Laboratory Practices for Stool-Specimen Culture for Bacterial Pathogens, Including Escherichia coli O157:H7, in the FoodNet Sites, 1995–2000
In 2000, we surveyed microbiologists in 388 clinical laboratories, which tested an estimated 339,000 stool specimens in 1999, about laboratory methods and policies for the routine testing of stool specimens for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Vibrio species, Yersinia entercolitica, and Esch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical infectious diseases 2004-04, Vol.38 (Supplement-3), p.S190-S197 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S197 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement-3 |
container_start_page | S190 |
container_title | Clinical infectious diseases |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Voetsch, Andrew C. Angulo, Frederick J. Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry Shallow, Sue Cassidy, Maureen Thomas, Stephanie M. Swanson, Ellen Zansky, Shelley M. Hawkins, Marguerite A. Jones, Timothy F. Shillam, Pamela J. Van Gilder, Thomas J. Wells, Joy G. Griffin, Patricia M. |
description | In 2000, we surveyed microbiologists in 388 clinical laboratories, which tested an estimated 339,000 stool specimens in 1999, about laboratory methods and policies for the routine testing of stool specimens for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Vibrio species, Yersinia entercolitica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. The results were compared with those of similar surveys conducted in 1995 and 1997. Although these laboratories reported routinely testing for Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter species, only 57% routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7, 50% for Y. entercolitica, and 50% for Vibrio species. The mean proportions of stool specimens that yielded these pathogens were as follows: Campylobacter, 1.3% of specimens; Salmonella, 0.9%; Shigella, 0.4%; and E. coli O157:H7, 0.3%. The proportion of laboratories that routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7 increased from 59% in 1995 to 68% in 2000; however, the proportion of stool specimens tested decreased from 53% to 46%. E. coli O157:H7 should be routinely sought in stool specimens submitted for microbiologic culture. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/381586 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71843438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4483952</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4483952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-81b222fbead589e39b75930242df35c50c0b4662c9a12a3a81f4a7e993fcb6503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQQFcIREuBL0DIJ05d8KzXa5tbidqmKNCggFT1Ynmd2cZlsw62V2pvfAEX_pAvwZAoHDnNSO_NXF5RPAf6Gqhs3jAJXDYPikPgTJQNV_Aw75TLspZMHhRPYrylFEBS_rg4AE4VB6kOix8z0_pgkg_3ZB6MTc5iJJ0PZJG878vFBq1b40AmY5_GgH_Ru-xhcKYnc5NW_gaHeEwuBtuPSzfckNNoVxnblTPE-t6RS-Di7VQcEzeQtEJy5v3yIyaycAnzJSjFf33_WVFKnxaPOtNHfLabR8WXs9PPk2k5uzy_mJzMSssakUoJbVVVXYtmyaVCplrBFaNVXS07xi2nlrZ101RWGagMMxK62ghUinW2bThlR8Wr7d9N8N9GjEmvXbTY92ZAP0YtQNasZvK_IgjBgWV1L9rgYwzY6U1waxPuNVD9J5HeJsriy93HsV3j8p-2a5KFF1vhNuYse17nkIpXGZdb7GLCuz024atuBBNcT6-u9fQ9vf4EV3P9gf0G51yifg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17751334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory Practices for Stool-Specimen Culture for Bacterial Pathogens, Including Escherichia coli O157:H7, in the FoodNet Sites, 1995–2000</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Voetsch, Andrew C. ; Angulo, Frederick J. ; Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry ; Shallow, Sue ; Cassidy, Maureen ; Thomas, Stephanie M. ; Swanson, Ellen ; Zansky, Shelley M. ; Hawkins, Marguerite A. ; Jones, Timothy F. ; Shillam, Pamela J. ; Van Gilder, Thomas J. ; Wells, Joy G. ; Griffin, Patricia M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Voetsch, Andrew C. ; Angulo, Frederick J. ; Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry ; Shallow, Sue ; Cassidy, Maureen ; Thomas, Stephanie M. ; Swanson, Ellen ; Zansky, Shelley M. ; Hawkins, Marguerite A. ; Jones, Timothy F. ; Shillam, Pamela J. ; Van Gilder, Thomas J. ; Wells, Joy G. ; Griffin, Patricia M. ; Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group ; the Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group</creatorcontrib><description>In 2000, we surveyed microbiologists in 388 clinical laboratories, which tested an estimated 339,000 stool specimens in 1999, about laboratory methods and policies for the routine testing of stool specimens for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Vibrio species, Yersinia entercolitica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. The results were compared with those of similar surveys conducted in 1995 and 1997. Although these laboratories reported routinely testing for Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter species, only 57% routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7, 50% for Y. entercolitica, and 50% for Vibrio species. The mean proportions of stool specimens that yielded these pathogens were as follows: Campylobacter, 1.3% of specimens; Salmonella, 0.9%; Shigella, 0.4%; and E. coli O157:H7, 0.3%. The proportion of laboratories that routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7 increased from 59% in 1995 to 68% in 2000; however, the proportion of stool specimens tested decreased from 53% to 46%. E. coli O157:H7 should be routinely sought in stool specimens submitted for microbiologic culture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/381586</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15095189</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Campylobacter ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques ; Epidemiology ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli O157 ; Feces - microbiology ; Humans ; Infections ; Labor force surveys ; Pathogens ; Public health ; Salmonella ; Shigella ; Specimens ; Surveillance ; United States - epidemiology ; Vibrio ; Yersinia ; Yersinia enterocolitica</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2004-04, Vol.38 (Supplement-3), p.S190-S197</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-81b222fbead589e39b75930242df35c50c0b4662c9a12a3a81f4a7e993fcb6503</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4483952$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4483952$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15095189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voetsch, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angulo, Frederick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shallow, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Stephanie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zansky, Shelley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Marguerite A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shillam, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gilder, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Joy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory Practices for Stool-Specimen Culture for Bacterial Pathogens, Including Escherichia coli O157:H7, in the FoodNet Sites, 1995–2000</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><description>In 2000, we surveyed microbiologists in 388 clinical laboratories, which tested an estimated 339,000 stool specimens in 1999, about laboratory methods and policies for the routine testing of stool specimens for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Vibrio species, Yersinia entercolitica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. The results were compared with those of similar surveys conducted in 1995 and 1997. Although these laboratories reported routinely testing for Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter species, only 57% routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7, 50% for Y. entercolitica, and 50% for Vibrio species. The mean proportions of stool specimens that yielded these pathogens were as follows: Campylobacter, 1.3% of specimens; Salmonella, 0.9%; Shigella, 0.4%; and E. coli O157:H7, 0.3%. The proportion of laboratories that routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7 increased from 59% in 1995 to 68% in 2000; however, the proportion of stool specimens tested decreased from 53% to 46%. E. coli O157:H7 should be routinely sought in stool specimens submitted for microbiologic culture.</description><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Labor force surveys</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Shigella</subject><subject>Specimens</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vibrio</subject><subject>Yersinia</subject><subject>Yersinia enterocolitica</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQQFcIREuBL0DIJ05d8KzXa5tbidqmKNCggFT1Ynmd2cZlsw62V2pvfAEX_pAvwZAoHDnNSO_NXF5RPAf6Gqhs3jAJXDYPikPgTJQNV_Aw75TLspZMHhRPYrylFEBS_rg4AE4VB6kOix8z0_pgkg_3ZB6MTc5iJJ0PZJG878vFBq1b40AmY5_GgH_Ru-xhcKYnc5NW_gaHeEwuBtuPSzfckNNoVxnblTPE-t6RS-Di7VQcEzeQtEJy5v3yIyaycAnzJSjFf33_WVFKnxaPOtNHfLabR8WXs9PPk2k5uzy_mJzMSssakUoJbVVVXYtmyaVCplrBFaNVXS07xi2nlrZ101RWGagMMxK62ghUinW2bThlR8Wr7d9N8N9GjEmvXbTY92ZAP0YtQNasZvK_IgjBgWV1L9rgYwzY6U1waxPuNVD9J5HeJsriy93HsV3j8p-2a5KFF1vhNuYse17nkIpXGZdb7GLCuz024atuBBNcT6-u9fQ9vf4EV3P9gf0G51yifg</recordid><startdate>20040415</startdate><enddate>20040415</enddate><creator>Voetsch, Andrew C.</creator><creator>Angulo, Frederick J.</creator><creator>Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry</creator><creator>Shallow, Sue</creator><creator>Cassidy, Maureen</creator><creator>Thomas, Stephanie M.</creator><creator>Swanson, Ellen</creator><creator>Zansky, Shelley M.</creator><creator>Hawkins, Marguerite A.</creator><creator>Jones, Timothy F.</creator><creator>Shillam, Pamela J.</creator><creator>Van Gilder, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Wells, Joy G.</creator><creator>Griffin, Patricia M.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040415</creationdate><title>Laboratory Practices for Stool-Specimen Culture for Bacterial Pathogens, Including Escherichia coli O157:H7, in the FoodNet Sites, 1995–2000</title><author>Voetsch, Andrew C. ; Angulo, Frederick J. ; Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry ; Shallow, Sue ; Cassidy, Maureen ; Thomas, Stephanie M. ; Swanson, Ellen ; Zansky, Shelley M. ; Hawkins, Marguerite A. ; Jones, Timothy F. ; Shillam, Pamela J. ; Van Gilder, Thomas J. ; Wells, Joy G. ; Griffin, Patricia M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-81b222fbead589e39b75930242df35c50c0b4662c9a12a3a81f4a7e993fcb6503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Labor force surveys</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Shigella</topic><topic>Specimens</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vibrio</topic><topic>Yersinia</topic><topic>Yersinia enterocolitica</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voetsch, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angulo, Frederick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shallow, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Stephanie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zansky, Shelley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Marguerite A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Timothy F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shillam, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gilder, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Joy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voetsch, Andrew C.</au><au>Angulo, Frederick J.</au><au>Rabatsky-Ehr, Terry</au><au>Shallow, Sue</au><au>Cassidy, Maureen</au><au>Thomas, Stephanie M.</au><au>Swanson, Ellen</au><au>Zansky, Shelley M.</au><au>Hawkins, Marguerite A.</au><au>Jones, Timothy F.</au><au>Shillam, Pamela J.</au><au>Van Gilder, Thomas J.</au><au>Wells, Joy G.</au><au>Griffin, Patricia M.</au><aucorp>Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group</aucorp><aucorp>the Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory Practices for Stool-Specimen Culture for Bacterial Pathogens, Including Escherichia coli O157:H7, in the FoodNet Sites, 1995–2000</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Clinical Infectious Diseases</addtitle><date>2004-04-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>Supplement-3</issue><spage>S190</spage><epage>S197</epage><pages>S190-S197</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>In 2000, we surveyed microbiologists in 388 clinical laboratories, which tested an estimated 339,000 stool specimens in 1999, about laboratory methods and policies for the routine testing of stool specimens for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Vibrio species, Yersinia entercolitica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. The results were compared with those of similar surveys conducted in 1995 and 1997. Although these laboratories reported routinely testing for Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter species, only 57% routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7, 50% for Y. entercolitica, and 50% for Vibrio species. The mean proportions of stool specimens that yielded these pathogens were as follows: Campylobacter, 1.3% of specimens; Salmonella, 0.9%; Shigella, 0.4%; and E. coli O157:H7, 0.3%. The proportion of laboratories that routinely tested for E. coli O157:H7 increased from 59% in 1995 to 68% in 2000; however, the proportion of stool specimens tested decreased from 53% to 46%. E. coli O157:H7 should be routinely sought in stool specimens submitted for microbiologic culture.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>15095189</pmid><doi>10.1086/381586</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-4838 |
ispartof | Clinical infectious diseases, 2004-04, Vol.38 (Supplement-3), p.S190-S197 |
issn | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71843438 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Campylobacter Clinical Laboratory Techniques Epidemiology Escherichia coli Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology Escherichia coli O157 Feces - microbiology Humans Infections Labor force surveys Pathogens Public health Salmonella Shigella Specimens Surveillance United States - epidemiology Vibrio Yersinia Yersinia enterocolitica |
title | Laboratory Practices for Stool-Specimen Culture for Bacterial Pathogens, Including Escherichia coli O157:H7, in the FoodNet Sites, 1995–2000 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A12%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20Practices%20for%20Stool-Specimen%20Culture%20for%20Bacterial%20Pathogens,%20Including%20Escherichia%20coli%20O157:H7,%20in%20the%20FoodNet%20Sites,%201995%E2%80%932000&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Voetsch,%20Andrew%20C.&rft.aucorp=Emerging%20Infections%20Program%20FoodNet%20Working%20Group&rft.date=2004-04-15&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=Supplement-3&rft.spage=S190&rft.epage=S197&rft.pages=S190-S197&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/381586&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4483952%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17751334&rft_id=info:pmid/15095189&rft_jstor_id=4483952&rfr_iscdi=true |