Evaluating a risk‐based model for mammographic screening of women in their forties

BACKGROUND A risk‐based model was developed for recommendations for mammography screening of women in their 40s. We determined retrospectively the proportion of women already diagnosed in their 40s with breast cancer (BC) who would have been recommended for mammography screening by this model. METHO...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2002-06, Vol.94 (11), p.2830-2835
Hauptverfasser: McPherson, Carol P., Nissen, Mary J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2835
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2830
container_title Cancer
container_volume 94
creator McPherson, Carol P.
Nissen, Mary J.
description BACKGROUND A risk‐based model was developed for recommendations for mammography screening of women in their 40s. We determined retrospectively the proportion of women already diagnosed in their 40s with breast cancer (BC) who would have been recommended for mammography screening by this model. METHODS Information was obtained from 404 women who were diagnosed with BC in their 40s from 1990 to 1998 at a large midwestern hospital. Data on BC detection method, mammography history, and BC risk factors existing before diagnosis were obtained from 353 of these women by mailed questionnaires. Data for an additional 51 women who had died were obtained by chart review. Two algorithms, the Exact Age Procedure (EAP) and the Grouped Age Procedure (GAP), were used to calculate the proportion of women who would have been recommended for mammography screening based on age, race, and BC risk factors. RESULTS Of women diagnosed with BC in their 40s, 74.5% would have been recommended for screening by the EAP and 70.5% by the GAP. The model would have recommended screening for approximately one half of the women who had no conventional risk factors (54% by EAP, 48% by GAP). CONCLUSION Although use of the risk‐based model could result in more recommendations for screening than individual recommendations based on patient‐physician discussions about the woman's risk factors, one in four women diagnosed with breast cancer in their 40s would not have been recommended for mammography screening. Cancer 2002; 94:2830–5. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10579 Gail and Rimer developed a risk‐based model to identify which women in their 40s should be recommended for mammography screening. When this model was applied retrospectively to women in their 40s who had been diagnosed with breast cancer, one in four would not have been recommended for screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.10579
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71887576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71887576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-4e600539769451409ca1f9b3b63a21d0f14ada5892c2f7c87317e2affb193b093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgio6XjQ8g2ehCqOY0TdMspYwXEAVRcFdO00SjvYzJjDI7H8Fn9Els7YA7V-cc-PgP_ITsAzsBxuJT3Wrfb0KqNTIBpmTEIInXyYQxlkUi4Y9bZDuEl_6UseCbZAtiAMFTNSH303esFzh37RNF6l14_f78KjGYijZdZWpqO08bbJruyePs2WkatDemHXxn6UfXmJa6ls6fjfMDnjsTdsmGxTqYvdXcIQ_n0_v8Mrq-vbjKz64jzRWoKDEpY4IrmapEQMKURrCq5GXKMYaKWUiwQpGpWMdW6kxykCZGa0tQvGSK75CjMXfmu7eFCfOicUGbusbWdItQSMgyKWTaw-MRat-F4I0tZt416JcFsGLosBg6LH477PHBKnVRNqb6o6vSenC4Ahg01tZjq134czyVSaJE72B0H642y39eFvlNfjc-_wGNJYm6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71887576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating a risk‐based model for mammographic screening of women in their forties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McPherson, Carol P. ; Nissen, Mary J.</creator><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Carol P. ; Nissen, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND A risk‐based model was developed for recommendations for mammography screening of women in their 40s. We determined retrospectively the proportion of women already diagnosed in their 40s with breast cancer (BC) who would have been recommended for mammography screening by this model. METHODS Information was obtained from 404 women who were diagnosed with BC in their 40s from 1990 to 1998 at a large midwestern hospital. Data on BC detection method, mammography history, and BC risk factors existing before diagnosis were obtained from 353 of these women by mailed questionnaires. Data for an additional 51 women who had died were obtained by chart review. Two algorithms, the Exact Age Procedure (EAP) and the Grouped Age Procedure (GAP), were used to calculate the proportion of women who would have been recommended for mammography screening based on age, race, and BC risk factors. RESULTS Of women diagnosed with BC in their 40s, 74.5% would have been recommended for screening by the EAP and 70.5% by the GAP. The model would have recommended screening for approximately one half of the women who had no conventional risk factors (54% by EAP, 48% by GAP). CONCLUSION Although use of the risk‐based model could result in more recommendations for screening than individual recommendations based on patient‐physician discussions about the woman's risk factors, one in four women diagnosed with breast cancer in their 40s would not have been recommended for mammography screening. Cancer 2002; 94:2830–5. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10579 Gail and Rimer developed a risk‐based model to identify which women in their 40s should be recommended for mammography screening. When this model was applied retrospectively to women in their 40s who had been diagnosed with breast cancer, one in four would not have been recommended for screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12115369</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; breast carcinoma ; breast carcinoma detection ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; mammography ; Mammography - methods ; mammography for women ages 40–49 years ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; screening ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2002-06, Vol.94 (11), p.2830-2835</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-4e600539769451409ca1f9b3b63a21d0f14ada5892c2f7c87317e2affb193b093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-4e600539769451409ca1f9b3b63a21d0f14ada5892c2f7c87317e2affb193b093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.10579$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.10579$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13674495$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12115369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Carol P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissen, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating a risk‐based model for mammographic screening of women in their forties</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND A risk‐based model was developed for recommendations for mammography screening of women in their 40s. We determined retrospectively the proportion of women already diagnosed in their 40s with breast cancer (BC) who would have been recommended for mammography screening by this model. METHODS Information was obtained from 404 women who were diagnosed with BC in their 40s from 1990 to 1998 at a large midwestern hospital. Data on BC detection method, mammography history, and BC risk factors existing before diagnosis were obtained from 353 of these women by mailed questionnaires. Data for an additional 51 women who had died were obtained by chart review. Two algorithms, the Exact Age Procedure (EAP) and the Grouped Age Procedure (GAP), were used to calculate the proportion of women who would have been recommended for mammography screening based on age, race, and BC risk factors. RESULTS Of women diagnosed with BC in their 40s, 74.5% would have been recommended for screening by the EAP and 70.5% by the GAP. The model would have recommended screening for approximately one half of the women who had no conventional risk factors (54% by EAP, 48% by GAP). CONCLUSION Although use of the risk‐based model could result in more recommendations for screening than individual recommendations based on patient‐physician discussions about the woman's risk factors, one in four women diagnosed with breast cancer in their 40s would not have been recommended for mammography screening. Cancer 2002; 94:2830–5. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10579 Gail and Rimer developed a risk‐based model to identify which women in their 40s should be recommended for mammography screening. When this model was applied retrospectively to women in their 40s who had been diagnosed with breast cancer, one in four would not have been recommended for screening.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>breast carcinoma</subject><subject>breast carcinoma detection</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>mammography for women ages 40–49 years</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgio6XjQ8g2ehCqOY0TdMspYwXEAVRcFdO00SjvYzJjDI7H8Fn9Els7YA7V-cc-PgP_ITsAzsBxuJT3Wrfb0KqNTIBpmTEIInXyYQxlkUi4Y9bZDuEl_6UseCbZAtiAMFTNSH303esFzh37RNF6l14_f78KjGYijZdZWpqO08bbJruyePs2WkatDemHXxn6UfXmJa6ls6fjfMDnjsTdsmGxTqYvdXcIQ_n0_v8Mrq-vbjKz64jzRWoKDEpY4IrmapEQMKURrCq5GXKMYaKWUiwQpGpWMdW6kxykCZGa0tQvGSK75CjMXfmu7eFCfOicUGbusbWdItQSMgyKWTaw-MRat-F4I0tZt416JcFsGLosBg6LH477PHBKnVRNqb6o6vSenC4Ahg01tZjq134czyVSaJE72B0H642y39eFvlNfjc-_wGNJYm6</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>McPherson, Carol P.</creator><creator>Nissen, Mary J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Evaluating a risk‐based model for mammographic screening of women in their forties</title><author>McPherson, Carol P. ; Nissen, Mary J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-4e600539769451409ca1f9b3b63a21d0f14ada5892c2f7c87317e2affb193b093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>breast carcinoma</topic><topic>breast carcinoma detection</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>mammography for women ages 40–49 years</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McPherson, Carol P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissen, Mary J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McPherson, Carol P.</au><au>Nissen, Mary J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating a risk‐based model for mammographic screening of women in their forties</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2830</spage><epage>2835</epage><pages>2830-2835</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND A risk‐based model was developed for recommendations for mammography screening of women in their 40s. We determined retrospectively the proportion of women already diagnosed in their 40s with breast cancer (BC) who would have been recommended for mammography screening by this model. METHODS Information was obtained from 404 women who were diagnosed with BC in their 40s from 1990 to 1998 at a large midwestern hospital. Data on BC detection method, mammography history, and BC risk factors existing before diagnosis were obtained from 353 of these women by mailed questionnaires. Data for an additional 51 women who had died were obtained by chart review. Two algorithms, the Exact Age Procedure (EAP) and the Grouped Age Procedure (GAP), were used to calculate the proportion of women who would have been recommended for mammography screening based on age, race, and BC risk factors. RESULTS Of women diagnosed with BC in their 40s, 74.5% would have been recommended for screening by the EAP and 70.5% by the GAP. The model would have recommended screening for approximately one half of the women who had no conventional risk factors (54% by EAP, 48% by GAP). CONCLUSION Although use of the risk‐based model could result in more recommendations for screening than individual recommendations based on patient‐physician discussions about the woman's risk factors, one in four women diagnosed with breast cancer in their 40s would not have been recommended for mammography screening. Cancer 2002; 94:2830–5. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10579 Gail and Rimer developed a risk‐based model to identify which women in their 40s should be recommended for mammography screening. When this model was applied retrospectively to women in their 40s who had been diagnosed with breast cancer, one in four would not have been recommended for screening.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>12115369</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.10579</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2002-06, Vol.94 (11), p.2830-2835
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71887576
source MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
breast carcinoma
breast carcinoma detection
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
mammography
Mammography - methods
mammography for women ages 40–49 years
Mass Screening - methods
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
screening
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tumors
title Evaluating a risk‐based model for mammographic screening of women in their forties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A06%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20a%20risk%E2%80%90based%20model%20for%20mammographic%20screening%20of%20women%20in%20their%20forties&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=McPherson,%20Carol%20P.&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2830&rft.epage=2835&rft.pages=2830-2835&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.10579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71887576%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71887576&rft_id=info:pmid/12115369&rfr_iscdi=true