A systematic review of COX-2 inhibitors compared with traditional NSAIDs, or different COX-2 inhibitors for post-operative pain

Background:  We have reviewed the analgesic efficacy of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitors compared with traditional non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), different COX‐2 inhibitors, and placebo in post‐operative pain. Methods:  Randomized controlled trials were evaluated. Outcome measure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004-05, Vol.48 (5), p.525-546
Hauptverfasser: Rømsing, J., Møiniche, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 5
container_start_page 525
container_title Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
container_volume 48
creator Rømsing, J.
Møiniche, S.
description Background:  We have reviewed the analgesic efficacy of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitors compared with traditional non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), different COX‐2 inhibitors, and placebo in post‐operative pain. Methods:  Randomized controlled trials were evaluated. Outcome measures were pain scores and demand for supplementary analgesia 0–24 h after surgery. Results:  Thirty‐three studies were included in which four COX‐2 inhibitors, rofecoxib 50 mg, celecoxib 200 and 400 mg, parecoxib 20, 40 and 80 mg, and valdecoxib 10, 20, 40, 80 mg were evaluated. Ten of these studies included 18 comparisons of rofecoxib, celecoxib, or parecoxib with NSAIDs. Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg provided analgesic efficacy comparable to that of the NSAIDs in the comparisons, and with a longer duration of action after dental surgery but possibly not after major procedures. Celecoxib 200 mg and parecoxib 20 mg provided less effective pain relief. Four studies included five comparisons of rofecoxib 50 mg with celecoxib 200 and 400 mg. Rofecoxib 50 mg provided superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg. Data on celecoxib 400 mg were too sparse for firm conclusions. Thirty‐three studies included 62 comparisons of the four COX‐2 inhibitors with placebo and the COX‐2 inhibitors significantly decreased post‐operative pain. Conclusion:  Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg have an equipotent analgesic efficacy relative to traditional NSAIDs in post‐operative pain after minor and major surgical procedures, and after dental surgery these COX‐2 inhibitors have a longer duration of action. Besides, rofecoxib 50 mg provides superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00379.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71846552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71846552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-f59114712d09c399566d433d15a102ea5f452b6450b10d7e2066f287b64a26823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v2yAch9G0as26fYWJy3aaU14MBGkXK926SlV66NrshogNKpltPCBNctpXH26ibtIu4wJ_eH68PAAAMZri3M7XU4QQLhgWZEoQKnNJhZzuXoAJplIWnAn-EkyeoVPwOsZ1Lmkp5StwihlGeFaKCfhVwbiPyXQ6uRoG8-jMFnoL5zffCwJd_-BWLvkQYe27QQfTwK1LDzAF3bjkfK9buLitri7iR-gDbJy1Jpg-_Zu3eXnwMRV-MCEf9mjgoF3_BpxY3Ubz9tifgbsvn7_NvxbXN5dX8-q6qEsmZGGZxLgUmDRI1vmFjPOmpLTBTGNEjGa2ZGTFS4ZWGDXCEMS5JTORpzThM0LPwIfDvkPwPzcmJtW5WJu21b3xm6hE1sEZG8HZAayDjzEYq4bgOh32CiM1yldrNXpVo1c1yldP8tUuR98dz9isOtP8CR5tZ-D9EdCx1q0Nuq9d_IuTQrCny346cFvXmv1_X0BV1W0e5HhxiLv8sbvnuA4_FBdUMLVcXCq2vKDLe7RQJf0ND4KtMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71846552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of COX-2 inhibitors compared with traditional NSAIDs, or different COX-2 inhibitors for post-operative pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Rømsing, J. ; Møiniche, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rømsing, J. ; Møiniche, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:  We have reviewed the analgesic efficacy of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitors compared with traditional non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), different COX‐2 inhibitors, and placebo in post‐operative pain. Methods:  Randomized controlled trials were evaluated. Outcome measures were pain scores and demand for supplementary analgesia 0–24 h after surgery. Results:  Thirty‐three studies were included in which four COX‐2 inhibitors, rofecoxib 50 mg, celecoxib 200 and 400 mg, parecoxib 20, 40 and 80 mg, and valdecoxib 10, 20, 40, 80 mg were evaluated. Ten of these studies included 18 comparisons of rofecoxib, celecoxib, or parecoxib with NSAIDs. Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg provided analgesic efficacy comparable to that of the NSAIDs in the comparisons, and with a longer duration of action after dental surgery but possibly not after major procedures. Celecoxib 200 mg and parecoxib 20 mg provided less effective pain relief. Four studies included five comparisons of rofecoxib 50 mg with celecoxib 200 and 400 mg. Rofecoxib 50 mg provided superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg. Data on celecoxib 400 mg were too sparse for firm conclusions. Thirty‐three studies included 62 comparisons of the four COX‐2 inhibitors with placebo and the COX‐2 inhibitors significantly decreased post‐operative pain. Conclusion:  Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg have an equipotent analgesic efficacy relative to traditional NSAIDs in post‐operative pain after minor and major surgical procedures, and after dental surgery these COX‐2 inhibitors have a longer duration of action. Besides, rofecoxib 50 mg provides superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00379.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15101847</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANEAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc</publisher><subject>analgesics anti-inflammatory ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Celecoxib ; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Humans ; inhibitors cyclooxygenase-2 ; Isoxazoles - therapeutic use ; Lactones - therapeutic use ; Medical sciences ; non-steroidal ; Pain Measurement ; pain post-operative ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Pyrazoles ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sulfonamides - therapeutic use ; Sulfones ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2004-05, Vol.48 (5), p.525-546</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-f59114712d09c399566d433d15a102ea5f452b6450b10d7e2066f287b64a26823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-f59114712d09c399566d433d15a102ea5f452b6450b10d7e2066f287b64a26823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.0001-5172.2004.00379.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.0001-5172.2004.00379.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15977582$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15101847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rømsing, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møiniche, S.</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of COX-2 inhibitors compared with traditional NSAIDs, or different COX-2 inhibitors for post-operative pain</title><title>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><description>Background:  We have reviewed the analgesic efficacy of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitors compared with traditional non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), different COX‐2 inhibitors, and placebo in post‐operative pain. Methods:  Randomized controlled trials were evaluated. Outcome measures were pain scores and demand for supplementary analgesia 0–24 h after surgery. Results:  Thirty‐three studies were included in which four COX‐2 inhibitors, rofecoxib 50 mg, celecoxib 200 and 400 mg, parecoxib 20, 40 and 80 mg, and valdecoxib 10, 20, 40, 80 mg were evaluated. Ten of these studies included 18 comparisons of rofecoxib, celecoxib, or parecoxib with NSAIDs. Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg provided analgesic efficacy comparable to that of the NSAIDs in the comparisons, and with a longer duration of action after dental surgery but possibly not after major procedures. Celecoxib 200 mg and parecoxib 20 mg provided less effective pain relief. Four studies included five comparisons of rofecoxib 50 mg with celecoxib 200 and 400 mg. Rofecoxib 50 mg provided superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg. Data on celecoxib 400 mg were too sparse for firm conclusions. Thirty‐three studies included 62 comparisons of the four COX‐2 inhibitors with placebo and the COX‐2 inhibitors significantly decreased post‐operative pain. Conclusion:  Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg have an equipotent analgesic efficacy relative to traditional NSAIDs in post‐operative pain after minor and major surgical procedures, and after dental surgery these COX‐2 inhibitors have a longer duration of action. Besides, rofecoxib 50 mg provides superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg.</description><subject>analgesics anti-inflammatory</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Celecoxib</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inhibitors cyclooxygenase-2</subject><subject>Isoxazoles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Lactones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>non-steroidal</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>pain post-operative</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pyrazoles</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Sulfones</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v2yAch9G0as26fYWJy3aaU14MBGkXK926SlV66NrshogNKpltPCBNctpXH26ibtIu4wJ_eH68PAAAMZri3M7XU4QQLhgWZEoQKnNJhZzuXoAJplIWnAn-EkyeoVPwOsZ1Lmkp5StwihlGeFaKCfhVwbiPyXQ6uRoG8-jMFnoL5zffCwJd_-BWLvkQYe27QQfTwK1LDzAF3bjkfK9buLitri7iR-gDbJy1Jpg-_Zu3eXnwMRV-MCEf9mjgoF3_BpxY3Ubz9tifgbsvn7_NvxbXN5dX8-q6qEsmZGGZxLgUmDRI1vmFjPOmpLTBTGNEjGa2ZGTFS4ZWGDXCEMS5JTORpzThM0LPwIfDvkPwPzcmJtW5WJu21b3xm6hE1sEZG8HZAayDjzEYq4bgOh32CiM1yldrNXpVo1c1yldP8tUuR98dz9isOtP8CR5tZ-D9EdCx1q0Nuq9d_IuTQrCny346cFvXmv1_X0BV1W0e5HhxiLv8sbvnuA4_FBdUMLVcXCq2vKDLe7RQJf0ND4KtMw</recordid><startdate>200405</startdate><enddate>200405</enddate><creator>Rømsing, J.</creator><creator>Møiniche, S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200405</creationdate><title>A systematic review of COX-2 inhibitors compared with traditional NSAIDs, or different COX-2 inhibitors for post-operative pain</title><author>Rømsing, J. ; Møiniche, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4579-f59114712d09c399566d433d15a102ea5f452b6450b10d7e2066f287b64a26823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>analgesics anti-inflammatory</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Celecoxib</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inhibitors cyclooxygenase-2</topic><topic>Isoxazoles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Lactones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>non-steroidal</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>pain post-operative</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pyrazoles</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Sulfones</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rømsing, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møiniche, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rømsing, J.</au><au>Møiniche, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of COX-2 inhibitors compared with traditional NSAIDs, or different COX-2 inhibitors for post-operative pain</atitle><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><date>2004-05</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>525-546</pages><issn>0001-5172</issn><eissn>1399-6576</eissn><coden>AANEAB</coden><abstract>Background:  We have reviewed the analgesic efficacy of cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitors compared with traditional non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), different COX‐2 inhibitors, and placebo in post‐operative pain. Methods:  Randomized controlled trials were evaluated. Outcome measures were pain scores and demand for supplementary analgesia 0–24 h after surgery. Results:  Thirty‐three studies were included in which four COX‐2 inhibitors, rofecoxib 50 mg, celecoxib 200 and 400 mg, parecoxib 20, 40 and 80 mg, and valdecoxib 10, 20, 40, 80 mg were evaluated. Ten of these studies included 18 comparisons of rofecoxib, celecoxib, or parecoxib with NSAIDs. Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg provided analgesic efficacy comparable to that of the NSAIDs in the comparisons, and with a longer duration of action after dental surgery but possibly not after major procedures. Celecoxib 200 mg and parecoxib 20 mg provided less effective pain relief. Four studies included five comparisons of rofecoxib 50 mg with celecoxib 200 and 400 mg. Rofecoxib 50 mg provided superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg. Data on celecoxib 400 mg were too sparse for firm conclusions. Thirty‐three studies included 62 comparisons of the four COX‐2 inhibitors with placebo and the COX‐2 inhibitors significantly decreased post‐operative pain. Conclusion:  Rofecoxib 50 mg and parecoxib 40 mg have an equipotent analgesic efficacy relative to traditional NSAIDs in post‐operative pain after minor and major surgical procedures, and after dental surgery these COX‐2 inhibitors have a longer duration of action. Besides, rofecoxib 50 mg provides superior analgesic effect compared with celecoxib 200 mg.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc</pub><pmid>15101847</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00379.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5172
ispartof Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2004-05, Vol.48 (5), p.525-546
issn 0001-5172
1399-6576
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71846552
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects analgesics anti-inflammatory
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Celecoxib
Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Humans
inhibitors cyclooxygenase-2
Isoxazoles - therapeutic use
Lactones - therapeutic use
Medical sciences
non-steroidal
Pain Measurement
pain post-operative
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Pyrazoles
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Sulfonamides - therapeutic use
Sulfones
Treatment Outcome
title A systematic review of COX-2 inhibitors compared with traditional NSAIDs, or different COX-2 inhibitors for post-operative pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T06%3A58%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20COX-2%20inhibitors%20compared%20with%20traditional%20NSAIDs,%20or%20different%20COX-2%20inhibitors%20for%20post-operative%20pain&rft.jtitle=Acta%20anaesthesiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=R%C3%B8msing,%20J.&rft.date=2004-05&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=525-546&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft.coden=AANEAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00379.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71846552%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71846552&rft_id=info:pmid/15101847&rfr_iscdi=true