Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study
The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative desig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of professional nursing 2004-03, Vol.20 (2), p.118-128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 128 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 118 |
container_title | Journal of professional nursing |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Wolf, Zane Robinson Bender, Pamela J Beitz, Janice M Wieland, Diane M Vito, Kathleen O |
description | The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71974751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8755722304000304</els_id><sourcerecordid>71974751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3af0223d48afc33f823c8cd1e972584c3eaff6ecce06967dd9e9bd534a2b12e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQtRCIhsJfqHzitou_dr3LCVRBi1SJA3C2HHucOiTexeMtyg_gf-M0AY7MZTSj9-bjPUKuOGs54_2bbTvnKaQlYysYUy2TLWPyCVnxTopmUAN_SlaD7rpGCyEvyAvELauhtHhOLnjHdc-4WpFfX0qGtCn3SG3y9CfY7wkQAekUaLBu2ZUDLWDdfUwbOkMOU97b5IBmmKdcwNP1gS7JQ95k6xdb4HHQ3-J44pGKZfGQCr6llnpAl-Nc4gM89g8vybNgdwivzvmSfPv44ev1bXP3-ebT9fu7xslelUbawOo3Xg02OCnDIKQbnOcwatENykmwIfTgHLB-7LX3I4xr30llxZoLGOQleX2aW8X7sQAWs4_oYLezCaYFjeajVrrjFdifgC5PiBmCmXPc23wwnJmjAWZr_hhgjgYYJk01oBKvzhuW9R78P9pZ8Qp4dwJA_fMhQjboIlRBfczgivFT_N-O3xsJn6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71974751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wolf, Zane Robinson ; Bender, Pamela J ; Beitz, Janice M ; Wieland, Diane M ; Vito, Kathleen O</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Zane Robinson ; Bender, Pamela J ; Beitz, Janice M ; Wieland, Diane M ; Vito, Kathleen O</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-7223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15176014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods ; Education, Nursing, Graduate - methods ; Employee Performance Appraisal ; Faculty teaching performance ; Faculty, Nursing ; Humans ; Nursing ; Retrospective Studies ; Strengths ; Teaching ; United States ; Weaknesses</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional nursing, 2004-03, Vol.20 (2), p.118-128</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3af0223d48afc33f823c8cd1e972584c3eaff6ecce06967dd9e9bd534a2b12e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3af0223d48afc33f823c8cd1e972584c3eaff6ecce06967dd9e9bd534a2b12e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15176014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Zane Robinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Pamela J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitz, Janice M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieland, Diane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vito, Kathleen O</creatorcontrib><title>Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study</title><title>Journal of professional nursing</title><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.</description><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>Employee Performance Appraisal</subject><subject>Faculty teaching performance</subject><subject>Faculty, Nursing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Strengths</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Weaknesses</subject><issn>8755-7223</issn><issn>1532-8481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQtRCIhsJfqHzitou_dr3LCVRBi1SJA3C2HHucOiTexeMtyg_gf-M0AY7MZTSj9-bjPUKuOGs54_2bbTvnKaQlYysYUy2TLWPyCVnxTopmUAN_SlaD7rpGCyEvyAvELauhtHhOLnjHdc-4WpFfX0qGtCn3SG3y9CfY7wkQAekUaLBu2ZUDLWDdfUwbOkMOU97b5IBmmKdcwNP1gS7JQ95k6xdb4HHQ3-J44pGKZfGQCr6llnpAl-Nc4gM89g8vybNgdwivzvmSfPv44ev1bXP3-ebT9fu7xslelUbawOo3Xg02OCnDIKQbnOcwatENykmwIfTgHLB-7LX3I4xr30llxZoLGOQleX2aW8X7sQAWs4_oYLezCaYFjeajVrrjFdifgC5PiBmCmXPc23wwnJmjAWZr_hhgjgYYJk01oBKvzhuW9R78P9pZ8Qp4dwJA_fMhQjboIlRBfczgivFT_N-O3xsJn6Y</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Wolf, Zane Robinson</creator><creator>Bender, Pamela J</creator><creator>Beitz, Janice M</creator><creator>Wieland, Diane M</creator><creator>Vito, Kathleen O</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study</title><author>Wolf, Zane Robinson ; Bender, Pamela J ; Beitz, Janice M ; Wieland, Diane M ; Vito, Kathleen O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3af0223d48afc33f823c8cd1e972584c3eaff6ecce06967dd9e9bd534a2b12e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>Employee Performance Appraisal</topic><topic>Faculty teaching performance</topic><topic>Faculty, Nursing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Strengths</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Weaknesses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Zane Robinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Pamela J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitz, Janice M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieland, Diane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vito, Kathleen O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolf, Zane Robinson</au><au>Bender, Pamela J</au><au>Beitz, Janice M</au><au>Wieland, Diane M</au><au>Vito, Kathleen O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>118-128</pages><issn>8755-7223</issn><eissn>1532-8481</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15176014</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-7223 |
ispartof | Journal of professional nursing, 2004-03, Vol.20 (2), p.118-128 |
issn | 8755-7223 1532-8481 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71974751 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods Education, Nursing, Graduate - methods Employee Performance Appraisal Faculty teaching performance Faculty, Nursing Humans Nursing Retrospective Studies Strengths Teaching United States Weaknesses |
title | Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A19%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strengths%20and%20weaknesses%20of%20faculty%20teaching%20performance%20reported%20by%20undergraduate%20and%20graduate%20nursing%20students:%20a%20descriptive%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20nursing&rft.au=Wolf,%20Zane%20Robinson&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=118-128&rft.issn=8755-7223&rft.eissn=1532-8481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71974751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71974751&rft_id=info:pmid/15176014&rft_els_id=S8755722304000304&rfr_iscdi=true |