Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study

The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative desig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of professional nursing 2004-03, Vol.20 (2), p.118-128
Hauptverfasser: Wolf, Zane Robinson, Bender, Pamela J, Beitz, Janice M, Wieland, Diane M, Vito, Kathleen O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 2
container_start_page 118
container_title Journal of professional nursing
container_volume 20
creator Wolf, Zane Robinson
Bender, Pamela J
Beitz, Janice M
Wieland, Diane M
Vito, Kathleen O
description The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71974751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8755722304000304</els_id><sourcerecordid>71974751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3af0223d48afc33f823c8cd1e972584c3eaff6ecce06967dd9e9bd534a2b12e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQtRCIhsJfqHzitou_dr3LCVRBi1SJA3C2HHucOiTexeMtyg_gf-M0AY7MZTSj9-bjPUKuOGs54_2bbTvnKaQlYysYUy2TLWPyCVnxTopmUAN_SlaD7rpGCyEvyAvELauhtHhOLnjHdc-4WpFfX0qGtCn3SG3y9CfY7wkQAekUaLBu2ZUDLWDdfUwbOkMOU97b5IBmmKdcwNP1gS7JQ95k6xdb4HHQ3-J44pGKZfGQCr6llnpAl-Nc4gM89g8vybNgdwivzvmSfPv44ev1bXP3-ebT9fu7xslelUbawOo3Xg02OCnDIKQbnOcwatENykmwIfTgHLB-7LX3I4xr30llxZoLGOQleX2aW8X7sQAWs4_oYLezCaYFjeajVrrjFdifgC5PiBmCmXPc23wwnJmjAWZr_hhgjgYYJk01oBKvzhuW9R78P9pZ8Qp4dwJA_fMhQjboIlRBfczgivFT_N-O3xsJn6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71974751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wolf, Zane Robinson ; Bender, Pamela J ; Beitz, Janice M ; Wieland, Diane M ; Vito, Kathleen O</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Zane Robinson ; Bender, Pamela J ; Beitz, Janice M ; Wieland, Diane M ; Vito, Kathleen O</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-7223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15176014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods ; Education, Nursing, Graduate - methods ; Employee Performance Appraisal ; Faculty teaching performance ; Faculty, Nursing ; Humans ; Nursing ; Retrospective Studies ; Strengths ; Teaching ; United States ; Weaknesses</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional nursing, 2004-03, Vol.20 (2), p.118-128</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3af0223d48afc33f823c8cd1e972584c3eaff6ecce06967dd9e9bd534a2b12e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3af0223d48afc33f823c8cd1e972584c3eaff6ecce06967dd9e9bd534a2b12e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15176014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Zane Robinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Pamela J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitz, Janice M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieland, Diane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vito, Kathleen O</creatorcontrib><title>Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study</title><title>Journal of professional nursing</title><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.</description><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>Employee Performance Appraisal</subject><subject>Faculty teaching performance</subject><subject>Faculty, Nursing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Strengths</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Weaknesses</subject><issn>8755-7223</issn><issn>1532-8481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQtRCIhsJfqHzitou_dr3LCVRBi1SJA3C2HHucOiTexeMtyg_gf-M0AY7MZTSj9-bjPUKuOGs54_2bbTvnKaQlYysYUy2TLWPyCVnxTopmUAN_SlaD7rpGCyEvyAvELauhtHhOLnjHdc-4WpFfX0qGtCn3SG3y9CfY7wkQAekUaLBu2ZUDLWDdfUwbOkMOU97b5IBmmKdcwNP1gS7JQ95k6xdb4HHQ3-J44pGKZfGQCr6llnpAl-Nc4gM89g8vybNgdwivzvmSfPv44ev1bXP3-ebT9fu7xslelUbawOo3Xg02OCnDIKQbnOcwatENykmwIfTgHLB-7LX3I4xr30llxZoLGOQleX2aW8X7sQAWs4_oYLezCaYFjeajVrrjFdifgC5PiBmCmXPc23wwnJmjAWZr_hhgjgYYJk01oBKvzhuW9R78P9pZ8Qp4dwJA_fMhQjboIlRBfczgivFT_N-O3xsJn6Y</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Wolf, Zane Robinson</creator><creator>Bender, Pamela J</creator><creator>Beitz, Janice M</creator><creator>Wieland, Diane M</creator><creator>Vito, Kathleen O</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study</title><author>Wolf, Zane Robinson ; Bender, Pamela J ; Beitz, Janice M ; Wieland, Diane M ; Vito, Kathleen O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3af0223d48afc33f823c8cd1e972584c3eaff6ecce06967dd9e9bd534a2b12e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>Employee Performance Appraisal</topic><topic>Faculty teaching performance</topic><topic>Faculty, Nursing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Strengths</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Weaknesses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Zane Robinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Pamela J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitz, Janice M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieland, Diane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vito, Kathleen O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolf, Zane Robinson</au><au>Bender, Pamela J</au><au>Beitz, Janice M</au><au>Wieland, Diane M</au><au>Vito, Kathleen O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Prof Nurs</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>118-128</pages><issn>8755-7223</issn><eissn>1532-8481</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to describe the patterns of strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance as reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students on a narrative section of a university faculty evaluation form. The study used a descriptive, retrospective, qualitative design. The summary forms represented a convenience sample of undergraduate and graduate nursing course sections (N = 317) taught by full-time and part-time nursing faculty from spring 1998 through fall 2002, including summer sessions. Course sections represented didactic and clinical education experiences. Content analysis was used to interpret the recorded comments representing strengths and weaknesses in faculty performance from students’ perspectives. Patterns and associated themes were derived. Faculty performance strengths included patterns such as being a knowledgeable and strategic teacher, creating a positive learning environment, demonstrating professionalism, displaying scholarly traits, and being supportive. Weaknesses included patterns such as poor delivery of content, acting disorganized, being inaccessible, displaying weak teaching skills, being dishonorable, being unprofessional, and displaying negative traits. Implications for continuous quality improvement in teaching/learning processes are presented.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15176014</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-7223
ispartof Journal of professional nursing, 2004-03, Vol.20 (2), p.118-128
issn 8755-7223
1532-8481
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71974751
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods
Education, Nursing, Graduate - methods
Employee Performance Appraisal
Faculty teaching performance
Faculty, Nursing
Humans
Nursing
Retrospective Studies
Strengths
Teaching
United States
Weaknesses
title Strengths and weaknesses of faculty teaching performance reported by undergraduate and graduate nursing students: a descriptive study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A19%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strengths%20and%20weaknesses%20of%20faculty%20teaching%20performance%20reported%20by%20undergraduate%20and%20graduate%20nursing%20students:%20a%20descriptive%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20nursing&rft.au=Wolf,%20Zane%20Robinson&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=118-128&rft.issn=8755-7223&rft.eissn=1532-8481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71974751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71974751&rft_id=info:pmid/15176014&rft_els_id=S8755722304000304&rfr_iscdi=true