The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities
The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler. I) During four weeks...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Netherlands journal of medicine 2004-02, Vol.62 (2), p.53-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Netherlands journal of medicine |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | VAN DE VEN, A. C BREDIE, S. J. H VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M HOLEWIJN, S THIEN, Th |
description | The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler.
I) During four weeks, four ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed on 44 patients: one measurement with the classic Doppler by an experienced investigator, one with the classic Doppler by an inexperienced investigator and two measurements with the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator. II) 36 patients were screened for venous insufficiency by detecting venous reflux with the StethoDop and classic Doppler at the saphenofemoral and saphenopoplitial junctions by an inexperienced investigator. The results were compared with the results of the duplex as gold standard and with the results of the examination by an experienced dermatologist with the classic Doppler.
I) The confidence interval of ABI measurement for both the classic Doppler and the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator was within an acceptable +/- 0.21 interval of significant change. II) For venous reflux determination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the StethoDop were comparable with the sensitivity and specificity of the classic Doppler: sensitivity 76.0 and 75.0%, specificity 94.8 and 94.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the StethoDop, compared with the duplex, was 87.5%; the negative predictive value was 90.0%.
I) For ABI measurement, the StethoDop is a valid instrument with reproducible results, even when used by inexperienced investigators. II) For venous reflux determination, the StethoDop is a valid screening instrument for venous insufficiency. However, as with determination with the classic Doppler, the reflux assessment by StethoDop gives no information about the deep veins and may miss up to 24% of apparent reflux. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71910132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71910132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-4913fe2957e0ee147c6688ecdae0bdd348b5871afdf714dc8fc1bf46ffb8e33e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0E1LxDAQBuAgiruu_gXJRW-FpGmb1Jusn7DgwfVc0nTiRtqkJqm6J_-6UVfw9MLw8M4we2hOBc-zmlR0H80JIyTLa85n6CiEF0JIxevyEM1oSXMuGJ2jz_UG8GOEuHFXbrzAEqcYe_A4_AyDciNgGaNUmwFsxNp5bOwbhGieZTTOYqex9BG8kT2WtsNvYN0UEgqT1kYZsGr7jWLa1Lv3VA0f0cNgooFwjA607AOc7HKBnm6u18u7bPVwe7-8XGVjznjMipoyDXldciAAtOCqqoQA1UkgbdexQrSl4FTqTnNadEpoRVtdVFq3AhgDtkDnv72jd69Tur4ZTFDQ99JCurbhtKaEsjzB0x2c2gG6ZvRmkH7b_L0sgbMdkEHJXntplQn_XCFKRmv2BRdMeaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71910132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>VAN DE VEN, A. C ; BREDIE, S. J. H ; VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M ; HOLEWIJN, S ; THIEN, Th</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN DE VEN, A. C ; BREDIE, S. J. H ; VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M ; HOLEWIJN, S ; THIEN, Th</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler.
I) During four weeks, four ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed on 44 patients: one measurement with the classic Doppler by an experienced investigator, one with the classic Doppler by an inexperienced investigator and two measurements with the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator. II) 36 patients were screened for venous insufficiency by detecting venous reflux with the StethoDop and classic Doppler at the saphenofemoral and saphenopoplitial junctions by an inexperienced investigator. The results were compared with the results of the duplex as gold standard and with the results of the examination by an experienced dermatologist with the classic Doppler.
I) The confidence interval of ABI measurement for both the classic Doppler and the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator was within an acceptable +/- 0.21 interval of significant change. II) For venous reflux determination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the StethoDop were comparable with the sensitivity and specificity of the classic Doppler: sensitivity 76.0 and 75.0%, specificity 94.8 and 94.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the StethoDop, compared with the duplex, was 87.5%; the negative predictive value was 90.0%.
I) For ABI measurement, the StethoDop is a valid instrument with reproducible results, even when used by inexperienced investigators. II) For venous reflux determination, the StethoDop is a valid screening instrument for venous insufficiency. However, as with determination with the classic Doppler, the reflux assessment by StethoDop gives no information about the deep veins and may miss up to 24% of apparent reflux.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-2977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15127831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alphen aan den Rijn: Van zuiden</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ankle - blood supply ; Ankle - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Brachial Artery - physiopathology ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous ; Female ; Femoral Vein - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Vein - physiopathology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Lower Extremity - blood supply ; Lower Extremity - physiopathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Popliteal Artery - physiopathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Saphenous Vein - diagnostic imaging ; Saphenous Vein - physiopathology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stethoscopes ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; Venous Insufficiency - diagnosis ; Venous Insufficiency - epidemiology ; Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Netherlands journal of medicine, 2004-02, Vol.62 (2), p.53-57</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15485319$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15127831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN DE VEN, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREDIE, S. J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLEWIJN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THIEN, Th</creatorcontrib><title>The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities</title><title>Netherlands journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Neth J Med</addtitle><description>The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler.
I) During four weeks, four ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed on 44 patients: one measurement with the classic Doppler by an experienced investigator, one with the classic Doppler by an inexperienced investigator and two measurements with the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator. II) 36 patients were screened for venous insufficiency by detecting venous reflux with the StethoDop and classic Doppler at the saphenofemoral and saphenopoplitial junctions by an inexperienced investigator. The results were compared with the results of the duplex as gold standard and with the results of the examination by an experienced dermatologist with the classic Doppler.
I) The confidence interval of ABI measurement for both the classic Doppler and the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator was within an acceptable +/- 0.21 interval of significant change. II) For venous reflux determination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the StethoDop were comparable with the sensitivity and specificity of the classic Doppler: sensitivity 76.0 and 75.0%, specificity 94.8 and 94.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the StethoDop, compared with the duplex, was 87.5%; the negative predictive value was 90.0%.
I) For ABI measurement, the StethoDop is a valid instrument with reproducible results, even when used by inexperienced investigators. II) For venous reflux determination, the StethoDop is a valid screening instrument for venous insufficiency. However, as with determination with the classic Doppler, the reflux assessment by StethoDop gives no information about the deep veins and may miss up to 24% of apparent reflux.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ankle - blood supply</subject><subject>Ankle - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brachial Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Vein - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Vein - physiopathology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - blood supply</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stethoscopes</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - diagnosis</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - epidemiology</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><issn>0300-2977</issn><issn>1872-9061</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpN0E1LxDAQBuAgiruu_gXJRW-FpGmb1Jusn7DgwfVc0nTiRtqkJqm6J_-6UVfw9MLw8M4we2hOBc-zmlR0H80JIyTLa85n6CiEF0JIxevyEM1oSXMuGJ2jz_UG8GOEuHFXbrzAEqcYe_A4_AyDciNgGaNUmwFsxNp5bOwbhGieZTTOYqex9BG8kT2WtsNvYN0UEgqT1kYZsGr7jWLa1Lv3VA0f0cNgooFwjA607AOc7HKBnm6u18u7bPVwe7-8XGVjznjMipoyDXldciAAtOCqqoQA1UkgbdexQrSl4FTqTnNadEpoRVtdVFq3AhgDtkDnv72jd69Tur4ZTFDQ99JCurbhtKaEsjzB0x2c2gG6ZvRmkH7b_L0sgbMdkEHJXntplQn_XCFKRmv2BRdMeaQ</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>VAN DE VEN, A. C</creator><creator>BREDIE, S. J. H</creator><creator>VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M</creator><creator>HOLEWIJN, S</creator><creator>THIEN, Th</creator><general>Van zuiden</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities</title><author>VAN DE VEN, A. C ; BREDIE, S. J. H ; VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M ; HOLEWIJN, S ; THIEN, Th</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-4913fe2957e0ee147c6688ecdae0bdd348b5871afdf714dc8fc1bf46ffb8e33e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ankle - blood supply</topic><topic>Ankle - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brachial Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Vein - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Vein - physiopathology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - blood supply</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stethoscopes</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - diagnosis</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - epidemiology</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN DE VEN, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREDIE, S. J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLEWIJN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THIEN, Th</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Netherlands journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN DE VEN, A. C</au><au>BREDIE, S. J. H</au><au>VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M</au><au>HOLEWIJN, S</au><au>THIEN, Th</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities</atitle><jtitle>Netherlands journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Neth J Med</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>53-57</pages><issn>0300-2977</issn><eissn>1872-9061</eissn><abstract>The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler.
I) During four weeks, four ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed on 44 patients: one measurement with the classic Doppler by an experienced investigator, one with the classic Doppler by an inexperienced investigator and two measurements with the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator. II) 36 patients were screened for venous insufficiency by detecting venous reflux with the StethoDop and classic Doppler at the saphenofemoral and saphenopoplitial junctions by an inexperienced investigator. The results were compared with the results of the duplex as gold standard and with the results of the examination by an experienced dermatologist with the classic Doppler.
I) The confidence interval of ABI measurement for both the classic Doppler and the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator was within an acceptable +/- 0.21 interval of significant change. II) For venous reflux determination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the StethoDop were comparable with the sensitivity and specificity of the classic Doppler: sensitivity 76.0 and 75.0%, specificity 94.8 and 94.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the StethoDop, compared with the duplex, was 87.5%; the negative predictive value was 90.0%.
I) For ABI measurement, the StethoDop is a valid instrument with reproducible results, even when used by inexperienced investigators. II) For venous reflux determination, the StethoDop is a valid screening instrument for venous insufficiency. However, as with determination with the classic Doppler, the reflux assessment by StethoDop gives no information about the deep veins and may miss up to 24% of apparent reflux.</abstract><cop>Alphen aan den Rijn</cop><pub>Van zuiden</pub><pmid>15127831</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-2977 |
ispartof | Netherlands journal of medicine, 2004-02, Vol.62 (2), p.53-57 |
issn | 0300-2977 1872-9061 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71910132 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Ankle - blood supply Ankle - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Blood and lymphatic vessels Blood Pressure - physiology Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging Brachial Artery - physiopathology Cardiology. Vascular system Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous Female Femoral Vein - diagnostic imaging Femoral Vein - physiopathology General aspects Humans Lower Extremity - blood supply Lower Extremity - physiopathology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Netherlands - epidemiology Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging Popliteal Artery - physiopathology Predictive Value of Tests Prevalence Risk Factors Saphenous Vein - diagnostic imaging Saphenous Vein - physiopathology Sensitivity and Specificity Stethoscopes Ultrasonography, Doppler Venous Insufficiency - diagnosis Venous Insufficiency - epidemiology Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology |
title | The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A42%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20StethoDop:%20a%20Doppler%20stethoscope%20attachment%20for%20investigation%20of%20arterial%20and%20venous%20insufficiency%20of%20the%20lower%20extremities&rft.jtitle=Netherlands%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=VAN%20DE%20VEN,%20A.%20C&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=53-57&rft.issn=0300-2977&rft.eissn=1872-9061&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71910132%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71910132&rft_id=info:pmid/15127831&rfr_iscdi=true |