Comparison between High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Determination of 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in Human Urine

8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), which has been regarded as a potential marker of oxidative DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species, was measured in human urine by a commercial ELISA using a monoclonal antibody N45.1 and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to an elec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2002-08, Vol.11 (8), p.767-770
Hauptverfasser: SHIMOI, Kayoko, KASAI, Hiroshi, YOKOTA, Naoko, TOYOKUNI, Shinya, KINAE, Naohide
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 770
container_issue 8
container_start_page 767
container_title Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention
container_volume 11
creator SHIMOI, Kayoko
KASAI, Hiroshi
YOKOTA, Naoko
TOYOKUNI, Shinya
KINAE, Naohide
description 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), which has been regarded as a potential marker of oxidative DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species, was measured in human urine by a commercial ELISA using a monoclonal antibody N45.1 and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to an electrochemical detector (HPLC-ECD) to evaluate whether the ELISA system is applicable to human monitoring studies. The urine samples were collected from 120 healthy men ages 18–58 in a steel-manufacturing company. A good correlation ( r = 0.833; P < 0.0001) was observed between the two methods on HPLC-purified 8-OH-dG fractions from 23 urine samples. The mean value (±SD) of 8-OH-dG (μg/g creatinine) was 5.47 (±2.97) by HPLC-ECD assay and 5.50 (±2.36) by ELISA. However, the correlation ( r ) between the two methods on 120 original urine samples was 0.460 [ P < 0.001; mean value (±SD) of 8-OH-dG (μg/g creatinine) was 4.46 (±2.03) by the HPLC assay and 9.33 (±3.23) by ELISA]. ELISA estimates were about 2-fold higher than the HPLC estimates on original urine. For an unknown reason, 10% of the urine samples showed more than a 4-fold increase in value by ELISA. It is suggested that the ELISA system is applicable for comparative human monitoring studies. Prepurification of ‘samples is required to determine the absolute value of 8-OH-dG in individual urine samples by ELISA.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71979833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71979833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h269t-a25a44848d63549a4dfdd8be3387a7be1fad8f3fe06cbc37dd0087d0b11423453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9O3DAQhyNUBHTbV0C-tD1ZiuM4do5o-bNIK7UHOEeTeLIxje3FTgThxMv0BfpIfZK6YlFPMyN985vRd5SdMcEVlVKID6nPhaB1XYnT7GOMD3mey1qIk-yUFazinLOz7Nfa2z0EE70jLU5PiI5szG6gPzD0PlhwHZKteZyNJusheAuT3wXYDwsBp8mVe1ks0tG4n6jJrbWz89GHFt1ELmKEhaQQMg1ILnHCYI2DyaRTvieKbhYd_PNCiz-vv6nG1O5mSPvGITHpjTldJ_chjZ-y4x7GiJ8PdZXdX1_drTd0-_3mdn2xpUNR1ROFQkBZqlLpiouyhlL3WqsWOVcSZIusB6163mNedW3HpdZ5rqTOW8bKgpeCr7Kvb7n74B9njFNjTexwHMGhn2MjWS1rlcytsvMDOLcWdbMPxkJYmnexCfhyACB2MPYhiTTxP8dVWaSwxH1744Yk_ckEbLp_ykPAiBC6oWGsUY2sJP8LLtSVIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71979833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Determination of 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in Human Urine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>SHIMOI, Kayoko ; KASAI, Hiroshi ; YOKOTA, Naoko ; TOYOKUNI, Shinya ; KINAE, Naohide</creator><creatorcontrib>SHIMOI, Kayoko ; KASAI, Hiroshi ; YOKOTA, Naoko ; TOYOKUNI, Shinya ; KINAE, Naohide</creatorcontrib><description>8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), which has been regarded as a potential marker of oxidative DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species, was measured in human urine by a commercial ELISA using a monoclonal antibody N45.1 and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to an electrochemical detector (HPLC-ECD) to evaluate whether the ELISA system is applicable to human monitoring studies. The urine samples were collected from 120 healthy men ages 18–58 in a steel-manufacturing company. A good correlation ( r = 0.833; P &lt; 0.0001) was observed between the two methods on HPLC-purified 8-OH-dG fractions from 23 urine samples. The mean value (±SD) of 8-OH-dG (μg/g creatinine) was 5.47 (±2.97) by HPLC-ECD assay and 5.50 (±2.36) by ELISA. However, the correlation ( r ) between the two methods on 120 original urine samples was 0.460 [ P &lt; 0.001; mean value (±SD) of 8-OH-dG (μg/g creatinine) was 4.46 (±2.03) by the HPLC assay and 9.33 (±3.23) by ELISA]. ELISA estimates were about 2-fold higher than the HPLC estimates on original urine. For an unknown reason, 10% of the urine samples showed more than a 4-fold increase in value by ELISA. It is suggested that the ELISA system is applicable for comparative human monitoring studies. Prepurification of ‘samples is required to determine the absolute value of 8-OH-dG in individual urine samples by ELISA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-9965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7755</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12163331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Deoxyguanosine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Deoxyguanosine - urine ; DNA Damage ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Host-tumor relations. Immunology. Biological markers ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specimen Handling ; Tumors ; Urinalysis</subject><ispartof>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention, 2002-08, Vol.11 (8), p.767-770</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13842197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12163331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHIMOI, Kayoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KASAI, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOKOTA, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOYOKUNI, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KINAE, Naohide</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Determination of 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in Human Urine</title><title>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</title><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><description>8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), which has been regarded as a potential marker of oxidative DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species, was measured in human urine by a commercial ELISA using a monoclonal antibody N45.1 and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to an electrochemical detector (HPLC-ECD) to evaluate whether the ELISA system is applicable to human monitoring studies. The urine samples were collected from 120 healthy men ages 18–58 in a steel-manufacturing company. A good correlation ( r = 0.833; P &lt; 0.0001) was observed between the two methods on HPLC-purified 8-OH-dG fractions from 23 urine samples. The mean value (±SD) of 8-OH-dG (μg/g creatinine) was 5.47 (±2.97) by HPLC-ECD assay and 5.50 (±2.36) by ELISA. However, the correlation ( r ) between the two methods on 120 original urine samples was 0.460 [ P &lt; 0.001; mean value (±SD) of 8-OH-dG (μg/g creatinine) was 4.46 (±2.03) by the HPLC assay and 9.33 (±3.23) by ELISA]. ELISA estimates were about 2-fold higher than the HPLC estimates on original urine. For an unknown reason, 10% of the urine samples showed more than a 4-fold increase in value by ELISA. It is suggested that the ELISA system is applicable for comparative human monitoring studies. Prepurification of ‘samples is required to determine the absolute value of 8-OH-dG in individual urine samples by ELISA.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>Deoxyguanosine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Deoxyguanosine - urine</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Host-tumor relations. Immunology. Biological markers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urinalysis</subject><issn>1055-9965</issn><issn>1538-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM9O3DAQhyNUBHTbV0C-tD1ZiuM4do5o-bNIK7UHOEeTeLIxje3FTgThxMv0BfpIfZK6YlFPMyN985vRd5SdMcEVlVKID6nPhaB1XYnT7GOMD3mey1qIk-yUFazinLOz7Nfa2z0EE70jLU5PiI5szG6gPzD0PlhwHZKteZyNJusheAuT3wXYDwsBp8mVe1ks0tG4n6jJrbWz89GHFt1ELmKEhaQQMg1ILnHCYI2DyaRTvieKbhYd_PNCiz-vv6nG1O5mSPvGITHpjTldJ_chjZ-y4x7GiJ8PdZXdX1_drTd0-_3mdn2xpUNR1ROFQkBZqlLpiouyhlL3WqsWOVcSZIusB6163mNedW3HpdZ5rqTOW8bKgpeCr7Kvb7n74B9njFNjTexwHMGhn2MjWS1rlcytsvMDOLcWdbMPxkJYmnexCfhyACB2MPYhiTTxP8dVWaSwxH1744Yk_ckEbLp_ykPAiBC6oWGsUY2sJP8LLtSVIA</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>SHIMOI, Kayoko</creator><creator>KASAI, Hiroshi</creator><creator>YOKOTA, Naoko</creator><creator>TOYOKUNI, Shinya</creator><creator>KINAE, Naohide</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Comparison between High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Determination of 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in Human Urine</title><author>SHIMOI, Kayoko ; KASAI, Hiroshi ; YOKOTA, Naoko ; TOYOKUNI, Shinya ; KINAE, Naohide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h269t-a25a44848d63549a4dfdd8be3387a7be1fad8f3fe06cbc37dd0087d0b11423453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>Deoxyguanosine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Deoxyguanosine - urine</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Host-tumor relations. Immunology. Biological markers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urinalysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHIMOI, Kayoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KASAI, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOKOTA, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOYOKUNI, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KINAE, Naohide</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHIMOI, Kayoko</au><au>KASAI, Hiroshi</au><au>YOKOTA, Naoko</au><au>TOYOKUNI, Shinya</au><au>KINAE, Naohide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Determination of 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in Human Urine</atitle><jtitle>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</addtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>770</epage><pages>767-770</pages><issn>1055-9965</issn><eissn>1538-7755</eissn><abstract>8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), which has been regarded as a potential marker of oxidative DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species, was measured in human urine by a commercial ELISA using a monoclonal antibody N45.1 and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to an electrochemical detector (HPLC-ECD) to evaluate whether the ELISA system is applicable to human monitoring studies. The urine samples were collected from 120 healthy men ages 18–58 in a steel-manufacturing company. A good correlation ( r = 0.833; P &lt; 0.0001) was observed between the two methods on HPLC-purified 8-OH-dG fractions from 23 urine samples. The mean value (±SD) of 8-OH-dG (μg/g creatinine) was 5.47 (±2.97) by HPLC-ECD assay and 5.50 (±2.36) by ELISA. However, the correlation ( r ) between the two methods on 120 original urine samples was 0.460 [ P &lt; 0.001; mean value (±SD) of 8-OH-dG (μg/g creatinine) was 4.46 (±2.03) by the HPLC assay and 9.33 (±3.23) by ELISA]. ELISA estimates were about 2-fold higher than the HPLC estimates on original urine. For an unknown reason, 10% of the urine samples showed more than a 4-fold increase in value by ELISA. It is suggested that the ELISA system is applicable for comparative human monitoring studies. Prepurification of ‘samples is required to determine the absolute value of 8-OH-dG in individual urine samples by ELISA.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>12163331</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-9965
ispartof Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2002-08, Vol.11 (8), p.767-770
issn 1055-9965
1538-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71979833
source MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers - analysis
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Deoxyguanosine - analogs & derivatives
Deoxyguanosine - urine
DNA Damage
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Host-tumor relations. Immunology. Biological markers
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specimen Handling
Tumors
Urinalysis
title Comparison between High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Determination of 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in Human Urine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20High-Performance%20Liquid%20Chromatography%20and%20Enzyme-linked%20Immunosorbent%20Assay%20for%20the%20Determination%20of%208-Hydroxy-2%E2%80%B2-deoxyguanosine%20in%20Human%20Urine&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20epidemiology,%20biomarkers%20&%20prevention&rft.au=SHIMOI,%20Kayoko&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=770&rft.pages=767-770&rft.issn=1055-9965&rft.eissn=1538-7755&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71979833%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71979833&rft_id=info:pmid/12163331&rfr_iscdi=true