Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study

Background and objective: The epidural and subarachnoid spaces should be identified at the first attempt, since multiple punctures increase the risk of postdural puncture headache, epidural haematoma and neural trauma. The study aimed to describe the predictors of successful neuraxial blocks at the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of anaesthesiology 2002-06, Vol.19 (6), p.447-451
Hauptverfasser: de Oliveira Filho, G. R., Gomes, H. P., da Fonseca, M. H. Z., Hoffman, J. C., Pederneiras, S. G., Garcia, J. H. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 451
container_issue 6
container_start_page 447
container_title European journal of anaesthesiology
container_volume 19
creator de Oliveira Filho, G. R.
Gomes, H. P.
da Fonseca, M. H. Z.
Hoffman, J. C.
Pederneiras, S. G.
Garcia, J. H. S.
description Background and objective: The epidural and subarachnoid spaces should be identified at the first attempt, since multiple punctures increase the risk of postdural puncture headache, epidural haematoma and neural trauma. The study aimed to describe the predictors of successful neuraxial blocks at the first attempt. Methods: After institutional Review Board approval, 1481 patients undergoing spinal or epidural anaesthesia were prospectively enrolled. For each block we recorded: gender, age, height, weight, body habitus, anatomical landmarks (palpability of the spinous processes), spinal anatomy, patient positioning, premedication, needle type and gauge, approach, spinal level of the block, and the provider’s level of experience. Retrieval of cerebrospinal fluid or loss of resistance to saline or air identified the subarachnoid and epidural spaces, respectively. The outcome variable was the first attempt success or failure (whether or not the needle was correctly located with one skin puncture and produced adequate surgical anaesthesia). Backward stepwise logistic regression tested its association with the other variables. Results: The first-attempt rate of success was 61.51%. Independent predictors (Odds ratio, 95% confidence limits) were the quality of anatomical landmarks (1.92 (1.57; 2.35)), the provider’s level of experience (1.24 (1.15; 1.33)) and the adequacy of patient positioning (3.84 (2.84; 5.19)). Conclusions: The successful location of the subarachnoid or the epidural space at the first attempt is influenced by the quality of patients’ anatomical landmarks, the adequacy of patient positioning and the provider’s level of experience.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0265021502000716
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71871266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0265021502000716</cupid><sourcerecordid>71871266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-7413d1cc9f32c32d1c32135fa9fed4b054421910582c5d030d3ea932ae9527273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLAzEQhYMotlZ_gC-yCPq2mkk2m0bwQYo3KCioz0s2F9m6l5psxP57U7pQUHwIE5jvzJw5CB0DvgAM_PIFk5xhAvFhjDnkO2gMNGcpoVm-i8brdrruj9CB94vIsKjbRyMgWGSC4DG6fnZGV6rvnE86m_iglPHehjppTXDyu5J1Utad-rhKZLJ0nV8a1VdfJvF90KtDtGdl7c3RUCfo7e72dfaQzp_uH2c381RRPu1TngHVoJSwlChK4pcSoMxKYY3OSsyyjIAAzKZEMY0p1tRIQYk0ghFOOJ2g883c6OAzGN8XTeWVqWvZmi74gsOUA8nzCJ7-AhddcG30VhDImcgFxhGCDaTiPd4ZWyxd1Ui3KgAX62CLP8FGzckwOJSN0VvFkGQEzgZAeiVr62SrKr_l6JTEm2nk6LBcNqWr9LvZWvx__Q9NHoy_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216596900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>de Oliveira Filho, G. R. ; Gomes, H. P. ; da Fonseca, M. H. Z. ; Hoffman, J. C. ; Pederneiras, S. G. ; Garcia, J. H. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira Filho, G. R. ; Gomes, H. P. ; da Fonseca, M. H. Z. ; Hoffman, J. C. ; Pederneiras, S. G. ; Garcia, J. H. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and objective: The epidural and subarachnoid spaces should be identified at the first attempt, since multiple punctures increase the risk of postdural puncture headache, epidural haematoma and neural trauma. The study aimed to describe the predictors of successful neuraxial blocks at the first attempt. Methods: After institutional Review Board approval, 1481 patients undergoing spinal or epidural anaesthesia were prospectively enrolled. For each block we recorded: gender, age, height, weight, body habitus, anatomical landmarks (palpability of the spinous processes), spinal anatomy, patient positioning, premedication, needle type and gauge, approach, spinal level of the block, and the provider’s level of experience. Retrieval of cerebrospinal fluid or loss of resistance to saline or air identified the subarachnoid and epidural spaces, respectively. The outcome variable was the first attempt success or failure (whether or not the needle was correctly located with one skin puncture and produced adequate surgical anaesthesia). Backward stepwise logistic regression tested its association with the other variables. Results: The first-attempt rate of success was 61.51%. Independent predictors (Odds ratio, 95% confidence limits) were the quality of anatomical landmarks (1.92 (1.57; 2.35)), the provider’s level of experience (1.24 (1.15; 1.33)) and the adequacy of patient positioning (3.84 (2.84; 5.19)). Conclusions: The successful location of the subarachnoid or the epidural space at the first attempt is influenced by the quality of patients’ anatomical landmarks, the adequacy of patient positioning and the provider’s level of experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-0215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0265021502000716</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12094920</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJANEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>(RD) Surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Epidural - methods ; Anesthesia, Spinal - methods ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesiology - education ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Competence ; Female ; Humans ; Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment) ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Needles ; Nerve Block - methods ; Nerve Block - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Odds Ratio ; Original Article ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Spine - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><ispartof>European journal of anaesthesiology, 2002-06, Vol.19 (6), p.447-451</ispartof><rights>2002 European Society of Anaesthesiology</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Jun 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-7413d1cc9f32c32d1c32135fa9fed4b054421910582c5d030d3ea932ae9527273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13822133$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12094920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira Filho, G. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, H. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Fonseca, M. H. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederneiras, S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, J. H. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study</title><title>European journal of anaesthesiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><description>Background and objective: The epidural and subarachnoid spaces should be identified at the first attempt, since multiple punctures increase the risk of postdural puncture headache, epidural haematoma and neural trauma. The study aimed to describe the predictors of successful neuraxial blocks at the first attempt. Methods: After institutional Review Board approval, 1481 patients undergoing spinal or epidural anaesthesia were prospectively enrolled. For each block we recorded: gender, age, height, weight, body habitus, anatomical landmarks (palpability of the spinous processes), spinal anatomy, patient positioning, premedication, needle type and gauge, approach, spinal level of the block, and the provider’s level of experience. Retrieval of cerebrospinal fluid or loss of resistance to saline or air identified the subarachnoid and epidural spaces, respectively. The outcome variable was the first attempt success or failure (whether or not the needle was correctly located with one skin puncture and produced adequate surgical anaesthesia). Backward stepwise logistic regression tested its association with the other variables. Results: The first-attempt rate of success was 61.51%. Independent predictors (Odds ratio, 95% confidence limits) were the quality of anatomical landmarks (1.92 (1.57; 2.35)), the provider’s level of experience (1.24 (1.15; 1.33)) and the adequacy of patient positioning (3.84 (2.84; 5.19)). Conclusions: The successful location of the subarachnoid or the epidural space at the first attempt is influenced by the quality of patients’ anatomical landmarks, the adequacy of patient positioning and the provider’s level of experience.</description><subject>(RD) Surgery</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesiology - education</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Nerve Block - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Spine - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><issn>0265-0215</issn><issn>1365-2346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLAzEQhYMotlZ_gC-yCPq2mkk2m0bwQYo3KCioz0s2F9m6l5psxP57U7pQUHwIE5jvzJw5CB0DvgAM_PIFk5xhAvFhjDnkO2gMNGcpoVm-i8brdrruj9CB94vIsKjbRyMgWGSC4DG6fnZGV6rvnE86m_iglPHehjppTXDyu5J1Utad-rhKZLJ0nV8a1VdfJvF90KtDtGdl7c3RUCfo7e72dfaQzp_uH2c381RRPu1TngHVoJSwlChK4pcSoMxKYY3OSsyyjIAAzKZEMY0p1tRIQYk0ghFOOJ2g883c6OAzGN8XTeWVqWvZmi74gsOUA8nzCJ7-AhddcG30VhDImcgFxhGCDaTiPd4ZWyxd1Ui3KgAX62CLP8FGzckwOJSN0VvFkGQEzgZAeiVr62SrKr_l6JTEm2nk6LBcNqWr9LvZWvx__Q9NHoy_</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>de Oliveira Filho, G. R.</creator><creator>Gomes, H. P.</creator><creator>da Fonseca, M. H. Z.</creator><creator>Hoffman, J. C.</creator><creator>Pederneiras, S. G.</creator><creator>Garcia, J. H. S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study</title><author>de Oliveira Filho, G. R. ; Gomes, H. P. ; da Fonseca, M. H. Z. ; Hoffman, J. C. ; Pederneiras, S. G. ; Garcia, J. H. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-7413d1cc9f32c32d1c32135fa9fed4b054421910582c5d030d3ea932ae9527273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>(RD) Surgery</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesiology - education</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Nerve Block - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Spine - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira Filho, G. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, H. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Fonseca, M. H. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederneiras, S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, J. H. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Oliveira Filho, G. R.</au><au>Gomes, H. P.</au><au>da Fonseca, M. H. Z.</au><au>Hoffman, J. C.</au><au>Pederneiras, S. G.</au><au>Garcia, J. H. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>451</epage><pages>447-451</pages><issn>0265-0215</issn><eissn>1365-2346</eissn><coden>EJANEG</coden><abstract>Background and objective: The epidural and subarachnoid spaces should be identified at the first attempt, since multiple punctures increase the risk of postdural puncture headache, epidural haematoma and neural trauma. The study aimed to describe the predictors of successful neuraxial blocks at the first attempt. Methods: After institutional Review Board approval, 1481 patients undergoing spinal or epidural anaesthesia were prospectively enrolled. For each block we recorded: gender, age, height, weight, body habitus, anatomical landmarks (palpability of the spinous processes), spinal anatomy, patient positioning, premedication, needle type and gauge, approach, spinal level of the block, and the provider’s level of experience. Retrieval of cerebrospinal fluid or loss of resistance to saline or air identified the subarachnoid and epidural spaces, respectively. The outcome variable was the first attempt success or failure (whether or not the needle was correctly located with one skin puncture and produced adequate surgical anaesthesia). Backward stepwise logistic regression tested its association with the other variables. Results: The first-attempt rate of success was 61.51%. Independent predictors (Odds ratio, 95% confidence limits) were the quality of anatomical landmarks (1.92 (1.57; 2.35)), the provider’s level of experience (1.24 (1.15; 1.33)) and the adequacy of patient positioning (3.84 (2.84; 5.19)). Conclusions: The successful location of the subarachnoid or the epidural space at the first attempt is influenced by the quality of patients’ anatomical landmarks, the adequacy of patient positioning and the provider’s level of experience.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>12094920</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0265021502000716</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-0215
ispartof European journal of anaesthesiology, 2002-06, Vol.19 (6), p.447-451
issn 0265-0215
1365-2346
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71871266
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects (RD) Surgery
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia
Anesthesia, Epidural - methods
Anesthesia, Spinal - methods
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthesiology - education
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical Competence
Female
Humans
Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)
Logistic Models
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Needles
Nerve Block - methods
Nerve Block - statistics & numerical data
Odds Ratio
Original Article
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Spine - anatomy & histology
title Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T07%3A40%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20successful%20neuraxial%20block:%20a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20anaesthesiology&rft.au=de%20Oliveira%20Filho,%20G.%20R.&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=451&rft.pages=447-451&rft.issn=0265-0215&rft.eissn=1365-2346&rft.coden=EJANEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0265021502000716&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71871266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216596900&rft_id=info:pmid/12094920&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0265021502000716&rfr_iscdi=true