Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape

Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2002-06, Vol.269 (1496), p.1095-1100
Hauptverfasser: Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., Perrett, D. I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1100
container_issue 1496
container_start_page 1095
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 269
creator Little, A. C.
Jones, B. C.
Penton-Voak, I. S.
Burt, D. M.
Perrett, D. I.
description Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2002.1984
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71821186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3067508</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3067508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-7501ca817e67556687e6f61aee385f0dc2fa0389a6c9d00a31b91114b49c9ed33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-P1CAYxhujcWdXr56M4eStI7SFwsVo1vVPMonGrF4J075sGVuoQHXnG_ixpdvJ6Bz0VOD9PQ8v79Mse0LwmmDBX_gwbtcFxsWaCF7dy1akqkleCFrdz1ZYsCLnFS3OsvMQdhhjQTl9mJ2RAjMiKF5lvz4pHy340JkRhajiFJCyLYodoAjD6LzqUeNshNuInEYeehWNszMfkLG6n8A2gLppUBZpGFQPaPSgwc_nAWnnUYDbKdm0ZnB-7EwYkhDdkVolbejUCI-yB1r1AR4fvhfZl7dX15fv883Hdx8uX2_yhtE65jXFpFGc1MBqShnjaaEZUQAlpxq3TaEVLrlQrBEtxqokW0EIqbaVaAS0ZXmRvVx8x2k7QNuAjemJcvRmUH4vnTLytGJNJ2_cD0mYIJgUyeD5wcC77xOEKAcTGuh7ZcFNQdaEF4RwlsD1AjbehZBGcryEYDmHJ-fw5ByenMNLgmd_t_YHP6SVgHIBvNunGbnGQNzLnZu8Tdt_2z5dVLsQnT-6ljhNEPNUzpeyCSnkY1n5b5LVZU3lV17JqnzDr4vPVG4SXyx8Z266n8aDPOkmbUYf0v1MSFIJNrdEk-jVf0Vzx3d_mY2nSqmnPqXT6vI3oP3tIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71821186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Little, A. C. ; Jones, B. C. ; Penton-Voak, I. S. ; Burt, D. M. ; Perrett, D. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Little, A. C. ; Jones, B. C. ; Penton-Voak, I. S. ; Burt, D. M. ; Perrett, D. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1984</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12061950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Birth control ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Collaboration ; Computer Graphics ; Context ; Contraception ; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal ; Face - physiology ; Facial Attractiveness ; Family Characteristics ; Female ; Female Preference ; Femininity ; Good-Gene Markers ; Humans ; Male ; Masculinity ; Mating behavior ; Men ; Menstrual cycle ; Partnership ; Sex Characteristics ; Time Factors ; Women</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-06, Vol.269 (1496), p.1095-1100</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-7501ca817e67556687e6f61aee385f0dc2fa0389a6c9d00a31b91114b49c9ed33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-7501ca817e67556687e6f61aee385f0dc2fa0389a6c9d00a31b91114b49c9ed33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3067508$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3067508$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12061950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Little, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, B. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penton-Voak, I. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrett, D. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer Graphics</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal</subject><subject>Face - physiology</subject><subject>Facial Attractiveness</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female Preference</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Good-Gene Markers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Menstrual cycle</subject><subject>Partnership</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-P1CAYxhujcWdXr56M4eStI7SFwsVo1vVPMonGrF4J075sGVuoQHXnG_ixpdvJ6Bz0VOD9PQ8v79Mse0LwmmDBX_gwbtcFxsWaCF7dy1akqkleCFrdz1ZYsCLnFS3OsvMQdhhjQTl9mJ2RAjMiKF5lvz4pHy340JkRhajiFJCyLYodoAjD6LzqUeNshNuInEYeehWNszMfkLG6n8A2gLppUBZpGFQPaPSgwc_nAWnnUYDbKdm0ZnB-7EwYkhDdkVolbejUCI-yB1r1AR4fvhfZl7dX15fv883Hdx8uX2_yhtE65jXFpFGc1MBqShnjaaEZUQAlpxq3TaEVLrlQrBEtxqokW0EIqbaVaAS0ZXmRvVx8x2k7QNuAjemJcvRmUH4vnTLytGJNJ2_cD0mYIJgUyeD5wcC77xOEKAcTGuh7ZcFNQdaEF4RwlsD1AjbehZBGcryEYDmHJ-fw5ByenMNLgmd_t_YHP6SVgHIBvNunGbnGQNzLnZu8Tdt_2z5dVLsQnT-6ljhNEPNUzpeyCSnkY1n5b5LVZU3lV17JqnzDr4vPVG4SXyx8Z266n8aDPOkmbUYf0v1MSFIJNrdEk-jVf0Vzx3d_mY2nSqmnPqXT6vI3oP3tIQ</recordid><startdate>20020607</startdate><enddate>20020607</enddate><creator>Little, A. C.</creator><creator>Jones, B. C.</creator><creator>Penton-Voak, I. S.</creator><creator>Burt, D. M.</creator><creator>Perrett, D. I.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020607</creationdate><title>Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape</title><author>Little, A. C. ; Jones, B. C. ; Penton-Voak, I. S. ; Burt, D. M. ; Perrett, D. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-7501ca817e67556687e6f61aee385f0dc2fa0389a6c9d00a31b91114b49c9ed33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer Graphics</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal</topic><topic>Face - physiology</topic><topic>Facial Attractiveness</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female Preference</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Good-Gene Markers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Menstrual cycle</topic><topic>Partnership</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Little, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, B. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penton-Voak, I. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrett, D. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Little, A. C.</au><au>Jones, B. C.</au><au>Penton-Voak, I. S.</au><au>Burt, D. M.</au><au>Perrett, D. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2002-06-07</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>269</volume><issue>1496</issue><spage>1095</spage><epage>1100</epage><pages>1095-1100</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>12061950</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2002.1984</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-06, Vol.269 (1496), p.1095-1100
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71821186
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Birth control
Choice Behavior - physiology
Collaboration
Computer Graphics
Context
Contraception
Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal
Face - physiology
Facial Attractiveness
Family Characteristics
Female
Female Preference
Femininity
Good-Gene Markers
Humans
Male
Masculinity
Mating behavior
Men
Menstrual cycle
Partnership
Sex Characteristics
Time Factors
Women
title Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A08%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partnership%20status%20and%20the%20temporal%20context%20of%20relationships%20influence%20human%20female%20preferences%20for%20sexual%20dimorphism%20in%20male%20face%20shape&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Little,%20A.%20C.&rft.date=2002-06-07&rft.volume=269&rft.issue=1496&rft.spage=1095&rft.epage=1100&rft.pages=1095-1100&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.1984&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3067508%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71821186&rft_id=info:pmid/12061950&rft_jstor_id=3067508&rfr_iscdi=true