The impact of longissimus glycolytic potential and short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate prior to slaughter on carcass characteristics and pork quality
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of longissimus glycolytic potential (GP) and of time of feeding of supplemental magnesium sulfate heptahydrate on carcass and pork quality traits. The study was carried out in a 2 x 2 x 4 factorial arrangement; the treatments were sex (castrate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2002-06, Vol.80 (6), p.1586-1592 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1592 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1586 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Hamilton, D. N Ellis, M Hemann, M. D McKeith, F. K Miller, K. D Purser, K. W |
description | The objective of this study was to compare the effects of longissimus glycolytic potential (GP) and of time of feeding of supplemental magnesium sulfate heptahydrate on carcass and pork quality traits. The study was carried out in a 2 x 2 x 4 factorial arrangement; the treatments were sex (castrate vs gilt), GP (Low [normal] vs High), and time of feeding of magnesium sulfate-fortified diets (0 [control] vs 2 vs 3 vs 5 d prior to slaughter). Glycolytic potential was determined on a biopsy sample of longissimus from the live animal prior to the start of the study. A total of 144 pigs were allotted to the feeding-time treatments on the basis of sex (castrate and gilt), weight, and GP. Pigs were placed in individual pens and had free access to water. Prior to the start of the study, pigs were given ad libitum access to a standard finisher diet. During the study, animals were fed at a fixed level of 2.75 kg of a standard finisher diet/day; the fortified diet contained 3.2 g/d of additional magnesium. At the end of the feeding period, animals were transported to a commercial packing facility and slaughtered within 15 min of arrival. Fresh meat quality was measured on the longissimus. There were no treatment interactions. Carcass traits were similar across time of feeding treatments. Backfat thickness at the last lumbar vertebra and 10th rib were lower (P < 0 .05) for High than for Low GP pigs. High GP pigs had lower ultimate pH (P < 0.001) and higher drip (P < 0.05) and purge loss (P < 0.01) than Low GP pigs. Drip loss was reduced (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the magnesium-fortified diet for 5 and 2 but not for 3 d compared to controls (8.98, 7.29, 7.89, and 7.41 for the 0-, 2-, 3-, and 5-d treatments, respectively, SEM 0.447). Purge loss was similar for all of the time of feeding treatments. Longissimus L* values were lower (P < 0.05) for the 2-d treatment than for the controls. Results from this study suggest an inconsistent effect of short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate on muscle color and drip loss in pigs with both Low (normal) and High GP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/2002.8061586x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71846406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71846406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5c5a6da10176d077a4181a2303579ef9aa1f5bcc8b5ac1a3a4b59744fabf80833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhSMEokvhyBVZSPSWYidx7BxRBQWpEpdytiaOk3hx4tTjqOQP8Ttx6KKVOI2s-ea9Gb8se8vodcEL8bGgtLiWtGZc1r-eZQfGC56XrC6fZ4fUYrmUrLjIXiEeKWUFb_jL7IIVVEhR0UP2-340xE4L6Eh8T5yfB4topxXJ4Dbt3RatJouPZo4WHIG5Izj6EPNowkR6Yzo7D_voBMNs0K4TwdX1EA0ZzRJh3LqwP5ZgfSDRE3SwDmOaJn4mGoIGRKJHCGkFEywmP_xrs_jwkzys4GzcXmcvenBo3pzqZfbjy-f7m6_53ffbbzef7nJdChFzrjnUHTDKRN1RIaBikkFR0pKLxvQNAOt5q7VsOWgGJVQtb0RV9dD2ksqyvMyunnSX4B9Wg1FNFrVxDmbjV1SCyaquaJ3A9_-BR7-GOe2miuRZsaauEpQ_QTp4xGB6lX5hgrApRtWentrTU__SS_y7k-jaTqY706e4EvDhBABqcH2AWVs8c6WgDWfN-YzRDuOjDUbhBM4lWaaOgJKqWu2W5R_d1rL_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218141964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of longissimus glycolytic potential and short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate prior to slaughter on carcass characteristics and pork quality</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hamilton, D. N ; Ellis, M ; Hemann, M. D ; McKeith, F. K ; Miller, K. D ; Purser, K. W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, D. N ; Ellis, M ; Hemann, M. D ; McKeith, F. K ; Miller, K. D ; Purser, K. W</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to compare the effects of longissimus glycolytic potential (GP) and of time of feeding of supplemental magnesium sulfate heptahydrate on carcass and pork quality traits. The study was carried out in a 2 x 2 x 4 factorial arrangement; the treatments were sex (castrate vs gilt), GP (Low [normal] vs High), and time of feeding of magnesium sulfate-fortified diets (0 [control] vs 2 vs 3 vs 5 d prior to slaughter). Glycolytic potential was determined on a biopsy sample of longissimus from the live animal prior to the start of the study. A total of 144 pigs were allotted to the feeding-time treatments on the basis of sex (castrate and gilt), weight, and GP. Pigs were placed in individual pens and had free access to water. Prior to the start of the study, pigs were given ad libitum access to a standard finisher diet. During the study, animals were fed at a fixed level of 2.75 kg of a standard finisher diet/day; the fortified diet contained 3.2 g/d of additional magnesium. At the end of the feeding period, animals were transported to a commercial packing facility and slaughtered within 15 min of arrival. Fresh meat quality was measured on the longissimus. There were no treatment interactions. Carcass traits were similar across time of feeding treatments. Backfat thickness at the last lumbar vertebra and 10th rib were lower (P < 0 .05) for High than for Low GP pigs. High GP pigs had lower ultimate pH (P < 0.001) and higher drip (P < 0.05) and purge loss (P < 0.01) than Low GP pigs. Drip loss was reduced (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the magnesium-fortified diet for 5 and 2 but not for 3 d compared to controls (8.98, 7.29, 7.89, and 7.41 for the 0-, 2-, 3-, and 5-d treatments, respectively, SEM 0.447). Purge loss was similar for all of the time of feeding treatments. Longissimus L* values were lower (P < 0.05) for the 2-d treatment than for the controls. Results from this study suggest an inconsistent effect of short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate on muscle color and drip loss in pigs with both Low (normal) and High GP.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2002.8061586x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12078740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology ; Animal Feed ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dietary Supplements ; Feeds ; Female ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genotype ; Glycolysis - drug effects ; Hogs ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Magnesium Sulfate - pharmacology ; Male ; Meat - standards ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism ; Pork ; Random Allocation ; Sex Factors ; Swine - genetics ; Swine - growth & development ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2002-06, Vol.80 (6), p.1586-1592</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Jun 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5c5a6da10176d077a4181a2303579ef9aa1f5bcc8b5ac1a3a4b59744fabf80833</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13709519$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12078740$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, D. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemann, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeith, F. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, K. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purser, K. W</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of longissimus glycolytic potential and short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate prior to slaughter on carcass characteristics and pork quality</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to compare the effects of longissimus glycolytic potential (GP) and of time of feeding of supplemental magnesium sulfate heptahydrate on carcass and pork quality traits. The study was carried out in a 2 x 2 x 4 factorial arrangement; the treatments were sex (castrate vs gilt), GP (Low [normal] vs High), and time of feeding of magnesium sulfate-fortified diets (0 [control] vs 2 vs 3 vs 5 d prior to slaughter). Glycolytic potential was determined on a biopsy sample of longissimus from the live animal prior to the start of the study. A total of 144 pigs were allotted to the feeding-time treatments on the basis of sex (castrate and gilt), weight, and GP. Pigs were placed in individual pens and had free access to water. Prior to the start of the study, pigs were given ad libitum access to a standard finisher diet. During the study, animals were fed at a fixed level of 2.75 kg of a standard finisher diet/day; the fortified diet contained 3.2 g/d of additional magnesium. At the end of the feeding period, animals were transported to a commercial packing facility and slaughtered within 15 min of arrival. Fresh meat quality was measured on the longissimus. There were no treatment interactions. Carcass traits were similar across time of feeding treatments. Backfat thickness at the last lumbar vertebra and 10th rib were lower (P < 0 .05) for High than for Low GP pigs. High GP pigs had lower ultimate pH (P < 0.001) and higher drip (P < 0.05) and purge loss (P < 0.01) than Low GP pigs. Drip loss was reduced (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the magnesium-fortified diet for 5 and 2 but not for 3 d compared to controls (8.98, 7.29, 7.89, and 7.41 for the 0-, 2-, 3-, and 5-d treatments, respectively, SEM 0.447). Purge loss was similar for all of the time of feeding treatments. Longissimus L* values were lower (P < 0.05) for the 2-d treatment than for the controls. Results from this study suggest an inconsistent effect of short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate on muscle color and drip loss in pigs with both Low (normal) and High GP.]]></description><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Glycolysis - drug effects</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Magnesium Sulfate - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Swine - genetics</subject><subject>Swine - growth & development</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhSMEokvhyBVZSPSWYidx7BxRBQWpEpdytiaOk3hx4tTjqOQP8Ttx6KKVOI2s-ea9Gb8se8vodcEL8bGgtLiWtGZc1r-eZQfGC56XrC6fZ4fUYrmUrLjIXiEeKWUFb_jL7IIVVEhR0UP2-340xE4L6Eh8T5yfB4topxXJ4Dbt3RatJouPZo4WHIG5Izj6EPNowkR6Yzo7D_voBMNs0K4TwdX1EA0ZzRJh3LqwP5ZgfSDRE3SwDmOaJn4mGoIGRKJHCGkFEywmP_xrs_jwkzys4GzcXmcvenBo3pzqZfbjy-f7m6_53ffbbzef7nJdChFzrjnUHTDKRN1RIaBikkFR0pKLxvQNAOt5q7VsOWgGJVQtb0RV9dD2ksqyvMyunnSX4B9Wg1FNFrVxDmbjV1SCyaquaJ3A9_-BR7-GOe2miuRZsaauEpQ_QTp4xGB6lX5hgrApRtWentrTU__SS_y7k-jaTqY706e4EvDhBABqcH2AWVs8c6WgDWfN-YzRDuOjDUbhBM4lWaaOgJKqWu2W5R_d1rL_</recordid><startdate>20020601</startdate><enddate>20020601</enddate><creator>Hamilton, D. N</creator><creator>Ellis, M</creator><creator>Hemann, M. D</creator><creator>McKeith, F. K</creator><creator>Miller, K. D</creator><creator>Purser, K. W</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020601</creationdate><title>The impact of longissimus glycolytic potential and short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate prior to slaughter on carcass characteristics and pork quality</title><author>Hamilton, D. N ; Ellis, M ; Hemann, M. D ; McKeith, F. K ; Miller, K. D ; Purser, K. W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5c5a6da10176d077a4181a2303579ef9aa1f5bcc8b5ac1a3a4b59744fabf80833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Glycolysis - drug effects</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Magnesium Sulfate - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Swine - genetics</topic><topic>Swine - growth & development</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, D. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemann, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeith, F. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, K. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purser, K. W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamilton, D. N</au><au>Ellis, M</au><au>Hemann, M. D</au><au>McKeith, F. K</au><au>Miller, K. D</au><au>Purser, K. W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of longissimus glycolytic potential and short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate prior to slaughter on carcass characteristics and pork quality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2002-06-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1586</spage><epage>1592</epage><pages>1586-1592</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to compare the effects of longissimus glycolytic potential (GP) and of time of feeding of supplemental magnesium sulfate heptahydrate on carcass and pork quality traits. The study was carried out in a 2 x 2 x 4 factorial arrangement; the treatments were sex (castrate vs gilt), GP (Low [normal] vs High), and time of feeding of magnesium sulfate-fortified diets (0 [control] vs 2 vs 3 vs 5 d prior to slaughter). Glycolytic potential was determined on a biopsy sample of longissimus from the live animal prior to the start of the study. A total of 144 pigs were allotted to the feeding-time treatments on the basis of sex (castrate and gilt), weight, and GP. Pigs were placed in individual pens and had free access to water. Prior to the start of the study, pigs were given ad libitum access to a standard finisher diet. During the study, animals were fed at a fixed level of 2.75 kg of a standard finisher diet/day; the fortified diet contained 3.2 g/d of additional magnesium. At the end of the feeding period, animals were transported to a commercial packing facility and slaughtered within 15 min of arrival. Fresh meat quality was measured on the longissimus. There were no treatment interactions. Carcass traits were similar across time of feeding treatments. Backfat thickness at the last lumbar vertebra and 10th rib were lower (P < 0 .05) for High than for Low GP pigs. High GP pigs had lower ultimate pH (P < 0.001) and higher drip (P < 0.05) and purge loss (P < 0.01) than Low GP pigs. Drip loss was reduced (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the magnesium-fortified diet for 5 and 2 but not for 3 d compared to controls (8.98, 7.29, 7.89, and 7.41 for the 0-, 2-, 3-, and 5-d treatments, respectively, SEM 0.447). Purge loss was similar for all of the time of feeding treatments. Longissimus L* values were lower (P < 0.05) for the 2-d treatment than for the controls. Results from this study suggest an inconsistent effect of short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate on muscle color and drip loss in pigs with both Low (normal) and High GP.]]></abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>12078740</pmid><doi>10.2527/2002.8061586x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2002-06, Vol.80 (6), p.1586-1592 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71846406 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology Animal Feed Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences Dietary Supplements Feeds Female Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genotype Glycolysis - drug effects Hogs Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Magnesium Sulfate - pharmacology Male Meat - standards Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism Pork Random Allocation Sex Factors Swine - genetics Swine - growth & development Terrestrial animal productions Time Factors Vertebrates |
title | The impact of longissimus glycolytic potential and short-term feeding of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate prior to slaughter on carcass characteristics and pork quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20longissimus%20glycolytic%20potential%20and%20short-term%20feeding%20of%20magnesium%20sulfate%20heptahydrate%20prior%20to%20slaughter%20on%20carcass%20characteristics%20and%20pork%20quality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Hamilton,%20D.%20N&rft.date=2002-06-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1586&rft.epage=1592&rft.pages=1586-1592&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2002.8061586x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71846406%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218141964&rft_id=info:pmid/12078740&rfr_iscdi=true |