Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program
Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2004-05, Vol.113 (6), p.1760-1770 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1770 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1760 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | KEYES, Geoffrey R SINGER, Robert IVERSON, Ronald E MCGUIRE, Michael YATES, James GOLD, Alan THOMPSON, Dennis |
description | Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility. This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.PRS.0000124743.75839.11 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71871484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71871484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-62c13f03ac4152a792f0cbd34946f6b48ad5c5d6d17146a70bcaec87a4dbf0433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtr3DAQRkVpabZp_0IRhfbNjkaSLbtvIfQGgYSkfRZjebSo-BbJTtl_X22zkOpFaOZ8M-gw9gFECaI1FwLK27v7UuQDUhutSlM1qi0BXrAdVLIttNTyJdsJoWQBopJn7E1KvzNuVF29ZmdQAWjQaseWywmHQwqJz57P27rgGmha-f0W9xQP3OUHRZ7Q03rgWwrTnuPEw7E60Vp0mKjnDxsOIffDuMT5kcbjBJx6vlDORnoM9Ifnzj7i-Ja98jgkene6z9mvr19-Xn0vrm--_bi6vC6c0tVa1NKB8kKh0_lHaFrphet6pVtd-7rTDfaVq_q6BwO6RiM6h-Qag7rvvNBKnbNPT3Pz3oeN0mrHkBwNA040b8kaaHKy0Rn8_AS6OKcUydslhhHjwYKwR99WgM2-7bNv-8-3Bcjh96ctWzdS_xw9Cc7AxxOAyeHgI04upP84o2TTSvUX6uiLsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71871484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>KEYES, Geoffrey R ; SINGER, Robert ; IVERSON, Ronald E ; MCGUIRE, Michael ; YATES, James ; GOLD, Alan ; THOMPSON, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>KEYES, Geoffrey R ; SINGER, Robert ; IVERSON, Ronald E ; MCGUIRE, Michael ; YATES, James ; GOLD, Alan ; THOMPSON, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility. This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000124743.75839.11</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15114143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Databases, Factual ; Humans ; Internet ; Medical sciences ; Peer Review, Health Care - standards ; Postoperative Complications ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Safety ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgicenters - standards</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2004-05, Vol.113 (6), p.1760-1770</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-62c13f03ac4152a792f0cbd34946f6b48ad5c5d6d17146a70bcaec87a4dbf0433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-62c13f03ac4152a792f0cbd34946f6b48ad5c5d6d17146a70bcaec87a4dbf0433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15732892$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15114143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KEYES, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGER, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IVERSON, Ronald E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGUIRE, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YATES, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLD, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMPSON, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility. This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Peer Review, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgicenters - standards</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFtr3DAQRkVpabZp_0IRhfbNjkaSLbtvIfQGgYSkfRZjebSo-BbJTtl_X22zkOpFaOZ8M-gw9gFECaI1FwLK27v7UuQDUhutSlM1qi0BXrAdVLIttNTyJdsJoWQBopJn7E1KvzNuVF29ZmdQAWjQaseWywmHQwqJz57P27rgGmha-f0W9xQP3OUHRZ7Q03rgWwrTnuPEw7E60Vp0mKjnDxsOIffDuMT5kcbjBJx6vlDORnoM9Ifnzj7i-Ja98jgkene6z9mvr19-Xn0vrm--_bi6vC6c0tVa1NKB8kKh0_lHaFrphet6pVtd-7rTDfaVq_q6BwO6RiM6h-Qag7rvvNBKnbNPT3Pz3oeN0mrHkBwNA040b8kaaHKy0Rn8_AS6OKcUydslhhHjwYKwR99WgM2-7bNv-8-3Bcjh96ctWzdS_xw9Cc7AxxOAyeHgI04upP84o2TTSvUX6uiLsA</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>KEYES, Geoffrey R</creator><creator>SINGER, Robert</creator><creator>IVERSON, Ronald E</creator><creator>MCGUIRE, Michael</creator><creator>YATES, James</creator><creator>GOLD, Alan</creator><creator>THOMPSON, Dennis</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program</title><author>KEYES, Geoffrey R ; SINGER, Robert ; IVERSON, Ronald E ; MCGUIRE, Michael ; YATES, James ; GOLD, Alan ; THOMPSON, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-62c13f03ac4152a792f0cbd34946f6b48ad5c5d6d17146a70bcaec87a4dbf0433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Peer Review, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgicenters - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KEYES, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGER, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IVERSON, Ronald E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGUIRE, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YATES, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLD, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMPSON, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KEYES, Geoffrey R</au><au>SINGER, Robert</au><au>IVERSON, Ronald E</au><au>MCGUIRE, Michael</au><au>YATES, James</au><au>GOLD, Alan</au><au>THOMPSON, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1760</spage><epage>1770</epage><pages>1760-1770</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility. This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>15114143</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.PRS.0000124743.75839.11</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2004-05, Vol.113 (6), p.1760-1770 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71871484 |
source | Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE |
subjects | Accreditation Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Biological and medical sciences Databases, Factual Humans Internet Medical sciences Peer Review, Health Care - standards Postoperative Complications Quality Assurance, Health Care Safety Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgicenters - standards |
title | Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A10%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20outpatient%20Surgery%20center%20safety%20using%20an%20internet-based%20quality%20improvement%20and%20peer%20review%20program&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=KEYES,%20Geoffrey%20R&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1760&rft.epage=1770&rft.pages=1760-1770&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.PRS.0000124743.75839.11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71871484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71871484&rft_id=info:pmid/15114143&rfr_iscdi=true |