Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients

There is increasing evidence that weaning protocols improve outcome from mechanical ventilation, but it is unclear how best to implement such protocols in large intensive care units. We evaluated a checklist of simple bedside criteria to determine whether it could be used reliably to predict success...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2004-06, Vol.92 (6), p.793-799
Hauptverfasser: Walsh, T. S., Dodds, S., McArdle, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 799
container_issue 6
container_start_page 793
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 92
creator Walsh, T. S.
Dodds, S.
McArdle, F.
description There is increasing evidence that weaning protocols improve outcome from mechanical ventilation, but it is unclear how best to implement such protocols in large intensive care units. We evaluated a checklist of simple bedside criteria to determine whether it could be used reliably to predict successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. We carried out a prospective observational cohort study in a 12‐bedded general intensive care unit (ICU). We developed a checklist of metabolic, cardiorespiratory and neurological criteria that suggested that patients should start the weaning process. We performed daily assessments throughout ICU stay and recorded whether the criteria were met. Ultimate ventilator independence was used as the reference standard. We studied 325 sequential admissions to the ICU. Data were available for 98% of patients; 97% of admissions were mechanically ventilated on admission to ICU. Overall, 205 of the 308 ventilated patients (67%) achieved ventilator independence during ICU admission; the other patients died or were transferred ventilated to other ICUs. Eighty‐three per cent of the patients who achieved ventilator independence met the set criteria. Fulfilling the criteria was a moderately strong predictor of ultimate ventilator independence: specificity 89%, positive predictive value 94%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) 7.6. When we analysed data by the day from admission on which patients were examined, the test was a strong predictor of subsequent ventilator independence when criteria were met by day 1 (LR 11.1) or day 2 (LR 6.9), but weaker when met by more than/equal to 4 days (LR
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/aeh139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71930321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aeh139</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217355526</els_id><sourcerecordid>651821841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-1d469bb61c0c96ed8718db229fb36d2a478b099c121316d06bb8001d9f04dd033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV2L1DAUhoMo7jh64w-QIOiFUDdpMklzKevurLAggoJ4E9Lk1M3YNt0kHfXfm7VFRUQInIQ85z0fL0KPKXlJiWKn7cGcGrimTN1BG8olrYSU9C7aEEJkRRStT9CDlA6EUFmr3X10Qne0Lne-QfH8aPrZZB9GHDqc_DD1gG30GaI3OAc8RXDeZpxmayGlbu7xVzCjHz_jLoYBD2Cvy9OaHh9hzL5fxPztyTAmfyx6JgKeykcB0kN0rzN9gkdr3KIPF-fvzy6rq7f7N2evrirLG5Ur6rhQbSuoJVYJcI2kjWvrWnUtE642XDYtUcqWSRgVjoi2bcqETnWEO0cY26Lni-4Uw80MKevBJwt9b0YIc9KSKkZYyd6ip3-BhzDHsfSmqZINE5zwAr1YIBtDShE6PUU_mPhdU6JvbdDFBr3YUOAnq-LcDuB-o-veC_BsBUwqm-uiGa1Pf3ANoepnaysX5un_BauF8ynDt1-kiV-0kEzu9OXHT_rdfideS77XF4XnCw_FgKOHqJMt5thidQSbtQv-X2V-AL9Qv4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197836404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Walsh, T. S. ; Dodds, S. ; McArdle, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walsh, T. S. ; Dodds, S. ; McArdle, F.</creatorcontrib><description>There is increasing evidence that weaning protocols improve outcome from mechanical ventilation, but it is unclear how best to implement such protocols in large intensive care units. We evaluated a checklist of simple bedside criteria to determine whether it could be used reliably to predict successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. We carried out a prospective observational cohort study in a 12‐bedded general intensive care unit (ICU). We developed a checklist of metabolic, cardiorespiratory and neurological criteria that suggested that patients should start the weaning process. We performed daily assessments throughout ICU stay and recorded whether the criteria were met. Ultimate ventilator independence was used as the reference standard. We studied 325 sequential admissions to the ICU. Data were available for 98% of patients; 97% of admissions were mechanically ventilated on admission to ICU. Overall, 205 of the 308 ventilated patients (67%) achieved ventilator independence during ICU admission; the other patients died or were transferred ventilated to other ICUs. Eighty‐three per cent of the patients who achieved ventilator independence met the set criteria. Fulfilling the criteria was a moderately strong predictor of ultimate ventilator independence: specificity 89%, positive predictive value 94%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) 7.6. When we analysed data by the day from admission on which patients were examined, the test was a strong predictor of subsequent ventilator independence when criteria were met by day 1 (LR 11.1) or day 2 (LR 6.9), but weaker when met by more than/equal to 4 days (LR &lt;3). Patients who met criteria after more than/equal to 4 days often had prolonged weaning and a high incidence of re‐intubation. Patients who achieved ventilator independence without fulfilling the criteria (n=35) had a short duration of mechanical ventilation (median 2 days, interquartile range 1–3 days). The most frequent reason for failing criteria before ventilator independence was a PaO2/FIO2 ratio less than 24 kPa (49% of cases). A simple checklist can assist nurse assessment of suitability for weaning and could be used as a trigger to commence a weaning protocol. The day on which criteria are met is a useful way of stratifying patients for likely patterns of weaning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15121724</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJANAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Clinical Protocols ; Critical Care - methods ; diagnostic test ; Humans ; intensive care ; mechanical ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; monitoring ; monitoring, diagnostic test ; monitoring, intensive care ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Nursing Assessment - methods ; Patient Selection ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Respiration, Artificial ; Scotland ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; ventilation ; ventilation, mechanical ; ventilation, weaning ; Ventilator Weaning - methods ; weaning</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2004-06, Vol.92 (6), p.793-799</ispartof><rights>2004 British Journal of Anaesthesia</rights><rights>The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright British Medical Association Jun 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-1d469bb61c0c96ed8718db229fb36d2a478b099c121316d06bb8001d9f04dd033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-1d469bb61c0c96ed8718db229fb36d2a478b099c121316d06bb8001d9f04dd033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15801921$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15121724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walsh, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArdle, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br. J. Anaesth</addtitle><addtitle>Br. J. Anaesth</addtitle><description>There is increasing evidence that weaning protocols improve outcome from mechanical ventilation, but it is unclear how best to implement such protocols in large intensive care units. We evaluated a checklist of simple bedside criteria to determine whether it could be used reliably to predict successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. We carried out a prospective observational cohort study in a 12‐bedded general intensive care unit (ICU). We developed a checklist of metabolic, cardiorespiratory and neurological criteria that suggested that patients should start the weaning process. We performed daily assessments throughout ICU stay and recorded whether the criteria were met. Ultimate ventilator independence was used as the reference standard. We studied 325 sequential admissions to the ICU. Data were available for 98% of patients; 97% of admissions were mechanically ventilated on admission to ICU. Overall, 205 of the 308 ventilated patients (67%) achieved ventilator independence during ICU admission; the other patients died or were transferred ventilated to other ICUs. Eighty‐three per cent of the patients who achieved ventilator independence met the set criteria. Fulfilling the criteria was a moderately strong predictor of ultimate ventilator independence: specificity 89%, positive predictive value 94%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) 7.6. When we analysed data by the day from admission on which patients were examined, the test was a strong predictor of subsequent ventilator independence when criteria were met by day 1 (LR 11.1) or day 2 (LR 6.9), but weaker when met by more than/equal to 4 days (LR &lt;3). Patients who met criteria after more than/equal to 4 days often had prolonged weaning and a high incidence of re‐intubation. Patients who achieved ventilator independence without fulfilling the criteria (n=35) had a short duration of mechanical ventilation (median 2 days, interquartile range 1–3 days). The most frequent reason for failing criteria before ventilator independence was a PaO2/FIO2 ratio less than 24 kPa (49% of cases). A simple checklist can assist nurse assessment of suitability for weaning and could be used as a trigger to commence a weaning protocol. The day on which criteria are met is a useful way of stratifying patients for likely patterns of weaning.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>diagnostic test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intensive care</subject><subject>mechanical</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>monitoring, diagnostic test</subject><subject>monitoring, intensive care</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Nursing Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ventilation</subject><subject>ventilation, mechanical</subject><subject>ventilation, weaning</subject><subject>Ventilator Weaning - methods</subject><subject>weaning</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV2L1DAUhoMo7jh64w-QIOiFUDdpMklzKevurLAggoJ4E9Lk1M3YNt0kHfXfm7VFRUQInIQ85z0fL0KPKXlJiWKn7cGcGrimTN1BG8olrYSU9C7aEEJkRRStT9CDlA6EUFmr3X10Qne0Lne-QfH8aPrZZB9GHDqc_DD1gG30GaI3OAc8RXDeZpxmayGlbu7xVzCjHz_jLoYBD2Cvy9OaHh9hzL5fxPztyTAmfyx6JgKeykcB0kN0rzN9gkdr3KIPF-fvzy6rq7f7N2evrirLG5Ur6rhQbSuoJVYJcI2kjWvrWnUtE642XDYtUcqWSRgVjoi2bcqETnWEO0cY26Lni-4Uw80MKevBJwt9b0YIc9KSKkZYyd6ip3-BhzDHsfSmqZINE5zwAr1YIBtDShE6PUU_mPhdU6JvbdDFBr3YUOAnq-LcDuB-o-veC_BsBUwqm-uiGa1Pf3ANoepnaysX5un_BauF8ynDt1-kiV-0kEzu9OXHT_rdfideS77XF4XnCw_FgKOHqJMt5thidQSbtQv-X2V-AL9Qv4E</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Walsh, T. S.</creator><creator>Dodds, S.</creator><creator>McArdle, F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients</title><author>Walsh, T. S. ; Dodds, S. ; McArdle, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-1d469bb61c0c96ed8718db229fb36d2a478b099c121316d06bb8001d9f04dd033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>diagnostic test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intensive care</topic><topic>mechanical</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>monitoring, diagnostic test</topic><topic>monitoring, intensive care</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Nursing Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ventilation</topic><topic>ventilation, mechanical</topic><topic>ventilation, weaning</topic><topic>Ventilator Weaning - methods</topic><topic>weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walsh, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArdle, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walsh, T. S.</au><au>Dodds, S.</au><au>McArdle, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><stitle>Br. J. Anaesth</stitle><addtitle>Br. J. Anaesth</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>793</spage><epage>799</epage><pages>793-799</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><coden>BJANAD</coden><abstract>There is increasing evidence that weaning protocols improve outcome from mechanical ventilation, but it is unclear how best to implement such protocols in large intensive care units. We evaluated a checklist of simple bedside criteria to determine whether it could be used reliably to predict successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. We carried out a prospective observational cohort study in a 12‐bedded general intensive care unit (ICU). We developed a checklist of metabolic, cardiorespiratory and neurological criteria that suggested that patients should start the weaning process. We performed daily assessments throughout ICU stay and recorded whether the criteria were met. Ultimate ventilator independence was used as the reference standard. We studied 325 sequential admissions to the ICU. Data were available for 98% of patients; 97% of admissions were mechanically ventilated on admission to ICU. Overall, 205 of the 308 ventilated patients (67%) achieved ventilator independence during ICU admission; the other patients died or were transferred ventilated to other ICUs. Eighty‐three per cent of the patients who achieved ventilator independence met the set criteria. Fulfilling the criteria was a moderately strong predictor of ultimate ventilator independence: specificity 89%, positive predictive value 94%, positive likelihood ratio (LR) 7.6. When we analysed data by the day from admission on which patients were examined, the test was a strong predictor of subsequent ventilator independence when criteria were met by day 1 (LR 11.1) or day 2 (LR 6.9), but weaker when met by more than/equal to 4 days (LR &lt;3). Patients who met criteria after more than/equal to 4 days often had prolonged weaning and a high incidence of re‐intubation. Patients who achieved ventilator independence without fulfilling the criteria (n=35) had a short duration of mechanical ventilation (median 2 days, interquartile range 1–3 days). The most frequent reason for failing criteria before ventilator independence was a PaO2/FIO2 ratio less than 24 kPa (49% of cases). A simple checklist can assist nurse assessment of suitability for weaning and could be used as a trigger to commence a weaning protocol. The day on which criteria are met is a useful way of stratifying patients for likely patterns of weaning.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15121724</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aeh139</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2004-06, Vol.92 (6), p.793-799
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71930321
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Clinical Protocols
Critical Care - methods
diagnostic test
Humans
intensive care
mechanical
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
monitoring
monitoring, diagnostic test
monitoring, intensive care
Monitoring, Physiologic - methods
Nursing Assessment - methods
Patient Selection
Point-of-Care Systems
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Respiration, Artificial
Scotland
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
ventilation
ventilation, mechanical
ventilation, weaning
Ventilator Weaning - methods
weaning
title Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T12%3A13%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20simple%20criteria%20to%20predict%20successful%20weaning%20from%20mechanical%20ventilation%20in%20intensive%20care%20patients&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Walsh,%20T.%20S.&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=793&rft.epage=799&rft.pages=793-799&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft.coden=BJANAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aeh139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E651821841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197836404&rft_id=info:pmid/15121724&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aeh139&rft_els_id=S0007091217355526&rfr_iscdi=true