Perception of esophageal manometry
Esophageal manometry is an important investigation method but its direct impact on patients' well‐being has not been studied. A structured questionnaire was given to all patients (n=92) after the manometry during one calendar year. The response rate was 91%. A total of seventy‐one patients also...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the esophagus 2002-01, Vol.15 (1), p.46-49 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 49 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 46 |
| container_title | Diseases of the esophagus |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Walamies, M. A. |
| description | Esophageal manometry is an important investigation method but its direct impact on patients' well‐being has not been studied. A structured questionnaire was given to all patients (n=92) after the manometry during one calendar year. The response rate was 91%. A total of seventy‐one patients also reported their health status during the next 24 h. No serious side‐effects were recorded. About half of the respondents regarded manometry as an easy or fairly easy investigation. The most common problems were irritation of nose and throat. In total, 48% of the respondents had mild to moderate late symptoms after manometry, usually soreness of the throat or nose lasting for some hours. The manometry was more troublesome to women than to men. It is concluded that esophageal manometry is generally a benign and fairly tolerated investigation, and the high level of anxiety that many patients show before the manometry is not well justified. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00224.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71825946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71825946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4534-c701a79e237e39d48d765a394a9e09ddba59abe43aa49dea8446db403323407b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFOg0AQhjdGY7X6CoZ48AYOuwPLHjyYWquxsSat8bhZYKpUKJWlsX17QZp69bDZycz_zSQfY44Png8YXi88H5G7HALwOAD3msfR2xywk_3gsKl9Dm4UKuyxU2sXAL4UYXTMek0_BEB-wi5fqEpoVWfl0innDtly9WHeyeROYZZlQXW1PWNHc5NbOt_9ffZ6P5wNHtzxZPQ4uB27CQYC3USCb6QiLiQJlWKUyjAwQqFRBCpNYxMoExMKY1ClZCLEMI0RhOACQcaiz666vauq_FqTrXWR2YTy3CypXFst_YgHCsMmGHXBpCqtrWiuV1VWmGqrfdCtH73QrQbdatCtH_3rR28a9GJ3Yx0XlP6BOyFN4KYLfGc5bf-9WN9NZsOmani34zNb02bPm-pTh1LIQL89j_QUYRoMngKN4gdxqIDf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71825946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of esophageal manometry</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Walamies, M. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walamies, M. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Esophageal manometry is an important investigation method but its direct impact on patients' well‐being has not been studied. A structured questionnaire was given to all patients (n=92) after the manometry during one calendar year. The response rate was 91%. A total of seventy‐one patients also reported their health status during the next 24 h. No serious side‐effects were recorded. About half of the respondents regarded manometry as an easy or fairly easy investigation. The most common problems were irritation of nose and throat. In total, 48% of the respondents had mild to moderate late symptoms after manometry, usually soreness of the throat or nose lasting for some hours. The manometry was more troublesome to women than to men. It is concluded that esophageal manometry is generally a benign and fairly tolerated investigation, and the high level of anxiety that many patients show before the manometry is not well justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-8694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00224.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12060042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Esophageal Diseases - diagnosis ; Female ; Finland ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Manometry - adverse effects ; Manometry - methods ; Middle Aged ; Pain - epidemiology ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Participation ; Probability ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Sampling Studies ; Sex Factors ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the esophagus, 2002-01, Vol.15 (1), p.46-49</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4534-c701a79e237e39d48d765a394a9e09ddba59abe43aa49dea8446db403323407b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4534-c701a79e237e39d48d765a394a9e09ddba59abe43aa49dea8446db403323407b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1442-2050.2002.00224.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1442-2050.2002.00224.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12060042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walamies, M. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of esophageal manometry</title><title>Diseases of the esophagus</title><addtitle>Dis Esophagus</addtitle><description>Esophageal manometry is an important investigation method but its direct impact on patients' well‐being has not been studied. A structured questionnaire was given to all patients (n=92) after the manometry during one calendar year. The response rate was 91%. A total of seventy‐one patients also reported their health status during the next 24 h. No serious side‐effects were recorded. About half of the respondents regarded manometry as an easy or fairly easy investigation. The most common problems were irritation of nose and throat. In total, 48% of the respondents had mild to moderate late symptoms after manometry, usually soreness of the throat or nose lasting for some hours. The manometry was more troublesome to women than to men. It is concluded that esophageal manometry is generally a benign and fairly tolerated investigation, and the high level of anxiety that many patients show before the manometry is not well justified.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manometry - adverse effects</subject><subject>Manometry - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1120-8694</issn><issn>1442-2050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFOg0AQhjdGY7X6CoZ48AYOuwPLHjyYWquxsSat8bhZYKpUKJWlsX17QZp69bDZycz_zSQfY44Png8YXi88H5G7HALwOAD3msfR2xywk_3gsKl9Dm4UKuyxU2sXAL4UYXTMek0_BEB-wi5fqEpoVWfl0innDtly9WHeyeROYZZlQXW1PWNHc5NbOt_9ffZ6P5wNHtzxZPQ4uB27CQYC3USCb6QiLiQJlWKUyjAwQqFRBCpNYxMoExMKY1ClZCLEMI0RhOACQcaiz666vauq_FqTrXWR2YTy3CypXFst_YgHCsMmGHXBpCqtrWiuV1VWmGqrfdCtH73QrQbdatCtH_3rR28a9GJ3Yx0XlP6BOyFN4KYLfGc5bf-9WN9NZsOmani34zNb02bPm-pTh1LIQL89j_QUYRoMngKN4gdxqIDf</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Walamies, M. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Perception of esophageal manometry</title><author>Walamies, M. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4534-c701a79e237e39d48d765a394a9e09ddba59abe43aa49dea8446db403323407b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manometry - adverse effects</topic><topic>Manometry - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walamies, M. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the esophagus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walamies, M. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception of esophageal manometry</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the esophagus</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Esophagus</addtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>46-49</pages><issn>1120-8694</issn><eissn>1442-2050</eissn><abstract>Esophageal manometry is an important investigation method but its direct impact on patients' well‐being has not been studied. A structured questionnaire was given to all patients (n=92) after the manometry during one calendar year. The response rate was 91%. A total of seventy‐one patients also reported their health status during the next 24 h. No serious side‐effects were recorded. About half of the respondents regarded manometry as an easy or fairly easy investigation. The most common problems were irritation of nose and throat. In total, 48% of the respondents had mild to moderate late symptoms after manometry, usually soreness of the throat or nose lasting for some hours. The manometry was more troublesome to women than to men. It is concluded that esophageal manometry is generally a benign and fairly tolerated investigation, and the high level of anxiety that many patients show before the manometry is not well justified.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><pmid>12060042</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00224.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1120-8694 |
| ispartof | Diseases of the esophagus, 2002-01, Vol.15 (1), p.46-49 |
| issn | 1120-8694 1442-2050 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71825946 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Esophageal Diseases - diagnosis Female Finland Humans Incidence Male Manometry - adverse effects Manometry - methods Middle Aged Pain - epidemiology Pain - etiology Pain Measurement Patient Participation Probability Prospective Studies Risk Assessment Sampling Studies Sex Factors Statistics, Nonparametric Surveys and Questionnaires |
| title | Perception of esophageal manometry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A09%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20esophageal%20manometry&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20esophagus&rft.au=Walamies,%20M.%20A.&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=46-49&rft.issn=1120-8694&rft.eissn=1442-2050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00224.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71825946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71825946&rft_id=info:pmid/12060042&rfr_iscdi=true |