Fragmentation of immunization history among providers and parents of children in selected underserved areas

Objective: We assessed fragmentation of children’s immunization history among providers and parents of children aged 12 to 35 months in four selected underserved areas. Study Design: Area probability cluster sample surveys were conducted in 1997–1998 in northern Manhattan, San Diego, Detroit, and ru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of preventive medicine 2002-08, Vol.23 (2), p.106-112
Hauptverfasser: Yusuf, Hussain, Adams, Melissa, Rodewald, Lance, Lu, Pengjun, Rosenthal, Jorge, Legum, Stanley E, Santoli, Jeanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 112
container_issue 2
container_start_page 106
container_title American journal of preventive medicine
container_volume 23
creator Yusuf, Hussain
Adams, Melissa
Rodewald, Lance
Lu, Pengjun
Rosenthal, Jorge
Legum, Stanley E
Santoli, Jeanne
description Objective: We assessed fragmentation of children’s immunization history among providers and parents of children aged 12 to 35 months in four selected underserved areas. Study Design: Area probability cluster sample surveys were conducted in 1997–1998 in northern Manhattan, San Diego, Detroit, and rural Colorado. Surveys consisted of face-to-face interviews with parents followed by record checks with all named immunization providers. We used Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations to determine up-to-date (UTD) status with vaccinations. The UTD status for each child was determined in four ways: (1) according to the parent-held immunization records, (2) according to the records of the child’s most recent provider, (3) according to the records of the child’s second most recent provider, and (4) according to provider and parent-reconciled information. Results: In all four areas, the majority of records of the most recent provider agreed with the reconciled information. However, in all areas, the percentage of children UTD according to provider- and parent-reconciled information was higher than the percentage of children UTD according to information from only the child’s most recent provider or from only parent-held immunization records. Across all sites, the percentage of children UTD with the DTP/DTaP vaccine was 2% to 9% lower, according to the most recent provider’s information than according to reconciled information. Similar results were seen for other vaccines. The most recent provider not having complete immunization history was significantly associated with not being UTD in New York and having received unnecessary immunizations in San Diego and Detroit. Conclusion: For most children, although the records of the most recent provider give accurate data for clinical decision making, the immunization histories of some children in these underserved areas are fragmented between providers and parents. This can limit the provider’s ability to vaccinate children appropriately.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00463-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71925450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749379702004634</els_id><sourcerecordid>71925450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-2e3f5ff1f22b7990aff201617386f9f77df62d8a4e530ec39b907b1632a13d213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gpKT6GE1H7ubzUmkWBUED-o5pJuJRnezNdkt1F9vaoseJYdk4HkzMw9Cx5RcUELLyycicplxIcUZYeeE5CXP8h00ppXgGSuJ2EXjX2SEDmJ8J4SIisp9NKIsHSGrMfqYBf3agu917zqPO4td2w7efW3qNxf7Lqywbjv_ihehWzoDIWLtDV7okHJxnanfXGNShZ3HERqoezB48GsUwjK9E6rjIdqzuolwtL0n6GV28zy9yx4eb--n1w9ZzUvaZwy4LayllrG5kJJoa1namApelVZaIYwtmal0DgUnUHM5l0TMacmZptwwyifodPNvmvdzgNir1sUamkZ76IaoBJWsyAuSwGID1qGLMYBVi-BaHVaKErW2rH4sq7VCRZj6sazylDvZNhjmLZi_1FZrAq42AKQ1lw6CirUDX4NxIclRpnP_tPgGHCGOUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71925450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fragmentation of immunization history among providers and parents of children in selected underserved areas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Yusuf, Hussain ; Adams, Melissa ; Rodewald, Lance ; Lu, Pengjun ; Rosenthal, Jorge ; Legum, Stanley E ; Santoli, Jeanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Yusuf, Hussain ; Adams, Melissa ; Rodewald, Lance ; Lu, Pengjun ; Rosenthal, Jorge ; Legum, Stanley E ; Santoli, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: We assessed fragmentation of children’s immunization history among providers and parents of children aged 12 to 35 months in four selected underserved areas. Study Design: Area probability cluster sample surveys were conducted in 1997–1998 in northern Manhattan, San Diego, Detroit, and rural Colorado. Surveys consisted of face-to-face interviews with parents followed by record checks with all named immunization providers. We used Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations to determine up-to-date (UTD) status with vaccinations. The UTD status for each child was determined in four ways: (1) according to the parent-held immunization records, (2) according to the records of the child’s most recent provider, (3) according to the records of the child’s second most recent provider, and (4) according to provider and parent-reconciled information. Results: In all four areas, the majority of records of the most recent provider agreed with the reconciled information. However, in all areas, the percentage of children UTD according to provider- and parent-reconciled information was higher than the percentage of children UTD according to information from only the child’s most recent provider or from only parent-held immunization records. Across all sites, the percentage of children UTD with the DTP/DTaP vaccine was 2% to 9% lower, according to the most recent provider’s information than according to reconciled information. Similar results were seen for other vaccines. The most recent provider not having complete immunization history was significantly associated with not being UTD in New York and having received unnecessary immunizations in San Diego and Detroit. Conclusion: For most children, although the records of the most recent provider give accurate data for clinical decision making, the immunization histories of some children in these underserved areas are fragmented between providers and parents. This can limit the provider’s ability to vaccinate children appropriately.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00463-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12121798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>child ; Child, Preschool ; Cluster Analysis ; Health Personnel ; history ; Humans ; immunization ; Immunization - standards ; Immunization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Immunization - utilization ; Immunization Schedule ; Infant ; Medical Records ; Medically Underserved Area ; Parents ; United States ; Unnecessary Procedures ; vaccination ; Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 2002-08, Vol.23 (2), p.106-112</ispartof><rights>2002 American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-2e3f5ff1f22b7990aff201617386f9f77df62d8a4e530ec39b907b1632a13d213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-2e3f5ff1f22b7990aff201617386f9f77df62d8a4e530ec39b907b1632a13d213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379702004634$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12121798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yusuf, Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodewald, Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Pengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legum, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoli, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><title>Fragmentation of immunization history among providers and parents of children in selected underserved areas</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><description>Objective: We assessed fragmentation of children’s immunization history among providers and parents of children aged 12 to 35 months in four selected underserved areas. Study Design: Area probability cluster sample surveys were conducted in 1997–1998 in northern Manhattan, San Diego, Detroit, and rural Colorado. Surveys consisted of face-to-face interviews with parents followed by record checks with all named immunization providers. We used Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations to determine up-to-date (UTD) status with vaccinations. The UTD status for each child was determined in four ways: (1) according to the parent-held immunization records, (2) according to the records of the child’s most recent provider, (3) according to the records of the child’s second most recent provider, and (4) according to provider and parent-reconciled information. Results: In all four areas, the majority of records of the most recent provider agreed with the reconciled information. However, in all areas, the percentage of children UTD according to provider- and parent-reconciled information was higher than the percentage of children UTD according to information from only the child’s most recent provider or from only parent-held immunization records. Across all sites, the percentage of children UTD with the DTP/DTaP vaccine was 2% to 9% lower, according to the most recent provider’s information than according to reconciled information. Similar results were seen for other vaccines. The most recent provider not having complete immunization history was significantly associated with not being UTD in New York and having received unnecessary immunizations in San Diego and Detroit. Conclusion: For most children, although the records of the most recent provider give accurate data for clinical decision making, the immunization histories of some children in these underserved areas are fragmented between providers and parents. This can limit the provider’s ability to vaccinate children appropriately.</description><subject>child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>history</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunization</subject><subject>Immunization - standards</subject><subject>Immunization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Immunization - utilization</subject><subject>Immunization Schedule</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Medical Records</subject><subject>Medically Underserved Area</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Unnecessary Procedures</subject><subject>vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0749-3797</issn><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gpKT6GE1H7ubzUmkWBUED-o5pJuJRnezNdkt1F9vaoseJYdk4HkzMw9Cx5RcUELLyycicplxIcUZYeeE5CXP8h00ppXgGSuJ2EXjX2SEDmJ8J4SIisp9NKIsHSGrMfqYBf3agu917zqPO4td2w7efW3qNxf7Lqywbjv_ihehWzoDIWLtDV7okHJxnanfXGNShZ3HERqoezB48GsUwjK9E6rjIdqzuolwtL0n6GV28zy9yx4eb--n1w9ZzUvaZwy4LayllrG5kJJoa1namApelVZaIYwtmal0DgUnUHM5l0TMacmZptwwyifodPNvmvdzgNir1sUamkZ76IaoBJWsyAuSwGID1qGLMYBVi-BaHVaKErW2rH4sq7VCRZj6sazylDvZNhjmLZi_1FZrAq42AKQ1lw6CirUDX4NxIclRpnP_tPgGHCGOUw</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Yusuf, Hussain</creator><creator>Adams, Melissa</creator><creator>Rodewald, Lance</creator><creator>Lu, Pengjun</creator><creator>Rosenthal, Jorge</creator><creator>Legum, Stanley E</creator><creator>Santoli, Jeanne</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Fragmentation of immunization history among providers and parents of children in selected underserved areas</title><author>Yusuf, Hussain ; Adams, Melissa ; Rodewald, Lance ; Lu, Pengjun ; Rosenthal, Jorge ; Legum, Stanley E ; Santoli, Jeanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-2e3f5ff1f22b7990aff201617386f9f77df62d8a4e530ec39b907b1632a13d213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>history</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunization</topic><topic>Immunization - standards</topic><topic>Immunization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Immunization - utilization</topic><topic>Immunization Schedule</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Medical Records</topic><topic>Medically Underserved Area</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Unnecessary Procedures</topic><topic>vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yusuf, Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodewald, Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Pengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legum, Stanley E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoli, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yusuf, Hussain</au><au>Adams, Melissa</au><au>Rodewald, Lance</au><au>Lu, Pengjun</au><au>Rosenthal, Jorge</au><au>Legum, Stanley E</au><au>Santoli, Jeanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fragmentation of immunization history among providers and parents of children in selected underserved areas</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>106-112</pages><issn>0749-3797</issn><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><abstract>Objective: We assessed fragmentation of children’s immunization history among providers and parents of children aged 12 to 35 months in four selected underserved areas. Study Design: Area probability cluster sample surveys were conducted in 1997–1998 in northern Manhattan, San Diego, Detroit, and rural Colorado. Surveys consisted of face-to-face interviews with parents followed by record checks with all named immunization providers. We used Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations to determine up-to-date (UTD) status with vaccinations. The UTD status for each child was determined in four ways: (1) according to the parent-held immunization records, (2) according to the records of the child’s most recent provider, (3) according to the records of the child’s second most recent provider, and (4) according to provider and parent-reconciled information. Results: In all four areas, the majority of records of the most recent provider agreed with the reconciled information. However, in all areas, the percentage of children UTD according to provider- and parent-reconciled information was higher than the percentage of children UTD according to information from only the child’s most recent provider or from only parent-held immunization records. Across all sites, the percentage of children UTD with the DTP/DTaP vaccine was 2% to 9% lower, according to the most recent provider’s information than according to reconciled information. Similar results were seen for other vaccines. The most recent provider not having complete immunization history was significantly associated with not being UTD in New York and having received unnecessary immunizations in San Diego and Detroit. Conclusion: For most children, although the records of the most recent provider give accurate data for clinical decision making, the immunization histories of some children in these underserved areas are fragmented between providers and parents. This can limit the provider’s ability to vaccinate children appropriately.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12121798</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00463-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-3797
ispartof American journal of preventive medicine, 2002-08, Vol.23 (2), p.106-112
issn 0749-3797
1873-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71925450
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects child
Child, Preschool
Cluster Analysis
Health Personnel
history
Humans
immunization
Immunization - standards
Immunization - statistics & numerical data
Immunization - utilization
Immunization Schedule
Infant
Medical Records
Medically Underserved Area
Parents
United States
Unnecessary Procedures
vaccination
Vaccines - administration & dosage
title Fragmentation of immunization history among providers and parents of children in selected underserved areas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A48%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fragmentation%20of%20immunization%20history%20among%20providers%20and%20parents%20of%20children%20in%20selected%20underserved%20areas&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Yusuf,%20Hussain&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=106-112&rft.issn=0749-3797&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00463-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71925450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71925450&rft_id=info:pmid/12121798&rft_els_id=S0749379702004634&rfr_iscdi=true