Willingness to pay for flood and ecological risk reduction in an urban watershed
Urban watershed managers frequently must address alternative policy goals; flood control and ecological risk reduction. This study combines hydrologic models of flood control and biotic models of ecologic risk with economic models of willingness-to-pay and psychological models of risk processing and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2002-01, Vol.45 (9), p.235-242 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 242 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 235 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | CLARK, D. E NOVOTNY, V GRIFFIN, R BOOTH, D BARTOSOVA, A DAUN, M. C HUTCHINSON, M |
| description | Urban watershed managers frequently must address alternative policy goals; flood control and ecological risk reduction. This study combines hydrologic models of flood control and biotic models of ecologic risk with economic models of willingness-to-pay and psychological models of risk processing and planned behavior to evaluate these two alternative policy objectives. The findings reveal that flood risk exposure, especially for those individuals who would remain outside the 100 year flood plain if the project were enacted, does influence the financial support that local residents would be willing to make to a flood control project. Other important determinants include demographic factors such as income, and attitudinal measures of the respondent. Expanding the scope of the project to include ecological risk reduction does not, however, appear to change the average willingness-to-pay for a project. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2002.0247 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71844478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20673502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d6e9e3264cfdb99bb5a8984b307e2e57cb20c7c58533790b9306ff46cbd509073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LHDEYh0O16Gp79CqBUulltm8-Jh9HWaoWFvRg6XFIMhkbOztZkxlk__tmcEHoQS95Lw-_983vQeiMwJISIb4_53FJAegSKJcf0IJoLSotGT1AJ0RxxjQnNT9EC6CSVYRSdoxOcn4EAMk4HKFjQkFqAmqB7n6Hvg_Dw-BzxmPEW7PDXUy462NssRla7F3s40Nwpscp5L84-XZyY4gDDkMB8JRseZ_N6FP-49tP6GNn-uw_7-cp-nX14351U61vr3-uLteV45yOVSu89owK7rrWam1tbZRW3DKQnvpaOkvBSVermjGpwWoGouu4cLatQZd_nKKLl9xtik-Tz2OzCdn5vjeDj1NuZGmCc6neBSkIyWqg74KEi1K_nld_exssXkS5UouCfvkPfYxTGkoxDdGccVLOnDdXL5RLMefku2abwsakXYlqZuVNUd7MyptZeeHP96mT3fj2ld5rLcDXPWByEdclM7iQXzlOFKhasX89Va-p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943417182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Willingness to pay for flood and ecological risk reduction in an urban watershed</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>CLARK, D. E ; NOVOTNY, V ; GRIFFIN, R ; BOOTH, D ; BARTOSOVA, A ; DAUN, M. C ; HUTCHINSON, M</creator><contributor>Burkart, M ; Heath, R</contributor><creatorcontrib>CLARK, D. E ; NOVOTNY, V ; GRIFFIN, R ; BOOTH, D ; BARTOSOVA, A ; DAUN, M. C ; HUTCHINSON, M ; Burkart, M ; Heath, R</creatorcontrib><description>Urban watershed managers frequently must address alternative policy goals; flood control and ecological risk reduction. This study combines hydrologic models of flood control and biotic models of ecologic risk with economic models of willingness-to-pay and psychological models of risk processing and planned behavior to evaluate these two alternative policy objectives. The findings reveal that flood risk exposure, especially for those individuals who would remain outside the 100 year flood plain if the project were enacted, does influence the financial support that local residents would be willing to make to a flood control project. Other important determinants include demographic factors such as income, and attitudinal measures of the respondent. Expanding the scope of the project to include ecological risk reduction does not, however, appear to change the average willingness-to-pay for a project.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1843394154</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781843394150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0247</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12079108</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WSTED4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA</publisher><subject>100 year floods ; Demographics ; Demography ; Disasters ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecological risk assessment ; Econometric models ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environment ; Environmental risk ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flood control ; Flood management ; Floodplains ; Floods ; Freshwater ; Humans ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Income ; Models, Economic ; Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc ; Policies ; Public Opinion ; Risk Assessment ; Risk management ; Risk reduction ; Risk taking ; Urban watersheds ; Water Supply ; Watershed management ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2002-01, Vol.45 (9), p.235-242</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing May 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d6e9e3264cfdb99bb5a8984b307e2e57cb20c7c58533790b9306ff46cbd509073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14180858$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12079108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Burkart, M</contributor><contributor>Heath, R</contributor><creatorcontrib>CLARK, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOVOTNY, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIFFIN, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOOTH, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARTOSOVA, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAUN, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTCHINSON, M</creatorcontrib><title>Willingness to pay for flood and ecological risk reduction in an urban watershed</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Urban watershed managers frequently must address alternative policy goals; flood control and ecological risk reduction. This study combines hydrologic models of flood control and biotic models of ecologic risk with economic models of willingness-to-pay and psychological models of risk processing and planned behavior to evaluate these two alternative policy objectives. The findings reveal that flood risk exposure, especially for those individuals who would remain outside the 100 year flood plain if the project were enacted, does influence the financial support that local residents would be willing to make to a flood control project. Other important determinants include demographic factors such as income, and attitudinal measures of the respondent. Expanding the scope of the project to include ecological risk reduction does not, however, appear to change the average willingness-to-pay for a project.</description><subject>100 year floods</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Econometric models</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Urban watersheds</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><isbn>1843394154</isbn><isbn>9781843394150</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1LHDEYh0O16Gp79CqBUulltm8-Jh9HWaoWFvRg6XFIMhkbOztZkxlk__tmcEHoQS95Lw-_983vQeiMwJISIb4_53FJAegSKJcf0IJoLSotGT1AJ0RxxjQnNT9EC6CSVYRSdoxOcn4EAMk4HKFjQkFqAmqB7n6Hvg_Dw-BzxmPEW7PDXUy462NssRla7F3s40Nwpscp5L84-XZyY4gDDkMB8JRseZ_N6FP-49tP6GNn-uw_7-cp-nX14351U61vr3-uLteV45yOVSu89owK7rrWam1tbZRW3DKQnvpaOkvBSVermjGpwWoGouu4cLatQZd_nKKLl9xtik-Tz2OzCdn5vjeDj1NuZGmCc6neBSkIyWqg74KEi1K_nld_exssXkS5UouCfvkPfYxTGkoxDdGccVLOnDdXL5RLMefku2abwsakXYlqZuVNUd7MyptZeeHP96mT3fj2ld5rLcDXPWByEdclM7iQXzlOFKhasX89Va-p</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>CLARK, D. E</creator><creator>NOVOTNY, V</creator><creator>GRIFFIN, R</creator><creator>BOOTH, D</creator><creator>BARTOSOVA, A</creator><creator>DAUN, M. C</creator><creator>HUTCHINSON, M</creator><general>IWA</general><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Willingness to pay for flood and ecological risk reduction in an urban watershed</title><author>CLARK, D. E ; NOVOTNY, V ; GRIFFIN, R ; BOOTH, D ; BARTOSOVA, A ; DAUN, M. C ; HUTCHINSON, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d6e9e3264cfdb99bb5a8984b307e2e57cb20c7c58533790b9306ff46cbd509073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>100 year floods</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Econometric models</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Urban watersheds</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CLARK, D. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOVOTNY, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIFFIN, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOOTH, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARTOSOVA, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAUN, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUTCHINSON, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CLARK, D. E</au><au>NOVOTNY, V</au><au>GRIFFIN, R</au><au>BOOTH, D</au><au>BARTOSOVA, A</au><au>DAUN, M. C</au><au>HUTCHINSON, M</au><au>Burkart, M</au><au>Heath, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Willingness to pay for flood and ecological risk reduction in an urban watershed</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>235-242</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><isbn>1843394154</isbn><isbn>9781843394150</isbn><coden>WSTED4</coden><abstract>Urban watershed managers frequently must address alternative policy goals; flood control and ecological risk reduction. This study combines hydrologic models of flood control and biotic models of ecologic risk with economic models of willingness-to-pay and psychological models of risk processing and planned behavior to evaluate these two alternative policy objectives. The findings reveal that flood risk exposure, especially for those individuals who would remain outside the 100 year flood plain if the project were enacted, does influence the financial support that local residents would be willing to make to a flood control project. Other important determinants include demographic factors such as income, and attitudinal measures of the respondent. Expanding the scope of the project to include ecological risk reduction does not, however, appear to change the average willingness-to-pay for a project.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA</pub><pmid>12079108</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2002.0247</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 2002-01, Vol.45 (9), p.235-242 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71844478 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | 100 year floods Demographics Demography Disasters Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Ecological risk assessment Econometric models Economic analysis Economic models Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Environment Environmental risk Exact sciences and technology Flood control Flood management Floodplains Floods Freshwater Humans Hydrologic models Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Income Models, Economic Natural hazards: prediction, damages, etc Policies Public Opinion Risk Assessment Risk management Risk reduction Risk taking Urban watersheds Water Supply Watershed management Willingness to pay |
| title | Willingness to pay for flood and ecological risk reduction in an urban watershed |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T01%3A10%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Willingness%20to%20pay%20for%20flood%20and%20ecological%20risk%20reduction%20in%20an%20urban%20watershed&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=CLARK,%20D.%20E&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=235-242&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft.isbn=1843394154&rft.isbn_list=9781843394150&rft.coden=WSTED4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2002.0247&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20673502%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943417182&rft_id=info:pmid/12079108&rfr_iscdi=true |