Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working group 4 report

The aim of Working Group 4 has been to develop and disseminate best practice in undertaking and reporting assessments, and to identify needs for methodologic development.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2002, Vol.18 (2), p.361-422
Hauptverfasser: Velasco, Marcial, Perleth, Matthias, Drummond, Michael, Gürtner, Felix, Jørgensen, Torben, Jovell, Albert, Malone, Jim, Rüther, Alric, Wild, Claudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 422
container_issue 2
container_start_page 361
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 18
creator Velasco, Marcial
Perleth, Matthias
Drummond, Michael
Gürtner, Felix
Jørgensen, Torben
Jovell, Albert
Malone, Jim
Rüther, Alric
Wild, Claudia
description The aim of Working Group 4 has been to develop and disseminate best practice in undertaking and reporting assessments, and to identify needs for methodologic development.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s0266462302000284
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71809897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71809897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-65f717753d6e11ae285ffcf72c59e782d2dc6146248c7d801061bf910f6e8b9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EouXxA7ggiwO3lF0nsZ0jVLwkJA6AOAbX2bSBNA52cuDfk9BKSD2tVjvfaGcYO0OYIaC6CiCkTKSIQQCA0Mkem2KiMJJxovfZdDxH433CjkL4BMAYMjhkExSQxolQU_ZxQ6HjrTe2qyzxquF9U5DvzFfVLLlpCu6pdb4btxWZulvxjuyqcbVb_nATAoWwpqYLM_7u_B-09K5vebIFT9hBaepAp9t5zN7ubl_nD9HT8_3j_PopskLJLpJpqVCpNC4kIRoSOi1LWyph04yUFoUorMQhS6KtKjQgSFyUGUIpSS-yIj5mlxvf1rvvfgiVr6tgqa5NQ64PuUINmc7UILzYEX663jfDb7lAiFNI01GEG5H1LgRPZd76am38T46Qj93nL7vdD8z51rhfrKn4J7Zlx7-p3n6x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210350557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working group 4 report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Velasco, Marcial ; Perleth, Matthias ; Drummond, Michael ; Gürtner, Felix ; Jørgensen, Torben ; Jovell, Albert ; Malone, Jim ; Rüther, Alric ; Wild, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Marcial ; Perleth, Matthias ; Drummond, Michael ; Gürtner, Felix ; Jørgensen, Torben ; Jovell, Albert ; Malone, Jim ; Rüther, Alric ; Wild, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of Working Group 4 has been to develop and disseminate best practice in undertaking and reporting assessments, and to identify needs for methodologic development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/s0266462302000284</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12053427</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Best practice ; Ethics ; Europe ; European Union - organization &amp; administration ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Information Services - standards ; International Cooperation ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Objectives ; Observatories ; Policy Making ; Program Evaluation ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - standards ; Terminology ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2002, Vol.18 (2), p.361-422</ispartof><rights>2002 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12053427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Marcial</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perleth, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gürtner, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jovell, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüther, Alric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working group 4 report</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>The aim of Working Group 4 has been to develop and disseminate best practice in undertaking and reporting assessments, and to identify needs for methodologic development.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Services - standards</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Observatories</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - standards</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtPwzAQhC0EouXxA7ggiwO3lF0nsZ0jVLwkJA6AOAbX2bSBNA52cuDfk9BKSD2tVjvfaGcYO0OYIaC6CiCkTKSIQQCA0Mkem2KiMJJxovfZdDxH433CjkL4BMAYMjhkExSQxolQU_ZxQ6HjrTe2qyzxquF9U5DvzFfVLLlpCu6pdb4btxWZulvxjuyqcbVb_nATAoWwpqYLM_7u_B-09K5vebIFT9hBaepAp9t5zN7ubl_nD9HT8_3j_PopskLJLpJpqVCpNC4kIRoSOi1LWyph04yUFoUorMQhS6KtKjQgSFyUGUIpSS-yIj5mlxvf1rvvfgiVr6tgqa5NQ64PuUINmc7UILzYEX663jfDb7lAiFNI01GEG5H1LgRPZd76am38T46Qj93nL7vdD8z51rhfrKn4J7Zlx7-p3n6x</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Velasco, Marcial</creator><creator>Perleth, Matthias</creator><creator>Drummond, Michael</creator><creator>Gürtner, Felix</creator><creator>Jørgensen, Torben</creator><creator>Jovell, Albert</creator><creator>Malone, Jim</creator><creator>Rüther, Alric</creator><creator>Wild, Claudia</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working group 4 report</title><author>Velasco, Marcial ; Perleth, Matthias ; Drummond, Michael ; Gürtner, Felix ; Jørgensen, Torben ; Jovell, Albert ; Malone, Jim ; Rüther, Alric ; Wild, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-65f717753d6e11ae285ffcf72c59e782d2dc6146248c7d801061bf910f6e8b9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Services - standards</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Observatories</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - standards</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Marcial</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perleth, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gürtner, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jovell, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüther, Alric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Velasco, Marcial</au><au>Perleth, Matthias</au><au>Drummond, Michael</au><au>Gürtner, Felix</au><au>Jørgensen, Torben</au><au>Jovell, Albert</au><au>Malone, Jim</au><au>Rüther, Alric</au><au>Wild, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working group 4 report</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>361-422</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>The aim of Working Group 4 has been to develop and disseminate best practice in undertaking and reporting assessments, and to identify needs for methodologic development.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>12053427</pmid><doi>10.1017/s0266462302000284</doi><tpages>62</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2002, Vol.18 (2), p.361-422
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71809897
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Benchmarking
Best practice
Ethics
Europe
European Union - organization & administration
Evidence-Based Medicine
Guidelines as Topic
Health technology assessment
Humans
Information Services - standards
International Cooperation
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Objectives
Observatories
Policy Making
Program Evaluation
Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods
Technology Assessment, Biomedical - standards
Terminology
Working groups
title Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working group 4 report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T00%3A36%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20practice%20in%20undertaking%20and%20reporting%20health%20technology%20assessments.%20Working%20group%204%20report&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Velasco,%20Marcial&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=361-422&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/s0266462302000284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71809897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210350557&rft_id=info:pmid/12053427&rfr_iscdi=true