; men: 16.5 +/- 2.21). The dimensional paradigm indicated that mass exponents not equal to 2/3 simultaneously factor out size-dependent and size-independent differences that accompany differences in size. Therefore, size-independent comparisons can only be made using the theoretical mass exponent of 2/3. Also, the experimental results indicated that structural changes accompanying growth must be different from those hypothesized to be the cause of 3/4 scaling in adult animals of different size and species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12165696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Basal Metabolism - physiology ; Body Composition - physiology ; Body Constitution - physiology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Energy Metabolism ; Exercise - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Prospective Studies ; Sampling Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sex Factors ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2002-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1382-1390</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12165696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCann, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, William C</creatorcontrib><title>A theory for normalizing resting .VO(2) for differences in body size</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>The purpose of this paper was two-fold: 1) to present a method of normalizing data for differences in body size that is consistent with the dimensional relationship between mass and power, and can be universally applied to subjects of any age, sex, or size without statistical cross-validation; and 2) to apply the model to data gathered from boys, girls, men, and women to determine whether or not age- and sex-dependent differences in resting .VO(2) exist. Mass, percent body fat, and resting .VO(2) were measured in 39 boys, 40 girls, 40 men, and 40 women. Dimensional analysis predicted .VO(2) = a fat-free mass (FFM)2/3, with a defined as the size-independent metabolism of FFM. Bivariate correlation revealed the association between .VO(2) and FFM in children was consistent with biological similarity but not in men and women. Group mean .VO(2).FFM(-2/3) (mL.min(-1).kg(-2/3)) was significantly greater in children (21.7 +/- 2.62) than adults (16.7 +/- 2.30). Also, .VO(2).FFM(-2/3) of female subjects was significantly lower than male subjects in children (girls: 21.0 +/- 2.46; boys: 22.5 +/- 2.61) and adults (women: 15.0 +/- 2.39; men: 16.5 +/- 2.21). The dimensional paradigm indicated that mass exponents not equal to 2/3 simultaneously factor out size-dependent and size-independent differences that accompany differences in size. Therefore, size-independent comparisons can only be made using the theoretical mass exponent of 2/3. Also, the experimental results indicated that structural changes accompanying growth must be different from those hypothesized to be the cause of 3/4 scaling in adult animals of different size and species.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Basal Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Body Composition - physiology</subject><subject>Body Constitution - physiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j71OwzAYRT2AaCm8AvKEYAjyf_KNVaGAVKlLxRo58Wcwyh92M6RPT4EyneEeXd17RuaMg86ASz4jlyl9MsZyKfkFmXHBjTZg5uRxSfcf2MeJ-j7Sro-tbcIhdO80Ytr_8OFteyfuf2MXvMeIXY2Jho5WvZtoCge8IufeNgmvT1yQ3fppt3rJNtvn19Vykw1amUxoLGpTuFp7Z0B6MKBqUDqvBHfSeqGkrxiCzg1qzz0UXHhuFVOukFChXJDbv9oh9l_jcV7ZhlRj09gO-zGVOQcQTOijeHMSx6pFVw4xtDZO5f9t-Q29SlFk</recordid><startdate>200208</startdate><enddate>200208</enddate><creator>McCann, Daniel J</creator><creator>Adams, William C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200208</creationdate><title>A theory for normalizing resting .VO(2) for differences in body size</title><author>McCann, Daniel J ; Adams, William C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-25e8c68dc5fd693f9694c9457b21d3af243fb0e9576e5f1f9812f1a404d839be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Basal Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Body Composition - physiology</topic><topic>Body Constitution - physiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCann, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, William C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCann, Daniel J</au><au>Adams, William C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A theory for normalizing resting .VO(2) for differences in body size</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2002-08</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1382</spage><epage>1390</epage><pages>1382-1390</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><abstract>The purpose of this paper was two-fold: 1) to present a method of normalizing data for differences in body size that is consistent with the dimensional relationship between mass and power, and can be universally applied to subjects of any age, sex, or size without statistical cross-validation; and 2) to apply the model to data gathered from boys, girls, men, and women to determine whether or not age- and sex-dependent differences in resting .VO(2) exist. Mass, percent body fat, and resting .VO(2) were measured in 39 boys, 40 girls, 40 men, and 40 women. Dimensional analysis predicted .VO(2) = a fat-free mass (FFM)2/3, with a defined as the size-independent metabolism of FFM. Bivariate correlation revealed the association between .VO(2) and FFM in children was consistent with biological similarity but not in men and women. Group mean .VO(2).FFM(-2/3) (mL.min(-1).kg(-2/3)) was significantly greater in children (21.7 +/- 2.62) than adults (16.7 +/- 2.30). Also, .VO(2).FFM(-2/3) of female subjects was significantly lower than male subjects in children (girls: 21.0 +/- 2.46; boys: 22.5 +/- 2.61) and adults (women: 15.0 +/- 2.39; men: 16.5 +/- 2.21). The dimensional paradigm indicated that mass exponents not equal to 2/3 simultaneously factor out size-dependent and size-independent differences that accompany differences in size. Therefore, size-independent comparisons can only be made using the theoretical mass exponent of 2/3. Also, the experimental results indicated that structural changes accompanying growth must be different from those hypothesized to be the cause of 3/4 scaling in adult animals of different size and species.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12165696</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9131
ispartof Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2002-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1382-1390
issn 0195-9131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71992025
source Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive; MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Basal Metabolism - physiology
Body Composition - physiology
Body Constitution - physiology
Child
Child, Preschool
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Energy Metabolism
Exercise - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Oxygen Consumption - physiology
Prospective Studies
Sampling Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sex Factors
Space life sciences
title A theory for normalizing resting .VO(2) for differences in body size
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20theory%20for%20normalizing%20resting%20.VO(2)%20for%20differences%20in%20body%20size&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=McCann,%20Daniel%20J&rft.date=2002-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1382&rft.epage=1390&rft.pages=1382-1390&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71992025%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71992025&rft_id=info:pmid/12165696&rfr_iscdi=true