The transgingival approach for placement of distraction implants

Purpose: Since 1997, distraction implants have been clinically used for alveolar ridge distraction and, later, for prosthetic treatment. While 63 patients have been treated by the authors by alveolar ridge distraction with distraction implants with an open approach, the aim of this study was to demo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2002-07, Vol.60 (7), p.793-796
Hauptverfasser: Gaggl, Alexander, Schultes, Günter, Rainer, Heribert, Kärcher, Hans
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 796
container_issue 7
container_start_page 793
container_title Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 60
creator Gaggl, Alexander
Schultes, Günter
Rainer, Heribert
Kärcher, Hans
description Purpose: Since 1997, distraction implants have been clinically used for alveolar ridge distraction and, later, for prosthetic treatment. While 63 patients have been treated by the authors by alveolar ridge distraction with distraction implants with an open approach, the aim of this study was to demonstrate a minimally invasive technique of distractor placement via a transgingival approach. Patients and Methods: Twelve patients were treated with a modified surgical incision using distraction implants. A tissue punch was used to remove transgingival mucosa, and a segmental osteotomy was performed using a vestibular incision. The distracted segment was pedicled at the lingual and crestal mucoperiosteum. Distraction was carried out for 0.5 mm per day, divided into 2 to 4 turns per day. A distraction of 5 to 7 mm was performed. At the end of distraction, the distraction insert was changed into a definitive stable implant insert. Prosthetic treatment was performed 4 months after the distraction period with fixed superstructures. The follow-up was performed with the aid of dental radiographs, evaluation of peri-implant probing depths, and Periotest values (Siemans, Bensheim, Germany). Results: The outcome of this technique showed minimal scarring of the gingiva with good aesthetic results, the clinical and radiologic findings were satisfying, and the Periotest values were negative at every examination. The rate of complications was low. Conclusion: Minimal scarring and good aesthetic and functional outcome resulted in patients with alveolar ridge distraction performed with a transgingival approach. © 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:793-796, 2002
doi_str_mv 10.1053/joms.2002.33248
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71868853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278239102000149</els_id><sourcerecordid>71868853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5aae7f4b8432ea4591c15741c8909cabd586e0bcc09d1304df9ab41f95493d5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAURS0EoqUws6EssKW14zixN1DFl1SJpcyW4zy3rpK42CkS_x6HRurE9IZ73tXVQeiW4DnBjC52rg3zDONsTmmW8zM0JYySlMXsHE1xVvI0o4JM0FUIO4wJYWVxiSYkw1wUgk3R43oLSe9VFza229hv1SRqv_dO6W1inE_2jdLQQtcnziS1DRHVvXVdYtsYdX24RhdGNQFuxjtDny_P6-Vbuvp4fV8-rVJNS9qnTCkoTV7xnGagciaIjltyornAQquqZrwAXGmNRU0ozmsjVJUTI1guaM2AztDDsTeO-zpA6GVrg4YmjgB3CLIkvOCc0QgujqD2LgQPRu69bZX_kQTLQZocpMlBmvyTFj_uxupD1UJ94kdLEbgfARW0akzUpW04cbQsC8aHInHkIIr4tuBl0BY6DbX1oHtZO_vviF8-SokI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71868853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The transgingival approach for placement of distraction implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gaggl, Alexander ; Schultes, Günter ; Rainer, Heribert ; Kärcher, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaggl, Alexander ; Schultes, Günter ; Rainer, Heribert ; Kärcher, Hans</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Since 1997, distraction implants have been clinically used for alveolar ridge distraction and, later, for prosthetic treatment. While 63 patients have been treated by the authors by alveolar ridge distraction with distraction implants with an open approach, the aim of this study was to demonstrate a minimally invasive technique of distractor placement via a transgingival approach. Patients and Methods: Twelve patients were treated with a modified surgical incision using distraction implants. A tissue punch was used to remove transgingival mucosa, and a segmental osteotomy was performed using a vestibular incision. The distracted segment was pedicled at the lingual and crestal mucoperiosteum. Distraction was carried out for 0.5 mm per day, divided into 2 to 4 turns per day. A distraction of 5 to 7 mm was performed. At the end of distraction, the distraction insert was changed into a definitive stable implant insert. Prosthetic treatment was performed 4 months after the distraction period with fixed superstructures. The follow-up was performed with the aid of dental radiographs, evaluation of peri-implant probing depths, and Periotest values (Siemans, Bensheim, Germany). Results: The outcome of this technique showed minimal scarring of the gingiva with good aesthetic results, the clinical and radiologic findings were satisfying, and the Periotest values were negative at every examination. The rate of complications was low. Conclusion: Minimal scarring and good aesthetic and functional outcome resulted in patients with alveolar ridge distraction performed with a transgingival approach. © 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:793-796, 2002</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.33248</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12089695</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery ; Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Process - injuries ; Alveolar Process - pathology ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods ; Atrophy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dentistry ; Esthetics, Dental ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gingiva - pathology ; Gingivectomy - methods ; Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Humans ; Male ; Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Medical sciences ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation ; Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods ; Osteotomy ; Periodontitis - etiology ; Periosteum - surgery ; Radiography ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2002-07, Vol.60 (7), p.793-796</ispartof><rights>2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5aae7f4b8432ea4591c15741c8909cabd586e0bcc09d1304df9ab41f95493d5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5aae7f4b8432ea4591c15741c8909cabd586e0bcc09d1304df9ab41f95493d5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.33248$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13776588$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12089695$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaggl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultes, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rainer, Heribert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kärcher, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>The transgingival approach for placement of distraction implants</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose: Since 1997, distraction implants have been clinically used for alveolar ridge distraction and, later, for prosthetic treatment. While 63 patients have been treated by the authors by alveolar ridge distraction with distraction implants with an open approach, the aim of this study was to demonstrate a minimally invasive technique of distractor placement via a transgingival approach. Patients and Methods: Twelve patients were treated with a modified surgical incision using distraction implants. A tissue punch was used to remove transgingival mucosa, and a segmental osteotomy was performed using a vestibular incision. The distracted segment was pedicled at the lingual and crestal mucoperiosteum. Distraction was carried out for 0.5 mm per day, divided into 2 to 4 turns per day. A distraction of 5 to 7 mm was performed. At the end of distraction, the distraction insert was changed into a definitive stable implant insert. Prosthetic treatment was performed 4 months after the distraction period with fixed superstructures. The follow-up was performed with the aid of dental radiographs, evaluation of peri-implant probing depths, and Periotest values (Siemans, Bensheim, Germany). Results: The outcome of this technique showed minimal scarring of the gingiva with good aesthetic results, the clinical and radiologic findings were satisfying, and the Periotest values were negative at every examination. The rate of complications was low. Conclusion: Minimal scarring and good aesthetic and functional outcome resulted in patients with alveolar ridge distraction performed with a transgingival approach. © 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:793-796, 2002</description><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - injuries</subject><subject>Alveolar Process - pathology</subject><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Atrophy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gingiva - pathology</subject><subject>Gingivectomy - methods</subject><subject>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Periodontitis - etiology</subject><subject>Periosteum - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAURS0EoqUws6EssKW14zixN1DFl1SJpcyW4zy3rpK42CkS_x6HRurE9IZ73tXVQeiW4DnBjC52rg3zDONsTmmW8zM0JYySlMXsHE1xVvI0o4JM0FUIO4wJYWVxiSYkw1wUgk3R43oLSe9VFza229hv1SRqv_dO6W1inE_2jdLQQtcnziS1DRHVvXVdYtsYdX24RhdGNQFuxjtDny_P6-Vbuvp4fV8-rVJNS9qnTCkoTV7xnGagciaIjltyornAQquqZrwAXGmNRU0ozmsjVJUTI1guaM2AztDDsTeO-zpA6GVrg4YmjgB3CLIkvOCc0QgujqD2LgQPRu69bZX_kQTLQZocpMlBmvyTFj_uxupD1UJ94kdLEbgfARW0akzUpW04cbQsC8aHInHkIIr4tuBl0BY6DbX1oHtZO_vviF8-SokI</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>Gaggl, Alexander</creator><creator>Schultes, Günter</creator><creator>Rainer, Heribert</creator><creator>Kärcher, Hans</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>The transgingival approach for placement of distraction implants</title><author>Gaggl, Alexander ; Schultes, Günter ; Rainer, Heribert ; Kärcher, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-5aae7f4b8432ea4591c15741c8909cabd586e0bcc09d1304df9ab41f95493d5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - injuries</topic><topic>Alveolar Process - pathology</topic><topic>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Atrophy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gingiva - pathology</topic><topic>Gingivectomy - methods</topic><topic>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Periodontitis - etiology</topic><topic>Periosteum - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaggl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultes, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rainer, Heribert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kärcher, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaggl, Alexander</au><au>Schultes, Günter</au><au>Rainer, Heribert</au><au>Kärcher, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The transgingival approach for placement of distraction implants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>793</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>793-796</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><coden>JOMSDA</coden><abstract>Purpose: Since 1997, distraction implants have been clinically used for alveolar ridge distraction and, later, for prosthetic treatment. While 63 patients have been treated by the authors by alveolar ridge distraction with distraction implants with an open approach, the aim of this study was to demonstrate a minimally invasive technique of distractor placement via a transgingival approach. Patients and Methods: Twelve patients were treated with a modified surgical incision using distraction implants. A tissue punch was used to remove transgingival mucosa, and a segmental osteotomy was performed using a vestibular incision. The distracted segment was pedicled at the lingual and crestal mucoperiosteum. Distraction was carried out for 0.5 mm per day, divided into 2 to 4 turns per day. A distraction of 5 to 7 mm was performed. At the end of distraction, the distraction insert was changed into a definitive stable implant insert. Prosthetic treatment was performed 4 months after the distraction period with fixed superstructures. The follow-up was performed with the aid of dental radiographs, evaluation of peri-implant probing depths, and Periotest values (Siemans, Bensheim, Germany). Results: The outcome of this technique showed minimal scarring of the gingiva with good aesthetic results, the clinical and radiologic findings were satisfying, and the Periotest values were negative at every examination. The rate of complications was low. Conclusion: Minimal scarring and good aesthetic and functional outcome resulted in patients with alveolar ridge distraction performed with a transgingival approach. © 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:793-796, 2002</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12089695</pmid><doi>10.1053/joms.2002.33248</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2391
ispartof Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2002-07, Vol.60 (7), p.793-796
issn 0278-2391
1531-5053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71868853
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Alveolar Bone Loss - surgery
Alveolar Process - diagnostic imaging
Alveolar Process - injuries
Alveolar Process - pathology
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods
Atrophy
Biological and medical sciences
Cicatrix - pathology
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Dentistry
Esthetics, Dental
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gingiva - pathology
Gingivectomy - methods
Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics
Humans
Male
Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics
Medical sciences
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation
Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods
Osteotomy
Periodontitis - etiology
Periosteum - surgery
Radiography
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Treatment Outcome
title The transgingival approach for placement of distraction implants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A55%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20transgingival%20approach%20for%20placement%20of%20distraction%20implants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Gaggl,%20Alexander&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=793&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=793-796&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft.coden=JOMSDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/joms.2002.33248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71868853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71868853&rft_id=info:pmid/12089695&rft_els_id=S0278239102000149&rfr_iscdi=true