Nuclear and nucleomorph SSU rDNA phylogeny in the Cryptophyta and the evolution of cryptophyte diversity

The plastid-bearing members of the Cryptophyta contain two functional eukaryotic genomes of different phylogenetic origin, residing in the nucleus and in the nucleomorph, respectively. These widespread and diverse protists thus offer a unique opportunity to study the coevolution of two different euk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of molecular evolution 2002-08, Vol.55 (2), p.161-179
Hauptverfasser: Hoef-Emden, Kerstin, Marin, Birger, Melkonian, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 161
container_title Journal of molecular evolution
container_volume 55
creator Hoef-Emden, Kerstin
Marin, Birger
Melkonian, Michael
description The plastid-bearing members of the Cryptophyta contain two functional eukaryotic genomes of different phylogenetic origin, residing in the nucleus and in the nucleomorph, respectively. These widespread and diverse protists thus offer a unique opportunity to study the coevolution of two different eukaryotic genomes within one group of organisms. In this study, the SSU rRNA genes of both genomes were PCR-amplified with specific primers and phylogenetic analyses were performed on different data sets using different evolutionary models. The results show that the composition of the principal clades obtained from the phylogenetic analyses of both genes was largely congruent, but striking differences in evolutionary rates were observed. These affected the topologies of the nuclear and nucleomorph phylogenies differently, resulting in long-branch attraction artifacts when simple evolutionary models were applied. Deletion of long-branch taxa stabilized the internal branching order in both phylogenies and resulted in a completely resolved topology in the nucleomorph phylogeny. A comparison of the tree topologies derived from SSU rDNA sequences with characters previously used in cryptophyte systematics revealed that the biliprotein type was congruent, but the type of inner periplast component incongruent, with the molecular trees. The latter is indicative of a hidden cellular dimorphism (cells with two periplast types present in a single clonal strain) of presumably widespread occurrence throughout cryptophyte diversity, which, in consequence, has far-reaching implications for cryptophyte systematics as it is practiced today.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00239-002-2313-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71885724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18690641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-4d5b15f81b48a8e0cecc83e1efc2b3305668177a7dda67c8b25c789be14e27773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQhS1UVBboD-ilsnroLcVjO7FzREuhlRAcYM-W40zYrLJxaidI-fd12FUr9cLlzWjmeyONHiGfgX0HxtRVZIyLMkuacQEiy0_ICqTg2SIfyCot0kZLeUbOY9wxBiovxUdyBhzY0q7I9mFyHdpAbV_Tfun93odhS5-eNjTcPFzTYTt3_gX7mbY9HbdI12EeRp_Go31zLTN89d00tr6nvqHuL4C0bl8xxHacL8lpY7uIn471gmxufzyvf2b3j3e_1tf3mZMcxkzWeQV5o6GS2mpkDp3TAgEbxyshWF4UGpSyqq5toZyueO6ULisEiVwpJS7It8PdIfjfE8bR7NvosOtsj36KRoHWueLyXRB0UbJCQgK__gfu_BT69IQpuVZSlrxIEBwgF3yMARszhHZvw2yAmSUscwjLJDVLWCZPni_Hw1O1x_qf45iO-APpMo_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>928744926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nuclear and nucleomorph SSU rDNA phylogeny in the Cryptophyta and the evolution of cryptophyte diversity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Hoef-Emden, Kerstin ; Marin, Birger ; Melkonian, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoef-Emden, Kerstin ; Marin, Birger ; Melkonian, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The plastid-bearing members of the Cryptophyta contain two functional eukaryotic genomes of different phylogenetic origin, residing in the nucleus and in the nucleomorph, respectively. These widespread and diverse protists thus offer a unique opportunity to study the coevolution of two different eukaryotic genomes within one group of organisms. In this study, the SSU rRNA genes of both genomes were PCR-amplified with specific primers and phylogenetic analyses were performed on different data sets using different evolutionary models. The results show that the composition of the principal clades obtained from the phylogenetic analyses of both genes was largely congruent, but striking differences in evolutionary rates were observed. These affected the topologies of the nuclear and nucleomorph phylogenies differently, resulting in long-branch attraction artifacts when simple evolutionary models were applied. Deletion of long-branch taxa stabilized the internal branching order in both phylogenies and resulted in a completely resolved topology in the nucleomorph phylogeny. A comparison of the tree topologies derived from SSU rDNA sequences with characters previously used in cryptophyte systematics revealed that the biliprotein type was congruent, but the type of inner periplast component incongruent, with the molecular trees. The latter is indicative of a hidden cellular dimorphism (cells with two periplast types present in a single clonal strain) of presumably widespread occurrence throughout cryptophyte diversity, which, in consequence, has far-reaching implications for cryptophyte systematics as it is practiced today.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00239-002-2313-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12107593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Algae ; Cell Nucleus - genetics ; DNA, Ribosomal ; Eukaryota - classification ; Eukaryota - genetics ; Eukaryotes ; Evolutionary biology ; Genetic diversity ; Genomes ; Likelihood Functions ; Phylogeny ; Phytoplankton - classification ; Phytoplankton - genetics ; Plastids - genetics ; Proteins ; Ribosomal DNA ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Systematics ; Topology</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular evolution, 2002-08, Vol.55 (2), p.161-179</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-4d5b15f81b48a8e0cecc83e1efc2b3305668177a7dda67c8b25c789be14e27773</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12107593$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoef-Emden, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Birger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melkonian, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Nuclear and nucleomorph SSU rDNA phylogeny in the Cryptophyta and the evolution of cryptophyte diversity</title><title>Journal of molecular evolution</title><addtitle>J Mol Evol</addtitle><description>The plastid-bearing members of the Cryptophyta contain two functional eukaryotic genomes of different phylogenetic origin, residing in the nucleus and in the nucleomorph, respectively. These widespread and diverse protists thus offer a unique opportunity to study the coevolution of two different eukaryotic genomes within one group of organisms. In this study, the SSU rRNA genes of both genomes were PCR-amplified with specific primers and phylogenetic analyses were performed on different data sets using different evolutionary models. The results show that the composition of the principal clades obtained from the phylogenetic analyses of both genes was largely congruent, but striking differences in evolutionary rates were observed. These affected the topologies of the nuclear and nucleomorph phylogenies differently, resulting in long-branch attraction artifacts when simple evolutionary models were applied. Deletion of long-branch taxa stabilized the internal branching order in both phylogenies and resulted in a completely resolved topology in the nucleomorph phylogeny. A comparison of the tree topologies derived from SSU rDNA sequences with characters previously used in cryptophyte systematics revealed that the biliprotein type was congruent, but the type of inner periplast component incongruent, with the molecular trees. The latter is indicative of a hidden cellular dimorphism (cells with two periplast types present in a single clonal strain) of presumably widespread occurrence throughout cryptophyte diversity, which, in consequence, has far-reaching implications for cryptophyte systematics as it is practiced today.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Cell Nucleus - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal</subject><subject>Eukaryota - classification</subject><subject>Eukaryota - genetics</subject><subject>Eukaryotes</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Phytoplankton - classification</subject><subject>Phytoplankton - genetics</subject><subject>Plastids - genetics</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><subject>Topology</subject><issn>0022-2844</issn><issn>1432-1432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQhS1UVBboD-ilsnroLcVjO7FzREuhlRAcYM-W40zYrLJxaidI-fd12FUr9cLlzWjmeyONHiGfgX0HxtRVZIyLMkuacQEiy0_ICqTg2SIfyCot0kZLeUbOY9wxBiovxUdyBhzY0q7I9mFyHdpAbV_Tfun93odhS5-eNjTcPFzTYTt3_gX7mbY9HbdI12EeRp_Go31zLTN89d00tr6nvqHuL4C0bl8xxHacL8lpY7uIn471gmxufzyvf2b3j3e_1tf3mZMcxkzWeQV5o6GS2mpkDp3TAgEbxyshWF4UGpSyqq5toZyueO6ULisEiVwpJS7It8PdIfjfE8bR7NvosOtsj36KRoHWueLyXRB0UbJCQgK__gfu_BT69IQpuVZSlrxIEBwgF3yMARszhHZvw2yAmSUscwjLJDVLWCZPni_Hw1O1x_qf45iO-APpMo_w</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Hoef-Emden, Kerstin</creator><creator>Marin, Birger</creator><creator>Melkonian, Michael</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Nuclear and nucleomorph SSU rDNA phylogeny in the Cryptophyta and the evolution of cryptophyte diversity</title><author>Hoef-Emden, Kerstin ; Marin, Birger ; Melkonian, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-4d5b15f81b48a8e0cecc83e1efc2b3305668177a7dda67c8b25c789be14e27773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Cell Nucleus - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal</topic><topic>Eukaryota - classification</topic><topic>Eukaryota - genetics</topic><topic>Eukaryotes</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Phytoplankton - classification</topic><topic>Phytoplankton - genetics</topic><topic>Plastids - genetics</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><topic>Topology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoef-Emden, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Birger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melkonian, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoef-Emden, Kerstin</au><au>Marin, Birger</au><au>Melkonian, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nuclear and nucleomorph SSU rDNA phylogeny in the Cryptophyta and the evolution of cryptophyte diversity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular evolution</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Evol</addtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>161-179</pages><issn>0022-2844</issn><eissn>1432-1432</eissn><abstract>The plastid-bearing members of the Cryptophyta contain two functional eukaryotic genomes of different phylogenetic origin, residing in the nucleus and in the nucleomorph, respectively. These widespread and diverse protists thus offer a unique opportunity to study the coevolution of two different eukaryotic genomes within one group of organisms. In this study, the SSU rRNA genes of both genomes were PCR-amplified with specific primers and phylogenetic analyses were performed on different data sets using different evolutionary models. The results show that the composition of the principal clades obtained from the phylogenetic analyses of both genes was largely congruent, but striking differences in evolutionary rates were observed. These affected the topologies of the nuclear and nucleomorph phylogenies differently, resulting in long-branch attraction artifacts when simple evolutionary models were applied. Deletion of long-branch taxa stabilized the internal branching order in both phylogenies and resulted in a completely resolved topology in the nucleomorph phylogeny. A comparison of the tree topologies derived from SSU rDNA sequences with characters previously used in cryptophyte systematics revealed that the biliprotein type was congruent, but the type of inner periplast component incongruent, with the molecular trees. The latter is indicative of a hidden cellular dimorphism (cells with two periplast types present in a single clonal strain) of presumably widespread occurrence throughout cryptophyte diversity, which, in consequence, has far-reaching implications for cryptophyte systematics as it is practiced today.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12107593</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00239-002-2313-5</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2844
ispartof Journal of molecular evolution, 2002-08, Vol.55 (2), p.161-179
issn 0022-2844
1432-1432
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71885724
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Algae
Cell Nucleus - genetics
DNA, Ribosomal
Eukaryota - classification
Eukaryota - genetics
Eukaryotes
Evolutionary biology
Genetic diversity
Genomes
Likelihood Functions
Phylogeny
Phytoplankton - classification
Phytoplankton - genetics
Plastids - genetics
Proteins
Ribosomal DNA
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Systematics
Topology
title Nuclear and nucleomorph SSU rDNA phylogeny in the Cryptophyta and the evolution of cryptophyte diversity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T10%3A40%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nuclear%20and%20nucleomorph%20SSU%20rDNA%20phylogeny%20in%20the%20Cryptophyta%20and%20the%20evolution%20of%20cryptophyte%20diversity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20evolution&rft.au=Hoef-Emden,%20Kerstin&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=161-179&rft.issn=0022-2844&rft.eissn=1432-1432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00239-002-2313-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18690641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=928744926&rft_id=info:pmid/12107593&rfr_iscdi=true