Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?

It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by vie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2004-03, Vol.271 (1539), p.553-559
Hauptverfasser: Ashman, T.L, Morgan, M.T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 559
container_issue 1539
container_start_page 553
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 271
creator Ashman, T.L
Morgan, M.T
description It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2003.2642
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71959702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71959702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c826t-235693cd086e3d0d40d1ffb623753fbc534c88f156c23d113a4109fe5ff61c943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYmPwyiPkiSdafO04iXlggmp8SJ2YKOP1ynXs1iONg52Ulb8eN60GFWKTIuXrd869514nyVMgYyCifOVDOx9TQtiY5hm9lxxDVsCICp7dT46JyOmozDg9Sh6FcEUIEbzkD5Mj4MBzAXCcdGfXbS1tY5tF2i5147pNa1UadK1VZ12TxisCTZfKrvMyflvrVC3l9lH78DpdyVqnpm8G-mW60E2lfTqXUaN06nyqlavdwipZp8o1nb7uTh8nD4ysg36yv58kl-_Pvk4-jqafP3yavJ2OVEnzbkRZbJKpipS5ZhWpMlKBMfOcsoIzM1ecZaosTYyiKKsAmMziTIzmxuSgRMZOkjc737afr3SldBMj1Nh6u5J-g05aPPzT2CUu3BohDidnEA1e7A28-9Hr0OHKBqXrGE67PmABgouC0DtBEHmWc0HuBotSMBAiguMdqLwLwWtz0zYQ3K4et6vH7epxu_ooePZ32D_4ftcRCDvAu02culNWdxu8cr1v4it-mV28i4XJmhZggTOBpGRAcsqzEn_Zdqi3BTACaEPoNQ7YYR__tsVuq_rfMKOdyoZ4Ym6ySP8d8yKuH7-VGZ7zaXExOZ8hj_zpjl_axfKn9RoPyg3uw-lruqH9oXHOGZq-jgeiMtEBbnVwm9aH-YE4ap7vNEY6lAtvA17OKAFGgBAKXLDfMY0j4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17893199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Ashman, T.L ; Morgan, M.T</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashman, T.L ; Morgan, M.T</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15156911</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Fertility - physiology ; Floral Evolution ; Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology ; Male Function ; Models, Biological ; Natural Selection ; Phenotype ; Phenotypic Selection ; Plant Physiological Phenomena ; Plants - anatomy &amp; histology ; Pollen Limitation ; Pollination ; Selection, Genetic</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2004-03, Vol.271 (1539), p.553-559</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c826t-235693cd086e3d0d40d1ffb623753fbc534c88f156c23d113a4109fe5ff61c943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c826t-235693cd086e3d0d40d1ffb623753fbc534c88f156c23d113a4109fe5ff61c943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691631/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691631/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15156911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashman, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, M.T</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.</description><subject>Fertility - physiology</subject><subject>Floral Evolution</subject><subject>Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Male Function</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Natural Selection</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypic Selection</subject><subject>Plant Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Plants - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Pollen Limitation</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYmPwyiPkiSdafO04iXlggmp8SJ2YKOP1ynXs1iONg52Ulb8eN60GFWKTIuXrd869514nyVMgYyCifOVDOx9TQtiY5hm9lxxDVsCICp7dT46JyOmozDg9Sh6FcEUIEbzkD5Mj4MBzAXCcdGfXbS1tY5tF2i5147pNa1UadK1VZ12TxisCTZfKrvMyflvrVC3l9lH78DpdyVqnpm8G-mW60E2lfTqXUaN06nyqlavdwipZp8o1nb7uTh8nD4ysg36yv58kl-_Pvk4-jqafP3yavJ2OVEnzbkRZbJKpipS5ZhWpMlKBMfOcsoIzM1ecZaosTYyiKKsAmMziTIzmxuSgRMZOkjc737afr3SldBMj1Nh6u5J-g05aPPzT2CUu3BohDidnEA1e7A28-9Hr0OHKBqXrGE67PmABgouC0DtBEHmWc0HuBotSMBAiguMdqLwLwWtz0zYQ3K4et6vH7epxu_ooePZ32D_4ftcRCDvAu02culNWdxu8cr1v4it-mV28i4XJmhZggTOBpGRAcsqzEn_Zdqi3BTACaEPoNQ7YYR__tsVuq_rfMKOdyoZ4Ym6ySP8d8yKuH7-VGZ7zaXExOZ8hj_zpjl_axfKn9RoPyg3uw-lruqH9oXHOGZq-jgeiMtEBbnVwm9aH-YE4ap7vNEY6lAtvA17OKAFGgBAKXLDfMY0j4g</recordid><startdate>20040322</startdate><enddate>20040322</enddate><creator>Ashman, T.L</creator><creator>Morgan, M.T</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040322</creationdate><title>Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?</title><author>Ashman, T.L ; Morgan, M.T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c826t-235693cd086e3d0d40d1ffb623753fbc534c88f156c23d113a4109fe5ff61c943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Fertility - physiology</topic><topic>Floral Evolution</topic><topic>Flowers - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Male Function</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Natural Selection</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypic Selection</topic><topic>Plant Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Plants - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Pollen Limitation</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashman, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, M.T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashman, T.L</au><au>Morgan, M.T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2004-03-22</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>271</volume><issue>1539</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>559</epage><pages>553-559</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>15156911</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2003.2642</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2004-03, Vol.271 (1539), p.553-559
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71959702
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; JSTOR
subjects Fertility - physiology
Floral Evolution
Flowers - anatomy & histology
Male Function
Models, Biological
Natural Selection
Phenotype
Phenotypic Selection
Plant Physiological Phenomena
Plants - anatomy & histology
Pollen Limitation
Pollination
Selection, Genetic
title Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A03%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20phenotypic%20selection%20on%20plant%20attractive%20characters:%20male%20function,%20gender%20balance%20or%20ecological%20context?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Ashman,%20T.L&rft.date=2004-03-22&rft.volume=271&rft.issue=1539&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=559&rft.pages=553-559&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2003.2642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_royal%3E71959702%3C/proquest_royal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17893199&rft_id=info:pmid/15156911&rfr_iscdi=true