Reducing Loss of Image Quality Because of the Attenuation Artifact in Uncorrected PET Whole-Body Images
In whole-body PET, it is not unusual to shorten the study time by omitting the transmission scan and to ignore attenuation during reconstruction. If a transmission scan is available, many centers reconstruct the images with, but also without, attenuation correction. Although ignoring attenuation lea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 2002-08, Vol.43 (8), p.1054-1062 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1062 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1054 |
container_title | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Nuyts, Johan Stroobants, Sigrid Dupont, Patrick Vleugels, Stefaan Flamen, Patrick Mortelmans, Luc |
description | In whole-body PET, it is not unusual to shorten the study time by omitting the transmission scan and to ignore attenuation during reconstruction. If a transmission scan is available, many centers reconstruct the images with, but also without, attenuation correction. Although ignoring attenuation leads to an artifact in the reconstructed images, these images still provide valuable diagnostic information in oncologic applications. Several authors have reported that the attenuation artifact may actually increase the tumor-to-background ratio. In this study, we analyzed the causes of the artifact and proposed a new algorithm to reduce the adverse effects on visual image quality.
We analyzed the causes of the attenuation artifact mathematically and numerically, and we examined its effect on tumor-to-background ratio and on signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, we showed that the attenuation artifact may lead to loss of image detail in conventional maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction. A new maximum-likelihood algorithm allowing negative reconstruction values (NEG-ML) was derived to reduce this loss.
The attenuation artifact consists of 2 components. The first component is the well-known scaling effect: The apparent activity is reduced because attenuation decreases the fraction of detected photons. The second component is a relatively smooth negative contribution that is added to attenuated regions surrounded by activity. The second component tends to increase the tumor-to-background ratio. However, a simulation experiment shows that this increase in signal may be entirely offset by an increase in noise. The negative contribution can interfere with the nonnegativity constraint of the MLEM algorithm, leading to loss of image detail in regions of high attenuation. The new NEG-ML algorithm avoids the problem by allowing negative pixel values. The algorithm is similar to MLEM in the suppression of the streak artifact but provides more anatomic information. In our department, it is in routine clinical use for reconstruction of PET whole-body images without attenuation correction.
Ignoring attenuation may increase the tumor-to-background ratio, but this increase does not imply improved tumor detection. The NEG-ML algorithm reduces the adverse effect of the attenuation artifact on visual image quality. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71978594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71978594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h296t-85a9c2228b2c30d04e7f4670aa2ab7d9c425ffed82ee1890e08c61302133ce2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0FtLwzAUwPEiis7LV5AgqE-FXJo0fZziZTDwgsPHkqWna0abaC7Ivr2VTQSfzsP58edw9rIJ4YznXIhyP5tgIkjOOeZH2XEIa4yxkFIeZkeEEsEEo5Ns9QpN0sau0NyFgFyLZoNaAXpJqjdxg25AqxTgZxE7QNMYwSYVjbNo6qNplY7IWLSw2nkPOkKDnu_e0HvneshvXLPZ9sJpdtCqPsDZbp5ki_u7t9vHfP70MLudzvOOViLmkqtKU0rlkmqGG1xA2RaixEpRtSybSheUty00kgIQWWHAUgvCMCWMaaANO8mutt0P7z4ThFgPJmjoe2XBpVCXpColr4oRXvyDa5e8HW-rKakIL4gkIzrfobQcoKk_vBmU39S__xvB5Q6ooFXfemW1CX-OSVaVRI7ueus6s-q-jIfaJt2D8j_VtR0KVsuaYF6wbz25hkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219154181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing Loss of Image Quality Because of the Attenuation Artifact in Uncorrected PET Whole-Body Images</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Nuyts, Johan ; Stroobants, Sigrid ; Dupont, Patrick ; Vleugels, Stefaan ; Flamen, Patrick ; Mortelmans, Luc</creator><creatorcontrib>Nuyts, Johan ; Stroobants, Sigrid ; Dupont, Patrick ; Vleugels, Stefaan ; Flamen, Patrick ; Mortelmans, Luc</creatorcontrib><description>In whole-body PET, it is not unusual to shorten the study time by omitting the transmission scan and to ignore attenuation during reconstruction. If a transmission scan is available, many centers reconstruct the images with, but also without, attenuation correction. Although ignoring attenuation leads to an artifact in the reconstructed images, these images still provide valuable diagnostic information in oncologic applications. Several authors have reported that the attenuation artifact may actually increase the tumor-to-background ratio. In this study, we analyzed the causes of the artifact and proposed a new algorithm to reduce the adverse effects on visual image quality.
We analyzed the causes of the attenuation artifact mathematically and numerically, and we examined its effect on tumor-to-background ratio and on signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, we showed that the attenuation artifact may lead to loss of image detail in conventional maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction. A new maximum-likelihood algorithm allowing negative reconstruction values (NEG-ML) was derived to reduce this loss.
The attenuation artifact consists of 2 components. The first component is the well-known scaling effect: The apparent activity is reduced because attenuation decreases the fraction of detected photons. The second component is a relatively smooth negative contribution that is added to attenuated regions surrounded by activity. The second component tends to increase the tumor-to-background ratio. However, a simulation experiment shows that this increase in signal may be entirely offset by an increase in noise. The negative contribution can interfere with the nonnegativity constraint of the MLEM algorithm, leading to loss of image detail in regions of high attenuation. The new NEG-ML algorithm avoids the problem by allowing negative pixel values. The algorithm is similar to MLEM in the suppression of the streak artifact but provides more anatomic information. In our department, it is in routine clinical use for reconstruction of PET whole-body images without attenuation correction.
Ignoring attenuation may increase the tumor-to-background ratio, but this increase does not imply improved tumor detection. The NEG-ML algorithm reduces the adverse effect of the attenuation artifact on visual image quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12163632</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: Soc Nuclear Med</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Likelihood Functions ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous. Technology ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Radionuclide investigations ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Whole-Body Counting</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2002-08, Vol.43 (8), p.1054-1062</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13839718$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12163632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nuyts, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stroobants, Sigrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Stefaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamen, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortelmans, Luc</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing Loss of Image Quality Because of the Attenuation Artifact in Uncorrected PET Whole-Body Images</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>In whole-body PET, it is not unusual to shorten the study time by omitting the transmission scan and to ignore attenuation during reconstruction. If a transmission scan is available, many centers reconstruct the images with, but also without, attenuation correction. Although ignoring attenuation leads to an artifact in the reconstructed images, these images still provide valuable diagnostic information in oncologic applications. Several authors have reported that the attenuation artifact may actually increase the tumor-to-background ratio. In this study, we analyzed the causes of the artifact and proposed a new algorithm to reduce the adverse effects on visual image quality.
We analyzed the causes of the attenuation artifact mathematically and numerically, and we examined its effect on tumor-to-background ratio and on signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, we showed that the attenuation artifact may lead to loss of image detail in conventional maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction. A new maximum-likelihood algorithm allowing negative reconstruction values (NEG-ML) was derived to reduce this loss.
The attenuation artifact consists of 2 components. The first component is the well-known scaling effect: The apparent activity is reduced because attenuation decreases the fraction of detected photons. The second component is a relatively smooth negative contribution that is added to attenuated regions surrounded by activity. The second component tends to increase the tumor-to-background ratio. However, a simulation experiment shows that this increase in signal may be entirely offset by an increase in noise. The negative contribution can interfere with the nonnegativity constraint of the MLEM algorithm, leading to loss of image detail in regions of high attenuation. The new NEG-ML algorithm avoids the problem by allowing negative pixel values. The algorithm is similar to MLEM in the suppression of the streak artifact but provides more anatomic information. In our department, it is in routine clinical use for reconstruction of PET whole-body images without attenuation correction.
Ignoring attenuation may increase the tumor-to-background ratio, but this increase does not imply improved tumor detection. The NEG-ML algorithm reduces the adverse effect of the attenuation artifact on visual image quality.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radionuclide investigations</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Whole-Body Counting</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0FtLwzAUwPEiis7LV5AgqE-FXJo0fZziZTDwgsPHkqWna0abaC7Ivr2VTQSfzsP58edw9rIJ4YznXIhyP5tgIkjOOeZH2XEIa4yxkFIeZkeEEsEEo5Ns9QpN0sau0NyFgFyLZoNaAXpJqjdxg25AqxTgZxE7QNMYwSYVjbNo6qNplY7IWLSw2nkPOkKDnu_e0HvneshvXLPZ9sJpdtCqPsDZbp5ki_u7t9vHfP70MLudzvOOViLmkqtKU0rlkmqGG1xA2RaixEpRtSybSheUty00kgIQWWHAUgvCMCWMaaANO8mutt0P7z4ThFgPJmjoe2XBpVCXpColr4oRXvyDa5e8HW-rKakIL4gkIzrfobQcoKk_vBmU39S__xvB5Q6ooFXfemW1CX-OSVaVRI7ueus6s-q-jIfaJt2D8j_VtR0KVsuaYF6wbz25hkQ</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Nuyts, Johan</creator><creator>Stroobants, Sigrid</creator><creator>Dupont, Patrick</creator><creator>Vleugels, Stefaan</creator><creator>Flamen, Patrick</creator><creator>Mortelmans, Luc</creator><general>Soc Nuclear Med</general><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Reducing Loss of Image Quality Because of the Attenuation Artifact in Uncorrected PET Whole-Body Images</title><author>Nuyts, Johan ; Stroobants, Sigrid ; Dupont, Patrick ; Vleugels, Stefaan ; Flamen, Patrick ; Mortelmans, Luc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h296t-85a9c2228b2c30d04e7f4670aa2ab7d9c425ffed82ee1890e08c61302133ce2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Technology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radionuclide investigations</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Whole-Body Counting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nuyts, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stroobants, Sigrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Stefaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamen, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortelmans, Luc</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nuyts, Johan</au><au>Stroobants, Sigrid</au><au>Dupont, Patrick</au><au>Vleugels, Stefaan</au><au>Flamen, Patrick</au><au>Mortelmans, Luc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing Loss of Image Quality Because of the Attenuation Artifact in Uncorrected PET Whole-Body Images</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1054</spage><epage>1062</epage><pages>1054-1062</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>In whole-body PET, it is not unusual to shorten the study time by omitting the transmission scan and to ignore attenuation during reconstruction. If a transmission scan is available, many centers reconstruct the images with, but also without, attenuation correction. Although ignoring attenuation leads to an artifact in the reconstructed images, these images still provide valuable diagnostic information in oncologic applications. Several authors have reported that the attenuation artifact may actually increase the tumor-to-background ratio. In this study, we analyzed the causes of the artifact and proposed a new algorithm to reduce the adverse effects on visual image quality.
We analyzed the causes of the attenuation artifact mathematically and numerically, and we examined its effect on tumor-to-background ratio and on signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, we showed that the attenuation artifact may lead to loss of image detail in conventional maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction. A new maximum-likelihood algorithm allowing negative reconstruction values (NEG-ML) was derived to reduce this loss.
The attenuation artifact consists of 2 components. The first component is the well-known scaling effect: The apparent activity is reduced because attenuation decreases the fraction of detected photons. The second component is a relatively smooth negative contribution that is added to attenuated regions surrounded by activity. The second component tends to increase the tumor-to-background ratio. However, a simulation experiment shows that this increase in signal may be entirely offset by an increase in noise. The negative contribution can interfere with the nonnegativity constraint of the MLEM algorithm, leading to loss of image detail in regions of high attenuation. The new NEG-ML algorithm avoids the problem by allowing negative pixel values. The algorithm is similar to MLEM in the suppression of the streak artifact but provides more anatomic information. In our department, it is in routine clinical use for reconstruction of PET whole-body images without attenuation correction.
Ignoring attenuation may increase the tumor-to-background ratio, but this increase does not imply improved tumor detection. The NEG-ML algorithm reduces the adverse effect of the attenuation artifact on visual image quality.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>Soc Nuclear Med</pub><pmid>12163632</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2002-08, Vol.43 (8), p.1054-1062 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71978594 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Algorithms Biological and medical sciences Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Likelihood Functions Medical sciences Miscellaneous. Technology Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Radionuclide investigations Tomography, Emission-Computed Whole-Body Counting |
title | Reducing Loss of Image Quality Because of the Attenuation Artifact in Uncorrected PET Whole-Body Images |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A07%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20Loss%20of%20Image%20Quality%20Because%20of%20the%20Attenuation%20Artifact%20in%20Uncorrected%20PET%20Whole-Body%20Images&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Nuyts,%20Johan&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1054&rft.epage=1062&rft.pages=1054-1062&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71978594%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219154181&rft_id=info:pmid/12163632&rfr_iscdi=true |