Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program

Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2004-05, Vol.113 (6), p.1760-1770
Hauptverfasser: KEYES, Geoffrey R, SINGER, Robert, IVERSON, Ronald E, MCGUIRE, Michael, YATES, James, GOLD, Alan, THOMPSON, Dennis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1770
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1760
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 113
creator KEYES, Geoffrey R
SINGER, Robert
IVERSON, Ronald E
MCGUIRE, Michael
YATES, James
GOLD, Alan
THOMPSON, Dennis
description Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility. This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.PRS.0000124743.75839.11
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71871484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71871484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-62c13f03ac4152a792f0cbd34946f6b48ad5c5d6d17146a70bcaec87a4dbf0433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtr3DAQRkVpabZp_0IRhfbNjkaSLbtvIfQGgYSkfRZjebSo-BbJTtl_X22zkOpFaOZ8M-gw9gFECaI1FwLK27v7UuQDUhutSlM1qi0BXrAdVLIttNTyJdsJoWQBopJn7E1KvzNuVF29ZmdQAWjQaseWywmHQwqJz57P27rgGmha-f0W9xQP3OUHRZ7Q03rgWwrTnuPEw7E60Vp0mKjnDxsOIffDuMT5kcbjBJx6vlDORnoM9Ifnzj7i-Ja98jgkene6z9mvr19-Xn0vrm--_bi6vC6c0tVa1NKB8kKh0_lHaFrphet6pVtd-7rTDfaVq_q6BwO6RiM6h-Qag7rvvNBKnbNPT3Pz3oeN0mrHkBwNA040b8kaaHKy0Rn8_AS6OKcUydslhhHjwYKwR99WgM2-7bNv-8-3Bcjh96ctWzdS_xw9Cc7AxxOAyeHgI04upP84o2TTSvUX6uiLsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71871484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>KEYES, Geoffrey R ; SINGER, Robert ; IVERSON, Ronald E ; MCGUIRE, Michael ; YATES, James ; GOLD, Alan ; THOMPSON, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>KEYES, Geoffrey R ; SINGER, Robert ; IVERSON, Ronald E ; MCGUIRE, Michael ; YATES, James ; GOLD, Alan ; THOMPSON, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility. This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000124743.75839.11</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15114143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Databases, Factual ; Humans ; Internet ; Medical sciences ; Peer Review, Health Care - standards ; Postoperative Complications ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Safety ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgicenters - standards</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2004-05, Vol.113 (6), p.1760-1770</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-62c13f03ac4152a792f0cbd34946f6b48ad5c5d6d17146a70bcaec87a4dbf0433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-62c13f03ac4152a792f0cbd34946f6b48ad5c5d6d17146a70bcaec87a4dbf0433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15732892$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15114143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KEYES, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGER, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IVERSON, Ronald E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGUIRE, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YATES, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLD, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMPSON, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility. This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Peer Review, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgicenters - standards</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFtr3DAQRkVpabZp_0IRhfbNjkaSLbtvIfQGgYSkfRZjebSo-BbJTtl_X22zkOpFaOZ8M-gw9gFECaI1FwLK27v7UuQDUhutSlM1qi0BXrAdVLIttNTyJdsJoWQBopJn7E1KvzNuVF29ZmdQAWjQaseWywmHQwqJz57P27rgGmha-f0W9xQP3OUHRZ7Q03rgWwrTnuPEw7E60Vp0mKjnDxsOIffDuMT5kcbjBJx6vlDORnoM9Ifnzj7i-Ja98jgkene6z9mvr19-Xn0vrm--_bi6vC6c0tVa1NKB8kKh0_lHaFrphet6pVtd-7rTDfaVq_q6BwO6RiM6h-Qag7rvvNBKnbNPT3Pz3oeN0mrHkBwNA040b8kaaHKy0Rn8_AS6OKcUydslhhHjwYKwR99WgM2-7bNv-8-3Bcjh96ctWzdS_xw9Cc7AxxOAyeHgI04upP84o2TTSvUX6uiLsA</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>KEYES, Geoffrey R</creator><creator>SINGER, Robert</creator><creator>IVERSON, Ronald E</creator><creator>MCGUIRE, Michael</creator><creator>YATES, James</creator><creator>GOLD, Alan</creator><creator>THOMPSON, Dennis</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program</title><author>KEYES, Geoffrey R ; SINGER, Robert ; IVERSON, Ronald E ; MCGUIRE, Michael ; YATES, James ; GOLD, Alan ; THOMPSON, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-62c13f03ac4152a792f0cbd34946f6b48ad5c5d6d17146a70bcaec87a4dbf0433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Peer Review, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgicenters - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KEYES, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGER, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IVERSON, Ronald E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGUIRE, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YATES, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLD, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMPSON, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KEYES, Geoffrey R</au><au>SINGER, Robert</au><au>IVERSON, Ronald E</au><au>MCGUIRE, Michael</au><au>YATES, James</au><au>GOLD, Alan</au><au>THOMPSON, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1760</spage><epage>1770</epage><pages>1760-1770</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility. This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>15114143</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.PRS.0000124743.75839.11</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2004-05, Vol.113 (6), p.1760-1770
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71871484
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE
subjects Accreditation
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Biological and medical sciences
Databases, Factual
Humans
Internet
Medical sciences
Peer Review, Health Care - standards
Postoperative Complications
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Safety
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgicenters - standards
title Analysis of outpatient Surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A10%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20outpatient%20Surgery%20center%20safety%20using%20an%20internet-based%20quality%20improvement%20and%20peer%20review%20program&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=KEYES,%20Geoffrey%20R&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1760&rft.epage=1770&rft.pages=1760-1770&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.PRS.0000124743.75839.11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71871484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71871484&rft_id=info:pmid/15114143&rfr_iscdi=true