Data management using the personal digital assistant in an acute pain service

Handheld personal digital assistants (PDA) are increasingly being used by physicians for a variety of information and data management purposes. We evaluated a PDA-based data management system for our acute pain service. A structured questionnaire survey was conducted to assess staff experience and a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia and intensive care 2004-02, Vol.32 (1), p.81-86
Hauptverfasser: CHAN, S. S. M, CHU, C. P. W, CHENG, B. C. P, CHEN, P. P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title Anaesthesia and intensive care
container_volume 32
creator CHAN, S. S. M
CHU, C. P. W
CHENG, B. C. P
CHEN, P. P
description Handheld personal digital assistants (PDA) are increasingly being used by physicians for a variety of information and data management purposes. We evaluated a PDA-based data management system for our acute pain service. A structured questionnaire survey was conducted to assess staff experience and attitude towards the paper system before the introduction of the PDA, and three months after introduction of the PDA system. We compared the time taken to conduct the acute pain round before and after the implementation of the PDA. The time saved in data management and the amount of paper saved were estimated. Data from 177 patients with a total of 635 acute pain follow-up visits were entered over a three-month period. User satisfaction, ease of access to drug reference and clinical guidelines were similar between the two systems. The respondents found that the PDA was easy to use but less so than the paper system (P = 0.007), in particular, when accessing a patient's cumulative data (P = 0.007). There was no missed follow-up or data entry with the use of PDA. The time taken to attend follow-up visits was similar for the two systems (Paper: 8.8 +/- 3.2 compared to PDA: 7.0 +/- 2.0 minutes, P = 0.151). The estimated annual amount of paper and time saved in data management was 650 sheets and 130 man-hours respectively. Our experience with the use of the PDA in APS was satisfactory. The PDA system can potentially reduce time and paper use and missed data entry and patient follow-up.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0310057x0403200113
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71805235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71805235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-4fe4f8eaef87fb41a013c2bcf26660e05e732f50bff3f42b001b9c31de0491b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0F1rFTEQBuAgFXta_QNeyFKod2tn8rHZvSxtrULFmwq9W7I5k2PKfpxmdkX_vTl0oSIEhsAzw8wrxHuET4jWXoBCAGN_gwYlARDVK7FBresSpMUjsTmAMouHY3HC_JhJI615I47RgKlRVhvx7drNrhjc6HY00DgXC8dxV8w_qdhT4ml0fbGNuzjn6pgjzy6jOBYuP7_Mmbn8Y0q_oqe34nVwPdO7tZ6KH59v7q--lHffb79eXd6VXgPMpQ6kQ02OQm1Dp9EBKi87H2RVVUBgyCoZDHQhqKBllxfvGq9wS6Ab7Iw6FR-f5-7T9LQQz-0Q2VPfu5GmhVuLNRipDvDsP_g4LSkfxa2UupZGNpiRfEY-TcyJQrtPcXDpT4vQHpJu16QfXpLOTR_WyUs30PalZY02g_MVOPauD8mNPvI_TlfYNFb9BYvHhQU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224825291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data management using the personal digital assistant in an acute pain service</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>CHAN, S. S. M ; CHU, C. P. W ; CHENG, B. C. P ; CHEN, P. P</creator><creatorcontrib>CHAN, S. S. M ; CHU, C. P. W ; CHENG, B. C. P ; CHEN, P. P</creatorcontrib><description>Handheld personal digital assistants (PDA) are increasingly being used by physicians for a variety of information and data management purposes. We evaluated a PDA-based data management system for our acute pain service. A structured questionnaire survey was conducted to assess staff experience and attitude towards the paper system before the introduction of the PDA, and three months after introduction of the PDA system. We compared the time taken to conduct the acute pain round before and after the implementation of the PDA. The time saved in data management and the amount of paper saved were estimated. Data from 177 patients with a total of 635 acute pain follow-up visits were entered over a three-month period. User satisfaction, ease of access to drug reference and clinical guidelines were similar between the two systems. The respondents found that the PDA was easy to use but less so than the paper system (P = 0.007), in particular, when accessing a patient's cumulative data (P = 0.007). There was no missed follow-up or data entry with the use of PDA. The time taken to attend follow-up visits was similar for the two systems (Paper: 8.8 +/- 3.2 compared to PDA: 7.0 +/- 2.0 minutes, P = 0.151). The estimated annual amount of paper and time saved in data management was 650 sheets and 130 man-hours respectively. Our experience with the use of the PDA in APS was satisfactory. The PDA system can potentially reduce time and paper use and missed data entry and patient follow-up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0403200113</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15058126</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AINCBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitude to Computers ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computer User Training ; Computers, Handheld ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Pain Management ; Pain Measurement ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2004-02, Vol.32 (1), p.81-86</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Australian Society of Anaesthetists Feb 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-4fe4f8eaef87fb41a013c2bcf26660e05e732f50bff3f42b001b9c31de0491b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-4fe4f8eaef87fb41a013c2bcf26660e05e732f50bff3f42b001b9c31de0491b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15461997$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15058126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHAN, S. S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHU, C. P. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHENG, B. C. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, P. P</creatorcontrib><title>Data management using the personal digital assistant in an acute pain service</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>Handheld personal digital assistants (PDA) are increasingly being used by physicians for a variety of information and data management purposes. We evaluated a PDA-based data management system for our acute pain service. A structured questionnaire survey was conducted to assess staff experience and attitude towards the paper system before the introduction of the PDA, and three months after introduction of the PDA system. We compared the time taken to conduct the acute pain round before and after the implementation of the PDA. The time saved in data management and the amount of paper saved were estimated. Data from 177 patients with a total of 635 acute pain follow-up visits were entered over a three-month period. User satisfaction, ease of access to drug reference and clinical guidelines were similar between the two systems. The respondents found that the PDA was easy to use but less so than the paper system (P = 0.007), in particular, when accessing a patient's cumulative data (P = 0.007). There was no missed follow-up or data entry with the use of PDA. The time taken to attend follow-up visits was similar for the two systems (Paper: 8.8 +/- 3.2 compared to PDA: 7.0 +/- 2.0 minutes, P = 0.151). The estimated annual amount of paper and time saved in data management was 650 sheets and 130 man-hours respectively. Our experience with the use of the PDA in APS was satisfactory. The PDA system can potentially reduce time and paper use and missed data entry and patient follow-up.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitude to Computers</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer User Training</subject><subject>Computers, Handheld</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0F1rFTEQBuAgFXta_QNeyFKod2tn8rHZvSxtrULFmwq9W7I5k2PKfpxmdkX_vTl0oSIEhsAzw8wrxHuET4jWXoBCAGN_gwYlARDVK7FBresSpMUjsTmAMouHY3HC_JhJI615I47RgKlRVhvx7drNrhjc6HY00DgXC8dxV8w_qdhT4ml0fbGNuzjn6pgjzy6jOBYuP7_Mmbn8Y0q_oqe34nVwPdO7tZ6KH59v7q--lHffb79eXd6VXgPMpQ6kQ02OQm1Dp9EBKi87H2RVVUBgyCoZDHQhqKBllxfvGq9wS6Ab7Iw6FR-f5-7T9LQQz-0Q2VPfu5GmhVuLNRipDvDsP_g4LSkfxa2UupZGNpiRfEY-TcyJQrtPcXDpT4vQHpJu16QfXpLOTR_WyUs30PalZY02g_MVOPauD8mNPvI_TlfYNFb9BYvHhQU</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>CHAN, S. S. M</creator><creator>CHU, C. P. W</creator><creator>CHENG, B. C. P</creator><creator>CHEN, P. P</creator><general>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Data management using the personal digital assistant in an acute pain service</title><author>CHAN, S. S. M ; CHU, C. P. W ; CHENG, B. C. P ; CHEN, P. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-4fe4f8eaef87fb41a013c2bcf26660e05e732f50bff3f42b001b9c31de0491b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitude to Computers</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer User Training</topic><topic>Computers, Handheld</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHAN, S. S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHU, C. P. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHENG, B. C. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, P. P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHAN, S. S. M</au><au>CHU, C. P. W</au><au>CHENG, B. C. P</au><au>CHEN, P. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data management using the personal digital assistant in an acute pain service</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>81-86</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><coden>AINCBS</coden><abstract>Handheld personal digital assistants (PDA) are increasingly being used by physicians for a variety of information and data management purposes. We evaluated a PDA-based data management system for our acute pain service. A structured questionnaire survey was conducted to assess staff experience and attitude towards the paper system before the introduction of the PDA, and three months after introduction of the PDA system. We compared the time taken to conduct the acute pain round before and after the implementation of the PDA. The time saved in data management and the amount of paper saved were estimated. Data from 177 patients with a total of 635 acute pain follow-up visits were entered over a three-month period. User satisfaction, ease of access to drug reference and clinical guidelines were similar between the two systems. The respondents found that the PDA was easy to use but less so than the paper system (P = 0.007), in particular, when accessing a patient's cumulative data (P = 0.007). There was no missed follow-up or data entry with the use of PDA. The time taken to attend follow-up visits was similar for the two systems (Paper: 8.8 +/- 3.2 compared to PDA: 7.0 +/- 2.0 minutes, P = 0.151). The estimated annual amount of paper and time saved in data management was 650 sheets and 130 man-hours respectively. Our experience with the use of the PDA in APS was satisfactory. The PDA system can potentially reduce time and paper use and missed data entry and patient follow-up.</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</pub><pmid>15058126</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057x0403200113</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0310-057X
ispartof Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2004-02, Vol.32 (1), p.81-86
issn 0310-057X
1448-0271
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71805235
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute Disease
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitude to Computers
Biological and medical sciences
Computer User Training
Computers, Handheld
Humans
Medical sciences
Pain Management
Pain Measurement
Point-of-Care Systems
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Data management using the personal digital assistant in an acute pain service
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data%20management%20using%20the%20personal%20digital%20assistant%20in%20an%20acute%20pain%20service&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=CHAN,%20S.%20S.%20M&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=81-86&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft.coden=AINCBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057x0403200113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71805235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224825291&rft_id=info:pmid/15058126&rfr_iscdi=true