Effects of nematicides on cotton root mycobiota

Baseline information on the diversity and population densities of fungi collected from soil debris and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) roots was determined. Samples were collected from Tifton, GA, and Starkville, MS containing cotton field soil treated with the nematicides 1,3-dichloroproprene (fumig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mycopathologia (1975) 2004-02, Vol.157 (2), p.191-199
Hauptverfasser: Baird, R E, Carling, D E, Watson, C E, Scruggs, M L, Hightower, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 199
container_issue 2
container_start_page 191
container_title Mycopathologia (1975)
container_volume 157
creator Baird, R E
Carling, D E
Watson, C E
Scruggs, M L
Hightower, P
description Baseline information on the diversity and population densities of fungi collected from soil debris and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) roots was determined. Samples were collected from Tifton, GA, and Starkville, MS containing cotton field soil treated with the nematicides 1,3-dichloroproprene (fumigant) and aldicarb (granules). A total of 10,550 and 13,450 fungal isolates were collected from these two study sites, respectively. Of this total, 34 genera of plant pathogenic or saprophytic species were identified. Pathogenic root fungi included Fusarium spp. (40% of all isolations), Macrophomina, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, and Sclerotium. Fusarium and Rhizoctonia were the most common fungal species identified and included F. oxysporum, F. verticillioides and F. solani, the three Fusarium species pathogenic on cotton plants. Population densities of Fusarium were not significantly different among locations or tissue types sampled. Macrophomina was isolated at greater numbers near the end of the growing seasons. Anastomosis groups of R. solani isolated from roots and soil debris included AG-3, -4, -7, 2-2, and -13 and anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia included CAG-2, -3, and -5. Occurrences and frequency of isolations among sampling dates were not consistent. Fluctuations in the frequency of isolation of Rhizoctonia did not correspond with changes in frequency of isolation of the biological control fungus, Trichoderma. When individual or pooled frequencies of the mycobiota were compared to nematicide treatments, no specific trends occurred between treatments, application methods or rates. Results from this study show that use of 1,3-D and aldicarb in cotton fields does not significantly impact plant pathogenic fungi or saprophytic fungal populations. Thus cotton producers need not adjust seedling disease control measures when these two nematicides are used.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/B:MYCO.0000020589.82402.81
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71894571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71894571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-296dd4c5187f867e840d6ded219be6d5affb785f05511ffbf65291c9249993813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1rwzAMhs3YWLtuf2GEHnZLatlxYve2lu4DOnrZYDuZxB-Q0sRd7Bz675e0hcKEQBK8kl4ehKaAE8CEzhbzj5_lJsFDEMy4SDhJMUk4XKExsJzGmFNyjcaYYohTnn2P0J33W4yhz_wWjYABCM6yMZqtrDUq-MjZqDF1ESpVadOPTaRcCH1pnQtRfVCurFwo7tGNLXbePJzrBH29rD6Xb_F68_q-fF7HiqYkxERkWqeKAc8tz3LDU6wzbTQBUZpMs8LaMufMYtY76XubMSJACZIKISgHOkFPp7v71v12xgdZV16Z3a5ojOu8zIGLlOWDcPpPuHVd2_TeJCFAIBMk70Xzk0i1zvvWWLlvq7poDxKwHJjKhRyYygtTeWQqj1Yezx-6sjb6snqGSP8AuUdxKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221216927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of nematicides on cotton root mycobiota</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Baird, R E ; Carling, D E ; Watson, C E ; Scruggs, M L ; Hightower, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Baird, R E ; Carling, D E ; Watson, C E ; Scruggs, M L ; Hightower, P</creatorcontrib><description>Baseline information on the diversity and population densities of fungi collected from soil debris and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) roots was determined. Samples were collected from Tifton, GA, and Starkville, MS containing cotton field soil treated with the nematicides 1,3-dichloroproprene (fumigant) and aldicarb (granules). A total of 10,550 and 13,450 fungal isolates were collected from these two study sites, respectively. Of this total, 34 genera of plant pathogenic or saprophytic species were identified. Pathogenic root fungi included Fusarium spp. (40% of all isolations), Macrophomina, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, and Sclerotium. Fusarium and Rhizoctonia were the most common fungal species identified and included F. oxysporum, F. verticillioides and F. solani, the three Fusarium species pathogenic on cotton plants. Population densities of Fusarium were not significantly different among locations or tissue types sampled. Macrophomina was isolated at greater numbers near the end of the growing seasons. Anastomosis groups of R. solani isolated from roots and soil debris included AG-3, -4, -7, 2-2, and -13 and anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia included CAG-2, -3, and -5. Occurrences and frequency of isolations among sampling dates were not consistent. Fluctuations in the frequency of isolation of Rhizoctonia did not correspond with changes in frequency of isolation of the biological control fungus, Trichoderma. When individual or pooled frequencies of the mycobiota were compared to nematicide treatments, no specific trends occurred between treatments, application methods or rates. Results from this study show that use of 1,3-D and aldicarb in cotton fields does not significantly impact plant pathogenic fungi or saprophytic fungal populations. Thus cotton producers need not adjust seedling disease control measures when these two nematicides are used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-486X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/B:MYCO.0000020589.82402.81</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15119856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aldicarb - pharmacology ; Allyl Compounds - pharmacology ; Animals ; Antinematodal Agents - pharmacology ; Cotton ; Fungi ; Fungi - drug effects ; Fungi - growth &amp; development ; Fungi - isolation &amp; purification ; Gossypium - microbiology ; Herbicides ; Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated ; Loam soils ; Microorganisms ; Nematodes ; Plant Diseases - microbiology ; Plant Diseases - parasitology ; Plant Roots - microbiology ; Soil Microbiology</subject><ispartof>Mycopathologia (1975), 2004-02, Vol.157 (2), p.191-199</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-296dd4c5187f867e840d6ded219be6d5affb785f05511ffbf65291c9249993813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baird, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carling, D E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hightower, P</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of nematicides on cotton root mycobiota</title><title>Mycopathologia (1975)</title><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><description>Baseline information on the diversity and population densities of fungi collected from soil debris and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) roots was determined. Samples were collected from Tifton, GA, and Starkville, MS containing cotton field soil treated with the nematicides 1,3-dichloroproprene (fumigant) and aldicarb (granules). A total of 10,550 and 13,450 fungal isolates were collected from these two study sites, respectively. Of this total, 34 genera of plant pathogenic or saprophytic species were identified. Pathogenic root fungi included Fusarium spp. (40% of all isolations), Macrophomina, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, and Sclerotium. Fusarium and Rhizoctonia were the most common fungal species identified and included F. oxysporum, F. verticillioides and F. solani, the three Fusarium species pathogenic on cotton plants. Population densities of Fusarium were not significantly different among locations or tissue types sampled. Macrophomina was isolated at greater numbers near the end of the growing seasons. Anastomosis groups of R. solani isolated from roots and soil debris included AG-3, -4, -7, 2-2, and -13 and anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia included CAG-2, -3, and -5. Occurrences and frequency of isolations among sampling dates were not consistent. Fluctuations in the frequency of isolation of Rhizoctonia did not correspond with changes in frequency of isolation of the biological control fungus, Trichoderma. When individual or pooled frequencies of the mycobiota were compared to nematicide treatments, no specific trends occurred between treatments, application methods or rates. Results from this study show that use of 1,3-D and aldicarb in cotton fields does not significantly impact plant pathogenic fungi or saprophytic fungal populations. Thus cotton producers need not adjust seedling disease control measures when these two nematicides are used.</description><subject>Aldicarb - pharmacology</subject><subject>Allyl Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antinematodal Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Fungi - drug effects</subject><subject>Fungi - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Fungi - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Gossypium - microbiology</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Plant Roots - microbiology</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><issn>0301-486X</issn><issn>1573-0832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1rwzAMhs3YWLtuf2GEHnZLatlxYve2lu4DOnrZYDuZxB-Q0sRd7Bz675e0hcKEQBK8kl4ehKaAE8CEzhbzj5_lJsFDEMy4SDhJMUk4XKExsJzGmFNyjcaYYohTnn2P0J33W4yhz_wWjYABCM6yMZqtrDUq-MjZqDF1ESpVadOPTaRcCH1pnQtRfVCurFwo7tGNLXbePJzrBH29rD6Xb_F68_q-fF7HiqYkxERkWqeKAc8tz3LDU6wzbTQBUZpMs8LaMufMYtY76XubMSJACZIKISgHOkFPp7v71v12xgdZV16Z3a5ojOu8zIGLlOWDcPpPuHVd2_TeJCFAIBMk70Xzk0i1zvvWWLlvq7poDxKwHJjKhRyYygtTeWQqj1Yezx-6sjb6snqGSP8AuUdxKA</recordid><startdate>200402</startdate><enddate>200402</enddate><creator>Baird, R E</creator><creator>Carling, D E</creator><creator>Watson, C E</creator><creator>Scruggs, M L</creator><creator>Hightower, P</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200402</creationdate><title>Effects of nematicides on cotton root mycobiota</title><author>Baird, R E ; Carling, D E ; Watson, C E ; Scruggs, M L ; Hightower, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-296dd4c5187f867e840d6ded219be6d5affb785f05511ffbf65291c9249993813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aldicarb - pharmacology</topic><topic>Allyl Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antinematodal Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Fungi - drug effects</topic><topic>Fungi - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Fungi - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Gossypium - microbiology</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Plant Roots - microbiology</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baird, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carling, D E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hightower, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mycopathologia (1975)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baird, R E</au><au>Carling, D E</au><au>Watson, C E</au><au>Scruggs, M L</au><au>Hightower, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of nematicides on cotton root mycobiota</atitle><jtitle>Mycopathologia (1975)</jtitle><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><date>2004-02</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>157</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>191-199</pages><issn>0301-486X</issn><eissn>1573-0832</eissn><abstract>Baseline information on the diversity and population densities of fungi collected from soil debris and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) roots was determined. Samples were collected from Tifton, GA, and Starkville, MS containing cotton field soil treated with the nematicides 1,3-dichloroproprene (fumigant) and aldicarb (granules). A total of 10,550 and 13,450 fungal isolates were collected from these two study sites, respectively. Of this total, 34 genera of plant pathogenic or saprophytic species were identified. Pathogenic root fungi included Fusarium spp. (40% of all isolations), Macrophomina, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, and Sclerotium. Fusarium and Rhizoctonia were the most common fungal species identified and included F. oxysporum, F. verticillioides and F. solani, the three Fusarium species pathogenic on cotton plants. Population densities of Fusarium were not significantly different among locations or tissue types sampled. Macrophomina was isolated at greater numbers near the end of the growing seasons. Anastomosis groups of R. solani isolated from roots and soil debris included AG-3, -4, -7, 2-2, and -13 and anastomosis groups of binucleate Rhizoctonia included CAG-2, -3, and -5. Occurrences and frequency of isolations among sampling dates were not consistent. Fluctuations in the frequency of isolation of Rhizoctonia did not correspond with changes in frequency of isolation of the biological control fungus, Trichoderma. When individual or pooled frequencies of the mycobiota were compared to nematicide treatments, no specific trends occurred between treatments, application methods or rates. Results from this study show that use of 1,3-D and aldicarb in cotton fields does not significantly impact plant pathogenic fungi or saprophytic fungal populations. Thus cotton producers need not adjust seedling disease control measures when these two nematicides are used.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15119856</pmid><doi>10.1023/B:MYCO.0000020589.82402.81</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-486X
ispartof Mycopathologia (1975), 2004-02, Vol.157 (2), p.191-199
issn 0301-486X
1573-0832
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71894571
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aldicarb - pharmacology
Allyl Compounds - pharmacology
Animals
Antinematodal Agents - pharmacology
Cotton
Fungi
Fungi - drug effects
Fungi - growth & development
Fungi - isolation & purification
Gossypium - microbiology
Herbicides
Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated
Loam soils
Microorganisms
Nematodes
Plant Diseases - microbiology
Plant Diseases - parasitology
Plant Roots - microbiology
Soil Microbiology
title Effects of nematicides on cotton root mycobiota
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20nematicides%20on%20cotton%20root%20mycobiota&rft.jtitle=Mycopathologia%20(1975)&rft.au=Baird,%20R%20E&rft.date=2004-02&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=191-199&rft.issn=0301-486X&rft.eissn=1573-0832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/B:MYCO.0000020589.82402.81&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71894571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221216927&rft_id=info:pmid/15119856&rfr_iscdi=true