The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task
In the present study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the interaction between the behavioral inhibition, measured by the stop signal task, and distractor interference, measured by the flanker task and the Stroop task. In the first experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a fl...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta psychologica 2004-05, Vol.116 (1), p.21-37 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 37 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 21 |
| container_title | Acta psychologica |
| container_volume | 116 |
| creator | Verbruggen, Frederick Liefooghe, Baptist Vandierendonck, André |
| description | In the present study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the interaction between the behavioral inhibition, measured by the stop signal task, and distractor interference, measured by the flanker task and the Stroop task. In the first experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a flanker task. Analysis revealed that participants responded faster when the distractors were congruent to the target. Also, the data suggest that it is more difficult to suppress a reaction when the distractors were incongruent. Whether the incongruent distractor was part of the response set (i.e. the distractor could also be a target) or not, had no influence on stopping reactions. In the second experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a manual version of the Stroop task and the degree of compatibility was varied. Even though in the second experiment of the present study interference control is differently operationalized, similar results as in the first experiment were found, indicating that inhibition of motor responses is influenced by the presentation of distracting information that is not part of the response set. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71857402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691803001203</els_id><sourcerecordid>71857402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-53895f2e10245cfe61ff7bb70a127a6efa9780a8dbc765df573c8cce51b36fee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj7-gUg3umvNTSdNuxFEfIHgwnEd0vTGydhpxySj-O9N7YCudBUu97snh3MIOQaaAYXifJEpHVb-M2OU5hmwjAJskQmUIk8LVoltMqGUQlpUUO6Rfe8XcZxCBbtkDzgAMFZOiJ3NMbFdQBfVbN8lNYYPxC7xoV8l3r50qo37ua3t91p1TdJYHwa8d-OlQYedHmSSENVMq7pXdN_oU3B91AnKvx6SHaNaj0eb94A831zPru7Sh8fb-6vLh1RHcyHleVlxwxAom3JtsABjRF0LqoAJVaBRlSipKptai4I3hotcl1ojhzovDGJ-QM5G3ZXr39bog1xar7GNrrBfeymg5GJK2b9gzgSlXPAITkdQu957h0aunF0q9ymByqELuZBjF3LoQgKTsYt4drLRX9dLbH6ONuFH4HQDKK9Va5zqtPW_uPh_dBq5i5HDGNu7RSe9tkPijXWog2x6-7eTL8fMq20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>32700575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Verbruggen, Frederick ; Liefooghe, Baptist ; Vandierendonck, André</creator><creatorcontrib>Verbruggen, Frederick ; Liefooghe, Baptist ; Vandierendonck, André</creatorcontrib><description>In the present study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the interaction between the behavioral inhibition, measured by the stop signal task, and distractor interference, measured by the flanker task and the Stroop task. In the first experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a flanker task. Analysis revealed that participants responded faster when the distractors were congruent to the target. Also, the data suggest that it is more difficult to suppress a reaction when the distractors were incongruent. Whether the incongruent distractor was part of the response set (i.e. the distractor could also be a target) or not, had no influence on stopping reactions. In the second experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a manual version of the Stroop task and the degree of compatibility was varied. Even though in the second experiment of the present study interference control is differently operationalized, similar results as in the first experiment were found, indicating that inhibition of motor responses is influenced by the presentation of distracting information that is not part of the response set.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15111228</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APSOAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Distractor interference ; Female ; Flanker task ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Male ; Miscellaneous ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Response inhibition ; Stop signal paradigm ; Stroop task ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2004-05, Vol.116 (1), p.21-37</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-53895f2e10245cfe61ff7bb70a127a6efa9780a8dbc765df573c8cce51b36fee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-53895f2e10245cfe61ff7bb70a127a6efa9780a8dbc765df573c8cce51b36fee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15700740$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15111228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verbruggen, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liefooghe, Baptist</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandierendonck, André</creatorcontrib><title>The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>In the present study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the interaction between the behavioral inhibition, measured by the stop signal task, and distractor interference, measured by the flanker task and the Stroop task. In the first experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a flanker task. Analysis revealed that participants responded faster when the distractors were congruent to the target. Also, the data suggest that it is more difficult to suppress a reaction when the distractors were incongruent. Whether the incongruent distractor was part of the response set (i.e. the distractor could also be a target) or not, had no influence on stopping reactions. In the second experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a manual version of the Stroop task and the degree of compatibility was varied. Even though in the second experiment of the present study interference control is differently operationalized, similar results as in the first experiment were found, indicating that inhibition of motor responses is influenced by the presentation of distracting information that is not part of the response set.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Distractor interference</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flanker task</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Response inhibition</subject><subject>Stop signal paradigm</subject><subject>Stroop task</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoOj7-gUg3umvNTSdNuxFEfIHgwnEd0vTGydhpxySj-O9N7YCudBUu97snh3MIOQaaAYXifJEpHVb-M2OU5hmwjAJskQmUIk8LVoltMqGUQlpUUO6Rfe8XcZxCBbtkDzgAMFZOiJ3NMbFdQBfVbN8lNYYPxC7xoV8l3r50qo37ua3t91p1TdJYHwa8d-OlQYedHmSSENVMq7pXdN_oU3B91AnKvx6SHaNaj0eb94A831zPru7Sh8fb-6vLh1RHcyHleVlxwxAom3JtsABjRF0LqoAJVaBRlSipKptai4I3hotcl1ojhzovDGJ-QM5G3ZXr39bog1xar7GNrrBfeymg5GJK2b9gzgSlXPAITkdQu957h0aunF0q9ymByqELuZBjF3LoQgKTsYt4drLRX9dLbH6ONuFH4HQDKK9Va5zqtPW_uPh_dBq5i5HDGNu7RSe9tkPijXWog2x6-7eTL8fMq20</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Verbruggen, Frederick</creator><creator>Liefooghe, Baptist</creator><creator>Vandierendonck, André</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task</title><author>Verbruggen, Frederick ; Liefooghe, Baptist ; Vandierendonck, André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-53895f2e10245cfe61ff7bb70a127a6efa9780a8dbc765df573c8cce51b36fee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Distractor interference</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flanker task</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Response inhibition</topic><topic>Stop signal paradigm</topic><topic>Stroop task</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verbruggen, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liefooghe, Baptist</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandierendonck, André</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verbruggen, Frederick</au><au>Liefooghe, Baptist</au><au>Vandierendonck, André</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>21-37</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><coden>APSOAZ</coden><abstract>In the present study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the interaction between the behavioral inhibition, measured by the stop signal task, and distractor interference, measured by the flanker task and the Stroop task. In the first experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a flanker task. Analysis revealed that participants responded faster when the distractors were congruent to the target. Also, the data suggest that it is more difficult to suppress a reaction when the distractors were incongruent. Whether the incongruent distractor was part of the response set (i.e. the distractor could also be a target) or not, had no influence on stopping reactions. In the second experiment, the stop signal task was combined with a manual version of the Stroop task and the degree of compatibility was varied. Even though in the second experiment of the present study interference control is differently operationalized, similar results as in the first experiment were found, indicating that inhibition of motor responses is influenced by the presentation of distracting information that is not part of the response set.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15111228</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0001-6918 |
| ispartof | Acta psychologica, 2004-05, Vol.116 (1), p.21-37 |
| issn | 0001-6918 1873-6297 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71857402 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Cognition. Intelligence Distractor interference Female Flanker task Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Inhibition (Psychology) Male Miscellaneous Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Response inhibition Stop signal paradigm Stroop task Visual Perception |
| title | The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A12%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interaction%20between%20stop%20signal%20inhibition%20and%20distractor%20interference%20in%20the%20flanker%20and%20Stroop%20task&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Verbruggen,%20Frederick&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=21-37&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft.coden=APSOAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71857402%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=32700575&rft_id=info:pmid/15111228&rft_els_id=S0001691803001203&rfr_iscdi=true |