A random cluster survey and a convenience sample give comparable estimates of immunity to vaccine preventable diseases in children of school age in Victoria, Australia

We compared estimates of the age-specific population immunity to measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B and varicella zoster viruses in Victorian school children obtained by a national sero-survey, using a convenience sample of residual sera from diagnostic laboratories throughout Australia, with thos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2002-08, Vol.20 (25), p.3130-3136
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, Heath, Riddell, Michaela A, Gidding, Heather F, Nolan, Terry, Gilbert, Gwendolyn L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3136
container_issue 25
container_start_page 3130
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 20
creator Kelly, Heath
Riddell, Michaela A
Gidding, Heather F
Nolan, Terry
Gilbert, Gwendolyn L
description We compared estimates of the age-specific population immunity to measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B and varicella zoster viruses in Victorian school children obtained by a national sero-survey, using a convenience sample of residual sera from diagnostic laboratories throughout Australia, with those from a three-stage random cluster survey. When grouped according to school age (primary or secondary school) there was no significant difference in the estimates of immunity to measles, mumps, hepatitis B or varicella. Compared with the convenience sample, the random cluster survey estimated higher immunity to rubella in samples from both primary (98.7% versus 93.6%, P=0.002) and secondary school students (98.4% versus 93.2%, P=0.03). Despite some limitations, this study suggests that the collection of a convenience sample of sera from diagnostic laboratories is an appropriate sampling strategy to provide population immunity data that will inform Australia’s current and future immunisation policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00255-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71986477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X02002554</els_id><sourcerecordid>71986477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-30819263942147a4b610bdaa80aa5c24631b972cc95e5c072d5401c96b6619533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAQgC0EokvhEUC-gFqJgP-TnNCqooBUiQM_4mZNnNnWKImDnUTaJ-I1cXZX9AYnyzPfjMfzEfKcszeccfP2CxNGFYqzHxdMXDImtC7UA7LhVSkLoXn1kGz-ImfkSUo_GWNa8voxOeOCG5mTG_J7SyMMbeip6-Y0YaRpjgvuaQ5SoC4MCw4eB4c0QT92SG_9gjnejxChyXdMk-9hwkTDjvq-nwc_7ekU6ALO-QHpGDH3mA5w6xNCyqwfqLvzXRtxWOuSuwuho3CLa-a7d1OIHl7TbZ4pQufhKXm0gy7hs9N5Tr5dv_969bG4-fzh09X2pnBKqKmQrOK1MLJWgqsSVGM4a1qAigFoJ5SRvKlL4VytUTtWilYrxl1tGmN4raU8J6-OfccYfs35b7b3yWHXwYBhTrbkdWVUWWbw4p8g14yVtRaGZ1QfURdDShF3dox5ZXFvObOrTHuQaVdTlgl7kGlVrntxemJuemzvq072MvDyBEBy0O2ySefTPScrJaVaB3h35DBvbvEYbXIHp62P6CbbBv-fUf4AcrO9OQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500795261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A random cluster survey and a convenience sample give comparable estimates of immunity to vaccine preventable diseases in children of school age in Victoria, Australia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kelly, Heath ; Riddell, Michaela A ; Gidding, Heather F ; Nolan, Terry ; Gilbert, Gwendolyn L</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Heath ; Riddell, Michaela A ; Gidding, Heather F ; Nolan, Terry ; Gilbert, Gwendolyn L</creatorcontrib><description>We compared estimates of the age-specific population immunity to measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B and varicella zoster viruses in Victorian school children obtained by a national sero-survey, using a convenience sample of residual sera from diagnostic laboratories throughout Australia, with those from a three-stage random cluster survey. When grouped according to school age (primary or secondary school) there was no significant difference in the estimates of immunity to measles, mumps, hepatitis B or varicella. Compared with the convenience sample, the random cluster survey estimated higher immunity to rubella in samples from both primary (98.7% versus 93.6%, P=0.002) and secondary school students (98.4% versus 93.2%, P=0.03). Despite some limitations, this study suggests that the collection of a convenience sample of sera from diagnostic laboratories is an appropriate sampling strategy to provide population immunity data that will inform Australia’s current and future immunisation policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00255-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12163264</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Antibodies, Viral - immunology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Specimen Collection - economics ; Chickenpox - prevention &amp; control ; Child ; Cluster Analysis ; Cluster survey ; Data Collection - economics ; Disease Susceptibility ; Female ; Health Policy ; Health Surveys ; Hepatitis B - prevention &amp; control ; Hepatitis B Antibodies - blood ; Hepatitis B Antibodies - immunology ; Hepatitis B virus ; Humans ; Immunization Programs ; Male ; Measles - prevention &amp; control ; Measles virus - immunology ; Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine ; Medical sciences ; Mumps - prevention &amp; control ; Mumps virus - immunology ; Population immunity data ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Random Allocation ; Rubella virus - immunology ; Sampling Studies ; Seroepidemiologic Studies ; Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) ; Vaccination ; Victoria - epidemiology ; Victorian school children</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2002-08, Vol.20 (25), p.3130-3136</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-30819263942147a4b610bdaa80aa5c24631b972cc95e5c072d5401c96b6619533</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X02002554$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13843341$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12163264$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Heath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riddell, Michaela A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gidding, Heather F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Gwendolyn L</creatorcontrib><title>A random cluster survey and a convenience sample give comparable estimates of immunity to vaccine preventable diseases in children of school age in Victoria, Australia</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>We compared estimates of the age-specific population immunity to measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B and varicella zoster viruses in Victorian school children obtained by a national sero-survey, using a convenience sample of residual sera from diagnostic laboratories throughout Australia, with those from a three-stage random cluster survey. When grouped according to school age (primary or secondary school) there was no significant difference in the estimates of immunity to measles, mumps, hepatitis B or varicella. Compared with the convenience sample, the random cluster survey estimated higher immunity to rubella in samples from both primary (98.7% versus 93.6%, P=0.002) and secondary school students (98.4% versus 93.2%, P=0.03). Despite some limitations, this study suggests that the collection of a convenience sample of sera from diagnostic laboratories is an appropriate sampling strategy to provide population immunity data that will inform Australia’s current and future immunisation policies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - economics</subject><subject>Chickenpox - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Cluster survey</subject><subject>Data Collection - economics</subject><subject>Disease Susceptibility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Antibodies - immunology</subject><subject>Hepatitis B virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization Programs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measles - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Measles virus - immunology</subject><subject>Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mumps - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Mumps virus - immunology</subject><subject>Population immunity data</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rubella virus - immunology</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Seroepidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Victoria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Victorian school children</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAQgC0EokvhEUC-gFqJgP-TnNCqooBUiQM_4mZNnNnWKImDnUTaJ-I1cXZX9AYnyzPfjMfzEfKcszeccfP2CxNGFYqzHxdMXDImtC7UA7LhVSkLoXn1kGz-ImfkSUo_GWNa8voxOeOCG5mTG_J7SyMMbeip6-Y0YaRpjgvuaQ5SoC4MCw4eB4c0QT92SG_9gjnejxChyXdMk-9hwkTDjvq-nwc_7ekU6ALO-QHpGDH3mA5w6xNCyqwfqLvzXRtxWOuSuwuho3CLa-a7d1OIHl7TbZ4pQufhKXm0gy7hs9N5Tr5dv_969bG4-fzh09X2pnBKqKmQrOK1MLJWgqsSVGM4a1qAigFoJ5SRvKlL4VytUTtWilYrxl1tGmN4raU8J6-OfccYfs35b7b3yWHXwYBhTrbkdWVUWWbw4p8g14yVtRaGZ1QfURdDShF3dox5ZXFvObOrTHuQaVdTlgl7kGlVrntxemJuemzvq072MvDyBEBy0O2ySefTPScrJaVaB3h35DBvbvEYbXIHp62P6CbbBv-fUf4AcrO9OQ</recordid><startdate>20020819</startdate><enddate>20020819</enddate><creator>Kelly, Heath</creator><creator>Riddell, Michaela A</creator><creator>Gidding, Heather F</creator><creator>Nolan, Terry</creator><creator>Gilbert, Gwendolyn L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020819</creationdate><title>A random cluster survey and a convenience sample give comparable estimates of immunity to vaccine preventable diseases in children of school age in Victoria, Australia</title><author>Kelly, Heath ; Riddell, Michaela A ; Gidding, Heather F ; Nolan, Terry ; Gilbert, Gwendolyn L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-30819263942147a4b610bdaa80aa5c24631b972cc95e5c072d5401c96b6619533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - economics</topic><topic>Chickenpox - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Cluster survey</topic><topic>Data Collection - economics</topic><topic>Disease Susceptibility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Antibodies - immunology</topic><topic>Hepatitis B virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization Programs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measles - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Measles virus - immunology</topic><topic>Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mumps - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Mumps virus - immunology</topic><topic>Population immunity data</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rubella virus - immunology</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Seroepidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Victoria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Victorian school children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Heath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riddell, Michaela A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gidding, Heather F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Gwendolyn L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Heath</au><au>Riddell, Michaela A</au><au>Gidding, Heather F</au><au>Nolan, Terry</au><au>Gilbert, Gwendolyn L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A random cluster survey and a convenience sample give comparable estimates of immunity to vaccine preventable diseases in children of school age in Victoria, Australia</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2002-08-19</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>3130</spage><epage>3136</epage><pages>3130-3136</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>We compared estimates of the age-specific population immunity to measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B and varicella zoster viruses in Victorian school children obtained by a national sero-survey, using a convenience sample of residual sera from diagnostic laboratories throughout Australia, with those from a three-stage random cluster survey. When grouped according to school age (primary or secondary school) there was no significant difference in the estimates of immunity to measles, mumps, hepatitis B or varicella. Compared with the convenience sample, the random cluster survey estimated higher immunity to rubella in samples from both primary (98.7% versus 93.6%, P=0.002) and secondary school students (98.4% versus 93.2%, P=0.03). Despite some limitations, this study suggests that the collection of a convenience sample of sera from diagnostic laboratories is an appropriate sampling strategy to provide population immunity data that will inform Australia’s current and future immunisation policies.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12163264</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00255-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2002-08, Vol.20 (25), p.3130-3136
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71986477
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Age Factors
Antibodies, Viral - blood
Antibodies, Viral - immunology
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Specimen Collection - economics
Chickenpox - prevention & control
Child
Cluster Analysis
Cluster survey
Data Collection - economics
Disease Susceptibility
Female
Health Policy
Health Surveys
Hepatitis B - prevention & control
Hepatitis B Antibodies - blood
Hepatitis B Antibodies - immunology
Hepatitis B virus
Humans
Immunization Programs
Male
Measles - prevention & control
Measles virus - immunology
Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
Medical sciences
Mumps - prevention & control
Mumps virus - immunology
Population immunity data
Prevention and actions
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Random Allocation
Rubella virus - immunology
Sampling Studies
Seroepidemiologic Studies
Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)
Vaccination
Victoria - epidemiology
Victorian school children
title A random cluster survey and a convenience sample give comparable estimates of immunity to vaccine preventable diseases in children of school age in Victoria, Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A14%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20random%20cluster%20survey%20and%20a%20convenience%20sample%20give%20comparable%20estimates%20of%20immunity%20to%20vaccine%20preventable%20diseases%20in%20children%20of%20school%20age%20in%20Victoria,%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Kelly,%20Heath&rft.date=2002-08-19&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=3130&rft.epage=3136&rft.pages=3130-3136&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00255-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71986477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500795261&rft_id=info:pmid/12163264&rft_els_id=S0264410X02002554&rfr_iscdi=true