Rapid intraoperative diagnosis of tumors of the eye and orbit by squash and imprint cytology

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative squash and imprint cytologic techniques in ocular and orbital lesions. Observational case series. Forty-five consecutive ocular and orbital biopsy specimens subjected to squash and imprint cytologic techniques for rapid intraoperative diagnosis w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2004-05, Vol.111 (5), p.1009-1015
Hauptverfasser: Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap, Naik, Milind N, Honavar, Santosh G, Sekhar, G.Chandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1015
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1009
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 111
creator Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap
Naik, Milind N
Honavar, Santosh G
Sekhar, G.Chandra
description To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative squash and imprint cytologic techniques in ocular and orbital lesions. Observational case series. Forty-five consecutive ocular and orbital biopsy specimens subjected to squash and imprint cytologic techniques for rapid intraoperative diagnosis were included in this study. The indications for which the surgeon requested intraoperative diagnosis included: (1) infiltrative lesions where a preoperative tissue diagnosis was not available, (2) discrepancy between preoperative and intraoperative clinical diagnosis, and (3) unusual clinical presentations with an uncertain diagnosis. Fresh unfixed tissue was used for making squash preparations and imprint smears. Alcohol-fixed smears were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, whereas air-dried smears were stained with the Giemsa stain. The residual tissue was subjected to routine processing for histopathologic examination. Correlation of intraoperative cytologic diagnosis with the final histologic diagnosis was the primary outcome measure. The correlation was considered to have complete concordance if the diagnosis matched with respect to nature of the lesion (benign vs. malignant) as well as with the further classification of the benign or the malignant lesion. Partial concordance was considered when there was agreement with respect to the nature of the lesion, but there was a mismatch in the further classification of the benign or the malignant lesion. Biopsies were obtained from 45 patients whose ages ranged from 1 to 79 years (median, 21 years). The sites of biopsy included eyelids (n = 4), conjunctiva (n = 6), intraocular tissue (n = 3), and orbit (n = 32). Adequate cellularity was obtained in all cases by squash and imprint techniques. A cytologic diagnosis could be made within 5 to 8 minutes after receiving the sample. Of 44 cases in which a cytologic diagnosis could be made, 21 (48%) were malignant and 23 (52%) were benign. Cytologic analysis was inconclusive in 1 case. The cytologic–histologic correlation showed complete concordance in 41 of 45 cases (91%) and partial concordance in 3 cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the squash and imprint technique in detecting malignant lesions was 100%. Assuming the availability of a skilled cytologist, ophthalmic pathologist, or both, squash and imprint preparations are useful for rapid and reliable intraoperative diagnosis of ocular and orbital lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71905173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161642003017433</els_id><sourcerecordid>71905173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-c12d02eb4c0668c718307b45d01c790d7f89d894834f24e8937072b0991f45453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0EpurQ3O6MPr-RLoYT0AwKBkN4KQpbkrBbbciQ54H9fbb3QnnqaYXjm5eVB6D2BmgDZXx3rMB_yQdcUgNUga-DkBdqRhrcVF4S9RLuCkWrPKVygNykdAWC_Z_w1uiANoYRJskO_7vXsLfZTjjrMLursnx22Xj9OIfmEQ4_zMoa4bQeH3eqwniwOsfMZdytOT4tOhz83P86xJGGz5jCEx_UtetXrIbl353mJfn69ebj-Xt3efftx_eW2MkzKXBlCLVDXcVP6SSOIZCA63lggRrRgRS9bK1suGe8pd7JlAgTtoG1JzxvesEv0acudY3haXMpq9Mm4YdCTC0tSgrTQEMEKyDfQxJBSdL0qhUcdV0VAnayqo9qsqpNVBVIVq-Xtwzl_6UZn_z6dNRbg4xnQyeihj3oyPv3DiYZKeir6eeNcsfHsXVTJeDcZZ310Jisb_P-b_AZRQ5bB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71905173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid intraoperative diagnosis of tumors of the eye and orbit by squash and imprint cytology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap ; Naik, Milind N ; Honavar, Santosh G ; Sekhar, G.Chandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap ; Naik, Milind N ; Honavar, Santosh G ; Sekhar, G.Chandra</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative squash and imprint cytologic techniques in ocular and orbital lesions. Observational case series. Forty-five consecutive ocular and orbital biopsy specimens subjected to squash and imprint cytologic techniques for rapid intraoperative diagnosis were included in this study. The indications for which the surgeon requested intraoperative diagnosis included: (1) infiltrative lesions where a preoperative tissue diagnosis was not available, (2) discrepancy between preoperative and intraoperative clinical diagnosis, and (3) unusual clinical presentations with an uncertain diagnosis. Fresh unfixed tissue was used for making squash preparations and imprint smears. Alcohol-fixed smears were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, whereas air-dried smears were stained with the Giemsa stain. The residual tissue was subjected to routine processing for histopathologic examination. Correlation of intraoperative cytologic diagnosis with the final histologic diagnosis was the primary outcome measure. The correlation was considered to have complete concordance if the diagnosis matched with respect to nature of the lesion (benign vs. malignant) as well as with the further classification of the benign or the malignant lesion. Partial concordance was considered when there was agreement with respect to the nature of the lesion, but there was a mismatch in the further classification of the benign or the malignant lesion. Biopsies were obtained from 45 patients whose ages ranged from 1 to 79 years (median, 21 years). The sites of biopsy included eyelids (n = 4), conjunctiva (n = 6), intraocular tissue (n = 3), and orbit (n = 32). Adequate cellularity was obtained in all cases by squash and imprint techniques. A cytologic diagnosis could be made within 5 to 8 minutes after receiving the sample. Of 44 cases in which a cytologic diagnosis could be made, 21 (48%) were malignant and 23 (52%) were benign. Cytologic analysis was inconclusive in 1 case. The cytologic–histologic correlation showed complete concordance in 41 of 45 cases (91%) and partial concordance in 3 cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the squash and imprint technique in detecting malignant lesions was 100%. Assuming the availability of a skilled cytologist, ophthalmic pathologist, or both, squash and imprint preparations are useful for rapid and reliable intraoperative diagnosis of ocular and orbital lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15121381</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cytodiagnosis - methods ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological ; Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Humans ; Infant ; Intraoperative Period ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Orbital Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Pathology, Surgical - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit ; Tumors and pseudotumors of the eye, orbit, eyelid, lacrimal apparatus ; Vision disorders</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2004-05, Vol.111 (5), p.1009-1015</ispartof><rights>2004 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-c12d02eb4c0668c718307b45d01c790d7f89d894834f24e8937072b0991f45453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-c12d02eb4c0668c718307b45d01c790d7f89d894834f24e8937072b0991f45453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15752825$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15121381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naik, Milind N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honavar, Santosh G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekhar, G.Chandra</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid intraoperative diagnosis of tumors of the eye and orbit by squash and imprint cytology</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative squash and imprint cytologic techniques in ocular and orbital lesions. Observational case series. Forty-five consecutive ocular and orbital biopsy specimens subjected to squash and imprint cytologic techniques for rapid intraoperative diagnosis were included in this study. The indications for which the surgeon requested intraoperative diagnosis included: (1) infiltrative lesions where a preoperative tissue diagnosis was not available, (2) discrepancy between preoperative and intraoperative clinical diagnosis, and (3) unusual clinical presentations with an uncertain diagnosis. Fresh unfixed tissue was used for making squash preparations and imprint smears. Alcohol-fixed smears were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, whereas air-dried smears were stained with the Giemsa stain. The residual tissue was subjected to routine processing for histopathologic examination. Correlation of intraoperative cytologic diagnosis with the final histologic diagnosis was the primary outcome measure. The correlation was considered to have complete concordance if the diagnosis matched with respect to nature of the lesion (benign vs. malignant) as well as with the further classification of the benign or the malignant lesion. Partial concordance was considered when there was agreement with respect to the nature of the lesion, but there was a mismatch in the further classification of the benign or the malignant lesion. Biopsies were obtained from 45 patients whose ages ranged from 1 to 79 years (median, 21 years). The sites of biopsy included eyelids (n = 4), conjunctiva (n = 6), intraocular tissue (n = 3), and orbit (n = 32). Adequate cellularity was obtained in all cases by squash and imprint techniques. A cytologic diagnosis could be made within 5 to 8 minutes after receiving the sample. Of 44 cases in which a cytologic diagnosis could be made, 21 (48%) were malignant and 23 (52%) were benign. Cytologic analysis was inconclusive in 1 case. The cytologic–histologic correlation showed complete concordance in 41 of 45 cases (91%) and partial concordance in 3 cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the squash and imprint technique in detecting malignant lesions was 100%. Assuming the availability of a skilled cytologist, ophthalmic pathologist, or both, squash and imprint preparations are useful for rapid and reliable intraoperative diagnosis of ocular and orbital lesions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cytodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</subject><subject>Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Intraoperative Period</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Orbital Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pathology, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><subject>Tumors and pseudotumors of the eye, orbit, eyelid, lacrimal apparatus</subject><subject>Vision disorders</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpabZp_0EpurQ3O6MPr-RLoYT0AwKBkN4KQpbkrBbbciQ54H9fbb3QnnqaYXjm5eVB6D2BmgDZXx3rMB_yQdcUgNUga-DkBdqRhrcVF4S9RLuCkWrPKVygNykdAWC_Z_w1uiANoYRJskO_7vXsLfZTjjrMLursnx22Xj9OIfmEQ4_zMoa4bQeH3eqwniwOsfMZdytOT4tOhz83P86xJGGz5jCEx_UtetXrIbl353mJfn69ebj-Xt3efftx_eW2MkzKXBlCLVDXcVP6SSOIZCA63lggRrRgRS9bK1suGe8pd7JlAgTtoG1JzxvesEv0acudY3haXMpq9Mm4YdCTC0tSgrTQEMEKyDfQxJBSdL0qhUcdV0VAnayqo9qsqpNVBVIVq-Xtwzl_6UZn_z6dNRbg4xnQyeihj3oyPv3DiYZKeir6eeNcsfHsXVTJeDcZZ310Jisb_P-b_AZRQ5bB</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap</creator><creator>Naik, Milind N</creator><creator>Honavar, Santosh G</creator><creator>Sekhar, G.Chandra</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>Rapid intraoperative diagnosis of tumors of the eye and orbit by squash and imprint cytology</title><author>Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap ; Naik, Milind N ; Honavar, Santosh G ; Sekhar, G.Chandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-c12d02eb4c0668c718307b45d01c790d7f89d894834f24e8937072b0991f45453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cytodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</topic><topic>Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Intraoperative Period</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Orbital Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pathology, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><topic>Tumors and pseudotumors of the eye, orbit, eyelid, lacrimal apparatus</topic><topic>Vision disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naik, Milind N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honavar, Santosh G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekhar, G.Chandra</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vemuganti, Geeta Kashyap</au><au>Naik, Milind N</au><au>Honavar, Santosh G</au><au>Sekhar, G.Chandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid intraoperative diagnosis of tumors of the eye and orbit by squash and imprint cytology</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1009</spage><epage>1015</epage><pages>1009-1015</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative squash and imprint cytologic techniques in ocular and orbital lesions. Observational case series. Forty-five consecutive ocular and orbital biopsy specimens subjected to squash and imprint cytologic techniques for rapid intraoperative diagnosis were included in this study. The indications for which the surgeon requested intraoperative diagnosis included: (1) infiltrative lesions where a preoperative tissue diagnosis was not available, (2) discrepancy between preoperative and intraoperative clinical diagnosis, and (3) unusual clinical presentations with an uncertain diagnosis. Fresh unfixed tissue was used for making squash preparations and imprint smears. Alcohol-fixed smears were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, whereas air-dried smears were stained with the Giemsa stain. The residual tissue was subjected to routine processing for histopathologic examination. Correlation of intraoperative cytologic diagnosis with the final histologic diagnosis was the primary outcome measure. The correlation was considered to have complete concordance if the diagnosis matched with respect to nature of the lesion (benign vs. malignant) as well as with the further classification of the benign or the malignant lesion. Partial concordance was considered when there was agreement with respect to the nature of the lesion, but there was a mismatch in the further classification of the benign or the malignant lesion. Biopsies were obtained from 45 patients whose ages ranged from 1 to 79 years (median, 21 years). The sites of biopsy included eyelids (n = 4), conjunctiva (n = 6), intraocular tissue (n = 3), and orbit (n = 32). Adequate cellularity was obtained in all cases by squash and imprint techniques. A cytologic diagnosis could be made within 5 to 8 minutes after receiving the sample. Of 44 cases in which a cytologic diagnosis could be made, 21 (48%) were malignant and 23 (52%) were benign. Cytologic analysis was inconclusive in 1 case. The cytologic–histologic correlation showed complete concordance in 41 of 45 cases (91%) and partial concordance in 3 cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the squash and imprint technique in detecting malignant lesions was 100%. Assuming the availability of a skilled cytologist, ophthalmic pathologist, or both, squash and imprint preparations are useful for rapid and reliable intraoperative diagnosis of ocular and orbital lesions.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15121381</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.041</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2004-05, Vol.111 (5), p.1009-1015
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71905173
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Child
Child, Preschool
Cytodiagnosis - methods
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Eye Neoplasms - diagnosis
Humans
Infant
Intraoperative Period
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Ophthalmology
Orbital Neoplasms - diagnosis
Pathology, Surgical - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the eye and orbit
Tumors and pseudotumors of the eye, orbit, eyelid, lacrimal apparatus
Vision disorders
title Rapid intraoperative diagnosis of tumors of the eye and orbit by squash and imprint cytology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20intraoperative%20diagnosis%20of%20tumors%20of%20the%20eye%20and%20orbit%20by%20squash%20and%20imprint%20cytology&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Vemuganti,%20Geeta%20Kashyap&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1009&rft.epage=1015&rft.pages=1009-1015&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71905173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71905173&rft_id=info:pmid/15121381&rft_els_id=S0161642003017433&rfr_iscdi=true