The development and testing of the depression, anxiety, and positive outlook scale (DAPOS)
Measurement of depression and other mood states in pain patients has been criticised in recent years on the grounds that most questionnaires were not developed in pain populations and suffer from criterion contamination by somatic items. In addition, there is no accepted measurement for positive emo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain (Amsterdam) 2004-05, Vol.109 (1), p.181-188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 188 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Pain (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Pincus, Tamar Williams, Amanda C.de C Vogel, Steven Field, Andy |
description | Measurement of depression and other mood states in pain patients has been criticised in recent years on the grounds that most questionnaires were not developed in pain populations and suffer from criterion contamination by somatic items. In addition, there is no accepted measurement for positive emotions which are more than the absence of depression. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and brief tool to assess mood in pain patients. Non-somatic items concerning depression, anxiety and positive outlook were extracted using exploratory factor analysis from commonly used instruments (the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) completed by over 900 chronic pain patients. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the internal structure of the final item set. Items were then reworded and presented as a new questionnaire (the Depression, Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale: DAPOS) to two new samples: patients attending pain management and patients attending osteopathy. The new questionnaire was compared with several well-known questionnaires (SF36, BDI, PCS). The structure was calibrated and tested using confirmatory factor analysis on both samples. Finally, a subset of patients carried out a sorting task to test for face validity. The DAPOS performed well, indicating that it is a reliable measure of the three mood states with good initial evidence of validity in these samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71833531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304395904000715</els_id><sourcerecordid>71833531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-e31ccf25752e1f59c3fd1b00e211f1813f1ea17fd7bc454aae4fd8ba5df6d0403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhq2Kqk0Lf4AD2guISt1lxt6vSFyqtlCkSq1EuXCxHHsMDpv1YjsR_fd1mkhw4vQe5nlHMw9jrxEqBGw_LKtJubHiAHUFvMpxwGbYd7xsWy5esBkIqEsxb-bH7CTGJQBwzudH7Bgb6DnWMGPfH35SYWhDg59WNKZCjaZIFJMbfxTeFul5PAWK0fnxPI__OEqP58_c5KNLbkOFX6fB-19F1Gqg4v3Vxf3d17OX7NCqIdKrfZ6yb5-uHy5vytu7z18uL25LLXqeShKoteVN13BC28y1sAYXAMQRLfYoLJLCzppuoeumVopqa_qFaoxtDdQgTtm73d4p-N_rfLpcuahpGNRIfh1lh70QjcAM8h2og48xkJVTcCsVHiWC3BqVS7k1KrdGJXCZI5fe7LevFysyfyt7hRl4uwfU9n0b1Khd_Idr60y1mfu44yi72DgKMmpHoybjAukkjXf_u-MJLaGURg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71833531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development and testing of the depression, anxiety, and positive outlook scale (DAPOS)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Pincus, Tamar ; Williams, Amanda C.de C ; Vogel, Steven ; Field, Andy</creator><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Tamar ; Williams, Amanda C.de C ; Vogel, Steven ; Field, Andy</creatorcontrib><description>Measurement of depression and other mood states in pain patients has been criticised in recent years on the grounds that most questionnaires were not developed in pain populations and suffer from criterion contamination by somatic items. In addition, there is no accepted measurement for positive emotions which are more than the absence of depression. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and brief tool to assess mood in pain patients. Non-somatic items concerning depression, anxiety and positive outlook were extracted using exploratory factor analysis from commonly used instruments (the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) completed by over 900 chronic pain patients. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the internal structure of the final item set. Items were then reworded and presented as a new questionnaire (the Depression, Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale: DAPOS) to two new samples: patients attending pain management and patients attending osteopathy. The new questionnaire was compared with several well-known questionnaires (SF36, BDI, PCS). The structure was calibrated and tested using confirmatory factor analysis on both samples. Finally, a subset of patients carried out a sorting task to test for face validity. The DAPOS performed well, indicating that it is a reliable measure of the three mood states with good initial evidence of validity in these samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15082140</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PAINDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Anxiety - diagnosis ; Anxiety - etiology ; Anxiety - psychology ; Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale ; Biological and medical sciences ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Depression ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - etiology ; Depression - psychology ; Disability Evaluation ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ; Humans ; Illness and personality ; Illness, stress and coping ; Male ; Pain - complications ; Pain - diagnosis ; Pain - psychology ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Personality Inventory ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology and medicine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Pain (Amsterdam), 2004-05, Vol.109 (1), p.181-188</ispartof><rights>2004 International Association for the Study of Pain</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-e31ccf25752e1f59c3fd1b00e211f1813f1ea17fd7bc454aae4fd8ba5df6d0403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-e31ccf25752e1f59c3fd1b00e211f1813f1ea17fd7bc454aae4fd8ba5df6d0403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15644036$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15082140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Amanda C.de C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Andy</creatorcontrib><title>The development and testing of the depression, anxiety, and positive outlook scale (DAPOS)</title><title>Pain (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><description>Measurement of depression and other mood states in pain patients has been criticised in recent years on the grounds that most questionnaires were not developed in pain populations and suffer from criterion contamination by somatic items. In addition, there is no accepted measurement for positive emotions which are more than the absence of depression. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and brief tool to assess mood in pain patients. Non-somatic items concerning depression, anxiety and positive outlook were extracted using exploratory factor analysis from commonly used instruments (the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) completed by over 900 chronic pain patients. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the internal structure of the final item set. Items were then reworded and presented as a new questionnaire (the Depression, Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale: DAPOS) to two new samples: patients attending pain management and patients attending osteopathy. The new questionnaire was compared with several well-known questionnaires (SF36, BDI, PCS). The structure was calibrated and tested using confirmatory factor analysis on both samples. Finally, a subset of patients carried out a sorting task to test for face validity. The DAPOS performed well, indicating that it is a reliable measure of the three mood states with good initial evidence of validity in these samples.</description><subject>Anxiety - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anxiety - etiology</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illness and personality</subject><subject>Illness, stress and coping</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pain - complications</subject><subject>Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology and medicine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0304-3959</issn><issn>1872-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhq2Kqk0Lf4AD2guISt1lxt6vSFyqtlCkSq1EuXCxHHsMDpv1YjsR_fd1mkhw4vQe5nlHMw9jrxEqBGw_LKtJubHiAHUFvMpxwGbYd7xsWy5esBkIqEsxb-bH7CTGJQBwzudH7Bgb6DnWMGPfH35SYWhDg59WNKZCjaZIFJMbfxTeFul5PAWK0fnxPI__OEqP58_c5KNLbkOFX6fB-19F1Gqg4v3Vxf3d17OX7NCqIdKrfZ6yb5-uHy5vytu7z18uL25LLXqeShKoteVN13BC28y1sAYXAMQRLfYoLJLCzppuoeumVopqa_qFaoxtDdQgTtm73d4p-N_rfLpcuahpGNRIfh1lh70QjcAM8h2og48xkJVTcCsVHiWC3BqVS7k1KrdGJXCZI5fe7LevFysyfyt7hRl4uwfU9n0b1Khd_Idr60y1mfu44yi72DgKMmpHoybjAukkjXf_u-MJLaGURg</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Pincus, Tamar</creator><creator>Williams, Amanda C.de C</creator><creator>Vogel, Steven</creator><creator>Field, Andy</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>The development and testing of the depression, anxiety, and positive outlook scale (DAPOS)</title><author>Pincus, Tamar ; Williams, Amanda C.de C ; Vogel, Steven ; Field, Andy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-e31ccf25752e1f59c3fd1b00e211f1813f1ea17fd7bc454aae4fd8ba5df6d0403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Anxiety - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anxiety - etiology</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illness and personality</topic><topic>Illness, stress and coping</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pain - complications</topic><topic>Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology and medicine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Amanda C.de C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Andy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pincus, Tamar</au><au>Williams, Amanda C.de C</au><au>Vogel, Steven</au><au>Field, Andy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development and testing of the depression, anxiety, and positive outlook scale (DAPOS)</atitle><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>181-188</pages><issn>0304-3959</issn><eissn>1872-6623</eissn><coden>PAINDB</coden><abstract>Measurement of depression and other mood states in pain patients has been criticised in recent years on the grounds that most questionnaires were not developed in pain populations and suffer from criterion contamination by somatic items. In addition, there is no accepted measurement for positive emotions which are more than the absence of depression. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and brief tool to assess mood in pain patients. Non-somatic items concerning depression, anxiety and positive outlook were extracted using exploratory factor analysis from commonly used instruments (the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) completed by over 900 chronic pain patients. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the internal structure of the final item set. Items were then reworded and presented as a new questionnaire (the Depression, Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale: DAPOS) to two new samples: patients attending pain management and patients attending osteopathy. The new questionnaire was compared with several well-known questionnaires (SF36, BDI, PCS). The structure was calibrated and tested using confirmatory factor analysis on both samples. Finally, a subset of patients carried out a sorting task to test for face validity. The DAPOS performed well, indicating that it is a reliable measure of the three mood states with good initial evidence of validity in these samples.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15082140</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.004</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3959 |
ispartof | Pain (Amsterdam), 2004-05, Vol.109 (1), p.181-188 |
issn | 0304-3959 1872-6623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71833531 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Anxiety - diagnosis Anxiety - etiology Anxiety - psychology Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale Biological and medical sciences Confirmatory factor analysis Depression Depression - diagnosis Depression - etiology Depression - psychology Disability Evaluation Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Humans Illness and personality Illness, stress and coping Male Pain - complications Pain - diagnosis Pain - psychology Pain Measurement - methods Personality Inventory Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychology and medicine Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | The development and testing of the depression, anxiety, and positive outlook scale (DAPOS) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T05%3A16%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20and%20testing%20of%20the%20depression,%20anxiety,%20and%20positive%20outlook%20scale%20(DAPOS)&rft.jtitle=Pain%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Pincus,%20Tamar&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=181-188&rft.issn=0304-3959&rft.eissn=1872-6623&rft.coden=PAINDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71833531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71833531&rft_id=info:pmid/15082140&rft_els_id=S0304395904000715&rfr_iscdi=true |