The Hunsaker Mon-Jet Ventilation Tube for Microlaryngeal Surgery: Optimal Laryngeal Exposure
Methods of delivering and monitoring anesthesia during microlaryngeal surgery are constantly evolving. In 1994, Hunsaker and colleagues introduced a laser-safe subglottic Mon-Jet ventilation tube, which has the ability to periodically measure end-tidal carbon dioxide levels. We conducted a retrospec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ear, nose, & throat journal nose, & throat journal, 2002-06, Vol.81 (6), p.390-394 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 394 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 390 |
container_title | Ear, nose, & throat journal |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Orloff, Lisa A. Parhizkar, Nooshin Ortiz, Erica |
description | Methods of delivering and monitoring anesthesia during microlaryngeal surgery are constantly evolving. In 1994, Hunsaker and colleagues introduced a laser-safe subglottic Mon-Jet ventilation tube, which has the ability to periodically measure end-tidal carbon dioxide levels. We conducted a retrospective review of 84 consecutive patients who had undergone microlaryngeal procedures with the aid of the Hunsaker Mon-Jet tube. Study parameters included the length of anesthetic induction and recovery times, the duration of surgery, the degree of surgical access to the larynx, and the incidence of anesthetic and surgical complications. We found that anesthetic induction and recovery times with the use of the Mon-Jet tube were comparable to those seen with standard endotracheal intubation. We also observed an apparent reduction in surgical time and a consistent subjective improvement in surgical visualization and access. The complication rate was acceptable, airway control was adequate, and use of the Mon-Jet tube was safe in all patients. We conclude that the Mon-Jet tube is a safe and effective subglottic jet ventilation system and that it has distinct advantages over other methods for both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/014556130208100610 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71872034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A87775899</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_014556130208100610</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A87775899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4600-81f464d106cf138f691cf6508334914a4c6d7bbb1b50670f17a3d7a8e11c840f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBuAIgei08AIsUIREV4T6OI7tsKuqQkGDumBghRQ5nuNMiscOdiIxb4-jGTFcKuSFpePPt_9k2TMgrwGEuCDAqopDSSiRQAgH8iBbQM1oISpKH2aLGRSzOMlOY7wjJBU4PM5OgJKaUkkX2dfVBvObyUX1DUP-0bviA475F3Rjb9XYe5evphZz49Nir4O3Kuxch8rmn6bQYdi9yW-Hsd-mwvLX0vWPwccp4JPskVE24tPDfJZ9fnu9uroplrfv3l9dLgvNOCGFBMM4WwPh2kApDa9BG14RWZasBqaY5mvRti20FeGCGBCqXAslEUBLRkx5lp3vzx2C_z5hHJttHzVaqxz6KTYCpKCkZAm--Ave-Sm49LYmJVIKTmua0Ks96pTFpnfGj0HpDh0GZb1D06fypRRCVLKuEy_u4Wmscdvr-_zL3_wm5TVuorfTHHb8w9G9S6nHGNA0Q0g5h10DpJn73_zb_7Tp-eGDU7vF9XHLoeHH2wcVtbImKKf7eHSlYFDS2V3sXVQdHlP6z9U_ARMowcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209376292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Hunsaker Mon-Jet Ventilation Tube for Microlaryngeal Surgery: Optimal Laryngeal Exposure</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Orloff, Lisa A. ; Parhizkar, Nooshin ; Ortiz, Erica</creator><creatorcontrib>Orloff, Lisa A. ; Parhizkar, Nooshin ; Ortiz, Erica</creatorcontrib><description>Methods of delivering and monitoring anesthesia during microlaryngeal surgery are constantly evolving. In 1994, Hunsaker and colleagues introduced a laser-safe subglottic Mon-Jet ventilation tube, which has the ability to periodically measure end-tidal carbon dioxide levels. We conducted a retrospective review of 84 consecutive patients who had undergone microlaryngeal procedures with the aid of the Hunsaker Mon-Jet tube. Study parameters included the length of anesthetic induction and recovery times, the duration of surgery, the degree of surgical access to the larynx, and the incidence of anesthetic and surgical complications. We found that anesthetic induction and recovery times with the use of the Mon-Jet tube were comparable to those seen with standard endotracheal intubation. We also observed an apparent reduction in surgical time and a consistent subjective improvement in surgical visualization and access. The complication rate was acceptable, airway control was adequate, and use of the Mon-Jet tube was safe in all patients. We conclude that the Mon-Jet tube is a safe and effective subglottic jet ventilation system and that it has distinct advantages over other methods for both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-5613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/014556130208100610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12092282</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENTJDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesiology - instrumentation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dosage and administration ; Drug delivery devices ; Evaluation ; Humans ; Larynx - surgery ; Medical equipment ; Medical equipment and supplies industry ; Medical sciences ; Medical test kit industry ; Microsurgery - instrumentation ; Physiological apparatus ; Product development ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><ispartof>Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2002-06, Vol.81 (6), p.390-394</ispartof><rights>2002 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Medquest Communications Inc. Jun 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4600-81f464d106cf138f691cf6508334914a4c6d7bbb1b50670f17a3d7a8e11c840f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4600-81f464d106cf138f691cf6508334914a4c6d7bbb1b50670f17a3d7a8e11c840f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014556130208100610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014556130208100610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/014556130208100610?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13741322$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12092282$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orloff, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parhizkar, Nooshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, Erica</creatorcontrib><title>The Hunsaker Mon-Jet Ventilation Tube for Microlaryngeal Surgery: Optimal Laryngeal Exposure</title><title>Ear, nose, & throat journal</title><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><description>Methods of delivering and monitoring anesthesia during microlaryngeal surgery are constantly evolving. In 1994, Hunsaker and colleagues introduced a laser-safe subglottic Mon-Jet ventilation tube, which has the ability to periodically measure end-tidal carbon dioxide levels. We conducted a retrospective review of 84 consecutive patients who had undergone microlaryngeal procedures with the aid of the Hunsaker Mon-Jet tube. Study parameters included the length of anesthetic induction and recovery times, the duration of surgery, the degree of surgical access to the larynx, and the incidence of anesthetic and surgical complications. We found that anesthetic induction and recovery times with the use of the Mon-Jet tube were comparable to those seen with standard endotracheal intubation. We also observed an apparent reduction in surgical time and a consistent subjective improvement in surgical visualization and access. The complication rate was acceptable, airway control was adequate, and use of the Mon-Jet tube was safe in all patients. We conclude that the Mon-Jet tube is a safe and effective subglottic jet ventilation system and that it has distinct advantages over other methods for both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesiology - instrumentation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug delivery devices</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Larynx - surgery</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medical equipment and supplies industry</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical test kit industry</subject><subject>Microsurgery - instrumentation</subject><subject>Physiological apparatus</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><issn>0145-5613</issn><issn>1942-7522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBuAIgei08AIsUIREV4T6OI7tsKuqQkGDumBghRQ5nuNMiscOdiIxb4-jGTFcKuSFpePPt_9k2TMgrwGEuCDAqopDSSiRQAgH8iBbQM1oISpKH2aLGRSzOMlOY7wjJBU4PM5OgJKaUkkX2dfVBvObyUX1DUP-0bviA475F3Rjb9XYe5evphZz49Nir4O3Kuxch8rmn6bQYdi9yW-Hsd-mwvLX0vWPwccp4JPskVE24tPDfJZ9fnu9uroplrfv3l9dLgvNOCGFBMM4WwPh2kApDa9BG14RWZasBqaY5mvRti20FeGCGBCqXAslEUBLRkx5lp3vzx2C_z5hHJttHzVaqxz6KTYCpKCkZAm--Ave-Sm49LYmJVIKTmua0Ks96pTFpnfGj0HpDh0GZb1D06fypRRCVLKuEy_u4Wmscdvr-_zL3_wm5TVuorfTHHb8w9G9S6nHGNA0Q0g5h10DpJn73_zb_7Tp-eGDU7vF9XHLoeHH2wcVtbImKKf7eHSlYFDS2V3sXVQdHlP6z9U_ARMowcA</recordid><startdate>200206</startdate><enddate>200206</enddate><creator>Orloff, Lisa A.</creator><creator>Parhizkar, Nooshin</creator><creator>Ortiz, Erica</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Medquest Communications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200206</creationdate><title>The Hunsaker Mon-Jet Ventilation Tube for Microlaryngeal Surgery: Optimal Laryngeal Exposure</title><author>Orloff, Lisa A. ; Parhizkar, Nooshin ; Ortiz, Erica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4600-81f464d106cf138f691cf6508334914a4c6d7bbb1b50670f17a3d7a8e11c840f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesiology - instrumentation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug delivery devices</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Larynx - surgery</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medical equipment and supplies industry</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical test kit industry</topic><topic>Microsurgery - instrumentation</topic><topic>Physiological apparatus</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orloff, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parhizkar, Nooshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, Erica</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Ear, nose, & throat journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orloff, Lisa A.</au><au>Parhizkar, Nooshin</au><au>Ortiz, Erica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Hunsaker Mon-Jet Ventilation Tube for Microlaryngeal Surgery: Optimal Laryngeal Exposure</atitle><jtitle>Ear, nose, & throat journal</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><date>2002-06</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>390</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>390-394</pages><issn>0145-5613</issn><eissn>1942-7522</eissn><coden>ENTJDO</coden><abstract>Methods of delivering and monitoring anesthesia during microlaryngeal surgery are constantly evolving. In 1994, Hunsaker and colleagues introduced a laser-safe subglottic Mon-Jet ventilation tube, which has the ability to periodically measure end-tidal carbon dioxide levels. We conducted a retrospective review of 84 consecutive patients who had undergone microlaryngeal procedures with the aid of the Hunsaker Mon-Jet tube. Study parameters included the length of anesthetic induction and recovery times, the duration of surgery, the degree of surgical access to the larynx, and the incidence of anesthetic and surgical complications. We found that anesthetic induction and recovery times with the use of the Mon-Jet tube were comparable to those seen with standard endotracheal intubation. We also observed an apparent reduction in surgical time and a consistent subjective improvement in surgical visualization and access. The complication rate was acceptable, airway control was adequate, and use of the Mon-Jet tube was safe in all patients. We conclude that the Mon-Jet tube is a safe and effective subglottic jet ventilation system and that it has distinct advantages over other methods for both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>12092282</pmid><doi>10.1177/014556130208100610</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-5613 |
ispartof | Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2002-06, Vol.81 (6), p.390-394 |
issn | 0145-5613 1942-7522 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71872034 |
source | SAGE Journals |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesiology - instrumentation Biological and medical sciences Dosage and administration Drug delivery devices Evaluation Humans Larynx - surgery Medical equipment Medical equipment and supplies industry Medical sciences Medical test kit industry Microsurgery - instrumentation Physiological apparatus Product development Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments |
title | The Hunsaker Mon-Jet Ventilation Tube for Microlaryngeal Surgery: Optimal Laryngeal Exposure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A20%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Hunsaker%20Mon-Jet%20Ventilation%20Tube%20for%20Microlaryngeal%20Surgery:%20Optimal%20Laryngeal%20Exposure&rft.jtitle=Ear,%20nose,%20&%20throat%20journal&rft.au=Orloff,%20Lisa%20A.&rft.date=2002-06&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=390&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=390-394&rft.issn=0145-5613&rft.eissn=1942-7522&rft.coden=ENTJDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/014556130208100610&rft_dat=%3Cgale_AFRWT%3EA87775899%3C/gale_AFRWT%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209376292&rft_id=info:pmid/12092282&rft_galeid=A87775899&rft_sage_id=10.1177_014556130208100610&rfr_iscdi=true |