Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game

The “intentional stance” is the disposition to treat an entity as a rational agent, possessing particular beliefs, desires, and intentions, in order to interpret and predict it's behavior. The intentional stance is a component of a broader social cognitive function, mentalizing. Here we report...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2002-07, Vol.16 (3), p.814-821
Hauptverfasser: Gallagher, Helen L., Jack, Anthony I., Roepstorff, Andreas, Frith, Christopher D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 821
container_issue 3
container_start_page 814
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 16
creator Gallagher, Helen L.
Jack, Anthony I.
Roepstorff, Andreas
Frith, Christopher D.
description The “intentional stance” is the disposition to treat an entity as a rational agent, possessing particular beliefs, desires, and intentions, in order to interpret and predict it's behavior. The intentional stance is a component of a broader social cognitive function, mentalizing. Here we report a study that investigates the neural substrates of “on-line” mentalizing, using PET, by asking volunteers to second-guess an opponent. In order to identify brain activity specifically associated with adoption of an intentional stance, we used a paradigm that allowed tight control of other cognitive demands. Volunteers played a computerised version of the children's game “stone, paper, scissors.” In the mentalizing condition volunteers believed they were playing against the experimenter. In the comparison condition, volunteers believed they were playing against a computer. In fact, during the actual scanning, the “opponent” produced a random sequence in both conditions. The only difference was the attitude, or stance, adopted by the volunteer. Only one region was more active when volunteers adopted the intentional stance. This was in anterior paracingulate cortex (bilaterally). This region has been activated in a number of previous studies involving mentalizing. However, this is the first study suggesting a specific link between activity in this brain region and the adoption of an intentional stance.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/nimg.2002.1117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71988748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811902911171</els_id><sourcerecordid>71988748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ed284f2fd2e2d648871d4f2d35da7a74f9679918a7a5aa81aa309ea261a300303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFLwzAUh4MoTqdXj9KTt9a8NG2Towydg4EH9Rxi8zojTTqbbOB_b8oGnjy934Pv_eB9hNwALYDS-t5btykYpawAgOaEXACVVS6rhp1OuSpzASBn5DKEL0qpBC7OyQwY1JLV1QXhK6c31m-y-InZykf00Q5e99lr1L7FzPpMZ4vBbTHaaPeYLbXDK3LW6T7g9XHOyfvT49viOV-_LFeLh3Xecl7HHA0TvGOdYchMzYVowKTdlJXRjW54J-tGShBpqbQWoHVJJWpWQwq0pOWc3B16t-PwvcMQlbOhxb7XHoddUA3IVMpFAosD2I5DCCN2ajtap8cfBVRNntTkSU2e1OQpHdwem3cfDs0ffhSTAHEAMP23tziq0FpMRowdsY3KDPa_7l_353VH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71988748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gallagher, Helen L. ; Jack, Anthony I. ; Roepstorff, Andreas ; Frith, Christopher D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Helen L. ; Jack, Anthony I. ; Roepstorff, Andreas ; Frith, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><description>The “intentional stance” is the disposition to treat an entity as a rational agent, possessing particular beliefs, desires, and intentions, in order to interpret and predict it's behavior. The intentional stance is a component of a broader social cognitive function, mentalizing. Here we report a study that investigates the neural substrates of “on-line” mentalizing, using PET, by asking volunteers to second-guess an opponent. In order to identify brain activity specifically associated with adoption of an intentional stance, we used a paradigm that allowed tight control of other cognitive demands. Volunteers played a computerised version of the children's game “stone, paper, scissors.” In the mentalizing condition volunteers believed they were playing against the experimenter. In the comparison condition, volunteers believed they were playing against a computer. In fact, during the actual scanning, the “opponent” produced a random sequence in both conditions. The only difference was the attitude, or stance, adopted by the volunteer. Only one region was more active when volunteers adopted the intentional stance. This was in anterior paracingulate cortex (bilaterally). This region has been activated in a number of previous studies involving mentalizing. However, this is the first study suggesting a specific link between activity in this brain region and the adoption of an intentional stance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12169265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Cognition - physiology ; Games, Experimental ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Mental Processes - physiology ; Posture ; Reaction Time ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Video Games</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2002-07, Vol.16 (3), p.814-821</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ed284f2fd2e2d648871d4f2d35da7a74f9679918a7a5aa81aa309ea261a300303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ed284f2fd2e2d648871d4f2d35da7a74f9679918a7a5aa81aa309ea261a300303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811902911171$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12169265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Anthony I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roepstorff, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frith, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>The “intentional stance” is the disposition to treat an entity as a rational agent, possessing particular beliefs, desires, and intentions, in order to interpret and predict it's behavior. The intentional stance is a component of a broader social cognitive function, mentalizing. Here we report a study that investigates the neural substrates of “on-line” mentalizing, using PET, by asking volunteers to second-guess an opponent. In order to identify brain activity specifically associated with adoption of an intentional stance, we used a paradigm that allowed tight control of other cognitive demands. Volunteers played a computerised version of the children's game “stone, paper, scissors.” In the mentalizing condition volunteers believed they were playing against the experimenter. In the comparison condition, volunteers believed they were playing against a computer. In fact, during the actual scanning, the “opponent” produced a random sequence in both conditions. The only difference was the attitude, or stance, adopted by the volunteer. Only one region was more active when volunteers adopted the intentional stance. This was in anterior paracingulate cortex (bilaterally). This region has been activated in a number of previous studies involving mentalizing. However, this is the first study suggesting a specific link between activity in this brain region and the adoption of an intentional stance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Games, Experimental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Processes - physiology</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Video Games</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFLwzAUh4MoTqdXj9KTt9a8NG2Towydg4EH9Rxi8zojTTqbbOB_b8oGnjy934Pv_eB9hNwALYDS-t5btykYpawAgOaEXACVVS6rhp1OuSpzASBn5DKEL0qpBC7OyQwY1JLV1QXhK6c31m-y-InZykf00Q5e99lr1L7FzPpMZ4vBbTHaaPeYLbXDK3LW6T7g9XHOyfvT49viOV-_LFeLh3Xecl7HHA0TvGOdYchMzYVowKTdlJXRjW54J-tGShBpqbQWoHVJJWpWQwq0pOWc3B16t-PwvcMQlbOhxb7XHoddUA3IVMpFAosD2I5DCCN2ajtap8cfBVRNntTkSU2e1OQpHdwem3cfDs0ffhSTAHEAMP23tziq0FpMRowdsY3KDPa_7l_353VH</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>Gallagher, Helen L.</creator><creator>Jack, Anthony I.</creator><creator>Roepstorff, Andreas</creator><creator>Frith, Christopher D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game</title><author>Gallagher, Helen L. ; Jack, Anthony I. ; Roepstorff, Andreas ; Frith, Christopher D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ed284f2fd2e2d648871d4f2d35da7a74f9679918a7a5aa81aa309ea261a300303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Games, Experimental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Processes - physiology</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Video Games</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Anthony I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roepstorff, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frith, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallagher, Helen L.</au><au>Jack, Anthony I.</au><au>Roepstorff, Andreas</au><au>Frith, Christopher D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>814</spage><epage>821</epage><pages>814-821</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>The “intentional stance” is the disposition to treat an entity as a rational agent, possessing particular beliefs, desires, and intentions, in order to interpret and predict it's behavior. The intentional stance is a component of a broader social cognitive function, mentalizing. Here we report a study that investigates the neural substrates of “on-line” mentalizing, using PET, by asking volunteers to second-guess an opponent. In order to identify brain activity specifically associated with adoption of an intentional stance, we used a paradigm that allowed tight control of other cognitive demands. Volunteers played a computerised version of the children's game “stone, paper, scissors.” In the mentalizing condition volunteers believed they were playing against the experimenter. In the comparison condition, volunteers believed they were playing against a computer. In fact, during the actual scanning, the “opponent” produced a random sequence in both conditions. The only difference was the attitude, or stance, adopted by the volunteer. Only one region was more active when volunteers adopted the intentional stance. This was in anterior paracingulate cortex (bilaterally). This region has been activated in a number of previous studies involving mentalizing. However, this is the first study suggesting a specific link between activity in this brain region and the adoption of an intentional stance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12169265</pmid><doi>10.1006/nimg.2002.1117</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2002-07, Vol.16 (3), p.814-821
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71988748
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping - methods
Cognition - physiology
Games, Experimental
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Mental Processes - physiology
Posture
Reaction Time
Tomography, Emission-Computed
Video Games
title Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A55%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20the%20Intentional%20Stance%20in%20a%20Competitive%20Game&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Gallagher,%20Helen%20L.&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=814&rft.epage=821&rft.pages=814-821&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/nimg.2002.1117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71988748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71988748&rft_id=info:pmid/12169265&rft_els_id=S1053811902911171&rfr_iscdi=true