Insulin-like growth factor-II imprinting in cancer

To help explain these disparate findings, Little and colleaguess proposed that [Wilms]' tumours have duplicate, active paternal IGF2 genes. This double-dose model is attractive since it fits with observations that two copies of paternal 11p15 are present constitutionally in some cases of Beckwi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2002-06, Vol.359 (9323), p.2050-2051
Hauptverfasser: Reeve, Anthony E, Becroft, David MO, Morison, Ian M, Fukuzawa, Ryuji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2051
container_issue 9323
container_start_page 2050
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 359
creator Reeve, Anthony E
Becroft, David MO
Morison, Ian M
Fukuzawa, Ryuji
description To help explain these disparate findings, Little and colleaguess proposed that [Wilms]' tumours have duplicate, active paternal IGF2 genes. This double-dose model is attractive since it fits with observations that two copies of paternal 11p15 are present constitutionally in some cases of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. This syndrome predisposes to Wilms' and other embryonal tumours.6 However, not all Wilms' tumours have loss of heterozygosity at 11p15; in about 50% of turnouts the normally silent maternal IGF2 allele is activated.7,8 Theoretically, tumours with loss of IGF2 imprinting and 11p15 loss of heterozygosity or reduplication may be regarded as biologically equivalent since they have the potential to give rise to a two-fold increase in IGF2 transcription (panel). In reality, confirmation of this two-fold difference is technically difficult and conflicting results have been reported; a definitive result will require analysis of many tumours to take into account the variation in tumour histology and cellular distribution of IGF2. This aspect was highlighted in the recent study by J D Ravenel and colleagues9 in which tumours with loss of IGF2 imprinting had 2.2-fold increased expression of IGF2 compared with tumours with normal imprinting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08947-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71857486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014067360208947X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71857486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b127bd7a0c9a3f9bd17fcc2a94372128efd3a7984335e89cdf776b314be22b113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LwzAYwPEgipvTj6AUBdFDNe9pTiLDl8HAgwq7hTRNZ2bXzqRV_PZmLygI4imX3_Mk-QNwiOAFgohfPkJEYcoF4WcQn8NMUpFOtkAfUUFTRsVkG_S_SQ_shTCDEFIO2S7oIQwzLhjrAzyqQ1e5Oq3cq02mvvloX5JSm7bx6WiUuPnCu7p19TRxdWJ0bazfBzulroI92JwD8Hx78zS8T8cPd6Ph9Tg1FPE2zREWeSE0NFKTUuYFEqUxWEtKBEY4s2VBtJAZJYTZTJqiFILnBNHcYpwjRAbgdL134Zu3zoZWzV0wtqp0bZsuKIEyJmjGIzz5BWdN5-v4NoUhzwimQoqojv9SSEpICWYsIrZGxjcheFuq-P-59p8KQbXsrlbd1TKqglituqtJnDvaLO_yuS1-pjahI7haAxuLvTvrVTDOxpyF89a0qmjcP1d8Aa0Xj_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199043255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insulin-like growth factor-II imprinting in cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Reeve, Anthony E ; Becroft, David MO ; Morison, Ian M ; Fukuzawa, Ryuji</creator><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Anthony E ; Becroft, David MO ; Morison, Ian M ; Fukuzawa, Ryuji</creatorcontrib><description>To help explain these disparate findings, Little and colleaguess proposed that [Wilms]' tumours have duplicate, active paternal IGF2 genes. This double-dose model is attractive since it fits with observations that two copies of paternal 11p15 are present constitutionally in some cases of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. This syndrome predisposes to Wilms' and other embryonal tumours.6 However, not all Wilms' tumours have loss of heterozygosity at 11p15; in about 50% of turnouts the normally silent maternal IGF2 allele is activated.7,8 Theoretically, tumours with loss of IGF2 imprinting and 11p15 loss of heterozygosity or reduplication may be regarded as biologically equivalent since they have the potential to give rise to a two-fold increase in IGF2 transcription (panel). In reality, confirmation of this two-fold difference is technically difficult and conflicting results have been reported; a definitive result will require analysis of many tumours to take into account the variation in tumour histology and cellular distribution of IGF2. This aspect was highlighted in the recent study by J D Ravenel and colleagues9 in which tumours with loss of IGF2 imprinting had 2.2-fold increased expression of IGF2 compared with tumours with normal imprinting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08947-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12086755</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Cancer ; Child, Preschool ; Chromosomes ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics ; DNA methylation ; Epigenetics ; Female ; Genes ; Genes, Wilms Tumor ; Genomic imprinting ; Genomic Imprinting - genetics ; Genomics ; Histology ; Humans ; Insulin ; Insulin-Like Growth Factor II - genetics ; Insulin-Like Growth Factor II - isolation &amp; purification ; Insulin-like growth factors ; Male ; Mutation ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2002-06, Vol.359 (9323), p.2050-2051</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Jun 15, 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 15, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b127bd7a0c9a3f9bd17fcc2a94372128efd3a7984335e89cdf776b314be22b113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b127bd7a0c9a3f9bd17fcc2a94372128efd3a7984335e89cdf776b314be22b113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014067360208947X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12086755$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Anthony E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becroft, David MO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morison, Ian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuzawa, Ryuji</creatorcontrib><title>Insulin-like growth factor-II imprinting in cancer</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>To help explain these disparate findings, Little and colleaguess proposed that [Wilms]' tumours have duplicate, active paternal IGF2 genes. This double-dose model is attractive since it fits with observations that two copies of paternal 11p15 are present constitutionally in some cases of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. This syndrome predisposes to Wilms' and other embryonal tumours.6 However, not all Wilms' tumours have loss of heterozygosity at 11p15; in about 50% of turnouts the normally silent maternal IGF2 allele is activated.7,8 Theoretically, tumours with loss of IGF2 imprinting and 11p15 loss of heterozygosity or reduplication may be regarded as biologically equivalent since they have the potential to give rise to a two-fold increase in IGF2 transcription (panel). In reality, confirmation of this two-fold difference is technically difficult and conflicting results have been reported; a definitive result will require analysis of many tumours to take into account the variation in tumour histology and cellular distribution of IGF2. This aspect was highlighted in the recent study by J D Ravenel and colleagues9 in which tumours with loss of IGF2 imprinting had 2.2-fold increased expression of IGF2 compared with tumours with normal imprinting.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>DNA methylation</subject><subject>Epigenetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genes, Wilms Tumor</subject><subject>Genomic imprinting</subject><subject>Genomic Imprinting - genetics</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Insulin-Like Growth Factor II - genetics</subject><subject>Insulin-Like Growth Factor II - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Insulin-like growth factors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LwzAYwPEgipvTj6AUBdFDNe9pTiLDl8HAgwq7hTRNZ2bXzqRV_PZmLygI4imX3_Mk-QNwiOAFgohfPkJEYcoF4WcQn8NMUpFOtkAfUUFTRsVkG_S_SQ_shTCDEFIO2S7oIQwzLhjrAzyqQ1e5Oq3cq02mvvloX5JSm7bx6WiUuPnCu7p19TRxdWJ0bazfBzulroI92JwD8Hx78zS8T8cPd6Ph9Tg1FPE2zREWeSE0NFKTUuYFEqUxWEtKBEY4s2VBtJAZJYTZTJqiFILnBNHcYpwjRAbgdL134Zu3zoZWzV0wtqp0bZsuKIEyJmjGIzz5BWdN5-v4NoUhzwimQoqojv9SSEpICWYsIrZGxjcheFuq-P-59p8KQbXsrlbd1TKqglituqtJnDvaLO_yuS1-pjahI7haAxuLvTvrVTDOxpyF89a0qmjcP1d8Aa0Xj_s</recordid><startdate>20020615</startdate><enddate>20020615</enddate><creator>Reeve, Anthony E</creator><creator>Becroft, David MO</creator><creator>Morison, Ian M</creator><creator>Fukuzawa, Ryuji</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020615</creationdate><title>Insulin-like growth factor-II imprinting in cancer</title><author>Reeve, Anthony E ; Becroft, David MO ; Morison, Ian M ; Fukuzawa, Ryuji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b127bd7a0c9a3f9bd17fcc2a94372128efd3a7984335e89cdf776b314be22b113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>DNA methylation</topic><topic>Epigenetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genes, Wilms Tumor</topic><topic>Genomic imprinting</topic><topic>Genomic Imprinting - genetics</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Insulin-Like Growth Factor II - genetics</topic><topic>Insulin-Like Growth Factor II - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Insulin-like growth factors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Anthony E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becroft, David MO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morison, Ian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuzawa, Ryuji</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reeve, Anthony E</au><au>Becroft, David MO</au><au>Morison, Ian M</au><au>Fukuzawa, Ryuji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insulin-like growth factor-II imprinting in cancer</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2002-06-15</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>359</volume><issue>9323</issue><spage>2050</spage><epage>2051</epage><pages>2050-2051</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>To help explain these disparate findings, Little and colleaguess proposed that [Wilms]' tumours have duplicate, active paternal IGF2 genes. This double-dose model is attractive since it fits with observations that two copies of paternal 11p15 are present constitutionally in some cases of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. This syndrome predisposes to Wilms' and other embryonal tumours.6 However, not all Wilms' tumours have loss of heterozygosity at 11p15; in about 50% of turnouts the normally silent maternal IGF2 allele is activated.7,8 Theoretically, tumours with loss of IGF2 imprinting and 11p15 loss of heterozygosity or reduplication may be regarded as biologically equivalent since they have the potential to give rise to a two-fold increase in IGF2 transcription (panel). In reality, confirmation of this two-fold difference is technically difficult and conflicting results have been reported; a definitive result will require analysis of many tumours to take into account the variation in tumour histology and cellular distribution of IGF2. This aspect was highlighted in the recent study by J D Ravenel and colleagues9 in which tumours with loss of IGF2 imprinting had 2.2-fold increased expression of IGF2 compared with tumours with normal imprinting.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12086755</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08947-X</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 2002-06, Vol.359 (9323), p.2050-2051
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71857486
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Business Source Complete
subjects Age
Cancer
Child, Preschool
Chromosomes
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics
DNA methylation
Epigenetics
Female
Genes
Genes, Wilms Tumor
Genomic imprinting
Genomic Imprinting - genetics
Genomics
Histology
Humans
Insulin
Insulin-Like Growth Factor II - genetics
Insulin-Like Growth Factor II - isolation & purification
Insulin-like growth factors
Male
Mutation
Tumors
title Insulin-like growth factor-II imprinting in cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A31%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insulin-like%20growth%20factor-II%20imprinting%20in%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Reeve,%20Anthony%20E&rft.date=2002-06-15&rft.volume=359&rft.issue=9323&rft.spage=2050&rft.epage=2051&rft.pages=2050-2051&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08947-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71857486%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199043255&rft_id=info:pmid/12086755&rft_els_id=S014067360208947X&rfr_iscdi=true