The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon
The objective of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of the COD removal in the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition and to determine its optimal operation, for the removal of residual organic matters (ROM) from biologically treated swine wastewate...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2004-01, Vol.49 (5-6), p.451-457 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 457 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5-6 |
| container_start_page | 451 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | Whang, G D Cho, Y M Park, H Jang, J G |
| description | The objective of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of the COD removal in the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition and to determine its optimal operation, for the removal of residual organic matters (ROM) from biologically treated swine wastewater. The MBR process with PAC showed higher removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD(Mn)) than that without PAC. When the average COD(Mn) concentration of the influent was 217 mg/L, the average COD(Mn) concentration of the permeate from the MBR with PAC was about 41.5 mg/L, indicating an approximate removal efficiency of 81%. On the other hand, the average COD(Mn) concentration of the permeate from the MBR without PAC was 172 mg/L. The PAC dosage estimated to obtain the above removal efficiency was about 0.74 g per litre of influent. Among the total residual organics removed by PAC-added MBR, 46.5% was removed by PAC adsorption, 20.8% by biodegradation, 4.4% by membrane separation, and 9.3% by enhanced microorganism activity. From these results, the MBR process with PAC was considered as a very useful treatment process for the reduction of COD(Mn) in biologically treated swine wastewater. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2004.0787 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71921303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71921303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b63221ea4691e44ff6a1bac983f0da71bc8ff8f238f602e51b5200c97370bfb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1r3DAQhkU_aLZpjr0WQSE3bzWSbEnHEtq0EOglPRtJljYKtrWV5Jj8jf7iys1CoZecZmCeeZmPF6H3QPYUuu7TmsueEsL3REjxAu1Aqa5RgtGX6EIJCZIzpnhH-Su0I1SwBihlZ-htzveEEME4eYPOoAUmeCt26PftncPJTfFBjzj6muYwLFueDnoOFk-6FJewT3HCJsQxHoLV4_iIS3K6uAHnNcwOrzoXt-oNXXKYD3hyk0m6VmpTJW2JCR9TtC5nvIZyh49xHVyqArUWHv5KWZ1MnN-h116P2V2c4jn6-fXL7dW35ubH9ferzzeNZUKVxnSMUnCadwoc5953Goy2SjJPBi3AWOm99JRJ3xHqWjBtvZutpxLEeMPYObp80q1j_VpcLv0UsnXjWKeOS-4FKAqMPA9SgJaClM-CoDilvCUV_PgfeB-XNNdtN4ZxoIrzSjVPlE0x5-R8f0xh0umxB9JvZuirGfrNDP1mhsp_OKkuZnLDP_r0bfYHwcewWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943412944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Whang, G D ; Cho, Y M ; Park, H ; Jang, J G</creator><contributor>Choi, E ; Yun, Z (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Whang, G D ; Cho, Y M ; Park, H ; Jang, J G ; Choi, E ; Yun, Z (eds)</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of the COD removal in the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition and to determine its optimal operation, for the removal of residual organic matters (ROM) from biologically treated swine wastewater. The MBR process with PAC showed higher removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD(Mn)) than that without PAC. When the average COD(Mn) concentration of the influent was 217 mg/L, the average COD(Mn) concentration of the permeate from the MBR with PAC was about 41.5 mg/L, indicating an approximate removal efficiency of 81%. On the other hand, the average COD(Mn) concentration of the permeate from the MBR without PAC was 172 mg/L. The PAC dosage estimated to obtain the above removal efficiency was about 0.74 g per litre of influent. Among the total residual organics removed by PAC-added MBR, 46.5% was removed by PAC adsorption, 20.8% by biodegradation, 4.4% by membrane separation, and 9.3% by enhanced microorganism activity. From these results, the MBR process with PAC was considered as a very useful treatment process for the reduction of COD(Mn) in biologically treated swine wastewater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781843394624</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1843394626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0787</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15137457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Activated Carbon ; Adsorption ; Animal wastes ; Animals ; Biodegradation ; Bioreactors ; Carbon - chemistry ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Dosage ; Efficiency ; Influents ; Membrane reactors ; Membranes, Artificial ; Organic Chemicals - isolation & purification ; Organic matter ; Oxygen ; Removal ; Swine ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2004-01, Vol.49 (5-6), p.451-457</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b63221ea4691e44ff6a1bac983f0da71bc8ff8f238f602e51b5200c97370bfb33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15137457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Choi, E</contributor><contributor>Yun, Z (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Whang, G D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Y M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, J G</creatorcontrib><title>The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of the COD removal in the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition and to determine its optimal operation, for the removal of residual organic matters (ROM) from biologically treated swine wastewater. The MBR process with PAC showed higher removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD(Mn)) than that without PAC. When the average COD(Mn) concentration of the influent was 217 mg/L, the average COD(Mn) concentration of the permeate from the MBR with PAC was about 41.5 mg/L, indicating an approximate removal efficiency of 81%. On the other hand, the average COD(Mn) concentration of the permeate from the MBR without PAC was 172 mg/L. The PAC dosage estimated to obtain the above removal efficiency was about 0.74 g per litre of influent. Among the total residual organics removed by PAC-added MBR, 46.5% was removed by PAC adsorption, 20.8% by biodegradation, 4.4% by membrane separation, and 9.3% by enhanced microorganism activity. From these results, the MBR process with PAC was considered as a very useful treatment process for the reduction of COD(Mn) in biologically treated swine wastewater.</description><subject>Activated Carbon</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Carbon - chemistry</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Membrane reactors</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><isbn>9781843394624</isbn><isbn>1843394626</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1r3DAQhkU_aLZpjr0WQSE3bzWSbEnHEtq0EOglPRtJljYKtrWV5Jj8jf7iys1CoZecZmCeeZmPF6H3QPYUuu7TmsueEsL3REjxAu1Aqa5RgtGX6EIJCZIzpnhH-Su0I1SwBihlZ-htzveEEME4eYPOoAUmeCt26PftncPJTfFBjzj6muYwLFueDnoOFk-6FJewT3HCJsQxHoLV4_iIS3K6uAHnNcwOrzoXt-oNXXKYD3hyk0m6VmpTJW2JCR9TtC5nvIZyh49xHVyqArUWHv5KWZ1MnN-h116P2V2c4jn6-fXL7dW35ubH9ferzzeNZUKVxnSMUnCadwoc5953Goy2SjJPBi3AWOm99JRJ3xHqWjBtvZutpxLEeMPYObp80q1j_VpcLv0UsnXjWKeOS-4FKAqMPA9SgJaClM-CoDilvCUV_PgfeB-XNNdtN4ZxoIrzSjVPlE0x5-R8f0xh0umxB9JvZuirGfrNDP1mhsp_OKkuZnLDP_r0bfYHwcewWg</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Whang, G D</creator><creator>Cho, Y M</creator><creator>Park, H</creator><creator>Jang, J G</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon</title><author>Whang, G D ; Cho, Y M ; Park, H ; Jang, J G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b63221ea4691e44ff6a1bac983f0da71bc8ff8f238f602e51b5200c97370bfb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Activated Carbon</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Carbon - chemistry</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Membrane reactors</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whang, G D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Y M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, J G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whang, G D</au><au>Cho, Y M</au><au>Park, H</au><au>Jang, J G</au><au>Choi, E</au><au>Yun, Z (eds)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>457</epage><pages>451-457</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><isbn>9781843394624</isbn><isbn>1843394626</isbn><abstract>The objective of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of the COD removal in the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process with powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition and to determine its optimal operation, for the removal of residual organic matters (ROM) from biologically treated swine wastewater. The MBR process with PAC showed higher removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD(Mn)) than that without PAC. When the average COD(Mn) concentration of the influent was 217 mg/L, the average COD(Mn) concentration of the permeate from the MBR with PAC was about 41.5 mg/L, indicating an approximate removal efficiency of 81%. On the other hand, the average COD(Mn) concentration of the permeate from the MBR without PAC was 172 mg/L. The PAC dosage estimated to obtain the above removal efficiency was about 0.74 g per litre of influent. Among the total residual organics removed by PAC-added MBR, 46.5% was removed by PAC adsorption, 20.8% by biodegradation, 4.4% by membrane separation, and 9.3% by enhanced microorganism activity. From these results, the MBR process with PAC was considered as a very useful treatment process for the reduction of COD(Mn) in biologically treated swine wastewater.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>15137457</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2004.0787</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 2004-01, Vol.49 (5-6), p.451-457 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71921303 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Activated Carbon Adsorption Animal wastes Animals Biodegradation Bioreactors Carbon - chemistry Chemical oxygen demand Dosage Efficiency Influents Membrane reactors Membranes, Artificial Organic Chemicals - isolation & purification Organic matter Oxygen Removal Swine Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water Purification - methods Water treatment plants |
| title | The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T19%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20removal%20of%20residual%20organic%20matter%20from%20biologically%20treated%20swine%20wastewater%20using%20membrane%20bioreactor%20process%20with%20powdered%20activated%20carbon&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Whang,%20G%20D&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=457&rft.pages=451-457&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft.isbn=9781843394624&rft.isbn_list=1843394626&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2004.0787&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71921303%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943412944&rft_id=info:pmid/15137457&rfr_iscdi=true |