Heterogeneity of Russell's viper venom affects the sensitivity of the dilute Russell's viper venom time to lupus anticoagulants

A number of studies have shown that commercial dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) reagents vary in their sensitivity for lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection. The differences in performance are considered to be predominantly due to antibody heterogeneity and a wide variation in phospholipi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis 2004-04, Vol.15 (3), p.279-282
Hauptverfasser: Moore, Gary W, Savidge, Geoffrey F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A number of studies have shown that commercial dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) reagents vary in their sensitivity for lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection. The differences in performance are considered to be predominantly due to antibody heterogeneity and a wide variation in phospholipid content, and also the techniques and clot detection methods employed. The present study compared the LA detection rates of five different Russell's viper venom (RVV) preparations using identical phospholipid reagents to assess the contribution of venom heterogeneity to LA detection by DRVVT. Initial analysis of 300 samples sent for thrombophilia screening identified 48 (16.0%) LAs by DRVVT and confirmatory tests with a single RVV reagent. Subsequent DRVVT analysis of all 300 samples using the other four venom reagents, with confirmatory tests on samples with elevated screen ratios, revealed a further 38 LAs in a variety of combinations of reagents. Only 15 of 86 (17.4%) of LAs were detected with all five RVV reagents. Significant biological variation of RVV exists due to differences between Russell's viper subspecies and a variety of environmental and physiological factors. The clear variations in diagnostic performance between alternative RVV preparations are most probably due to biological venom heterogeneity, and also differences in the manufacturing processes.
ISSN:0957-5235
1473-5733
DOI:10.1097/00001721-200404000-00015