The culture of criticism and argument in health education
A programme to introduce skills in critical analytical reading and writing in postgraduate tertiary students in Public Health Management is described. The students had considerable professional experience, but their previous academic learning did not require a critical-analytical approach. The abili...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical teacher 2002-03, Vol.24 (2), p.156-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 156 |
container_title | Medical teacher |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Westwood, Barbara Westwood, Geoffrey |
description | A programme to introduce skills in critical analytical reading and writing in postgraduate tertiary students in Public Health Management is described. The students had considerable professional experience, but their previous academic learning did not require a critical-analytical approach. The ability to review and analyse past theory and practice and to critically analyse and evaluate public health programmes is an essential element of the skills required by graduates. The paper describes and discusses the teaching and learning strategies used in critical analysis sessions. The personal and systemic barriers to achieving substantial change in cultures of learning are reviewed. As a limited response to a perceived problem, significant changes in the ability of students to critically analyse published material and write appropriate essays were achieved. The value of critical analysis in public health is described and the implication for medical education at all levels is considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/014215900220159 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71876834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>624293951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b1d3683202b8e444a3f2a01c0205f17942983be76895cec8680a04a68feeee273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9LwzAUx4Mobk7P3qR48Fb38qNt4k2Gv2DgZcJuIU1T19E2M2mR_fdmdDAciLk8SD7f73vvG4SuMdxj4DAFzAhOBAAhEOoJGmOWpjHm2fIUjXevcbhejtCF92sASIRIztEIExCc0WSMxGJlIt3XXe9MZMtIu6qrdOWbSLVFpNxn35i2i6o2WhlVd6vIFL1WXWXbS3RWqtqbq32doI_np8XsNZ6_v7zNHuexZgnp4hwXNOWUAMm5YYwpWhIFWAOBpMSZYERwmpss5SLRRvOUgwKmUl6acEhGJ-hu8N04-9Ub38mm8trUtWqN7b3MwrKhAfsXTDIuRMZ4AG-PwLXtXRuWkIRSwjIBIkDTAdLOeu9MKTeuapTbSgxyl708yj4obva2fd6Y4sDvww7AwwBUbWldo76tqwvZqW1tXelUG2KX9G938Us8fIdWzhym_0v7A7dWoH8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233247909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The culture of criticism and argument in health education</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Westwood, Barbara ; Westwood, Geoffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Barbara ; Westwood, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><description>A programme to introduce skills in critical analytical reading and writing in postgraduate tertiary students in Public Health Management is described. The students had considerable professional experience, but their previous academic learning did not require a critical-analytical approach. The ability to review and analyse past theory and practice and to critically analyse and evaluate public health programmes is an essential element of the skills required by graduates. The paper describes and discusses the teaching and learning strategies used in critical analysis sessions. The personal and systemic barriers to achieving substantial change in cultures of learning are reviewed. As a limited response to a perceived problem, significant changes in the ability of students to critically analyse published material and write appropriate essays were achieved. The value of critical analysis in public health is described and the implication for medical education at all levels is considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-159X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-187X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/014215900220159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12098435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Competency-Based Education - methods ; Critical thinking ; Education, Graduate - methods ; Educational evaluation ; Health education ; Humans ; Learning ; Medical education ; New South Wales ; Organizational Culture ; Postgraduate students ; Program Development ; Program Evaluation ; Public health ; Public Health Administration - education ; Public health medicine ; Reading ; Teaching - methods ; Training ; Writing - standards</subject><ispartof>Medical teacher, 2002-03, Vol.24 (2), p.156-161</ispartof><rights>2002 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Mar 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b1d3683202b8e444a3f2a01c0205f17942983be76895cec8680a04a68feeee273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/014215900220159$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/014215900220159$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000,59647,59753,60436,60542,61221,61256,61402,61437</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12098435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><title>The culture of criticism and argument in health education</title><title>Medical teacher</title><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><description>A programme to introduce skills in critical analytical reading and writing in postgraduate tertiary students in Public Health Management is described. The students had considerable professional experience, but their previous academic learning did not require a critical-analytical approach. The ability to review and analyse past theory and practice and to critically analyse and evaluate public health programmes is an essential element of the skills required by graduates. The paper describes and discusses the teaching and learning strategies used in critical analysis sessions. The personal and systemic barriers to achieving substantial change in cultures of learning are reviewed. As a limited response to a perceived problem, significant changes in the ability of students to critically analyse published material and write appropriate essays were achieved. The value of critical analysis in public health is described and the implication for medical education at all levels is considered.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Competency-Based Education - methods</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Education, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>New South Wales</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Postgraduate students</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health Administration - education</subject><subject>Public health medicine</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Teaching - methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Writing - standards</subject><issn>0142-159X</issn><issn>1466-187X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9LwzAUx4Mobk7P3qR48Fb38qNt4k2Gv2DgZcJuIU1T19E2M2mR_fdmdDAciLk8SD7f73vvG4SuMdxj4DAFzAhOBAAhEOoJGmOWpjHm2fIUjXevcbhejtCF92sASIRIztEIExCc0WSMxGJlIt3XXe9MZMtIu6qrdOWbSLVFpNxn35i2i6o2WhlVd6vIFL1WXWXbS3RWqtqbq32doI_np8XsNZ6_v7zNHuexZgnp4hwXNOWUAMm5YYwpWhIFWAOBpMSZYERwmpss5SLRRvOUgwKmUl6acEhGJ-hu8N04-9Ub38mm8trUtWqN7b3MwrKhAfsXTDIuRMZ4AG-PwLXtXRuWkIRSwjIBIkDTAdLOeu9MKTeuapTbSgxyl708yj4obva2fd6Y4sDvww7AwwBUbWldo76tqwvZqW1tXelUG2KX9G938Us8fIdWzhym_0v7A7dWoH8</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Westwood, Barbara</creator><creator>Westwood, Geoffrey</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>The culture of criticism and argument in health education</title><author>Westwood, Barbara ; Westwood, Geoffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b1d3683202b8e444a3f2a01c0205f17942983be76895cec8680a04a68feeee273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Competency-Based Education - methods</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Education, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>New South Wales</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Postgraduate students</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health Administration - education</topic><topic>Public health medicine</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Teaching - methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Writing - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Westwood, Barbara</au><au>Westwood, Geoffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The culture of criticism and argument in health education</atitle><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>156-161</pages><issn>0142-159X</issn><eissn>1466-187X</eissn><abstract>A programme to introduce skills in critical analytical reading and writing in postgraduate tertiary students in Public Health Management is described. The students had considerable professional experience, but their previous academic learning did not require a critical-analytical approach. The ability to review and analyse past theory and practice and to critically analyse and evaluate public health programmes is an essential element of the skills required by graduates. The paper describes and discusses the teaching and learning strategies used in critical analysis sessions. The personal and systemic barriers to achieving substantial change in cultures of learning are reviewed. As a limited response to a perceived problem, significant changes in the ability of students to critically analyse published material and write appropriate essays were achieved. The value of critical analysis in public health is described and the implication for medical education at all levels is considered.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>12098435</pmid><doi>10.1080/014215900220159</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-159X |
ispartof | Medical teacher, 2002-03, Vol.24 (2), p.156-161 |
issn | 0142-159X 1466-187X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71876834 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; EBSCOhost Education Source; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Australia Competency-Based Education - methods Critical thinking Education, Graduate - methods Educational evaluation Health education Humans Learning Medical education New South Wales Organizational Culture Postgraduate students Program Development Program Evaluation Public health Public Health Administration - education Public health medicine Reading Teaching - methods Training Writing - standards |
title | The culture of criticism and argument in health education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A04%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20culture%20of%20criticism%20and%20argument%20in%20health%20education&rft.jtitle=Medical%20teacher&rft.au=Westwood,%20Barbara&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=156-161&rft.issn=0142-159X&rft.eissn=1466-187X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/014215900220159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E624293951%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233247909&rft_id=info:pmid/12098435&rfr_iscdi=true |