A Retrospective Study of Myopia Progression in Adult Contact Lens Wearers

To study retrospectively the frequency of myopia progression and risk factors for progression in a sample of adult contact lens wearers. From a database of 815 soft contact lens wearers, patients were identified whose age was between 20 and 40 years, who had at least -0.50 D spherical equivalent of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2002-07, Vol.43 (7), p.2110-2113
Hauptverfasser: Bullimore, Mark A, Jones, Lisa A, Moeschberger, Melvin L, Zadnik, Karla, Payor, Rick E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2113
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2110
container_title Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
container_volume 43
creator Bullimore, Mark A
Jones, Lisa A
Moeschberger, Melvin L
Zadnik, Karla
Payor, Rick E
description To study retrospectively the frequency of myopia progression and risk factors for progression in a sample of adult contact lens wearers. From a database of 815 soft contact lens wearers, patients were identified whose age was between 20 and 40 years, who had at least -0.50 D spherical equivalent of myopia in both eyes, three or more refractions, and > or =5 years of follow-up. Only data from the right eye were used. Progression was defined as an increase of at least -1.00 D over 5 years. Subjects were also asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their ocular history, demographics, family history, and the amount of time spent performing different tasks at home and at work. Two hundred ninety-one subjects met the eligibility criteria with a mean baseline refractive error of -3.29 +/- 1.92 D and a mean age of 28.5 +/- 5.0 years. Of these, 21.3% progressed by at least -1.00 D over the 5-year period. The 5-year rate of progression decreased with increasing age (chi(2) = 12.44, P = 0.006). One hundred ninety-seven subjects (67.6%) completed and returned questionnaires. "Progressors" (N = 41) did not differ from "nonprogressors" (N = 156) in terms of hours per day spent reading and writing, computer use, education level, family history of myopia, age of onset of myopia, and contact lens wear. In this database of soft contact lens wearers, myopia progression was common for subjects in their twenties and less common for those in their thirties.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71861989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71861989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h268t-c69d8fdaa0b3a46e56d6e1f94f73721824caf1f18059ccb3dc1b1f76c80db83a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0FtLwzAUB_AgipvTryB50bdC0rRJ-jiGl8FE8YKPIc1li7RNTVLLvr0FJ3s5Bw4__odzTsAcl2WelYyTUzBHuKAZKlAxAxcxfiGUY5yjczCbaoWn-Rysl_DVpOBjb1RyPwa-pUHvobfwae97J-FL8NtgYnS-g66DSz00Ca58l6RKcGO6CD-NDCbES3BmZRPN1aEvwMf93fvqMds8P6xXy022yylPmaKV5lZLiWoiC2pKqqnBtiosIyzHPC-UtNhijspKqZpohWtsGVUc6ZoTSRbg9i-3D_57MDGJ1kVlmkZ2xg9RMMwprng1wesDHOrWaNEH18qwF__HT-DmAGRUsrFBdsrFoyOMEcrz48ad2-5GF4yIrWyaKRaLcRwLIpiYPovIL58tcMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71861989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Retrospective Study of Myopia Progression in Adult Contact Lens Wearers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bullimore, Mark A ; Jones, Lisa A ; Moeschberger, Melvin L ; Zadnik, Karla ; Payor, Rick E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bullimore, Mark A ; Jones, Lisa A ; Moeschberger, Melvin L ; Zadnik, Karla ; Payor, Rick E</creatorcontrib><description>To study retrospectively the frequency of myopia progression and risk factors for progression in a sample of adult contact lens wearers. From a database of 815 soft contact lens wearers, patients were identified whose age was between 20 and 40 years, who had at least -0.50 D spherical equivalent of myopia in both eyes, three or more refractions, and &gt; or =5 years of follow-up. Only data from the right eye were used. Progression was defined as an increase of at least -1.00 D over 5 years. Subjects were also asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their ocular history, demographics, family history, and the amount of time spent performing different tasks at home and at work. Two hundred ninety-one subjects met the eligibility criteria with a mean baseline refractive error of -3.29 +/- 1.92 D and a mean age of 28.5 +/- 5.0 years. Of these, 21.3% progressed by at least -1.00 D over the 5-year period. The 5-year rate of progression decreased with increasing age (chi(2) = 12.44, P = 0.006). One hundred ninety-seven subjects (67.6%) completed and returned questionnaires. "Progressors" (N = 41) did not differ from "nonprogressors" (N = 156) in terms of hours per day spent reading and writing, computer use, education level, family history of myopia, age of onset of myopia, and contact lens wear. In this database of soft contact lens wearers, myopia progression was common for subjects in their twenties and less common for those in their thirties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-0404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12091404</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOVSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rockville, MD: ARVO</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aging - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects ; Disease Progression ; Diseases of the eye ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Myopia - etiology ; Myopia - physiopathology ; Myopia - therapy ; Ophthalmology ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Refraction, Ocular ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Vision disorders</subject><ispartof>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science, 2002-07, Vol.43 (7), p.2110-2113</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13773682$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12091404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bullimore, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeschberger, Melvin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zadnik, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payor, Rick E</creatorcontrib><title>A Retrospective Study of Myopia Progression in Adult Contact Lens Wearers</title><title>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</title><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><description>To study retrospectively the frequency of myopia progression and risk factors for progression in a sample of adult contact lens wearers. From a database of 815 soft contact lens wearers, patients were identified whose age was between 20 and 40 years, who had at least -0.50 D spherical equivalent of myopia in both eyes, three or more refractions, and &gt; or =5 years of follow-up. Only data from the right eye were used. Progression was defined as an increase of at least -1.00 D over 5 years. Subjects were also asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their ocular history, demographics, family history, and the amount of time spent performing different tasks at home and at work. Two hundred ninety-one subjects met the eligibility criteria with a mean baseline refractive error of -3.29 +/- 1.92 D and a mean age of 28.5 +/- 5.0 years. Of these, 21.3% progressed by at least -1.00 D over the 5-year period. The 5-year rate of progression decreased with increasing age (chi(2) = 12.44, P = 0.006). One hundred ninety-seven subjects (67.6%) completed and returned questionnaires. "Progressors" (N = 41) did not differ from "nonprogressors" (N = 156) in terms of hours per day spent reading and writing, computer use, education level, family history of myopia, age of onset of myopia, and contact lens wear. In this database of soft contact lens wearers, myopia progression was common for subjects in their twenties and less common for those in their thirties.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Diseases of the eye</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Myopia - etiology</subject><subject>Myopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myopia - therapy</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Refraction, Ocular</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Vision disorders</subject><issn>0146-0404</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0FtLwzAUB_AgipvTryB50bdC0rRJ-jiGl8FE8YKPIc1li7RNTVLLvr0FJ3s5Bw4__odzTsAcl2WelYyTUzBHuKAZKlAxAxcxfiGUY5yjczCbaoWn-Rysl_DVpOBjb1RyPwa-pUHvobfwae97J-FL8NtgYnS-g66DSz00Ca58l6RKcGO6CD-NDCbES3BmZRPN1aEvwMf93fvqMds8P6xXy022yylPmaKV5lZLiWoiC2pKqqnBtiosIyzHPC-UtNhijspKqZpohWtsGVUc6ZoTSRbg9i-3D_57MDGJ1kVlmkZ2xg9RMMwprng1wesDHOrWaNEH18qwF__HT-DmAGRUsrFBdsrFoyOMEcrz48ad2-5GF4yIrWyaKRaLcRwLIpiYPovIL58tcMg</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>Bullimore, Mark A</creator><creator>Jones, Lisa A</creator><creator>Moeschberger, Melvin L</creator><creator>Zadnik, Karla</creator><creator>Payor, Rick E</creator><general>ARVO</general><general>Association for Research in Vision and Ophtalmology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>A Retrospective Study of Myopia Progression in Adult Contact Lens Wearers</title><author>Bullimore, Mark A ; Jones, Lisa A ; Moeschberger, Melvin L ; Zadnik, Karla ; Payor, Rick E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h268t-c69d8fdaa0b3a46e56d6e1f94f73721824caf1f18059ccb3dc1b1f76c80db83a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Diseases of the eye</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Myopia - etiology</topic><topic>Myopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myopia - therapy</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Refraction, Ocular</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Vision disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bullimore, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeschberger, Melvin L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zadnik, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payor, Rick E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bullimore, Mark A</au><au>Jones, Lisa A</au><au>Moeschberger, Melvin L</au><au>Zadnik, Karla</au><au>Payor, Rick E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Retrospective Study of Myopia Progression in Adult Contact Lens Wearers</atitle><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2110</spage><epage>2113</epage><pages>2110-2113</pages><issn>0146-0404</issn><eissn>1552-5783</eissn><coden>IOVSDA</coden><abstract>To study retrospectively the frequency of myopia progression and risk factors for progression in a sample of adult contact lens wearers. From a database of 815 soft contact lens wearers, patients were identified whose age was between 20 and 40 years, who had at least -0.50 D spherical equivalent of myopia in both eyes, three or more refractions, and &gt; or =5 years of follow-up. Only data from the right eye were used. Progression was defined as an increase of at least -1.00 D over 5 years. Subjects were also asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their ocular history, demographics, family history, and the amount of time spent performing different tasks at home and at work. Two hundred ninety-one subjects met the eligibility criteria with a mean baseline refractive error of -3.29 +/- 1.92 D and a mean age of 28.5 +/- 5.0 years. Of these, 21.3% progressed by at least -1.00 D over the 5-year period. The 5-year rate of progression decreased with increasing age (chi(2) = 12.44, P = 0.006). One hundred ninety-seven subjects (67.6%) completed and returned questionnaires. "Progressors" (N = 41) did not differ from "nonprogressors" (N = 156) in terms of hours per day spent reading and writing, computer use, education level, family history of myopia, age of onset of myopia, and contact lens wear. In this database of soft contact lens wearers, myopia progression was common for subjects in their twenties and less common for those in their thirties.</abstract><cop>Rockville, MD</cop><pub>ARVO</pub><pmid>12091404</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-0404
ispartof Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2002-07, Vol.43 (7), p.2110-2113
issn 0146-0404
1552-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71861989
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aging - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects
Disease Progression
Diseases of the eye
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Myopia - etiology
Myopia - physiopathology
Myopia - therapy
Ophthalmology
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Refraction, Ocular
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Vision disorders
title A Retrospective Study of Myopia Progression in Adult Contact Lens Wearers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T07%3A42%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Retrospective%20Study%20of%20Myopia%20Progression%20in%20Adult%20Contact%20Lens%20Wearers&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20ophthalmology%20&%20visual%20science&rft.au=Bullimore,%20Mark%20A&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2110&rft.epage=2113&rft.pages=2110-2113&rft.issn=0146-0404&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft.coden=IOVSDA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71861989%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71861989&rft_id=info:pmid/12091404&rfr_iscdi=true