Percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of deep thoracic and abdominal masses in dogs and cats
Percutaneous fine‐needle biopsy was used to investigate thoracic and abdominal masses in the dog and cat. One hundred and thirty‐two cases were included in the study; 20 cases were excluded from the comparative study due to poor cellularity or blood contamination (retrieval rate 86.8 per cent). One...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of small animal practice 2004-04, Vol.45 (4), p.191-198 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 198 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 191 |
| container_title | Journal of small animal practice |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Bonfanti, U Bussadori, C Zatelli, A Lorenzi, D. de Masserdotti, C Bertazzolo, W Faverzani, S Ghisleni, G Capobianco, R Caniatti, M |
| description | Percutaneous fine‐needle biopsy was used to investigate thoracic and abdominal masses in the dog and cat. One hundred and thirty‐two cases were included in the study; 20 cases were excluded from the comparative study due to poor cellularity or blood contamination (retrieval rate 86.8 per cent). One hundred samples (56 dogs and 44 cats) were classified by cytology as neoplastic. All the cytological diagnoses of neoplasia were confirmed by histological samples obtained either by non‐surgical methods, at surgery or during postmortem examination. No false positive diagnoses of neoplasia were made. Thirty‐two samples were cytologically classified as ‘negative for neoplasia’. Subsequent histological examination revealed 18 true negative and 14 false negative results. The procedure had an overall 89.4 per cent (118 cases out of 132) agreement between the diagnosis of inflammatory disease versus neoplasia, with a sensitivity of 87.8 per cent, a specificity of 100 per cent, a predictive value of a positive test of 100 per cent and a predictive value of a negative test of 56.3 per cent. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2004.tb00223.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71883532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71883532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-4fe39a39551a442d2563535d1404306e519772bf88f728b4886f51ac26da58083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1v1DAQhi0EokvhL4DFgVuCP2OHC2orKJQKKvWD48iJ7eIliRc7K3b_PQlZlTO-jOx55rXmQeg1JSWdztt1SZXQhdRMlYwQUY4NIYzxcvcIrR5aj9Fqfi2EpOQIPct5PV0rochTdEQlpZXWaoXurlxqt6MZXNxm7MPgisE52znchLjJexw9ts5t8PgjJtOGFpvBYtPY2IfBdLg3ObuMw4BtvM9_m60Z83P0xJsuuxeHeoxuP364OftUXH47_3x2clm0gnNaCO94bXgtJTVCMMtkxSWXlgoiOKmcpLVSrPFae8V0I7Su_IS2rLJGaqL5MXqz5G5S_LV1eYQ-5NZ13bIQKKr1lMgm8N0CtinmnJyHTQq9SXugBGarsIZZHczqYLYKB6uwm4ZfHn7ZNr2z_0YPGifg_QL8Dp3b_0c0XFyfXNGaTgnFkhDy6HYPCSb9hEpxJeH713O4YfrL6d2FgJl_tfDeRDD3KWS4vWaEckLqWlNJ-B8yNp5E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71883532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of deep thoracic and abdominal masses in dogs and cats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bonfanti, U ; Bussadori, C ; Zatelli, A ; Lorenzi, D. de ; Masserdotti, C ; Bertazzolo, W ; Faverzani, S ; Ghisleni, G ; Capobianco, R ; Caniatti, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonfanti, U ; Bussadori, C ; Zatelli, A ; Lorenzi, D. de ; Masserdotti, C ; Bertazzolo, W ; Faverzani, S ; Ghisleni, G ; Capobianco, R ; Caniatti, M</creatorcontrib><description>Percutaneous fine‐needle biopsy was used to investigate thoracic and abdominal masses in the dog and cat. One hundred and thirty‐two cases were included in the study; 20 cases were excluded from the comparative study due to poor cellularity or blood contamination (retrieval rate 86.8 per cent). One hundred samples (56 dogs and 44 cats) were classified by cytology as neoplastic. All the cytological diagnoses of neoplasia were confirmed by histological samples obtained either by non‐surgical methods, at surgery or during postmortem examination. No false positive diagnoses of neoplasia were made. Thirty‐two samples were cytologically classified as ‘negative for neoplasia’. Subsequent histological examination revealed 18 true negative and 14 false negative results. The procedure had an overall 89.4 per cent (118 cases out of 132) agreement between the diagnosis of inflammatory disease versus neoplasia, with a sensitivity of 87.8 per cent, a specificity of 100 per cent, a predictive value of a positive test of 100 per cent and a predictive value of a negative test of 56.3 per cent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-5827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2004.tb00223.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15116887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdominal Neoplasms - pathology ; Abdominal Neoplasms - veterinary ; Animals ; Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Biopsy, Needle - veterinary ; Cat Diseases - pathology ; Cats ; Dog Diseases - pathology ; Dogs ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Records - veterinary ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Thoracic Neoplasms - pathology ; Thoracic Neoplasms - veterinary</subject><ispartof>Journal of small animal practice, 2004-04, Vol.45 (4), p.191-198</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-4fe39a39551a442d2563535d1404306e519772bf88f728b4886f51ac26da58083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-4fe39a39551a442d2563535d1404306e519772bf88f728b4886f51ac26da58083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1748-5827.2004.tb00223.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1748-5827.2004.tb00223.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15116887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonfanti, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussadori, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zatelli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzi, D. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masserdotti, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertazzolo, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faverzani, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghisleni, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capobianco, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caniatti, M</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of deep thoracic and abdominal masses in dogs and cats</title><title>Journal of small animal practice</title><addtitle>J Small Anim Pract</addtitle><description>Percutaneous fine‐needle biopsy was used to investigate thoracic and abdominal masses in the dog and cat. One hundred and thirty‐two cases were included in the study; 20 cases were excluded from the comparative study due to poor cellularity or blood contamination (retrieval rate 86.8 per cent). One hundred samples (56 dogs and 44 cats) were classified by cytology as neoplastic. All the cytological diagnoses of neoplasia were confirmed by histological samples obtained either by non‐surgical methods, at surgery or during postmortem examination. No false positive diagnoses of neoplasia were made. Thirty‐two samples were cytologically classified as ‘negative for neoplasia’. Subsequent histological examination revealed 18 true negative and 14 false negative results. The procedure had an overall 89.4 per cent (118 cases out of 132) agreement between the diagnosis of inflammatory disease versus neoplasia, with a sensitivity of 87.8 per cent, a specificity of 100 per cent, a predictive value of a positive test of 100 per cent and a predictive value of a negative test of 56.3 per cent.</description><subject>Abdominal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Abdominal Neoplasms - veterinary</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - veterinary</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Records - veterinary</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Thoracic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Thoracic Neoplasms - veterinary</subject><issn>0022-4510</issn><issn>1748-5827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1v1DAQhi0EokvhL4DFgVuCP2OHC2orKJQKKvWD48iJ7eIliRc7K3b_PQlZlTO-jOx55rXmQeg1JSWdztt1SZXQhdRMlYwQUY4NIYzxcvcIrR5aj9Fqfi2EpOQIPct5PV0rochTdEQlpZXWaoXurlxqt6MZXNxm7MPgisE52znchLjJexw9ts5t8PgjJtOGFpvBYtPY2IfBdLg3ObuMw4BtvM9_m60Z83P0xJsuuxeHeoxuP364OftUXH47_3x2clm0gnNaCO94bXgtJTVCMMtkxSWXlgoiOKmcpLVSrPFae8V0I7Su_IS2rLJGaqL5MXqz5G5S_LV1eYQ-5NZ13bIQKKr1lMgm8N0CtinmnJyHTQq9SXugBGarsIZZHczqYLYKB6uwm4ZfHn7ZNr2z_0YPGifg_QL8Dp3b_0c0XFyfXNGaTgnFkhDy6HYPCSb9hEpxJeH713O4YfrL6d2FgJl_tfDeRDD3KWS4vWaEckLqWlNJ-B8yNp5E</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Bonfanti, U</creator><creator>Bussadori, C</creator><creator>Zatelli, A</creator><creator>Lorenzi, D. de</creator><creator>Masserdotti, C</creator><creator>Bertazzolo, W</creator><creator>Faverzani, S</creator><creator>Ghisleni, G</creator><creator>Capobianco, R</creator><creator>Caniatti, M</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of deep thoracic and abdominal masses in dogs and cats</title><author>Bonfanti, U ; Bussadori, C ; Zatelli, A ; Lorenzi, D. de ; Masserdotti, C ; Bertazzolo, W ; Faverzani, S ; Ghisleni, G ; Capobianco, R ; Caniatti, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4331-4fe39a39551a442d2563535d1404306e519772bf88f728b4886f51ac26da58083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Abdominal Neoplasms - veterinary</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - veterinary</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Records - veterinary</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Thoracic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Thoracic Neoplasms - veterinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonfanti, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussadori, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zatelli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzi, D. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masserdotti, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertazzolo, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faverzani, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghisleni, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capobianco, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caniatti, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of small animal practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonfanti, U</au><au>Bussadori, C</au><au>Zatelli, A</au><au>Lorenzi, D. de</au><au>Masserdotti, C</au><au>Bertazzolo, W</au><au>Faverzani, S</au><au>Ghisleni, G</au><au>Capobianco, R</au><au>Caniatti, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of deep thoracic and abdominal masses in dogs and cats</atitle><jtitle>Journal of small animal practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Small Anim Pract</addtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>191-198</pages><issn>0022-4510</issn><eissn>1748-5827</eissn><abstract>Percutaneous fine‐needle biopsy was used to investigate thoracic and abdominal masses in the dog and cat. One hundred and thirty‐two cases were included in the study; 20 cases were excluded from the comparative study due to poor cellularity or blood contamination (retrieval rate 86.8 per cent). One hundred samples (56 dogs and 44 cats) were classified by cytology as neoplastic. All the cytological diagnoses of neoplasia were confirmed by histological samples obtained either by non‐surgical methods, at surgery or during postmortem examination. No false positive diagnoses of neoplasia were made. Thirty‐two samples were cytologically classified as ‘negative for neoplasia’. Subsequent histological examination revealed 18 true negative and 14 false negative results. The procedure had an overall 89.4 per cent (118 cases out of 132) agreement between the diagnosis of inflammatory disease versus neoplasia, with a sensitivity of 87.8 per cent, a specificity of 100 per cent, a predictive value of a positive test of 100 per cent and a predictive value of a negative test of 56.3 per cent.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>15116887</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1748-5827.2004.tb00223.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-4510 |
| ispartof | Journal of small animal practice, 2004-04, Vol.45 (4), p.191-198 |
| issn | 0022-4510 1748-5827 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71883532 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Abdominal Neoplasms - pathology Abdominal Neoplasms - veterinary Animals Biopsy, Needle - methods Biopsy, Needle - veterinary Cat Diseases - pathology Cats Dog Diseases - pathology Dogs Predictive Value of Tests Records - veterinary Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Thoracic Neoplasms - pathology Thoracic Neoplasms - veterinary |
| title | Percutaneous fine-needle biopsy of deep thoracic and abdominal masses in dogs and cats |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T06%3A39%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20fine-needle%20biopsy%20of%20deep%20thoracic%20and%20abdominal%20masses%20in%20dogs%20and%20cats&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20small%20animal%20practice&rft.au=Bonfanti,%20U&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=191-198&rft.issn=0022-4510&rft.eissn=1748-5827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2004.tb00223.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71883532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71883532&rft_id=info:pmid/15116887&rfr_iscdi=true |