Determination of the dynamics of restored teeth by 3D electronic speckle pattern interferometry

Background and Objectives The difficulties typically encountered in studying the effects of restorations on tooth reinforcement are often due to the 3‐dimensional (3D) nature of deformation. Therefore, electronic 3D‐Speckle‐Interferometry (3D‐ESPI) was used to assess the impact of different restorat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2004-01, Vol.34 (4), p.300-309
Hauptverfasser: Lang, H., Rampado, M., Müllejans, R., Raab, W.H.-M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 309
container_issue 4
container_start_page 300
container_title Lasers in surgery and medicine
container_volume 34
creator Lang, H.
Rampado, M.
Müllejans, R.
Raab, W.H.-M.
description Background and Objectives The difficulties typically encountered in studying the effects of restorations on tooth reinforcement are often due to the 3‐dimensional (3D) nature of deformation. Therefore, electronic 3D‐Speckle‐Interferometry (3D‐ESPI) was used to assess the impact of different restorative materials on the deformation of teeth. Study Design/Materials and Methods Small and large MOD‐preparations in extracted premolars were restored with gold inlays, ceramic inlays, composite resin inlays, amalgam, or composite resin. The restorations and cusps were loaded (90 N) and the deformation was assessed by 3D‐ESPI. Results Teeth with small restorations were deformed only slightly and the differences between the materials were minimal (P>0.05). In contrast, teeth with large restorations displayed material‐specific deformation patterns: (a) all materials led to decreased deformation as compared with unfilled teeth, (b) elastic materials caused only local deformation, (c) non‐adhesive materials resulted in translation of the restoration and marginal discrepancies, (d) adhesive inlays brought about increased deformation of the luting resin composite, (e) loading of the cusps caused higher deformation than loading of the restorations, and (f) bonded restorations stabilized the cusps. Conclusions The results show that the deformation pattern of restored teeth is material‐specific but the extent of deformation is primarily limited by the remaining tooth substance. Lasers Surg. Med. 34:300–309, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lsm.20036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71824421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17820587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4856-1f34dccae077eccf82115ed7207d3d1f51d7ba7f20dc0df4fa636ead157a27943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1vFDEQhi0EIkeg4A8gV0gUm8zYu-vdEhIIiAOKgCLRWD57rJjsx8X2Cfbf43AHVIhqZqTnfTR6GXuKcIIA4nRI44kAkO09tkLo26pHwPtsBVj2DnpxxB6l9A0KIkA9ZEfYQCfrHlZMn1OmOIbJ5DBPfPY8XxN3y2TGYNPdHSnlOZLjmShf883C5TmngWyO8xQsT1uyNwPxrcnFNPEwleEpziPluDxmD7wZEj05zGP25c3rz2dvq_Wni3dnL9eVrbumrdDL2llrCJQia30nEBtyqrzrpEPfoFMbo7wAZ8H52ptWtmQcNsoI1dfymD3fe7dxvt2Vl_UYkqVhMBPNu6QVdqKuBf4XRNUJaDpVwBd70MY5pUheb2MYTVw0gr6rXZfa9a_aC_vsIN1tRnJ_yUPPBTjdA9_DQMu_TXp9-eG3stonQsr040_CxBvdKqkaffXxQl--6vH916ta9_Ind-ucww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17820587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of the dynamics of restored teeth by 3D electronic speckle pattern interferometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lang, H. ; Rampado, M. ; Müllejans, R. ; Raab, W.H.-M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lang, H. ; Rampado, M. ; Müllejans, R. ; Raab, W.H.-M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives The difficulties typically encountered in studying the effects of restorations on tooth reinforcement are often due to the 3‐dimensional (3D) nature of deformation. Therefore, electronic 3D‐Speckle‐Interferometry (3D‐ESPI) was used to assess the impact of different restorative materials on the deformation of teeth. Study Design/Materials and Methods Small and large MOD‐preparations in extracted premolars were restored with gold inlays, ceramic inlays, composite resin inlays, amalgam, or composite resin. The restorations and cusps were loaded (90 N) and the deformation was assessed by 3D‐ESPI. Results Teeth with small restorations were deformed only slightly and the differences between the materials were minimal (P&gt;0.05). In contrast, teeth with large restorations displayed material‐specific deformation patterns: (a) all materials led to decreased deformation as compared with unfilled teeth, (b) elastic materials caused only local deformation, (c) non‐adhesive materials resulted in translation of the restoration and marginal discrepancies, (d) adhesive inlays brought about increased deformation of the luting resin composite, (e) loading of the cusps caused higher deformation than loading of the restorations, and (f) bonded restorations stabilized the cusps. Conclusions The results show that the deformation pattern of restored teeth is material‐specific but the extent of deformation is primarily limited by the remaining tooth substance. Lasers Surg. Med. 34:300–309, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15083490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; bonding ; deformation ; Dental Cavity Preparation - adverse effects ; Dental Cavity Preparation - methods ; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Interferometry - methods ; Middle Aged ; restoration ; teeth ; Tooth Diseases - diagnosis ; Tooth Diseases - etiology</subject><ispartof>Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2004-01, Vol.34 (4), p.300-309</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4856-1f34dccae077eccf82115ed7207d3d1f51d7ba7f20dc0df4fa636ead157a27943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4856-1f34dccae077eccf82115ed7207d3d1f51d7ba7f20dc0df4fa636ead157a27943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flsm.20036$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flsm.20036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15083490$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lang, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rampado, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müllejans, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raab, W.H.-M.</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of the dynamics of restored teeth by 3D electronic speckle pattern interferometry</title><title>Lasers in surgery and medicine</title><addtitle>Lasers Surg. Med</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives The difficulties typically encountered in studying the effects of restorations on tooth reinforcement are often due to the 3‐dimensional (3D) nature of deformation. Therefore, electronic 3D‐Speckle‐Interferometry (3D‐ESPI) was used to assess the impact of different restorative materials on the deformation of teeth. Study Design/Materials and Methods Small and large MOD‐preparations in extracted premolars were restored with gold inlays, ceramic inlays, composite resin inlays, amalgam, or composite resin. The restorations and cusps were loaded (90 N) and the deformation was assessed by 3D‐ESPI. Results Teeth with small restorations were deformed only slightly and the differences between the materials were minimal (P&gt;0.05). In contrast, teeth with large restorations displayed material‐specific deformation patterns: (a) all materials led to decreased deformation as compared with unfilled teeth, (b) elastic materials caused only local deformation, (c) non‐adhesive materials resulted in translation of the restoration and marginal discrepancies, (d) adhesive inlays brought about increased deformation of the luting resin composite, (e) loading of the cusps caused higher deformation than loading of the restorations, and (f) bonded restorations stabilized the cusps. Conclusions The results show that the deformation pattern of restored teeth is material‐specific but the extent of deformation is primarily limited by the remaining tooth substance. Lasers Surg. Med. 34:300–309, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>bonding</subject><subject>deformation</subject><subject>Dental Cavity Preparation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dental Cavity Preparation - methods</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Interferometry - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>teeth</subject><subject>Tooth Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tooth Diseases - etiology</subject><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1vFDEQhi0EIkeg4A8gV0gUm8zYu-vdEhIIiAOKgCLRWD57rJjsx8X2Cfbf43AHVIhqZqTnfTR6GXuKcIIA4nRI44kAkO09tkLo26pHwPtsBVj2DnpxxB6l9A0KIkA9ZEfYQCfrHlZMn1OmOIbJ5DBPfPY8XxN3y2TGYNPdHSnlOZLjmShf883C5TmngWyO8xQsT1uyNwPxrcnFNPEwleEpziPluDxmD7wZEj05zGP25c3rz2dvq_Wni3dnL9eVrbumrdDL2llrCJQia30nEBtyqrzrpEPfoFMbo7wAZ8H52ptWtmQcNsoI1dfymD3fe7dxvt2Vl_UYkqVhMBPNu6QVdqKuBf4XRNUJaDpVwBd70MY5pUheb2MYTVw0gr6rXZfa9a_aC_vsIN1tRnJ_yUPPBTjdA9_DQMu_TXp9-eG3stonQsr040_CxBvdKqkaffXxQl--6vH916ta9_Ind-ucww</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Lang, H.</creator><creator>Rampado, M.</creator><creator>Müllejans, R.</creator><creator>Raab, W.H.-M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Determination of the dynamics of restored teeth by 3D electronic speckle pattern interferometry</title><author>Lang, H. ; Rampado, M. ; Müllejans, R. ; Raab, W.H.-M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4856-1f34dccae077eccf82115ed7207d3d1f51d7ba7f20dc0df4fa636ead157a27943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>bonding</topic><topic>deformation</topic><topic>Dental Cavity Preparation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dental Cavity Preparation - methods</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Interferometry - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>teeth</topic><topic>Tooth Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tooth Diseases - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lang, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rampado, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müllejans, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raab, W.H.-M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lang, H.</au><au>Rampado, M.</au><au>Müllejans, R.</au><au>Raab, W.H.-M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of the dynamics of restored teeth by 3D electronic speckle pattern interferometry</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Lasers Surg. Med</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>300-309</pages><issn>0196-8092</issn><eissn>1096-9101</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives The difficulties typically encountered in studying the effects of restorations on tooth reinforcement are often due to the 3‐dimensional (3D) nature of deformation. Therefore, electronic 3D‐Speckle‐Interferometry (3D‐ESPI) was used to assess the impact of different restorative materials on the deformation of teeth. Study Design/Materials and Methods Small and large MOD‐preparations in extracted premolars were restored with gold inlays, ceramic inlays, composite resin inlays, amalgam, or composite resin. The restorations and cusps were loaded (90 N) and the deformation was assessed by 3D‐ESPI. Results Teeth with small restorations were deformed only slightly and the differences between the materials were minimal (P&gt;0.05). In contrast, teeth with large restorations displayed material‐specific deformation patterns: (a) all materials led to decreased deformation as compared with unfilled teeth, (b) elastic materials caused only local deformation, (c) non‐adhesive materials resulted in translation of the restoration and marginal discrepancies, (d) adhesive inlays brought about increased deformation of the luting resin composite, (e) loading of the cusps caused higher deformation than loading of the restorations, and (f) bonded restorations stabilized the cusps. Conclusions The results show that the deformation pattern of restored teeth is material‐specific but the extent of deformation is primarily limited by the remaining tooth substance. Lasers Surg. Med. 34:300–309, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15083490</pmid><doi>10.1002/lsm.20036</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8092
ispartof Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2004-01, Vol.34 (4), p.300-309
issn 0196-8092
1096-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71824421
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
bonding
deformation
Dental Cavity Preparation - adverse effects
Dental Cavity Preparation - methods
Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Interferometry - methods
Middle Aged
restoration
teeth
Tooth Diseases - diagnosis
Tooth Diseases - etiology
title Determination of the dynamics of restored teeth by 3D electronic speckle pattern interferometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T16%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20the%20dynamics%20of%20restored%20teeth%20by%203D%20electronic%20speckle%20pattern%20interferometry&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20surgery%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Lang,%20H.&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=300-309&rft.issn=0196-8092&rft.eissn=1096-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lsm.20036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17820587%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17820587&rft_id=info:pmid/15083490&rfr_iscdi=true