The interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis
Objectives To examine the interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler data acquisition from the uterus and ovary. Methods 3D power Doppler angiography was used to acquire endometrial data from 20 patients and ovarian data from a further 20 different patients at various stages o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2004-05, Vol.23 (5), p.501-508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 508 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 501 |
container_title | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Raine‐Fenning, N. J. Campbell, B. K. Clewes, J. S. Kendall, N. R. Johnson, I. R. |
description | Objectives
To examine the interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler data acquisition from the uterus and ovary.
Methods
3D power Doppler angiography was used to acquire endometrial data from 20 patients and ovarian data from a further 20 different patients at various stages of in vitro fertilization. Two different observers each acquired two datasets from all 40 patients resulting in 80 endometrial and 80 ovarian datasets in total. Virtual Organ Computer‐aided AnaLysis was used to define the object of interest and semiquantify the power Doppler signal within it. The reliability of measurements of volume and vascularity was assessed by calculating interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement between the two observers.
Results
Whilst volumetric data proved more reliably acquirable than power Doppler data, the interobserver reliability of data acquisition was high overall for both the endometrium and ovary with all measurements obtaining a lower ICC of above 0.9. Limits of agreement revealed minimal disagreement between the two observers for measurements of volume and vascularity within both the ovary and endometrium. The ‘indices of vascularity’ within the endometrium were less than those derived from the ovary and subendometrium, which were comparable.
Conclusions
3D ultrasound can be reliably used between observers to acquire power Doppler information from the ovary and endometrium thus supporting the current use and further development of this technique in clinical practice. Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/uog.1019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71908319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71908319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4129-7c41dc2e0dd8a02bade4547f2f31492a8b34d1b265030c9cad0f6a0f0c62c1fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9u1DAQBnALUdFtQeIJkC8gLinjP3E2R9RCQarUS3uOHHvMGjlxaidd7Y1H4Bl5ErzdleCCOH0-_GZG8kfIawYXDIB_WOK38mDtM7JiUrUVNFA_JytoFVSNavkpOcv5OwAoKdQLcspqJsQa5IqEuw1SP86YYp8xPWKiCYPXvQ9-3tHo6LxJiL9-_LR-wDH7OOpAp7gt8CpOUyhp9aypNg-Lz34ugG79vPFjmUTqcNAB6YTh0eeX5MTpkPHVMc_J_edPd5dfqpvb66-XH28qIxlvq6aENRzB2rUG3muLspaN404w2XK97oW0rOeqBgGmNdqCUxocGMUNc1ack3eHvVOKDwvmuRt8NhiCHjEuuWtYC2vB2v9C1tQNcAUFvj9Ak2LOCV03JT_otOsYdPsKulJBt6-g0DfHnUs_oP0Dj39ewNsj0Nno4JIejc9_uaZmUuxddXBbH3D3z4Pd_e310-HfJUqfvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17570260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Raine‐Fenning, N. J. ; Campbell, B. K. ; Clewes, J. S. ; Kendall, N. R. ; Johnson, I. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raine‐Fenning, N. J. ; Campbell, B. K. ; Clewes, J. S. ; Kendall, N. R. ; Johnson, I. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To examine the interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler data acquisition from the uterus and ovary.
Methods
3D power Doppler angiography was used to acquire endometrial data from 20 patients and ovarian data from a further 20 different patients at various stages of in vitro fertilization. Two different observers each acquired two datasets from all 40 patients resulting in 80 endometrial and 80 ovarian datasets in total. Virtual Organ Computer‐aided AnaLysis was used to define the object of interest and semiquantify the power Doppler signal within it. The reliability of measurements of volume and vascularity was assessed by calculating interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement between the two observers.
Results
Whilst volumetric data proved more reliably acquirable than power Doppler data, the interobserver reliability of data acquisition was high overall for both the endometrium and ovary with all measurements obtaining a lower ICC of above 0.9. Limits of agreement revealed minimal disagreement between the two observers for measurements of volume and vascularity within both the ovary and endometrium. The ‘indices of vascularity’ within the endometrium were less than those derived from the ovary and subendometrium, which were comparable.
Conclusions
3D ultrasound can be reliably used between observers to acquire power Doppler information from the ovary and endometrium thus supporting the current use and further development of this technique in clinical practice. Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.1019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15133804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; data acquisition ; Data Collection ; Embryo Transfer ; Endometrium - blood supply ; Endometrium - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Medical sciences ; Menstrual Cycle ; Observer Variation ; Ovary - blood supply ; Ovary - diagnostic imaging ; power Doppler ; Pregnancy ; Regional Blood Flow ; reliability ; three‐dimensional ultrasound ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2004-05, Vol.23 (5), p.501-508</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4129-7c41dc2e0dd8a02bade4547f2f31492a8b34d1b265030c9cad0f6a0f0c62c1fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4129-7c41dc2e0dd8a02bade4547f2f31492a8b34d1b265030c9cad0f6a0f0c62c1fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.1019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.1019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27915,27916,45565,45566,46400,46824</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15751434$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15133804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raine‐Fenning, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, B. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clewes, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, N. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, I. R.</creatorcontrib><title>The interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To examine the interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler data acquisition from the uterus and ovary.
Methods
3D power Doppler angiography was used to acquire endometrial data from 20 patients and ovarian data from a further 20 different patients at various stages of in vitro fertilization. Two different observers each acquired two datasets from all 40 patients resulting in 80 endometrial and 80 ovarian datasets in total. Virtual Organ Computer‐aided AnaLysis was used to define the object of interest and semiquantify the power Doppler signal within it. The reliability of measurements of volume and vascularity was assessed by calculating interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement between the two observers.
Results
Whilst volumetric data proved more reliably acquirable than power Doppler data, the interobserver reliability of data acquisition was high overall for both the endometrium and ovary with all measurements obtaining a lower ICC of above 0.9. Limits of agreement revealed minimal disagreement between the two observers for measurements of volume and vascularity within both the ovary and endometrium. The ‘indices of vascularity’ within the endometrium were less than those derived from the ovary and subendometrium, which were comparable.
Conclusions
3D ultrasound can be reliably used between observers to acquire power Doppler information from the ovary and endometrium thus supporting the current use and further development of this technique in clinical practice. Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>data acquisition</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Endometrium - blood supply</subject><subject>Endometrium - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Menstrual Cycle</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Ovary - blood supply</subject><subject>Ovary - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>power Doppler</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>three‐dimensional ultrasound</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9u1DAQBnALUdFtQeIJkC8gLinjP3E2R9RCQarUS3uOHHvMGjlxaidd7Y1H4Bl5ErzdleCCOH0-_GZG8kfIawYXDIB_WOK38mDtM7JiUrUVNFA_JytoFVSNavkpOcv5OwAoKdQLcspqJsQa5IqEuw1SP86YYp8xPWKiCYPXvQ9-3tHo6LxJiL9-_LR-wDH7OOpAp7gt8CpOUyhp9aypNg-Lz34ugG79vPFjmUTqcNAB6YTh0eeX5MTpkPHVMc_J_edPd5dfqpvb66-XH28qIxlvq6aENRzB2rUG3muLspaN404w2XK97oW0rOeqBgGmNdqCUxocGMUNc1ack3eHvVOKDwvmuRt8NhiCHjEuuWtYC2vB2v9C1tQNcAUFvj9Ak2LOCV03JT_otOsYdPsKulJBt6-g0DfHnUs_oP0Dj39ewNsj0Nno4JIejc9_uaZmUuxddXBbH3D3z4Pd_e310-HfJUqfvA</recordid><startdate>200405</startdate><enddate>200405</enddate><creator>Raine‐Fenning, N. J.</creator><creator>Campbell, B. K.</creator><creator>Clewes, J. S.</creator><creator>Kendall, N. R.</creator><creator>Johnson, I. R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200405</creationdate><title>The interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis</title><author>Raine‐Fenning, N. J. ; Campbell, B. K. ; Clewes, J. S. ; Kendall, N. R. ; Johnson, I. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4129-7c41dc2e0dd8a02bade4547f2f31492a8b34d1b265030c9cad0f6a0f0c62c1fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>data acquisition</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Endometrium - blood supply</topic><topic>Endometrium - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Menstrual Cycle</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Ovary - blood supply</topic><topic>Ovary - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>power Doppler</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>three‐dimensional ultrasound</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raine‐Fenning, N. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, B. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clewes, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, N. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, I. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raine‐Fenning, N. J.</au><au>Campbell, B. K.</au><au>Clewes, J. S.</au><au>Kendall, N. R.</au><au>Johnson, I. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2004-05</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>501-508</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To examine the interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler data acquisition from the uterus and ovary.
Methods
3D power Doppler angiography was used to acquire endometrial data from 20 patients and ovarian data from a further 20 different patients at various stages of in vitro fertilization. Two different observers each acquired two datasets from all 40 patients resulting in 80 endometrial and 80 ovarian datasets in total. Virtual Organ Computer‐aided AnaLysis was used to define the object of interest and semiquantify the power Doppler signal within it. The reliability of measurements of volume and vascularity was assessed by calculating interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and limits of agreement between the two observers.
Results
Whilst volumetric data proved more reliably acquirable than power Doppler data, the interobserver reliability of data acquisition was high overall for both the endometrium and ovary with all measurements obtaining a lower ICC of above 0.9. Limits of agreement revealed minimal disagreement between the two observers for measurements of volume and vascularity within both the ovary and endometrium. The ‘indices of vascularity’ within the endometrium were less than those derived from the ovary and subendometrium, which were comparable.
Conclusions
3D ultrasound can be reliably used between observers to acquire power Doppler information from the ovary and endometrium thus supporting the current use and further development of this technique in clinical practice. Copyright © 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>15133804</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.1019</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7692 |
ispartof | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2004-05, Vol.23 (5), p.501-508 |
issn | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71908319 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences data acquisition Data Collection Embryo Transfer Endometrium - blood supply Endometrium - diagnostic imaging Female Fertilization in Vitro Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Medical sciences Menstrual Cycle Observer Variation Ovary - blood supply Ovary - diagnostic imaging power Doppler Pregnancy Regional Blood Flow reliability three‐dimensional ultrasound Ultrasonography, Doppler Ultrasonography, Prenatal |
title | The interobserver reliability of three‐dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interobserver%20reliability%20of%20three%E2%80%90dimensional%20power%20Doppler%20data%20acquisition%20within%20the%20female%20pelvis&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Raine%E2%80%90Fenning,%20N.%20J.&rft.date=2004-05&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=501-508&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.1019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71908319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17570260&rft_id=info:pmid/15133804&rfr_iscdi=true |