Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?
It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by vie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2004-03, Vol.271 (1539), p.553-559 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 559 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1539 |
container_start_page | 553 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 271 |
creator | Ashman, T.L Morgan, M.T |
description | It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.2003.2642 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71959702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71959702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c826t-235693cd086e3d0d40d1ffb623753fbc534c88f156c23d113a4109fe5ff61c943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYmPwyiPkiSdafO04iXlggmp8SJ2YKOP1ynXs1iONg52Ulb8eN60GFWKTIuXrd869514nyVMgYyCifOVDOx9TQtiY5hm9lxxDVsCICp7dT46JyOmozDg9Sh6FcEUIEbzkD5Mj4MBzAXCcdGfXbS1tY5tF2i5147pNa1UadK1VZ12TxisCTZfKrvMyflvrVC3l9lH78DpdyVqnpm8G-mW60E2lfTqXUaN06nyqlavdwipZp8o1nb7uTh8nD4ysg36yv58kl-_Pvk4-jqafP3yavJ2OVEnzbkRZbJKpipS5ZhWpMlKBMfOcsoIzM1ecZaosTYyiKKsAmMziTIzmxuSgRMZOkjc737afr3SldBMj1Nh6u5J-g05aPPzT2CUu3BohDidnEA1e7A28-9Hr0OHKBqXrGE67PmABgouC0DtBEHmWc0HuBotSMBAiguMdqLwLwWtz0zYQ3K4et6vH7epxu_ooePZ32D_4ftcRCDvAu02culNWdxu8cr1v4it-mV28i4XJmhZggTOBpGRAcsqzEn_Zdqi3BTACaEPoNQ7YYR__tsVuq_rfMKOdyoZ4Ym6ySP8d8yKuH7-VGZ7zaXExOZ8hj_zpjl_axfKn9RoPyg3uw-lruqH9oXHOGZq-jgeiMtEBbnVwm9aH-YE4ap7vNEY6lAtvA17OKAFGgBAKXLDfMY0j4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17893199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Ashman, T.L ; Morgan, M.T</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashman, T.L ; Morgan, M.T</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15156911</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Fertility - physiology ; Floral Evolution ; Flowers - anatomy & histology ; Male Function ; Models, Biological ; Natural Selection ; Phenotype ; Phenotypic Selection ; Plant Physiological Phenomena ; Plants - anatomy & histology ; Pollen Limitation ; Pollination ; Selection, Genetic</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2004-03, Vol.271 (1539), p.553-559</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c826t-235693cd086e3d0d40d1ffb623753fbc534c88f156c23d113a4109fe5ff61c943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c826t-235693cd086e3d0d40d1ffb623753fbc534c88f156c23d113a4109fe5ff61c943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691631/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691631/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15156911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashman, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, M.T</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.</description><subject>Fertility - physiology</subject><subject>Floral Evolution</subject><subject>Flowers - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Male Function</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Natural Selection</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypic Selection</subject><subject>Plant Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Plants - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Pollen Limitation</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYmPwyiPkiSdafO04iXlggmp8SJ2YKOP1ynXs1iONg52Ulb8eN60GFWKTIuXrd869514nyVMgYyCifOVDOx9TQtiY5hm9lxxDVsCICp7dT46JyOmozDg9Sh6FcEUIEbzkD5Mj4MBzAXCcdGfXbS1tY5tF2i5147pNa1UadK1VZ12TxisCTZfKrvMyflvrVC3l9lH78DpdyVqnpm8G-mW60E2lfTqXUaN06nyqlavdwipZp8o1nb7uTh8nD4ysg36yv58kl-_Pvk4-jqafP3yavJ2OVEnzbkRZbJKpipS5ZhWpMlKBMfOcsoIzM1ecZaosTYyiKKsAmMziTIzmxuSgRMZOkjc737afr3SldBMj1Nh6u5J-g05aPPzT2CUu3BohDidnEA1e7A28-9Hr0OHKBqXrGE67PmABgouC0DtBEHmWc0HuBotSMBAiguMdqLwLwWtz0zYQ3K4et6vH7epxu_ooePZ32D_4ftcRCDvAu02culNWdxu8cr1v4it-mV28i4XJmhZggTOBpGRAcsqzEn_Zdqi3BTACaEPoNQ7YYR__tsVuq_rfMKOdyoZ4Ym6ySP8d8yKuH7-VGZ7zaXExOZ8hj_zpjl_axfKn9RoPyg3uw-lruqH9oXHOGZq-jgeiMtEBbnVwm9aH-YE4ap7vNEY6lAtvA17OKAFGgBAKXLDfMY0j4g</recordid><startdate>20040322</startdate><enddate>20040322</enddate><creator>Ashman, T.L</creator><creator>Morgan, M.T</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040322</creationdate><title>Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?</title><author>Ashman, T.L ; Morgan, M.T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c826t-235693cd086e3d0d40d1ffb623753fbc534c88f156c23d113a4109fe5ff61c943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Fertility - physiology</topic><topic>Floral Evolution</topic><topic>Flowers - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Male Function</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Natural Selection</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypic Selection</topic><topic>Plant Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Plants - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Pollen Limitation</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashman, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, M.T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashman, T.L</au><au>Morgan, M.T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2004-03-22</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>271</volume><issue>1539</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>559</epage><pages>553-559</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>15156911</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2003.2642</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2004-03, Vol.271 (1539), p.553-559 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71959702 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; JSTOR |
subjects | Fertility - physiology Floral Evolution Flowers - anatomy & histology Male Function Models, Biological Natural Selection Phenotype Phenotypic Selection Plant Physiological Phenomena Plants - anatomy & histology Pollen Limitation Pollination Selection, Genetic |
title | Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A03%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20phenotypic%20selection%20on%20plant%20attractive%20characters:%20male%20function,%20gender%20balance%20or%20ecological%20context?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Ashman,%20T.L&rft.date=2004-03-22&rft.volume=271&rft.issue=1539&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=559&rft.pages=553-559&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2003.2642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_royal%3E71959702%3C/proquest_royal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17893199&rft_id=info:pmid/15156911&rfr_iscdi=true |