Living-related liver transplantation from the view of the donor: A 1-year follow-up survey
In the past, follow-up surveys for living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) mainly focused on the medical outcome of recipients and donors. In this survey the prevalence of personal, familial, or economic problems of the donors and changes of quality of life after donation were studied. Questionn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation 2002-06, Vol.73 (11), p.1799-1804 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1804 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1799 |
container_title | Transplantation |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | KARLIOVA, Marc MALAGO, Massimo VALENTIN-GAMAZO, Camino REIMER, Jens TREICHEL, Ulrich FRANKE, Gabriele H NADALIN, Silvio FRILLING, Andrea GERKEN, Guido BROELSCH, Christoph E |
description | In the past, follow-up surveys for living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) mainly focused on the medical outcome of recipients and donors. In this survey the prevalence of personal, familial, or economic problems of the donors and changes of quality of life after donation were studied.
Questionnaires were sent to 24 donors after right hepatectomy for LRLT (response 92%). The modified EUROTOLD (European Multicenter Study of Transplantation Using Living Donors) questionnaire was used to inquire about the decision-making process, family problems, and economic problems related to the donation. Global quality of life was measured with the SF-36 Health Survey.
For most donors the decision to donate was easy or not very difficult (21/22) and was made spontaneously (17/22). The amount of information about the risks of LRLT was limited at the time of decision but increased remarkably immediately before the operation. In 28%, family conflicts occurred (5/22). Retrospectively, all but two donors (91%) would donate again. On average, donors started working after 9 (+/-3.7) weeks and felt fully recovered after 13 (+/-7.3) weeks. Adverse financial affects were experienced by 41% of the donors (9/22) because of the donation, and four of those received a compensation. Importantly, quality of life did not differ between donors and nondonors.
Donors viewed LRLT positively. Quality of life after donation did not change. However, donors had a prolonged period of physical rehabilitation, and 41% experienced financial disadvantages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00007890-200206150-00017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71852667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71852667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-e9ccba75476873639dcf68319f614438b9a439219109d427db393e804fca78863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTlPwzAYhi0EgnL8BeQFNoPvg62quKRKLLCwRK5jQ1AaFztJ1X-PgQIjXmx9fr7rfQGABF8QbNQlLkdpgxHFmGJJBEYlQtQOmBDBOJJY410wwZgTRBhTB-Aw57eCCKbUPjggFGtRfifged6MTfeCkm9t72vYNqNPsE-2y6vWdr3tm9jBkOIS9q8ejo1fwxi-3nXsYrqCU0jQxtsEQ2zbuEbDCuYhjX5zDPaCbbM_2d5H4Onm-nF2h-YPt_ez6Rw5wWmPvHFuYZXgSmrFJDO1C1IzYoIknDO9MJYzQ4kpm9ecqnrBDPMa8-Cs0lqyI3D-XXeV4vvgc18tm-x8W8b3cciVIlpQKdW_INGS0iJrAfU36FLMOflQrVKztGlTEVx9GlD9GFD9GlB9GVBST7c9hsXS13-JW8ULcLYFbHa2DUVp1-Q_jikhNNfsAyNHjDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18622789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Living-related liver transplantation from the view of the donor: A 1-year follow-up survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>KARLIOVA, Marc ; MALAGO, Massimo ; VALENTIN-GAMAZO, Camino ; REIMER, Jens ; TREICHEL, Ulrich ; FRANKE, Gabriele H ; NADALIN, Silvio ; FRILLING, Andrea ; GERKEN, Guido ; BROELSCH, Christoph E</creator><creatorcontrib>KARLIOVA, Marc ; MALAGO, Massimo ; VALENTIN-GAMAZO, Camino ; REIMER, Jens ; TREICHEL, Ulrich ; FRANKE, Gabriele H ; NADALIN, Silvio ; FRILLING, Andrea ; GERKEN, Guido ; BROELSCH, Christoph E</creatorcontrib><description>In the past, follow-up surveys for living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) mainly focused on the medical outcome of recipients and donors. In this survey the prevalence of personal, familial, or economic problems of the donors and changes of quality of life after donation were studied.
Questionnaires were sent to 24 donors after right hepatectomy for LRLT (response 92%). The modified EUROTOLD (European Multicenter Study of Transplantation Using Living Donors) questionnaire was used to inquire about the decision-making process, family problems, and economic problems related to the donation. Global quality of life was measured with the SF-36 Health Survey.
For most donors the decision to donate was easy or not very difficult (21/22) and was made spontaneously (17/22). The amount of information about the risks of LRLT was limited at the time of decision but increased remarkably immediately before the operation. In 28%, family conflicts occurred (5/22). Retrospectively, all but two donors (91%) would donate again. On average, donors started working after 9 (+/-3.7) weeks and felt fully recovered after 13 (+/-7.3) weeks. Adverse financial affects were experienced by 41% of the donors (9/22) because of the donation, and four of those received a compensation. Importantly, quality of life did not differ between donors and nondonors.
Donors viewed LRLT positively. Quality of life after donation did not change. However, donors had a prolonged period of physical rehabilitation, and 41% experienced financial disadvantages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200206150-00017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12085004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPLAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attitude to Health ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Data Collection ; Decision Making ; Employment ; Family Health ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Liver Transplantation - psychology ; Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen ; Living Donors - psychology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Quality of Life ; Social Class ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system</subject><ispartof>Transplantation, 2002-06, Vol.73 (11), p.1799-1804</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-e9ccba75476873639dcf68319f614438b9a439219109d427db393e804fca78863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-e9ccba75476873639dcf68319f614438b9a439219109d427db393e804fca78863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13755848$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12085004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KARLIOVA, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALAGO, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VALENTIN-GAMAZO, Camino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REIMER, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TREICHEL, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRANKE, Gabriele H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NADALIN, Silvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRILLING, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GERKEN, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROELSCH, Christoph E</creatorcontrib><title>Living-related liver transplantation from the view of the donor: A 1-year follow-up survey</title><title>Transplantation</title><addtitle>Transplantation</addtitle><description>In the past, follow-up surveys for living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) mainly focused on the medical outcome of recipients and donors. In this survey the prevalence of personal, familial, or economic problems of the donors and changes of quality of life after donation were studied.
Questionnaires were sent to 24 donors after right hepatectomy for LRLT (response 92%). The modified EUROTOLD (European Multicenter Study of Transplantation Using Living Donors) questionnaire was used to inquire about the decision-making process, family problems, and economic problems related to the donation. Global quality of life was measured with the SF-36 Health Survey.
For most donors the decision to donate was easy or not very difficult (21/22) and was made spontaneously (17/22). The amount of information about the risks of LRLT was limited at the time of decision but increased remarkably immediately before the operation. In 28%, family conflicts occurred (5/22). Retrospectively, all but two donors (91%) would donate again. On average, donors started working after 9 (+/-3.7) weeks and felt fully recovered after 13 (+/-7.3) weeks. Adverse financial affects were experienced by 41% of the donors (9/22) because of the donation, and four of those received a compensation. Importantly, quality of life did not differ between donors and nondonors.
Donors viewed LRLT positively. Quality of life after donation did not change. However, donors had a prolonged period of physical rehabilitation, and 41% experienced financial disadvantages.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Family Health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - psychology</subject><subject>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</subject><subject>Living Donors - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><issn>0041-1337</issn><issn>1534-6080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTlPwzAYhi0EgnL8BeQFNoPvg62quKRKLLCwRK5jQ1AaFztJ1X-PgQIjXmx9fr7rfQGABF8QbNQlLkdpgxHFmGJJBEYlQtQOmBDBOJJY410wwZgTRBhTB-Aw57eCCKbUPjggFGtRfifged6MTfeCkm9t72vYNqNPsE-2y6vWdr3tm9jBkOIS9q8ejo1fwxi-3nXsYrqCU0jQxtsEQ2zbuEbDCuYhjX5zDPaCbbM_2d5H4Onm-nF2h-YPt_ez6Rw5wWmPvHFuYZXgSmrFJDO1C1IzYoIknDO9MJYzQ4kpm9ecqnrBDPMa8-Cs0lqyI3D-XXeV4vvgc18tm-x8W8b3cciVIlpQKdW_INGS0iJrAfU36FLMOflQrVKztGlTEVx9GlD9GFD9GlB9GVBST7c9hsXS13-JW8ULcLYFbHa2DUVp1-Q_jikhNNfsAyNHjDA</recordid><startdate>20020615</startdate><enddate>20020615</enddate><creator>KARLIOVA, Marc</creator><creator>MALAGO, Massimo</creator><creator>VALENTIN-GAMAZO, Camino</creator><creator>REIMER, Jens</creator><creator>TREICHEL, Ulrich</creator><creator>FRANKE, Gabriele H</creator><creator>NADALIN, Silvio</creator><creator>FRILLING, Andrea</creator><creator>GERKEN, Guido</creator><creator>BROELSCH, Christoph E</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020615</creationdate><title>Living-related liver transplantation from the view of the donor: A 1-year follow-up survey</title><author>KARLIOVA, Marc ; MALAGO, Massimo ; VALENTIN-GAMAZO, Camino ; REIMER, Jens ; TREICHEL, Ulrich ; FRANKE, Gabriele H ; NADALIN, Silvio ; FRILLING, Andrea ; GERKEN, Guido ; BROELSCH, Christoph E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-e9ccba75476873639dcf68319f614438b9a439219109d427db393e804fca78863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Family Health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - psychology</topic><topic>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</topic><topic>Living Donors - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KARLIOVA, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALAGO, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VALENTIN-GAMAZO, Camino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REIMER, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TREICHEL, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRANKE, Gabriele H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NADALIN, Silvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRILLING, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GERKEN, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROELSCH, Christoph E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KARLIOVA, Marc</au><au>MALAGO, Massimo</au><au>VALENTIN-GAMAZO, Camino</au><au>REIMER, Jens</au><au>TREICHEL, Ulrich</au><au>FRANKE, Gabriele H</au><au>NADALIN, Silvio</au><au>FRILLING, Andrea</au><au>GERKEN, Guido</au><au>BROELSCH, Christoph E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Living-related liver transplantation from the view of the donor: A 1-year follow-up survey</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Transplantation</addtitle><date>2002-06-15</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1799</spage><epage>1804</epage><pages>1799-1804</pages><issn>0041-1337</issn><eissn>1534-6080</eissn><coden>TRPLAU</coden><abstract>In the past, follow-up surveys for living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) mainly focused on the medical outcome of recipients and donors. In this survey the prevalence of personal, familial, or economic problems of the donors and changes of quality of life after donation were studied.
Questionnaires were sent to 24 donors after right hepatectomy for LRLT (response 92%). The modified EUROTOLD (European Multicenter Study of Transplantation Using Living Donors) questionnaire was used to inquire about the decision-making process, family problems, and economic problems related to the donation. Global quality of life was measured with the SF-36 Health Survey.
For most donors the decision to donate was easy or not very difficult (21/22) and was made spontaneously (17/22). The amount of information about the risks of LRLT was limited at the time of decision but increased remarkably immediately before the operation. In 28%, family conflicts occurred (5/22). Retrospectively, all but two donors (91%) would donate again. On average, donors started working after 9 (+/-3.7) weeks and felt fully recovered after 13 (+/-7.3) weeks. Adverse financial affects were experienced by 41% of the donors (9/22) because of the donation, and four of those received a compensation. Importantly, quality of life did not differ between donors and nondonors.
Donors viewed LRLT positively. Quality of life after donation did not change. However, donors had a prolonged period of physical rehabilitation, and 41% experienced financial disadvantages.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>12085004</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007890-200206150-00017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1337 |
ispartof | Transplantation, 2002-06, Vol.73 (11), p.1799-1804 |
issn | 0041-1337 1534-6080 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71852667 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Attitude to Health Biological and medical sciences Child Data Collection Decision Making Employment Family Health Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Liver Transplantation - psychology Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen Living Donors - psychology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Quality of Life Social Class Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system |
title | Living-related liver transplantation from the view of the donor: A 1-year follow-up survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A37%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Living-related%20liver%20transplantation%20from%20the%20view%20of%20the%20donor:%20A%201-year%20follow-up%20survey&rft.jtitle=Transplantation&rft.au=KARLIOVA,%20Marc&rft.date=2002-06-15&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1799&rft.epage=1804&rft.pages=1799-1804&rft.issn=0041-1337&rft.eissn=1534-6080&rft.coden=TRPLAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007890-200206150-00017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71852667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18622789&rft_id=info:pmid/12085004&rfr_iscdi=true |