The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities

The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler. I) During four weeks...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Netherlands journal of medicine 2004-02, Vol.62 (2), p.53-57
Hauptverfasser: VAN DE VEN, A. C, BREDIE, S. J. H, VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M, HOLEWIJN, S, THIEN, Th
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 2
container_start_page 53
container_title Netherlands journal of medicine
container_volume 62
creator VAN DE VEN, A. C
BREDIE, S. J. H
VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M
HOLEWIJN, S
THIEN, Th
description The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler. I) During four weeks, four ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed on 44 patients: one measurement with the classic Doppler by an experienced investigator, one with the classic Doppler by an inexperienced investigator and two measurements with the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator. II) 36 patients were screened for venous insufficiency by detecting venous reflux with the StethoDop and classic Doppler at the saphenofemoral and saphenopoplitial junctions by an inexperienced investigator. The results were compared with the results of the duplex as gold standard and with the results of the examination by an experienced dermatologist with the classic Doppler. I) The confidence interval of ABI measurement for both the classic Doppler and the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator was within an acceptable +/- 0.21 interval of significant change. II) For venous reflux determination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the StethoDop were comparable with the sensitivity and specificity of the classic Doppler: sensitivity 76.0 and 75.0%, specificity 94.8 and 94.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the StethoDop, compared with the duplex, was 87.5%; the negative predictive value was 90.0%. I) For ABI measurement, the StethoDop is a valid instrument with reproducible results, even when used by inexperienced investigators. II) For venous reflux determination, the StethoDop is a valid screening instrument for venous insufficiency. However, as with determination with the classic Doppler, the reflux assessment by StethoDop gives no information about the deep veins and may miss up to 24% of apparent reflux.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71910132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71910132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-4913fe2957e0ee147c6688ecdae0bdd348b5871afdf714dc8fc1bf46ffb8e33e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0E1LxDAQBuAgiruu_gXJRW-FpGmb1Jusn7DgwfVc0nTiRtqkJqm6J_-6UVfw9MLw8M4we2hOBc-zmlR0H80JIyTLa85n6CiEF0JIxevyEM1oSXMuGJ2jz_UG8GOEuHFXbrzAEqcYe_A4_AyDciNgGaNUmwFsxNp5bOwbhGieZTTOYqex9BG8kT2WtsNvYN0UEgqT1kYZsGr7jWLa1Lv3VA0f0cNgooFwjA607AOc7HKBnm6u18u7bPVwe7-8XGVjznjMipoyDXldciAAtOCqqoQA1UkgbdexQrSl4FTqTnNadEpoRVtdVFq3AhgDtkDnv72jd69Tur4ZTFDQ99JCurbhtKaEsjzB0x2c2gG6ZvRmkH7b_L0sgbMdkEHJXntplQn_XCFKRmv2BRdMeaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71910132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>VAN DE VEN, A. C ; BREDIE, S. J. H ; VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M ; HOLEWIJN, S ; THIEN, Th</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN DE VEN, A. C ; BREDIE, S. J. H ; VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M ; HOLEWIJN, S ; THIEN, Th</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler. I) During four weeks, four ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed on 44 patients: one measurement with the classic Doppler by an experienced investigator, one with the classic Doppler by an inexperienced investigator and two measurements with the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator. II) 36 patients were screened for venous insufficiency by detecting venous reflux with the StethoDop and classic Doppler at the saphenofemoral and saphenopoplitial junctions by an inexperienced investigator. The results were compared with the results of the duplex as gold standard and with the results of the examination by an experienced dermatologist with the classic Doppler. I) The confidence interval of ABI measurement for both the classic Doppler and the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator was within an acceptable +/- 0.21 interval of significant change. II) For venous reflux determination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the StethoDop were comparable with the sensitivity and specificity of the classic Doppler: sensitivity 76.0 and 75.0%, specificity 94.8 and 94.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the StethoDop, compared with the duplex, was 87.5%; the negative predictive value was 90.0%. I) For ABI measurement, the StethoDop is a valid instrument with reproducible results, even when used by inexperienced investigators. II) For venous reflux determination, the StethoDop is a valid screening instrument for venous insufficiency. However, as with determination with the classic Doppler, the reflux assessment by StethoDop gives no information about the deep veins and may miss up to 24% of apparent reflux.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-2977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15127831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alphen aan den Rijn: Van zuiden</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ankle - blood supply ; Ankle - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Brachial Artery - physiopathology ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous ; Female ; Femoral Vein - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Vein - physiopathology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Lower Extremity - blood supply ; Lower Extremity - physiopathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Popliteal Artery - physiopathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Saphenous Vein - diagnostic imaging ; Saphenous Vein - physiopathology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stethoscopes ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; Venous Insufficiency - diagnosis ; Venous Insufficiency - epidemiology ; Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Netherlands journal of medicine, 2004-02, Vol.62 (2), p.53-57</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15485319$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15127831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN DE VEN, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREDIE, S. J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLEWIJN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THIEN, Th</creatorcontrib><title>The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities</title><title>Netherlands journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Neth J Med</addtitle><description>The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler. I) During four weeks, four ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed on 44 patients: one measurement with the classic Doppler by an experienced investigator, one with the classic Doppler by an inexperienced investigator and two measurements with the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator. II) 36 patients were screened for venous insufficiency by detecting venous reflux with the StethoDop and classic Doppler at the saphenofemoral and saphenopoplitial junctions by an inexperienced investigator. The results were compared with the results of the duplex as gold standard and with the results of the examination by an experienced dermatologist with the classic Doppler. I) The confidence interval of ABI measurement for both the classic Doppler and the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator was within an acceptable +/- 0.21 interval of significant change. II) For venous reflux determination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the StethoDop were comparable with the sensitivity and specificity of the classic Doppler: sensitivity 76.0 and 75.0%, specificity 94.8 and 94.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the StethoDop, compared with the duplex, was 87.5%; the negative predictive value was 90.0%. I) For ABI measurement, the StethoDop is a valid instrument with reproducible results, even when used by inexperienced investigators. II) For venous reflux determination, the StethoDop is a valid screening instrument for venous insufficiency. However, as with determination with the classic Doppler, the reflux assessment by StethoDop gives no information about the deep veins and may miss up to 24% of apparent reflux.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ankle - blood supply</subject><subject>Ankle - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brachial Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Vein - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Vein - physiopathology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - blood supply</subject><subject>Lower Extremity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stethoscopes</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - diagnosis</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - epidemiology</subject><subject>Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><issn>0300-2977</issn><issn>1872-9061</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpN0E1LxDAQBuAgiruu_gXJRW-FpGmb1Jusn7DgwfVc0nTiRtqkJqm6J_-6UVfw9MLw8M4we2hOBc-zmlR0H80JIyTLa85n6CiEF0JIxevyEM1oSXMuGJ2jz_UG8GOEuHFXbrzAEqcYe_A4_AyDciNgGaNUmwFsxNp5bOwbhGieZTTOYqex9BG8kT2WtsNvYN0UEgqT1kYZsGr7jWLa1Lv3VA0f0cNgooFwjA607AOc7HKBnm6u18u7bPVwe7-8XGVjznjMipoyDXldciAAtOCqqoQA1UkgbdexQrSl4FTqTnNadEpoRVtdVFq3AhgDtkDnv72jd69Tur4ZTFDQ99JCurbhtKaEsjzB0x2c2gG6ZvRmkH7b_L0sgbMdkEHJXntplQn_XCFKRmv2BRdMeaQ</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>VAN DE VEN, A. C</creator><creator>BREDIE, S. J. H</creator><creator>VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M</creator><creator>HOLEWIJN, S</creator><creator>THIEN, Th</creator><general>Van zuiden</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities</title><author>VAN DE VEN, A. C ; BREDIE, S. J. H ; VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M ; HOLEWIJN, S ; THIEN, Th</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-4913fe2957e0ee147c6688ecdae0bdd348b5871afdf714dc8fc1bf46ffb8e33e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ankle - blood supply</topic><topic>Ankle - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brachial Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Vein - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Vein - physiopathology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - blood supply</topic><topic>Lower Extremity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stethoscopes</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - diagnosis</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - epidemiology</topic><topic>Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN DE VEN, A. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREDIE, S. J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLEWIJN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THIEN, Th</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Netherlands journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN DE VEN, A. C</au><au>BREDIE, S. J. H</au><au>VAN DER VLEUTEN, C. J. M</au><au>HOLEWIJN, S</au><au>THIEN, Th</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities</atitle><jtitle>Netherlands journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Neth J Med</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>53-57</pages><issn>0300-2977</issn><eissn>1872-9061</eissn><abstract>The aim of the current study was to investigate whether the StethoDop can serve as a valid and reproducible instrument for measuring the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and assessing venous reflux, even when used by inexperienced investigators, in comparison with the classic Doppler. I) During four weeks, four ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed on 44 patients: one measurement with the classic Doppler by an experienced investigator, one with the classic Doppler by an inexperienced investigator and two measurements with the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator. II) 36 patients were screened for venous insufficiency by detecting venous reflux with the StethoDop and classic Doppler at the saphenofemoral and saphenopoplitial junctions by an inexperienced investigator. The results were compared with the results of the duplex as gold standard and with the results of the examination by an experienced dermatologist with the classic Doppler. I) The confidence interval of ABI measurement for both the classic Doppler and the StethoDop by the inexperienced investigator was within an acceptable +/- 0.21 interval of significant change. II) For venous reflux determination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the StethoDop were comparable with the sensitivity and specificity of the classic Doppler: sensitivity 76.0 and 75.0%, specificity 94.8 and 94.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the StethoDop, compared with the duplex, was 87.5%; the negative predictive value was 90.0%. I) For ABI measurement, the StethoDop is a valid instrument with reproducible results, even when used by inexperienced investigators. II) For venous reflux determination, the StethoDop is a valid screening instrument for venous insufficiency. However, as with determination with the classic Doppler, the reflux assessment by StethoDop gives no information about the deep veins and may miss up to 24% of apparent reflux.</abstract><cop>Alphen aan den Rijn</cop><pub>Van zuiden</pub><pmid>15127831</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-2977
ispartof Netherlands journal of medicine, 2004-02, Vol.62 (2), p.53-57
issn 0300-2977
1872-9061
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71910132
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ankle - blood supply
Ankle - physiopathology
Biological and medical sciences
Blood and lymphatic vessels
Blood Pressure - physiology
Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging
Brachial Artery - physiopathology
Cardiology. Vascular system
Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous
Female
Femoral Vein - diagnostic imaging
Femoral Vein - physiopathology
General aspects
Humans
Lower Extremity - blood supply
Lower Extremity - physiopathology
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Netherlands - epidemiology
Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging
Popliteal Artery - physiopathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prevalence
Risk Factors
Saphenous Vein - diagnostic imaging
Saphenous Vein - physiopathology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stethoscopes
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Venous Insufficiency - diagnosis
Venous Insufficiency - epidemiology
Venous Insufficiency - physiopathology
title The StethoDop: a Doppler stethoscope attachment for investigation of arterial and venous insufficiency of the lower extremities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A42%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20StethoDop:%20a%20Doppler%20stethoscope%20attachment%20for%20investigation%20of%20arterial%20and%20venous%20insufficiency%20of%20the%20lower%20extremities&rft.jtitle=Netherlands%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=VAN%20DE%20VEN,%20A.%20C&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=53-57&rft.issn=0300-2977&rft.eissn=1872-9061&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71910132%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71910132&rft_id=info:pmid/15127831&rfr_iscdi=true