HER2 Amplification Ratios by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Correlation with Immunohistochemistry in a Cohort of 6556 Breast Cancer Tissues

To analyze HER2 amplification in a large cohort of diagnostic breast cancer specimens, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on the same specimens with use of Food and Drug Administration—approved products. Procedures were standardized following the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical breast cancer 2004-04, Vol.5 (1), p.63-69
Hauptverfasser: Owens, Marilyn A., Horten, Bruce C., Da Silva, Moacyr M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Clinical breast cancer
container_volume 5
creator Owens, Marilyn A.
Horten, Bruce C.
Da Silva, Moacyr M.
description To analyze HER2 amplification in a large cohort of diagnostic breast cancer specimens, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on the same specimens with use of Food and Drug Administration—approved products. Procedures were standardized following the manufacturers' recommendations. Of 116,736 IHC specimens, 20% were positive for HER2. In 16,092 FISH specimens, 22.7% showed HER2 amplification. In the subset of 6556 tissues analyzed with IHC and FISH, however, 59% were positive on IHC and 23.6% were amplified on FISH. The increased frequency of positive test results is skewed by more frequent reflex FISH testing. In general, expression and amplification trended together, with the least amplification (4.1%) seen in IHC-negative cases, 7.4% amplification seen in IHC 1+ cases, 23.3% amplification seen in IHC 2+ cases, and 91.7% amplification seen in IHC 3+ cases. When FISH amplification ratios were stratified, the low FISH ratios (2.0-2.2) were most frequently seen in specimens with negative IHC results, high ratios (> 5.0) were seen in IHC 3+ specimens, and intermediate levels of amplification were similar for all levels of IHC. The effect of changing the cutoff point was analyzed: removing cases with a ratio of exactly 2.0 decreased the FISH positivity rate to 22.2% in the combined IHC and FISH cohort. Sequentially moving the cutoff point to 2.2 and 2.5 affected cases at all IHC expression levels. Each change removed approximately 2% from the apparent positivity. This large database provides the distribution frequency of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer. The relationship between level of HER2 amplification and clinical outcome will require reanalysis of pivotal trial data.
doi_str_mv 10.3816/CBC.2004.n.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71913353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1526820911708345</els_id><sourcerecordid>71913353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-92faf39bcb427fe3860a5fb09da2b5ad70b8473c2501adc8e14fe786f2e021a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoSdI01x6LTr3Z0R9blo-JSboLgUK6dyHLI1bBtraS3LL5Gv3C1eKFnnJ6M_DTm9E8hL5QUnJJxV330JWMkKqcS0LpBbqmLZcFEUJ8yHXNRCEZaa_QpxhfCWGCU3KJrmhNK8Jkc43-bh5fGL6fDqOzzujk_IxfThJxf8RP4-IDRAOzAbyd8U-XFrw59sEN7m2F9TzgzocA49r_cWmPt9O0zH7vYvJmD1PWcMQuwxnd-5Cwt1jUtcAPAXRMuNN5QMA7F-MC8TP6aPUY4fasN2j39LjrNsXzj-_b7v65MJyQVLTMasvb3vQVayxwKYiubU_aQbO-1kNDelk13LCaUD0YCbSy0EhhGRBGNb9B31bbQ_C_8tik8qIGxlHP4JeoGtpSzmuewXIFTfAxBrDqENykw1FRok4pqJyCOqWgZpVTyA--np2XfoLhP34-ewbkCkD-3m8HQUXjTkceXACT1ODde97_AIyQl3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71913353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HER2 Amplification Ratios by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Correlation with Immunohistochemistry in a Cohort of 6556 Breast Cancer Tissues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Owens, Marilyn A. ; Horten, Bruce C. ; Da Silva, Moacyr M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Owens, Marilyn A. ; Horten, Bruce C. ; Da Silva, Moacyr M.</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze HER2 amplification in a large cohort of diagnostic breast cancer specimens, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on the same specimens with use of Food and Drug Administration—approved products. Procedures were standardized following the manufacturers' recommendations. Of 116,736 IHC specimens, 20% were positive for HER2. In 16,092 FISH specimens, 22.7% showed HER2 amplification. In the subset of 6556 tissues analyzed with IHC and FISH, however, 59% were positive on IHC and 23.6% were amplified on FISH. The increased frequency of positive test results is skewed by more frequent reflex FISH testing. In general, expression and amplification trended together, with the least amplification (4.1%) seen in IHC-negative cases, 7.4% amplification seen in IHC 1+ cases, 23.3% amplification seen in IHC 2+ cases, and 91.7% amplification seen in IHC 3+ cases. When FISH amplification ratios were stratified, the low FISH ratios (2.0-2.2) were most frequently seen in specimens with negative IHC results, high ratios (&gt; 5.0) were seen in IHC 3+ specimens, and intermediate levels of amplification were similar for all levels of IHC. The effect of changing the cutoff point was analyzed: removing cases with a ratio of exactly 2.0 decreased the FISH positivity rate to 22.2% in the combined IHC and FISH cohort. Sequentially moving the cutoff point to 2.2 and 2.5 affected cases at all IHC expression levels. Each change removed approximately 2% from the apparent positivity. This large database provides the distribution frequency of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer. The relationship between level of HER2 amplification and clinical outcome will require reanalysis of pivotal trial data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-8209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2004.n.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15140287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Breast - chemistry ; Breast - metabolism ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology ; Carcinoma, Lobular - genetics ; Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Gene amplification ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry - methods ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Invasive ductal breast carcinoma ; Lobular breast carcinoma ; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods ; Prognosis ; Protein expression ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics ; Trastuzumab</subject><ispartof>Clinical breast cancer, 2004-04, Vol.5 (1), p.63-69</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-92faf39bcb427fe3860a5fb09da2b5ad70b8473c2501adc8e14fe786f2e021a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-92faf39bcb427fe3860a5fb09da2b5ad70b8473c2501adc8e14fe786f2e021a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3816/CBC.2004.n.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15140287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Owens, Marilyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horten, Bruce C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da Silva, Moacyr M.</creatorcontrib><title>HER2 Amplification Ratios by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Correlation with Immunohistochemistry in a Cohort of 6556 Breast Cancer Tissues</title><title>Clinical breast cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Breast Cancer</addtitle><description>To analyze HER2 amplification in a large cohort of diagnostic breast cancer specimens, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on the same specimens with use of Food and Drug Administration—approved products. Procedures were standardized following the manufacturers' recommendations. Of 116,736 IHC specimens, 20% were positive for HER2. In 16,092 FISH specimens, 22.7% showed HER2 amplification. In the subset of 6556 tissues analyzed with IHC and FISH, however, 59% were positive on IHC and 23.6% were amplified on FISH. The increased frequency of positive test results is skewed by more frequent reflex FISH testing. In general, expression and amplification trended together, with the least amplification (4.1%) seen in IHC-negative cases, 7.4% amplification seen in IHC 1+ cases, 23.3% amplification seen in IHC 2+ cases, and 91.7% amplification seen in IHC 3+ cases. When FISH amplification ratios were stratified, the low FISH ratios (2.0-2.2) were most frequently seen in specimens with negative IHC results, high ratios (&gt; 5.0) were seen in IHC 3+ specimens, and intermediate levels of amplification were similar for all levels of IHC. The effect of changing the cutoff point was analyzed: removing cases with a ratio of exactly 2.0 decreased the FISH positivity rate to 22.2% in the combined IHC and FISH cohort. Sequentially moving the cutoff point to 2.2 and 2.5 affected cases at all IHC expression levels. Each change removed approximately 2% from the apparent positivity. This large database provides the distribution frequency of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer. The relationship between level of HER2 amplification and clinical outcome will require reanalysis of pivotal trial data.</description><subject>Breast - chemistry</subject><subject>Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene amplification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry - methods</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Invasive ductal breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Lobular breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Protein expression</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</subject><subject>Trastuzumab</subject><issn>1526-8209</issn><issn>1938-0666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoSdI01x6LTr3Z0R9blo-JSboLgUK6dyHLI1bBtraS3LL5Gv3C1eKFnnJ6M_DTm9E8hL5QUnJJxV330JWMkKqcS0LpBbqmLZcFEUJ8yHXNRCEZaa_QpxhfCWGCU3KJrmhNK8Jkc43-bh5fGL6fDqOzzujk_IxfThJxf8RP4-IDRAOzAbyd8U-XFrw59sEN7m2F9TzgzocA49r_cWmPt9O0zH7vYvJmD1PWcMQuwxnd-5Cwt1jUtcAPAXRMuNN5QMA7F-MC8TP6aPUY4fasN2j39LjrNsXzj-_b7v65MJyQVLTMasvb3vQVayxwKYiubU_aQbO-1kNDelk13LCaUD0YCbSy0EhhGRBGNb9B31bbQ_C_8tik8qIGxlHP4JeoGtpSzmuewXIFTfAxBrDqENykw1FRok4pqJyCOqWgZpVTyA--np2XfoLhP34-ewbkCkD-3m8HQUXjTkceXACT1ODde97_AIyQl3o</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Owens, Marilyn A.</creator><creator>Horten, Bruce C.</creator><creator>Da Silva, Moacyr M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>HER2 Amplification Ratios by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Correlation with Immunohistochemistry in a Cohort of 6556 Breast Cancer Tissues</title><author>Owens, Marilyn A. ; Horten, Bruce C. ; Da Silva, Moacyr M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-92faf39bcb427fe3860a5fb09da2b5ad70b8473c2501adc8e14fe786f2e021a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Breast - chemistry</topic><topic>Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene amplification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry - methods</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Invasive ductal breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Lobular breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Protein expression</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</topic><topic>Trastuzumab</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Owens, Marilyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horten, Bruce C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da Silva, Moacyr M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical breast cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Owens, Marilyn A.</au><au>Horten, Bruce C.</au><au>Da Silva, Moacyr M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HER2 Amplification Ratios by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Correlation with Immunohistochemistry in a Cohort of 6556 Breast Cancer Tissues</atitle><jtitle>Clinical breast cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Breast Cancer</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>63-69</pages><issn>1526-8209</issn><eissn>1938-0666</eissn><abstract>To analyze HER2 amplification in a large cohort of diagnostic breast cancer specimens, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed on the same specimens with use of Food and Drug Administration—approved products. Procedures were standardized following the manufacturers' recommendations. Of 116,736 IHC specimens, 20% were positive for HER2. In 16,092 FISH specimens, 22.7% showed HER2 amplification. In the subset of 6556 tissues analyzed with IHC and FISH, however, 59% were positive on IHC and 23.6% were amplified on FISH. The increased frequency of positive test results is skewed by more frequent reflex FISH testing. In general, expression and amplification trended together, with the least amplification (4.1%) seen in IHC-negative cases, 7.4% amplification seen in IHC 1+ cases, 23.3% amplification seen in IHC 2+ cases, and 91.7% amplification seen in IHC 3+ cases. When FISH amplification ratios were stratified, the low FISH ratios (2.0-2.2) were most frequently seen in specimens with negative IHC results, high ratios (&gt; 5.0) were seen in IHC 3+ specimens, and intermediate levels of amplification were similar for all levels of IHC. The effect of changing the cutoff point was analyzed: removing cases with a ratio of exactly 2.0 decreased the FISH positivity rate to 22.2% in the combined IHC and FISH cohort. Sequentially moving the cutoff point to 2.2 and 2.5 affected cases at all IHC expression levels. Each change removed approximately 2% from the apparent positivity. This large database provides the distribution frequency of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification in invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer. The relationship between level of HER2 amplification and clinical outcome will require reanalysis of pivotal trial data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15140287</pmid><doi>10.3816/CBC.2004.n.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-8209
ispartof Clinical breast cancer, 2004-04, Vol.5 (1), p.63-69
issn 1526-8209
1938-0666
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71913353
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Breast - chemistry
Breast - metabolism
Breast - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - genetics
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology
Carcinoma, Lobular - genetics
Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism
Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology
Cohort Studies
Female
Gene amplification
Humans
Immunohistochemistry - methods
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma
Lobular breast carcinoma
Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods
Prognosis
Protein expression
Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis
Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics
Trastuzumab
title HER2 Amplification Ratios by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Correlation with Immunohistochemistry in a Cohort of 6556 Breast Cancer Tissues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A31%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HER2%20Amplification%20Ratios%20by%20Fluorescence%20In%20Situ%20Hybridization%20and%20Correlation%20with%20Immunohistochemistry%20in%20a%20Cohort%20of%206556%20Breast%20Cancer%20Tissues&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20breast%20cancer&rft.au=Owens,%20Marilyn%20A.&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=63-69&rft.issn=1526-8209&rft.eissn=1938-0666&rft_id=info:doi/10.3816/CBC.2004.n.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71913353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71913353&rft_id=info:pmid/15140287&rft_els_id=S1526820911708345&rfr_iscdi=true