Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape
Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2002-06, Vol.269 (1496), p.1095-1100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1100 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1496 |
container_start_page | 1095 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 269 |
creator | Little, A. C. Jones, B. C. Penton-Voak, I. S. Burt, D. M. Perrett, D. I. |
description | Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.2002.1984 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71821186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3067508</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3067508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-7501ca817e67556687e6f61aee385f0dc2fa0389a6c9d00a31b91114b49c9ed33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-P1CAYxhujcWdXr56M4eStI7SFwsVo1vVPMonGrF4J075sGVuoQHXnG_ixpdvJ6Bz0VOD9PQ8v79Mse0LwmmDBX_gwbtcFxsWaCF7dy1akqkleCFrdz1ZYsCLnFS3OsvMQdhhjQTl9mJ2RAjMiKF5lvz4pHy340JkRhajiFJCyLYodoAjD6LzqUeNshNuInEYeehWNszMfkLG6n8A2gLppUBZpGFQPaPSgwc_nAWnnUYDbKdm0ZnB-7EwYkhDdkVolbejUCI-yB1r1AR4fvhfZl7dX15fv883Hdx8uX2_yhtE65jXFpFGc1MBqShnjaaEZUQAlpxq3TaEVLrlQrBEtxqokW0EIqbaVaAS0ZXmRvVx8x2k7QNuAjemJcvRmUH4vnTLytGJNJ2_cD0mYIJgUyeD5wcC77xOEKAcTGuh7ZcFNQdaEF4RwlsD1AjbehZBGcryEYDmHJ-fw5ByenMNLgmd_t_YHP6SVgHIBvNunGbnGQNzLnZu8Tdt_2z5dVLsQnT-6ljhNEPNUzpeyCSnkY1n5b5LVZU3lV17JqnzDr4vPVG4SXyx8Z266n8aDPOkmbUYf0v1MSFIJNrdEk-jVf0Vzx3d_mY2nSqmnPqXT6vI3oP3tIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71821186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Little, A. C. ; Jones, B. C. ; Penton-Voak, I. S. ; Burt, D. M. ; Perrett, D. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Little, A. C. ; Jones, B. C. ; Penton-Voak, I. S. ; Burt, D. M. ; Perrett, D. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1984</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12061950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Birth control ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Collaboration ; Computer Graphics ; Context ; Contraception ; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal ; Face - physiology ; Facial Attractiveness ; Family Characteristics ; Female ; Female Preference ; Femininity ; Good-Gene Markers ; Humans ; Male ; Masculinity ; Mating behavior ; Men ; Menstrual cycle ; Partnership ; Sex Characteristics ; Time Factors ; Women</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-06, Vol.269 (1496), p.1095-1100</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-7501ca817e67556687e6f61aee385f0dc2fa0389a6c9d00a31b91114b49c9ed33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-7501ca817e67556687e6f61aee385f0dc2fa0389a6c9d00a31b91114b49c9ed33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3067508$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3067508$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12061950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Little, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, B. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penton-Voak, I. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrett, D. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer Graphics</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal</subject><subject>Face - physiology</subject><subject>Facial Attractiveness</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female Preference</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Good-Gene Markers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Menstrual cycle</subject><subject>Partnership</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-P1CAYxhujcWdXr56M4eStI7SFwsVo1vVPMonGrF4J075sGVuoQHXnG_ixpdvJ6Bz0VOD9PQ8v79Mse0LwmmDBX_gwbtcFxsWaCF7dy1akqkleCFrdz1ZYsCLnFS3OsvMQdhhjQTl9mJ2RAjMiKF5lvz4pHy340JkRhajiFJCyLYodoAjD6LzqUeNshNuInEYeehWNszMfkLG6n8A2gLppUBZpGFQPaPSgwc_nAWnnUYDbKdm0ZnB-7EwYkhDdkVolbejUCI-yB1r1AR4fvhfZl7dX15fv883Hdx8uX2_yhtE65jXFpFGc1MBqShnjaaEZUQAlpxq3TaEVLrlQrBEtxqokW0EIqbaVaAS0ZXmRvVx8x2k7QNuAjemJcvRmUH4vnTLytGJNJ2_cD0mYIJgUyeD5wcC77xOEKAcTGuh7ZcFNQdaEF4RwlsD1AjbehZBGcryEYDmHJ-fw5ByenMNLgmd_t_YHP6SVgHIBvNunGbnGQNzLnZu8Tdt_2z5dVLsQnT-6ljhNEPNUzpeyCSnkY1n5b5LVZU3lV17JqnzDr4vPVG4SXyx8Z266n8aDPOkmbUYf0v1MSFIJNrdEk-jVf0Vzx3d_mY2nSqmnPqXT6vI3oP3tIQ</recordid><startdate>20020607</startdate><enddate>20020607</enddate><creator>Little, A. C.</creator><creator>Jones, B. C.</creator><creator>Penton-Voak, I. S.</creator><creator>Burt, D. M.</creator><creator>Perrett, D. I.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020607</creationdate><title>Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape</title><author>Little, A. C. ; Jones, B. C. ; Penton-Voak, I. S. ; Burt, D. M. ; Perrett, D. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-7501ca817e67556687e6f61aee385f0dc2fa0389a6c9d00a31b91114b49c9ed33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer Graphics</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal</topic><topic>Face - physiology</topic><topic>Facial Attractiveness</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female Preference</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Good-Gene Markers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Menstrual cycle</topic><topic>Partnership</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Little, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, B. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penton-Voak, I. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrett, D. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Little, A. C.</au><au>Jones, B. C.</au><au>Penton-Voak, I. S.</au><au>Burt, D. M.</au><au>Perrett, D. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2002-06-07</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>269</volume><issue>1496</issue><spage>1095</spage><epage>1100</epage><pages>1095-1100</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>12061950</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2002.1984</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2002-06, Vol.269 (1496), p.1095-1100 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71821186 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Birth control Choice Behavior - physiology Collaboration Computer Graphics Context Contraception Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal Face - physiology Facial Attractiveness Family Characteristics Female Female Preference Femininity Good-Gene Markers Humans Male Masculinity Mating behavior Men Menstrual cycle Partnership Sex Characteristics Time Factors Women |
title | Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A08%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partnership%20status%20and%20the%20temporal%20context%20of%20relationships%20influence%20human%20female%20preferences%20for%20sexual%20dimorphism%20in%20male%20face%20shape&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Little,%20A.%20C.&rft.date=2002-06-07&rft.volume=269&rft.issue=1496&rft.spage=1095&rft.epage=1100&rft.pages=1095-1100&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2002.1984&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3067508%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71821186&rft_id=info:pmid/12061950&rft_jstor_id=3067508&rfr_iscdi=true |