Continuity of primary care clinician in early childhood

This study uses the first national data on well-child care for young children to 1) assess how many children have a specific clinician for well-child care; 2) identify the health insurance, health care setting, and child and family determinants of having a specific clinician; and 3) assess how paren...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2004-06, Vol.113 (6 Suppl), p.1917-1925
Hauptverfasser: Inkelas, Moira, Schuster, Mark A, Olson, Lynn M, Park, Christina H, Halfon, Neal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1925
container_issue 6 Suppl
container_start_page 1917
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 113
creator Inkelas, Moira
Schuster, Mark A
Olson, Lynn M
Park, Christina H
Halfon, Neal
description This study uses the first national data on well-child care for young children to 1) assess how many children have a specific clinician for well-child care; 2) identify the health insurance, health care setting, and child and family determinants of having a specific clinician; and 3) assess how parents choose pediatric clinicians. Data from the National Survey of Early Childhood Health (NSECH), a nationally representative survey of health care quality for young children fielded by the National Center for Health Statistics in 2000, were used to describe well-child care settings for children aged 4 to 35 months. Parents reported the child's usual setting of well-child care, whether their child has a specific clinician for well-child care, and selection method for those with a clinician. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses are used to identify determinants of having a specific clinician and of provider selection method, including health care setting, insurance, managed care, and child and family characteristics. Nearly all young children aged 4 to 35 months in the United States (98%) have a regular setting, but only 46% have a specific clinician for well-child care. The proportion of young children who have a single clinician is highest among privately insured children (51%) and lowest among publicly insured children (37%) and uninsured children (28%). In multivariate logistic regression including health care and sociodemographic factors, odds of having a specific clinician vary little by health care setting. Odds are lower for children who are publicly insured (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.97) and for Hispanic children with less acculturated parents (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.39-0.91). Odds are higher for children in a health plan with gatekeeping requirements (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.02-1.88). Approximately 13% of young children with a specific clinician were assigned to that provider. Assignment rather than parent choice is more frequent for children who are publicly insured, in managed care, cared for in a community health center/public clinic, Hispanic, and of lower income and whose mother has lower education. In multivariate logistic regression, only lack of health insurance, care in a community health center, and managed care participation are associated with lack of choice. Anticipatory guidance is the foundation of health supervision visits and may be most effective when there is a continuous relationship between the pediatric
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71972177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A118676248</galeid><sourcerecordid>A118676248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g383t-89a87cb80d3e870410d345266fa33292b78d59be445391f5191e5b5bc9bf444e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0c1LwzAUAPAiipvTf0GKB8FDJZ9NchxFpzDYRc8lTV-7jDSZ_QD97w1sHiYjh4TH74X3cZHMMVIyY0Twy2SOEMUZQ4jPkpth2CGEGBfkOplhjgVlOZknogh-tH6y408amnTf2073P6nRPaTGWW-N1T61PgXduxjfWldvQ6hvk6tGuwHujvci-Xx9-SjesvVm9V4s11lLJR0zqbQUppKopiAFYjg-GCd53mhKiSKVkDVXFTDGqcINxwoDr3hlVNUwxoAuksfDv_s-fE0wjGVnBwPOaQ9hGkqBlSBYiAgf_sFdmHofaysJkQxJxVVE2QG12kFpfRPGXpsWPPTaBQ-NjeElxjIXOWEy-uczPp4aOmvOJjydJEQzwvfY6mkYSrlan9rsnDXBOWihjGMsNqf-_tjhVHVQl8ddlX_LpL9sJ5bK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228408959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuity of primary care clinician in early childhood</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Inkelas, Moira ; Schuster, Mark A ; Olson, Lynn M ; Park, Christina H ; Halfon, Neal</creator><creatorcontrib>Inkelas, Moira ; Schuster, Mark A ; Olson, Lynn M ; Park, Christina H ; Halfon, Neal</creatorcontrib><description>This study uses the first national data on well-child care for young children to 1) assess how many children have a specific clinician for well-child care; 2) identify the health insurance, health care setting, and child and family determinants of having a specific clinician; and 3) assess how parents choose pediatric clinicians. Data from the National Survey of Early Childhood Health (NSECH), a nationally representative survey of health care quality for young children fielded by the National Center for Health Statistics in 2000, were used to describe well-child care settings for children aged 4 to 35 months. Parents reported the child's usual setting of well-child care, whether their child has a specific clinician for well-child care, and selection method for those with a clinician. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses are used to identify determinants of having a specific clinician and of provider selection method, including health care setting, insurance, managed care, and child and family characteristics. Nearly all young children aged 4 to 35 months in the United States (98%) have a regular setting, but only 46% have a specific clinician for well-child care. The proportion of young children who have a single clinician is highest among privately insured children (51%) and lowest among publicly insured children (37%) and uninsured children (28%). In multivariate logistic regression including health care and sociodemographic factors, odds of having a specific clinician vary little by health care setting. Odds are lower for children who are publicly insured (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.97) and for Hispanic children with less acculturated parents (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.39-0.91). Odds are higher for children in a health plan with gatekeeping requirements (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.02-1.88). Approximately 13% of young children with a specific clinician were assigned to that provider. Assignment rather than parent choice is more frequent for children who are publicly insured, in managed care, cared for in a community health center/public clinic, Hispanic, and of lower income and whose mother has lower education. In multivariate logistic regression, only lack of health insurance, care in a community health center, and managed care participation are associated with lack of choice. Anticipatory guidance is the foundation of health supervision visits and may be most effective when there is a continuous relationship between the pediatric provider and the parent. Only half of young children in the United States are reported to have a specific clinician for well-child care. Low rates of continuity are found across health care settings. Furthermore, not all parents of children with a continuous relationship exercised choice, particularly among children in safety net health care settings. These provisional findings on a new measure of primary care continuity for children raise important questions about the prevalence and determinants of continuity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15173462</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Child Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Continuity of Patient Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health aspects ; Health Care Surveys ; Health insurance ; Health services ; Humans ; Infant ; Insurance, Health ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Parents ; Pediatrics ; Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Physicians ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Practice ; Primary care ; Primary care nursing ; Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Primary nursing ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveys ; United States</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2004-06, Vol.113 (6 Suppl), p.1917-1925</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Jun 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15173462$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inkelas, Moira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Lynn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Christina H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halfon, Neal</creatorcontrib><title>Continuity of primary care clinician in early childhood</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>This study uses the first national data on well-child care for young children to 1) assess how many children have a specific clinician for well-child care; 2) identify the health insurance, health care setting, and child and family determinants of having a specific clinician; and 3) assess how parents choose pediatric clinicians. Data from the National Survey of Early Childhood Health (NSECH), a nationally representative survey of health care quality for young children fielded by the National Center for Health Statistics in 2000, were used to describe well-child care settings for children aged 4 to 35 months. Parents reported the child's usual setting of well-child care, whether their child has a specific clinician for well-child care, and selection method for those with a clinician. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses are used to identify determinants of having a specific clinician and of provider selection method, including health care setting, insurance, managed care, and child and family characteristics. Nearly all young children aged 4 to 35 months in the United States (98%) have a regular setting, but only 46% have a specific clinician for well-child care. The proportion of young children who have a single clinician is highest among privately insured children (51%) and lowest among publicly insured children (37%) and uninsured children (28%). In multivariate logistic regression including health care and sociodemographic factors, odds of having a specific clinician vary little by health care setting. Odds are lower for children who are publicly insured (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.97) and for Hispanic children with less acculturated parents (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.39-0.91). Odds are higher for children in a health plan with gatekeeping requirements (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.02-1.88). Approximately 13% of young children with a specific clinician were assigned to that provider. Assignment rather than parent choice is more frequent for children who are publicly insured, in managed care, cared for in a community health center/public clinic, Hispanic, and of lower income and whose mother has lower education. In multivariate logistic regression, only lack of health insurance, care in a community health center, and managed care participation are associated with lack of choice. Anticipatory guidance is the foundation of health supervision visits and may be most effective when there is a continuous relationship between the pediatric provider and the parent. Only half of young children in the United States are reported to have a specific clinician for well-child care. Low rates of continuity are found across health care settings. Furthermore, not all parents of children with a continuous relationship exercised choice, particularly among children in safety net health care settings. These provisional findings on a new measure of primary care continuity for children raise important questions about the prevalence and determinants of continuity.</description><subject>Child Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary care nursing</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Primary nursing</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0c1LwzAUAPAiipvTf0GKB8FDJZ9NchxFpzDYRc8lTV-7jDSZ_QD97w1sHiYjh4TH74X3cZHMMVIyY0Twy2SOEMUZQ4jPkpth2CGEGBfkOplhjgVlOZknogh-tH6y408amnTf2073P6nRPaTGWW-N1T61PgXduxjfWldvQ6hvk6tGuwHujvci-Xx9-SjesvVm9V4s11lLJR0zqbQUppKopiAFYjg-GCd53mhKiSKVkDVXFTDGqcINxwoDr3hlVNUwxoAuksfDv_s-fE0wjGVnBwPOaQ9hGkqBlSBYiAgf_sFdmHofaysJkQxJxVVE2QG12kFpfRPGXpsWPPTaBQ-NjeElxjIXOWEy-uczPp4aOmvOJjydJEQzwvfY6mkYSrlan9rsnDXBOWihjGMsNqf-_tjhVHVQl8ddlX_LpL9sJ5bK</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Inkelas, Moira</creator><creator>Schuster, Mark A</creator><creator>Olson, Lynn M</creator><creator>Park, Christina H</creator><creator>Halfon, Neal</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Continuity of primary care clinician in early childhood</title><author>Inkelas, Moira ; Schuster, Mark A ; Olson, Lynn M ; Park, Christina H ; Halfon, Neal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g383t-89a87cb80d3e870410d345266fa33292b78d59be445391f5191e5b5bc9bf444e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Child Health Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pediatrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary care nursing</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Primary nursing</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inkelas, Moira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Lynn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Christina H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halfon, Neal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inkelas, Moira</au><au>Schuster, Mark A</au><au>Olson, Lynn M</au><au>Park, Christina H</au><au>Halfon, Neal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuity of primary care clinician in early childhood</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>6 Suppl</issue><spage>1917</spage><epage>1925</epage><pages>1917-1925</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>This study uses the first national data on well-child care for young children to 1) assess how many children have a specific clinician for well-child care; 2) identify the health insurance, health care setting, and child and family determinants of having a specific clinician; and 3) assess how parents choose pediatric clinicians. Data from the National Survey of Early Childhood Health (NSECH), a nationally representative survey of health care quality for young children fielded by the National Center for Health Statistics in 2000, were used to describe well-child care settings for children aged 4 to 35 months. Parents reported the child's usual setting of well-child care, whether their child has a specific clinician for well-child care, and selection method for those with a clinician. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses are used to identify determinants of having a specific clinician and of provider selection method, including health care setting, insurance, managed care, and child and family characteristics. Nearly all young children aged 4 to 35 months in the United States (98%) have a regular setting, but only 46% have a specific clinician for well-child care. The proportion of young children who have a single clinician is highest among privately insured children (51%) and lowest among publicly insured children (37%) and uninsured children (28%). In multivariate logistic regression including health care and sociodemographic factors, odds of having a specific clinician vary little by health care setting. Odds are lower for children who are publicly insured (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.97) and for Hispanic children with less acculturated parents (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.39-0.91). Odds are higher for children in a health plan with gatekeeping requirements (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.02-1.88). Approximately 13% of young children with a specific clinician were assigned to that provider. Assignment rather than parent choice is more frequent for children who are publicly insured, in managed care, cared for in a community health center/public clinic, Hispanic, and of lower income and whose mother has lower education. In multivariate logistic regression, only lack of health insurance, care in a community health center, and managed care participation are associated with lack of choice. Anticipatory guidance is the foundation of health supervision visits and may be most effective when there is a continuous relationship between the pediatric provider and the parent. Only half of young children in the United States are reported to have a specific clinician for well-child care. Low rates of continuity are found across health care settings. Furthermore, not all parents of children with a continuous relationship exercised choice, particularly among children in safety net health care settings. These provisional findings on a new measure of primary care continuity for children raise important questions about the prevalence and determinants of continuity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>15173462</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2004-06, Vol.113 (6 Suppl), p.1917-1925
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71972177
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Child Health Services - statistics & numerical data
Child, Preschool
Children
Continuity of Patient Care - statistics & numerical data
Health aspects
Health Care Surveys
Health insurance
Health services
Humans
Infant
Insurance, Health
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Parents
Pediatrics
Pediatrics - statistics & numerical data
Physicians
Polls & surveys
Practice
Primary care
Primary care nursing
Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Primary nursing
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys
United States
title Continuity of primary care clinician in early childhood
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A20%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuity%20of%20primary%20care%20clinician%20in%20early%20childhood&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Inkelas,%20Moira&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=6%20Suppl&rft.spage=1917&rft.epage=1925&rft.pages=1917-1925&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA118676248%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228408959&rft_id=info:pmid/15173462&rft_galeid=A118676248&rfr_iscdi=true