Pediatric Procedural Approach-Avoidance Coping and Distress: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis
Objective To evaluate the construct validity of children's approach-avoidance coping and distress during immunizations, and to examine the instruments used to assess these domains. Methods We used a multitrait-multimethod matrix to examine the validity of the approach-avoidance coping and distr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pediatric psychology 2004-03, Vol.29 (2), p.131-141 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 141 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 131 |
| container_title | Journal of pediatric psychology |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Bernard, Rebecca S. Cohen, Lindsey L. McClellan, Catherine B. MacLaren, Jill E. |
| description | Objective To evaluate the construct validity of children's approach-avoidance coping and distress during immunizations, and to examine the instruments used to assess these domains. Methods We used a multitrait-multimethod matrix to examine the validity of the approach-avoidance coping and distress constructs for 62 4- to 6-year-old children receiving immunization injections. Assessment instruments of both constructs consisted of child, parent, and nurse ratings, and three behavior observation scales. Results Pediatric procedural distress demonstrated adequate convergent and discriminant validity, and it can be assessed in a valid manner. Whereas most approach-avoidance measures demonstrated good convergent validity, several measures did not adequately distinguish between avoidance and distress. Conclusions It is possible that children's approach-avoidance coping may be qualitatively different than adult's approach-avoidance. Researchers should be cognizant of these differences when designing treatments for child procedural distress. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jpepsy/jsh016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71850118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71850118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-952dc3b92cbff897f1decf042d830735183fe83615cfb61edcf6a0b7a4c3ce2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFP2zAUh61pCLqO464ol3HLsGPHSXYLZaxIrOsBJLTDLMd-pu7SJPgliP73C7QCTn7W-_R7732EfGH0G6MFP1t30OH2bI0ryuQHMmFCpnHG07uPZELHT5zLgh-RT4hrSqkQXB6SI5bSQqZcTMjfJViv--BNtAytATsEXUdl14VWm1VcPrbe6sZANGs739xHurHRhcc-AOL3qIx-DXXv-6B9H7-UG-hXrY3KRtdb9PiZHDhdIxzv3ym5vfxxM5vH179_Xs3K69jwQvZxkSbW8KpITOVcXmSOWTCOisTmnI7HsJw7yLlkqXGVZGCNk5pWmRaGG0gMn5LTXe6498MA2KuNRwN1rRtoB1QZy1PKxpgpiXegCS1iAKe64Dc6bBWj6lmo2glVO6Ejf7IPHqoN2Dd6b3AEvu4BjUbXLoy2PL7jMpFTwd8Gj_Lg6bWvwz8lM56lan73Ry2WC3l-KRIl-X-zQpF5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71850118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pediatric Procedural Approach-Avoidance Coping and Distress: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bernard, Rebecca S. ; Cohen, Lindsey L. ; McClellan, Catherine B. ; MacLaren, Jill E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernard, Rebecca S. ; Cohen, Lindsey L. ; McClellan, Catherine B. ; MacLaren, Jill E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the construct validity of children's approach-avoidance coping and distress during immunizations, and to examine the instruments used to assess these domains. Methods We used a multitrait-multimethod matrix to examine the validity of the approach-avoidance coping and distress constructs for 62 4- to 6-year-old children receiving immunization injections. Assessment instruments of both constructs consisted of child, parent, and nurse ratings, and three behavior observation scales. Results Pediatric procedural distress demonstrated adequate convergent and discriminant validity, and it can be assessed in a valid manner. Whereas most approach-avoidance measures demonstrated good convergent validity, several measures did not adequately distinguish between avoidance and distress. Conclusions It is possible that children's approach-avoidance coping may be qualitatively different than adult's approach-avoidance. Researchers should be cognizant of these differences when designing treatments for child procedural distress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-8693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-735X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsh016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15096534</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPPSDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta, GA: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; approach-avoidance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; children ; coping style ; distress ; Female ; Humans ; Immunization - psychology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Models, Psychological ; multitrait-multimethod ; Northwestern United States ; Prevention and actions ; Psychological Tests ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Reproducibility of Results ; Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) ; Stress, Psychological - prevention & control ; Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric psychology, 2004-03, Vol.29 (2), p.131-141</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-952dc3b92cbff897f1decf042d830735183fe83615cfb61edcf6a0b7a4c3ce2c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15748043$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15096534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernard, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lindsey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClellan, Catherine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLaren, Jill E.</creatorcontrib><title>Pediatric Procedural Approach-Avoidance Coping and Distress: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis</title><title>Journal of pediatric psychology</title><addtitle>J. Pediatr. Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the construct validity of children's approach-avoidance coping and distress during immunizations, and to examine the instruments used to assess these domains. Methods We used a multitrait-multimethod matrix to examine the validity of the approach-avoidance coping and distress constructs for 62 4- to 6-year-old children receiving immunization injections. Assessment instruments of both constructs consisted of child, parent, and nurse ratings, and three behavior observation scales. Results Pediatric procedural distress demonstrated adequate convergent and discriminant validity, and it can be assessed in a valid manner. Whereas most approach-avoidance measures demonstrated good convergent validity, several measures did not adequately distinguish between avoidance and distress. Conclusions It is possible that children's approach-avoidance coping may be qualitatively different than adult's approach-avoidance. Researchers should be cognizant of these differences when designing treatments for child procedural distress.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>approach-avoidance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>coping style</subject><subject>distress</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>multitrait-multimethod</subject><subject>Northwestern United States</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - prevention & control</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><issn>0146-8693</issn><issn>1465-735X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFP2zAUh61pCLqO464ol3HLsGPHSXYLZaxIrOsBJLTDLMd-pu7SJPgliP73C7QCTn7W-_R7732EfGH0G6MFP1t30OH2bI0ryuQHMmFCpnHG07uPZELHT5zLgh-RT4hrSqkQXB6SI5bSQqZcTMjfJViv--BNtAytATsEXUdl14VWm1VcPrbe6sZANGs739xHurHRhcc-AOL3qIx-DXXv-6B9H7-UG-hXrY3KRtdb9PiZHDhdIxzv3ym5vfxxM5vH179_Xs3K69jwQvZxkSbW8KpITOVcXmSOWTCOisTmnI7HsJw7yLlkqXGVZGCNk5pWmRaGG0gMn5LTXe6498MA2KuNRwN1rRtoB1QZy1PKxpgpiXegCS1iAKe64Dc6bBWj6lmo2glVO6Ejf7IPHqoN2Dd6b3AEvu4BjUbXLoy2PL7jMpFTwd8Gj_Lg6bWvwz8lM56lan73Ry2WC3l-KRIl-X-zQpF5</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Bernard, Rebecca S.</creator><creator>Cohen, Lindsey L.</creator><creator>McClellan, Catherine B.</creator><creator>MacLaren, Jill E.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Pediatric Procedural Approach-Avoidance Coping and Distress: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis</title><author>Bernard, Rebecca S. ; Cohen, Lindsey L. ; McClellan, Catherine B. ; MacLaren, Jill E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-952dc3b92cbff897f1decf042d830735183fe83615cfb61edcf6a0b7a4c3ce2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>approach-avoidance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>coping style</topic><topic>distress</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>multitrait-multimethod</topic><topic>Northwestern United States</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - prevention & control</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernard, Rebecca S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Lindsey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClellan, Catherine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLaren, Jill E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernard, Rebecca S.</au><au>Cohen, Lindsey L.</au><au>McClellan, Catherine B.</au><au>MacLaren, Jill E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pediatric Procedural Approach-Avoidance Coping and Distress: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pediatr. Psychol</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>131-141</pages><issn>0146-8693</issn><eissn>1465-735X</eissn><coden>JPPSDW</coden><abstract>Objective To evaluate the construct validity of children's approach-avoidance coping and distress during immunizations, and to examine the instruments used to assess these domains. Methods We used a multitrait-multimethod matrix to examine the validity of the approach-avoidance coping and distress constructs for 62 4- to 6-year-old children receiving immunization injections. Assessment instruments of both constructs consisted of child, parent, and nurse ratings, and three behavior observation scales. Results Pediatric procedural distress demonstrated adequate convergent and discriminant validity, and it can be assessed in a valid manner. Whereas most approach-avoidance measures demonstrated good convergent validity, several measures did not adequately distinguish between avoidance and distress. Conclusions It is possible that children's approach-avoidance coping may be qualitatively different than adult's approach-avoidance. Researchers should be cognizant of these differences when designing treatments for child procedural distress.</abstract><cop>Atlanta, GA</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15096534</pmid><doi>10.1093/jpepsy/jsh016</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0146-8693 |
| ispartof | Journal of pediatric psychology, 2004-03, Vol.29 (2), p.131-141 |
| issn | 0146-8693 1465-735X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71850118 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Education Source (EBSCOhost); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Adaptation, Psychological approach-avoidance Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool children coping style distress Female Humans Immunization - psychology Male Medical sciences Models, Psychological multitrait-multimethod Northwestern United States Prevention and actions Psychological Tests Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Reproducibility of Results Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) Stress, Psychological - prevention & control Stress, Psychological - psychology |
| title | Pediatric Procedural Approach-Avoidance Coping and Distress: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A37%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pediatric%20Procedural%20Approach-Avoidance%20Coping%20and%20Distress:%20A%20Multitrait-Multimethod%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20psychology&rft.au=Bernard,%20Rebecca%20S.&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=131-141&rft.issn=0146-8693&rft.eissn=1465-735X&rft.coden=JPPSDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jpepsy/jsh016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71850118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71850118&rft_id=info:pmid/15096534&rfr_iscdi=true |