[18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management

Prognosis and management of patients with recurrent breast cancer depend on the spread of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose gamma camera positron emission tomography (FDG-GPET) in detecting breast cancer recurrence, its clinical impa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2004-02, Vol.31 (2), p.179-188
Hauptverfasser: Grahek, Dany, Montravers, Françoise, Kerrou, Khaldoun, Aide, Nicolas, Lotz, Jean-Pierre, Talbot, Jean-Noël
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 188
container_issue 2
container_start_page 179
container_title European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 31
creator Grahek, Dany
Montravers, Françoise
Kerrou, Khaldoun
Aide, Nicolas
Lotz, Jean-Pierre
Talbot, Jean-Noël
description Prognosis and management of patients with recurrent breast cancer depend on the spread of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose gamma camera positron emission tomography (FDG-GPET) in detecting breast cancer recurrence, its clinical impact and the relevance of induced changes in management. Patients (n = 134) with suspicion of recurrence either clinically or on conventional imaging (suspected recurrence: SR) or with an isolated increase in tumour marker levels (occult recurrence: OR) underwent FDG-GPET on a coincidence gamma camera. The reference standard for evaluation of accuracy, either histology (n = 26) or follow-up for 1 year (n = 49), was available in 75 (56%) patients. A questionnaire was sent to the referring clinician to evaluate the impact of FDG on management. Responses were obtained for 75 patients. Information regarding both approaches was available for 46 patients (46/134 = 34%). At the patient level, the sensitivity of FDG-GPET was 84%, significantly higher than the 63% sensitivity for conventional modalities, and the specificity was 78% versus 61%. The values for FDG-GPET were 81% and 86% respectively in the SR group and 90% and 73% respectively in the OR group, without any significant difference between these settings. The rate of change in management was 44% overall, 43% in the SR group and 45% in the OR group. Within the two groups, intermodality (major) changes were more frequent than intramodality (minor) changes. In the 46 patients for whom both approaches were available, 93% of management modifications were relevant (validated by biopsy or clinical follow-up). The results of this retrospective study show that FDG-GPET has an important role to play in patient management by confirming and evaluating the extent of recurrence or by localising occult recurrence.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00259-003-1348-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71912466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71912466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-35fe28dfdd9b6dcfaff9d82cd295d6b99afde42f3242164b0f35c931204708f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhoMofqz-AC8SPHiymkk_403UVUHwoieRkCaTtdKma9IKgj_elF0UvCSBeeadIQ8hh8DOgLHyPDDGc5EwliaQZlUCG2QXChBJySqx-fsu2Q7ZC-GdMah4JbbJDuTARSHELvl-gWr-Or--pY2jHvXoPbqB1h5VGKhWTqO_oKZRC9eHodF0id72vpsK4ZTqtnGNVi1tuqXSA1XOxJQWP6c67W1MNaNGQ_WbcgsM05TYqxbYxTH7ZMuqNuDB-p6R5_nN09Vd8vB4e391-ZDolGdDkuYWeWWsMaIujLbKWmEqrg0XuSlqIZQ1mHEbYQ5FVjOb5lqkwFkWP8KW6YycrHKXvv8YMQyya4LGtlUO-zHIEgTwrCgiePwPfO9H7-JukkNW5CzjLEKwgrTvQ_Bo5dI3nfJfEpicvMiVFxm9yMlLPGbkaB081h2av461iPQH6FyJhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214650420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>[18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Grahek, Dany ; Montravers, Françoise ; Kerrou, Khaldoun ; Aide, Nicolas ; Lotz, Jean-Pierre ; Talbot, Jean-Noël</creator><creatorcontrib>Grahek, Dany ; Montravers, Françoise ; Kerrou, Khaldoun ; Aide, Nicolas ; Lotz, Jean-Pierre ; Talbot, Jean-Noël</creatorcontrib><description>Prognosis and management of patients with recurrent breast cancer depend on the spread of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose gamma camera positron emission tomography (FDG-GPET) in detecting breast cancer recurrence, its clinical impact and the relevance of induced changes in management. Patients (n = 134) with suspicion of recurrence either clinically or on conventional imaging (suspected recurrence: SR) or with an isolated increase in tumour marker levels (occult recurrence: OR) underwent FDG-GPET on a coincidence gamma camera. The reference standard for evaluation of accuracy, either histology (n = 26) or follow-up for 1 year (n = 49), was available in 75 (56%) patients. A questionnaire was sent to the referring clinician to evaluate the impact of FDG on management. Responses were obtained for 75 patients. Information regarding both approaches was available for 46 patients (46/134 = 34%). At the patient level, the sensitivity of FDG-GPET was 84%, significantly higher than the 63% sensitivity for conventional modalities, and the specificity was 78% versus 61%. The values for FDG-GPET were 81% and 86% respectively in the SR group and 90% and 73% respectively in the OR group, without any significant difference between these settings. The rate of change in management was 44% overall, 43% in the SR group and 45% in the OR group. Within the two groups, intermodality (major) changes were more frequent than intramodality (minor) changes. In the 46 patients for whom both approaches were available, 93% of management modifications were relevant (validated by biopsy or clinical follow-up). The results of this retrospective study show that FDG-GPET has an important role to play in patient management by confirming and evaluating the extent of recurrence or by localising occult recurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1348-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15129699</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Decision Making ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging ; Patient Care Management - methods ; Prognosis ; Radionuclide Imaging - methods ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2004-02, Vol.31 (2), p.179-188</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-35fe28dfdd9b6dcfaff9d82cd295d6b99afde42f3242164b0f35c931204708f73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15129699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grahek, Dany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montravers, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerrou, Khaldoun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aide, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotz, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Jean-Noël</creatorcontrib><title>[18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>Prognosis and management of patients with recurrent breast cancer depend on the spread of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose gamma camera positron emission tomography (FDG-GPET) in detecting breast cancer recurrence, its clinical impact and the relevance of induced changes in management. Patients (n = 134) with suspicion of recurrence either clinically or on conventional imaging (suspected recurrence: SR) or with an isolated increase in tumour marker levels (occult recurrence: OR) underwent FDG-GPET on a coincidence gamma camera. The reference standard for evaluation of accuracy, either histology (n = 26) or follow-up for 1 year (n = 49), was available in 75 (56%) patients. A questionnaire was sent to the referring clinician to evaluate the impact of FDG on management. Responses were obtained for 75 patients. Information regarding both approaches was available for 46 patients (46/134 = 34%). At the patient level, the sensitivity of FDG-GPET was 84%, significantly higher than the 63% sensitivity for conventional modalities, and the specificity was 78% versus 61%. The values for FDG-GPET were 81% and 86% respectively in the SR group and 90% and 73% respectively in the OR group, without any significant difference between these settings. The rate of change in management was 44% overall, 43% in the SR group and 45% in the OR group. Within the two groups, intermodality (major) changes were more frequent than intramodality (minor) changes. In the 46 patients for whom both approaches were available, 93% of management modifications were relevant (validated by biopsy or clinical follow-up). The results of this retrospective study show that FDG-GPET has an important role to play in patient management by confirming and evaluating the extent of recurrence or by localising occult recurrence.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Patient Care Management - methods</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhoMofqz-AC8SPHiymkk_403UVUHwoieRkCaTtdKma9IKgj_elF0UvCSBeeadIQ8hh8DOgLHyPDDGc5EwliaQZlUCG2QXChBJySqx-fsu2Q7ZC-GdMah4JbbJDuTARSHELvl-gWr-Or--pY2jHvXoPbqB1h5VGKhWTqO_oKZRC9eHodF0id72vpsK4ZTqtnGNVi1tuqXSA1XOxJQWP6c67W1MNaNGQ_WbcgsM05TYqxbYxTH7ZMuqNuDB-p6R5_nN09Vd8vB4e391-ZDolGdDkuYWeWWsMaIujLbKWmEqrg0XuSlqIZQ1mHEbYQ5FVjOb5lqkwFkWP8KW6YycrHKXvv8YMQyya4LGtlUO-zHIEgTwrCgiePwPfO9H7-JukkNW5CzjLEKwgrTvQ_Bo5dI3nfJfEpicvMiVFxm9yMlLPGbkaB081h2av461iPQH6FyJhw</recordid><startdate>200402</startdate><enddate>200402</enddate><creator>Grahek, Dany</creator><creator>Montravers, Françoise</creator><creator>Kerrou, Khaldoun</creator><creator>Aide, Nicolas</creator><creator>Lotz, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Talbot, Jean-Noël</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200402</creationdate><title>[18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management</title><author>Grahek, Dany ; Montravers, Françoise ; Kerrou, Khaldoun ; Aide, Nicolas ; Lotz, Jean-Pierre ; Talbot, Jean-Noël</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-35fe28dfdd9b6dcfaff9d82cd295d6b99afde42f3242164b0f35c931204708f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Patient Care Management - methods</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grahek, Dany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montravers, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerrou, Khaldoun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aide, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotz, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbot, Jean-Noël</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grahek, Dany</au><au>Montravers, Françoise</au><au>Kerrou, Khaldoun</au><au>Aide, Nicolas</au><au>Lotz, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Talbot, Jean-Noël</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>[18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><date>2004-02</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>179-188</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>Prognosis and management of patients with recurrent breast cancer depend on the spread of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose gamma camera positron emission tomography (FDG-GPET) in detecting breast cancer recurrence, its clinical impact and the relevance of induced changes in management. Patients (n = 134) with suspicion of recurrence either clinically or on conventional imaging (suspected recurrence: SR) or with an isolated increase in tumour marker levels (occult recurrence: OR) underwent FDG-GPET on a coincidence gamma camera. The reference standard for evaluation of accuracy, either histology (n = 26) or follow-up for 1 year (n = 49), was available in 75 (56%) patients. A questionnaire was sent to the referring clinician to evaluate the impact of FDG on management. Responses were obtained for 75 patients. Information regarding both approaches was available for 46 patients (46/134 = 34%). At the patient level, the sensitivity of FDG-GPET was 84%, significantly higher than the 63% sensitivity for conventional modalities, and the specificity was 78% versus 61%. The values for FDG-GPET were 81% and 86% respectively in the SR group and 90% and 73% respectively in the OR group, without any significant difference between these settings. The rate of change in management was 44% overall, 43% in the SR group and 45% in the OR group. Within the two groups, intermodality (major) changes were more frequent than intramodality (minor) changes. In the 46 patients for whom both approaches were available, 93% of management modifications were relevant (validated by biopsy or clinical follow-up). The results of this retrospective study show that FDG-GPET has an important role to play in patient management by confirming and evaluating the extent of recurrence or by localising occult recurrence.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15129699</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-003-1348-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1619-7070
ispartof European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2004-02, Vol.31 (2), p.179-188
issn 1619-7070
1619-7089
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71912466
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Decision Making
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging
Patient Care Management - methods
Prognosis
Radionuclide Imaging - methods
Radiopharmaceuticals
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment - methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods
title [18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A35%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%5B18F%5DFDG%20in%20recurrent%20breast%20cancer:%20diagnostic%20performances,%20clinical%20impact%20and%20relevance%20of%20induced%20changes%20in%20management&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Grahek,%20Dany&rft.date=2004-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=179-188&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-003-1348-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71912466%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214650420&rft_id=info:pmid/15129699&rfr_iscdi=true